True Blue LA: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: UNC 77, Ohio State 73

The All-Time LA Dodger Lineup: The Leadoff Hitter

"You can't start a fire, you can't start a fire without a spark."

-Bruce Springsteen, Dancing In The Dark

Our kickoff to creating the best lineup in LA Dodger history begins, fittingly, with the leadoff position.  First, we are restricting this to Los Angeles Dodgers only.  Not because we are soulless, evil people who take pleasure in opening old wounds with the fine people of Brooklyn.  The main reason we are restricting this to LA only is that the Dodgers' timeline out west coincides nicely with the Retrosheet Era.  Getting play-by-play data from before 1956 is quite a chore, so it's difficult to discern where certain players batted. 

The Dodgers, for the most part, have had a nice linear progression of leadoff men ever since their move to Los Angeles.  Here is a look at the LA Dodger leadoff men, their years as primary leadoff man, along with their overall stats as Dodgers:

Player Years #1 Starts PA Runs SB CS Slash Stats OPS+
Junior Gilliam 1958-1960 377 4893 630 112 56 .261/.358/.338 92
Maury Wills 61-66,69-71 1276 6744 876 490 171 .281/.331/.332 87
Davey Lopes 1973-1981 1130 5308 759 418 85 .262/.349/.380 105
Steve Sax 1982-1988 826 4745 574 290 126 .282/.339/.356 97
Brett Butler 91-94, 1997 599 3342 455 179 90 .298/.392/.368 112

A couple of notes: 

1) As we pick each batting order position, that position in the field becomes unavailable for future polls

2) For purposes of this poll, Jim Gilliam is counted as a third baseman.  In his years as the primary leadoff man in LA (1958-1960), he started 385 games at 3B, versus 75 in the OF and 55 games at 2B.  If we extend this poll to add utility men, Gilliam is pretty much guaranteed a spot.

Between Butler and the arrival of Rafael Furcal, the Dodgers had a hodgepodge of guys bat leadoff, a mix of Eric Young, Dave Roberts, and Cesar Izturis.  If we do this poll in a couple of years, Furcal will definitely be in this poll, and might have a shot at the top spot.

The leadoff position is probably my favorite position in the batting order.  I love players at the top of the lineup who get on base and wreak absolute havoc on the bases.  I loved watching Brett Butler play.  With him, bunting was an art form, and watching him lure in the third baseman only to slap a single (or double) over his drawn-in head was a thing of beauty.  Steve Sax has a special place in my heart for batting leadoff for my favorite team of all-timeJim Gilliam should probably get some extra credit for his Brooklyn days (he was Rookie of the Year in 1953), and he was Walter O'Malley's favorite player, for what it's worth.  Maury Wills was a key cog in the 1960s championship machine.

However, my vote will go to Davey Lopes.  I never got to watch him play live, outside of some games late in his career as an Astro.  I still remember his 1987 Topps "Record Breaker" card, noting that he had the most steals as a 40+ year old (he had 25 in 1986, a record that was broken by -- you'll never guess this one -- the newest Hall of Famer).  I've seen plenty of Lopes on tape to pick him as the best leadoff man in Los Angeles Dodger history.

Who's your pick?

[Editor Note] - I've added Rafael Furcal

Poll
Who is the Greatest LA Dodger Leadoff Hitter Ever?
SS - Rafy Furcal
43 votes
SS - Maury Wills
201 votes
2B - Davey Lopes
146 votes
2B - Steve Sax
24 votes
CF - Brett Butler
195 votes
3rd - Junior Gilliam
7 votes
Other (use the comments to write-in your pick)
0 votes

616 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Brett Butler

While I will not argue that Davey Lopes is the best 2nd baseman in LA Dodger history and a great leadoff hitter in his own right, I think Brett Butler is man for the job. For one thing we have very few great CF in our past. You could even say we have none. Jimmy Wynn was not here long enough and while I’d love to see him make this team I can’t see a place for him. Willie Davis had his moments but if Willie Davis is on your all-time lineup you have some problems. That doesn’t leave much else so the main reason I’m going with Brett is the three plus 387 OBP which is imperative for leadoff man but also because I think we can find a place for Lopes or Sax or Kent or Gilliam at the bottom of the lineup. Brett Butler has three of the top 15 OBP seasons..

