Debunking conventional wisdom
For years I've yelled at players who have slid into 1st base in an effort to beat the throw. I'd been taught and it seemed to make sense that running through the base was the best way to beat a throw. BP recently did a chat with Dr. Alan Nathan a Physics Professor working in the Nuclear Physics Lab at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Nathan is not just any Physicist but is the chairman of the Science and Baseball committee of SABR. In the conversation one of his nuggets of information was to comment that he felt sliding into 1st base is the best option in a close play because "The essential physics is that by sliding with outstretched arms, the batter reaches the bag before his center of gravity reaches it, whereas those two times more or less coincide when running through the bag."
I'm not sure I'm convinced but I won't be so quick to vocalize my displeasure the next time Jeff Kent slides into 1st base.
If you have access to BP here is the Link to the complete interview.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting
- While in the act of diving you are deaccelerating, thus slowing down for the last few feet.
- When running through a base, your outstretched foot reaches the base before your center of gravity does, of course with a little different physics than it would sliding head first.
My comments are all subjective, I don't have a PhD in Physics or Anthropology to back anything up. Like I said, it would interesting to read his study and see what he took into consideration.
vr, Xei
by xeifrank @ True Blue LA on Aug 2, 2007 1:20 PM PDT reply actions
Danger of Injury
Diving at 1st
Debunking conventional wisdom
by bluebleeder08 on Aug 2, 2007 4:07 PM PDT reply actions
One other point of note...
Though I agree the injury risk far outweighs the advantages.
















