Smiling Sammy says Sayonara
Back on December 12th I was told the moon was going to be the biggest in years but when I went to take a walk with my wife tonight I could have sworn this moon was the biggest I'd ever seen. I'd just finished reading Eric's take on Sammy leaving us for Boston and it left me feeling wistful about losing one of my favorite players.
So with a full moon bathing my back yard in the glory of it's moonlight it was a good time to bask in the good times that Takashi Saito gave me over the last three years. His smile was like the moon I was looking at tonight, large and infectious, if Sammy was smiling good things had happened. In reflection it was hard to belive that the diminutive Saito would give us anything to remember him for, however by the time he said good bye this week he had touched all Dodger fans with his smile and skill.
Back in February of 2006, noted Dodger author Jon Weisman had this to say about Sammy Saito
Takashi Saito, P: This year's Norihiro Nakamura, pitching side. A 36-year-old (on Valentine's Day) pitcher with a 3.82 ERA in Japan last season doesn't excite.
I wasn't blogging back then but I would have agreed with the above sentiment. Even for a mere 500,000 I felt it was wasted money and his spring training did nothing to absolve those doubts. As 2006 started he was an after thought but he got off to a great start and gave up one run in his first 12 appearances. With a .69 ERA going into his 13th game he had gotten the attention of Dodger fans. Then reality seemed to settle in as he got hammered in back to back games and his ERA swelled to 3.68. This surely was the real Saito and I did not expect him to last much longer.
From that point on May 6th, 2006, Takashi Saito put together some of the best relief pitching any Dodger team has ever seen, and he did it with a smile that won over all Dodger fans. When Eric Gagne went down it could have been a catastrophe but when smiling Sammy stepped into to fill the void the Dodgers didn't lose a thing.
It took a while for me to believe in Sammy, I even went into the 2007 season still a skeptic but quickly became his biggest fan when he proved his 2006 was not a fluke but the result of a solid fastball, killer slider, and incredible command.
I love players who love the game and are not afraid to show such love, and Sammy was one of those players. My best memory of Sammy occurred when he had failure, not success, as I was moved by how devastated he was by his failure. It was the infamous 4 + 1 game and Sammy felt he was the goat because he gave up 3 runs in the 9th. One of the greatest regular seasons game at Dodger Stadium would never have happened if he hadn't picked that inning to implode. In fact I left that game in the 9th because Sammy imploded and I felt like Sammy with with his head down in the dugout.
The Dodgers have made a baseball decision to let him go but you have to wonder if it was the right thing to do. Some will argue that this was simply a business decision and that due to his health we owed him nothing. They will say it matters not at all that he performed for 500,000 in 2006, 1 Million in 2007, and 2 Million in 2008 while giving the Dodgers millions more in performance and memories then he was paid.
They may be right but it does not feel right to me that the Boston Red Sox feel he is a good enough bet that they are willing to bet on him and we weren't. Currently the Red Sox are betting on two of our past heroes regaining past glory. One left here as a malcontent who evidently burned his bridges and that was that. The only memory I have of him is that loved his hair more then his team, and that when Depodesta needed him to come up big his nerve gave out. The other left here after giving us everything he had.
I know which one I'll be rooting for to make the Dodgers look foolish.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'll miss Saito
His smile was great, and a nice end to many games for the Dodgers. Diamond Leung on his blog also brought up the 4+1 game, and I thought this passage typified just how cool Sammy was:
“A lot of the guys saw me crying, and they thought I was crying because of the runs I gave up,” Saito said through a translator. “But I wasn’t crying because of that. It’s actually embarrassing to talk about that now, but the reason I was crying was because I was so moved by everybody’s emotions and the way they were encouraging me to forget about what had happened.”
How can anyone not love this guy?
-Eric
dodgers have blown it twice now in one off season, both Saito and Penny should have been kept. I mean we have Estes and maybe Reyes to take their places? hooooorahh
train
"Blown it" is too strong
I would have liked to see both Saito and Penny back, but each have legitimate injury concerns:
1) Penny admitted that he withheld information about his injury so he can keep pitching, and all of a sudden now he says he feels great. How are we supposed to believe him. Players will say anything to play. Plus, Penny was a prick who wore out his welcome in LA and was essentially told to take a hike for the playoffs…they didn’t even want him in the clubhouse.
2) The club felt Saito might not even be ready to pitch until May or June, and that’s why he was non-tendered (he probably would have received at least $4 or $5 million in arbitration). I surely would have brought him back for at least the same contract as Boston, with only $1.5 to $2.5 million guaranteed. I’m sad to see him go, but it’s reasonable to have concerns about a pitcher who (a) threw 5.2 IP after July 12 last year, and (b) is 39 this year.
Estes isn’t guaranteed a roster spot. I can’t believe that move is getting any flack. Every club brings in a bunch of crap every spring and they through it all against the wall. If it sticks, great. If it doesn’t, the player gets released or provides minor league depth. Do you really believe the Dodgers won’t sign a starting pitcher now because they signed Estes and Claudio Vargas?
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Jan 11, 2009 10:12 AM PST up reply actions
re:
I agree that all teams do these things but I also believe that the signing of players like Castro/Estes may be more then insurance. We shall wait and see but I wouldn’t be surprised to see Hu and Stults in AAA with Castro/Estes on the major league roster. No I don’t believe that signing Estes or Vargas will preclude the team from signing another pitcher if they so desire.
Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen
by Phil Gurnee on Jan 11, 2009 10:21 AM PST up reply actions
In the case of Castro
I wouldn’t mind at all if Hu was in AAA starting rather than riding the pine with the big club. I just hope Abreu is healthy this spring and can claim his rightful spot as at least the utility infielder with LA.
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Jan 11, 2009 10:26 AM PST up reply actions
Saito and Penny
Yeah, I really dug Saito, too. Great vibe and outstanding performance (hard to find a lot of that these days). Considering the money he was making (very low by MLB standards for a quality pitcher), I also am inclined to say, “hey, why not give him a chance, like Boston?” Of the course, the situation is different, with Boston already pretty solid with pitching and relief, while the Dodgers have some serious holes and feel that don’t have as much room to say, “what the hell, sign him.” Plus I suspect serious money issues (shortages) with management. I also suspect further that Frank is just cruising and grooming the team to be sold at a nice profit for himself.
As far as Penny is concerned, certainly no good vibes there. He was an ass last season in mouthing off while the team was in the middle of the playoff run, while demanding a contract extension after a serious arm injury. That kind of thing really turns me off on a player. Whatever his side of it is, there is a professional and unprofessional way of doing things, which always comes back to your respect for the team, the game, and its fans—-which many players seem to forget.
I wish him all the worst in Boston.
Saito—rock out, dude! Love ya’!