Davey Lopes doesn’t’ crack the top 50. His best OBP was .372 while above average it is not close to the .392 that Butler averaged as a Dodger. Lopes comes in with a .349 career OBP. For me the OBP and the fact we don’t have many strong center fielders puts Butler in the lead off spot.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 23, 2009 2:16 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Good analysis

Like I said, it’s a tough call, and I really love Butler. I think strategic planning is a good way to go, but is having Willie Davis in CF that much different than having Steve Sax at 2B? Jeff Kent was also very good — for 3 years — but Davis had a much longer run.

I wish Baseball Reference had a way to search by OBP+ or something like it. Lopes was pretty good in OBP, but as you said not as good as Butler. I looked at season-by-season OBP compared to the park adjusted *lgOBP (listed on each player’s page) to figure out OBP+:

Lopes
1973: 107
1974: 106
1975: 108
1976: 102
1977: 110
1978: 108
1979: 112
1980: 108
1981: 115
rough average: 108

Butler
1991: 124
1992: 128
1993: 118
1994: 123
1997: 109
rough average: 120

Butler’s worst OBP+ is higher than Lopes’ average OBP+ as a Dodger.

However, while Lopes may not have the on-base prowess of Butler, he made up for it with a bit more pop (although Butler did have a higher OPS+), a much better success rate on the bases (83% vs. 66.5% for Butler), and of course longevity (almost double the games).

Either way, I think this is a fun way to do the lineup. I’m looking forward to finding out more as we move down the order!

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 2:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hard to beat Butler’s OBP. I voted for him, but if it were purely who I would enjoy watching more, then I would have to go with Lopes.

by the big grabowski on Jan 23, 2009 3:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wanted to throw Wills in here too

Here are the OBP+ numbers for Maury Wills as a Dodger:

1960: 101
1961: 100
1962: 106
1963: 116
1964: 102
1965: 106
1966: 101
1969: 111
1970: 100
1971: 102
rough average: 105

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 25, 2009 9:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Furcal

1542 plate appearances should make him eligible. Our SS position is so weak, if Maury does not win the lead off spot I think Furcal has to be top SS to be used later in the lineup.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 23, 2009 2:42 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Furcal was a tough ommission

He only started 316 games at leadoff. If we do this poll next year or the year after, perhaps he will work his way onto the list. I think Bill Russell has as good a claim as anyone to the top SS spot and he batted 2nd, 7th & 8th. I’m thinking he ends up as the #8 man.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 2:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

re:

As someone who watched Bill Russel more then I want to admit he will make this team over my dead body.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 23, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's going to be hard...

coming up with a better #8 hitter than Russell.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 3:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

re:

By the time we get to the eight spot we might have disagreed a few times but that could be where the big battle looms.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 23, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Didn’t Ethier, Kemp, Blake and Loney all bat 8th last year at one point? That could be an epic battle.

by the big grabowski on Jan 23, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

order

Eric, are you restricting this just to what order a batter hit in? Since Furcal only hit lead off, he can’t be used as the no. 8 hitter, right?

by the big grabowski on Jan 23, 2009 3:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

re:

That wasn’t my intention, my intention was to create the best lineup using all eight positions but if that is the direction Eric takes us then so be it. We do have baseball-reference to let us know where the majority of at bats have come from within the lineup. That could be why Eric thinks Bill Russel will be hard to beat as a number eight hitter.

If we go that route then we need some parameters as to how many at bats in that lineup spot they have to had to be eligible.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 23, 2009 3:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, plus there’s the question of whether we think a player who batted in a certain spot would have been better suited for a different spot. Like putting Furcal at the no. 2 spot, even though he only batted lead off during his time.

by the big grabowski on Jan 23, 2009 4:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm looking at it like this

If the player never hit 7th, he’s not the best 7th hitter in LA Dodger history. This will get really interesting I think as we move down the lineup.

As far as a limit, I’m viewing each position in the batting order as it comes. For leadoff hitters, we used 300 starts. At first I didn’t want to include Furcal (too early) but Phil made a compelling argument that he deserved to be included. 300 starts seems like a good demarcation line, but if there’s a clear cluster at a different point at a different spot in the batting order we can use that.

I’m working on the #2 article right now, and let’s just say it’s not looking epic. For #2 hitters, there were also 6 players that started at least 300 games batting second for the Dodgers. More to come Monday night!

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maury Wills

is getting some support. Make your case, the career Los Angeles stolen base leader certainly should have some supporters.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 23, 2009 3:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I thought about Wills, and the stolen bases are impressive, but I have him third behind Lopes and Butler.

by the big grabowski on Jan 23, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Brett Butler was 34 when he first joined the Dodgers

If Brett Butler joined the Dodgers at 28 instead of 34, there would be no argument. He is clearly the on base machine that creates havoc on the bases that a leadoff hitter should be. The lead-off hitter getting on base is a tremendous boost to any offense. I just don’t view it as much of a contest.

by mr_blond on Jan 23, 2009 6:31 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Right now the poll agrees with you

Butler is currently outpolling the next two guys (Lopes & Wills) combined.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 7:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tough choices

I was lucky to see Gilliam, Wills, Sax, Lopes and Butler all in person or on tv in my lifetime.
I would have to say hands down, not statistically, but in my heart, Junior was the greatest leadoff I ever saw for the Dodgers.
He brought SUCH and excitement to the game EVERY game he played.
It is a tough call though, as I LOVED Maury and Brett, but Brett was in the free agent days and I just can’t go with guys who weren’t REALLY Dodgers.
He was a GIANT for crying out loud! Braves too. I HATE THOSE FRIGGING TEAMS!
So, again, the nod goes to Junior with Maury close second. Just my humble opinion and thanks guys for this awesome site, it is linked on my blog!

by dodgerbill on Jan 23, 2009 7:58 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Dodgerbill, what is your blog address? I’ll check it out.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 8:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

eric

hey eric, again this is a great site, thanks for doing it!
My blog is billswasteofair.blogspot.com
I will warn ahead of time, not a lot of sports, mostly Conservative politics and Christian Theology but I do an occasional sports story and I HAD to have your blog linked! Thank you!

by dodgerbill on Jan 24, 2009 8:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't the question flawed?

I mean, you’re not mentioning all of the other players that are eliminated. For example, if you pick Brett Buttler you are eliminating Duke Snider, but you can still pick Furcal or Wills later. Obviously this is implied, but its hard to think about it that way the way you have the poll set up. But when you vote for Brett Butler you have to remember you are eliminating all other CF’ers as possibilities. Therefore I think you should do it by position. I’d personally take Furcal and Snider anyday over Butler and Furcal/WIlls

by Brendan Scolari on Jan 23, 2009 8:32 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Sorry for the confusion

It will become clearer later (I explain it a little better in the post for the best #2 hitter), but Furcal and Wills will be eliminated if they lose this poll because they simply didn’t play enough in other positions in the batting order.

If we just voted position by position, that would be like missionary style. Trust me, this is a round about way of doing it, but in the end we’ll arrive at a pretty darned good and real lineup.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 9:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok thanks for clearing that up

sorry for being a pain. :)

I’ll take Butler then.

by Brendan Scolari on Jan 24, 2009 2:48 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What's wrong with missionary?

Oh I get. You want to try something a little more exotic. I like your thinking.

by mr_blond on Jan 26, 2009 1:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Where are all the old guys, Wills Rules Baby!!

Sorry Gents, but these guys don’t hold a candle to Wills. He is the only one on the list who will ever come close to the Hall of Fame. The only thing holding him back seems to be the drug problems people discovered when he was a manager. He has led a clean and exemplary life since. If only he had been brought up to the majors at 23 or 24 instead of 27 think of what he would have accomplished.

Until Maury Wills came along the stolen base had largely become a forgotten weapon in the National League. No one had stolen 40 bases in a season since Kiki Cuyler of the Cubs lead the league in 1929. In fact by 1938 it had fallena ll teh way to 16 in a season by another Cub, Stan Hack (aptly named) who pulled himself together and led the league the next year with a whopping 17. Those crack base stealers in the NL kept it in the totals in the 20’s and 30’ until Willie Mays stole 40 in 1956 and even his totals fell off after that.

Then in 1960 Maury Wills began his run of six straight stolen base titles which reached it’s zenith with an unheard of 104 stolen bases. Nobody thought 100 were possible after Ty Cobb had established the so-called “Record the Would Never Be Broken” with an incredible 94 in 1911. He managed to add his second straight Gold Glove award and the NL MVP that year.

He was so feared on the basepaths that teams would soak down the infield before games almost turning them into swamps to try to slow him down. Teams devised defensive strategies just for him. He single-handedly brought the stolen base back as a feared weapon after so many years of neglect of that aspect of the game.

Don’t get me wrong guys, Lopes was and always will be a favorite in L.A. becuase of the record setting infield and his place on the 1977 and 1978 teams who should have beat the Yankees and the 1981 team that did. He did have some pop in his bat that the others did not.

Butler was a hustler and probably the best bunter of the bunch but he was here such a short time you can not compare him to Lopes much less Wills.

Finally, go compare Wills against other Hall of Fame middle infielders and leadoff batters many of whom started much younger that Wills did in the majors. He compares well and actually exceeds many of them in most categories. Don’t get caught up in the minutae. I am lucky enought to remember Wills, Lopes, Sax, Butler, Furcal, both Davis’s and many others. Wills is the man, baby!

by IWILLRULEYOU on Jan 23, 2009 8:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Very Nice

This was a very passionate defense of Wills. For me it was a close decision.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 23, 2009 9:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Lopes

I also went on the assumption that we were choosing the best batting order lineup, as in what the best lineup would be based on where each player hit the majority of their time with the Dodgers. I eliminated Butler because of Willie Davis, and I eliminated Sax because of Lopes, Furcal because of Wills and Gilliam because of Cey. Seeing that it left me with Wills and Lopes, I went with Lopes because Russell may have been the best #2 and #8 hitter for what the Dodgers were looking for at that point in time that I have ever seen and he ends up being my SS at some point in time. Remember, when he hit #2 in front of Lopes, he took pitch after to pitch to let Lopes steal a base and if he didn’t, he invariably gave himself up by going to the right side. When he hit #8, he was a great squeeze guy or sac bunt guy to get to a pinch hitter. Those things are as valued now, but he did his job back in the day.

by MVP1963 on Jan 23, 2009 10:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

JP

Although it of course seems like much more, here are the start totals for Pierre as a Dodger:

Leadoff – 96 games
Batting 2nd – 135

Although I know you were joking. :)

Pierre did not make it onto the poll for greatest #2 hitter either. :)

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 10:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maury Wills using his speed to gain on Butler!

Wills is closing the gap! This should be a close race, down to the wire.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 1:21 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I'm always a little surprised. . .

(and disappointed) that other people don’t dislike Butler as much as I do. He was the public face of the strike. I vote against Butler reflexively, like I vote against Mountjoys.

by Andrew Shimmin on Jan 24, 2009 3:13 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I haven't checked the logs...

…to see if Mike Busch has voted yet. Regardless of how one feels about strikes/unions/replacements, the term “scab” is just awesome, and I wish it would come into use much more often.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re:

No doubt, Butler dropped from one of my favorite players to one of my least with how he treated Busch considering how much he bragged about his religion. I guess he skipped the forgiveness part in Sunday school.

Still I can separate the baseball Butler from the personal Butler. Sheffield has to be in this lineup and I disliked him as much as I ever disliked a player.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 24, 2009 6:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn’t really around for the Sheffield years, so I don’t have the animus towards him that I expect I ought to. Butler made the unwise choice of being irritating while I was paying attention.

by Andrew Shimmin on Jan 24, 2009 6:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

0% all

For some reason, now that I’ve voted, whenever I come back to this page, the raw poll results are displayed but the percentages are shown as 0% for everyone.

by berkowit28 on Jan 24, 2009 3:13 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

% galore

OK, you must have seen my comment. Now true % figures appear, along with a high-tech horizontal bar – way to go! And Maury pulls into the lead, with charts ablaze!

by berkowit28 on Jan 24, 2009 11:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Were you viewing it via your phone before?

If not, there were some technical problems with SB Nation earlier today, although I’m not sure if that would have affected your ability to view the poll.

I’m just glad you are able to now! :)

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 11:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I sense a runoff

If the poll is this close as of Monday (Butler currently leads Wills 85 votes to 84) we might have to do a runoff with just Butler vs. Wills. We’ll see.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 4:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

re:

Even though I voted for Butler I’m loving the Wills comeback. I’d vote against a runoff and let the results stand as of Monday at Noon. If we do a runoff many people who voted who vote the 2nd time.

If Maury had only gotten on base at a decent clip this would be slam dunk but his on base totals are terrible for a lead off hitter no matter how many stolen bases he has.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 24, 2009 6:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

re:

So your saying Eric is right and we should do a runoff?

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 24, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m biased enough that I probably shouldn’t vote. But runoff elections are what made New Orleanian politics the envy of the Western world. . .

by Andrew Shimmin on Jan 24, 2009 9:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm OK with no runoff

It would be more of a possibility with 2 candidates clearly out front, but Lopes is a close enough third to just let the race stand as is.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 9:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Lawler's Law

Butler was the first to get to 100 votes (Wills has 98 at the time of this comment). Poll over! :)

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 9:07 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Brett Butler for the weird stance alone should get him some votes

by kretz on Jan 24, 2009 9:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Maury pulls a head

for the first time with 103 to 102. I’m actually now rooting for Maury so that Mr. Stephen has to find another 8 spot besides Mr. Russel.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 24, 2009 10:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Haha

If Wills wins, my entire lineup is screwed up. The #8 options with 300 games started batting 8th are:

SS Bill Russell
C Steve Yeager
SS Alfredo Griffin

If Wills wins, we are going to have to greatly reduce the games played threshold.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 24, 2009 11:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How is this close? :o

Butler is ridiculously underrated.

by kensai on Jan 25, 2009 3:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Evidently

The late Saturday Night/Sunday morning group were Butler and Lopes supporters. What a surge by Lopes.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 25, 2009 8:45 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

The 8 slot will be hard to fill

You’re right: By the time we get to the bottom of the lineup, the pickings are going to be pretty slim.

Does Piazza take up the catching slot? Then Yeager is ineligible.
Does Wills take up the SS slot? Then Russell & Griffin are ineligible.

This process only works if we allow more than one person to be picked per defensive position. (Which kind of makes sense, because “all-time” ballots that pick one person for each defensive position usually have more than one leadoff hitter, and more than one cleanup hitter, & etc.)

by MattBaker on Jan 25, 2009 3:04 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

This is crazy close

The nighthawks have put it neck and neck.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Jan 26, 2009 8:09 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Looks

like you are going to have to re-write your next post.

by meercatjohn on Jan 26, 2009 9:39 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Let's have Wills and Butler

Looks like Wills and Butler are very popular for the lead spot. Let me propose something that would take advantage of both their strengths. I still propose Wills for the top slot as I feel he is more dangerous on the basepaths and disruptive to the pitcher. Butler demonstrated his ability to work a pitcher, take pitches, work deep into a count and his bunting ability. He also is dangerous on the basepaths. This gets Wills into the lineup at SS where he definately has the best glove over Russell or Griffin and Butler can stay in the #2 slot in CF where a lot of folks seem to like him best. Now I say Snider is a much superior CF but you could always move Butler to LF in a defensive alignment.
My feeling is get Wills and Butler into the lineup at the top of the order and you will definately have one of them on base being disruptive to the pitcher and setting up the three, four and five guys.
Seems like a good compromise.

by IWILLRULEYOU on Jan 26, 2009 9:57 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Too soon to compromise

I want this to be an accurate reflection of where the players batted in the Dodger career. As Dodgers, Butler only batted 2nd 106 times, and Wills 46 times. To have them as #2 hitters would not be accurate. One can be on the bench, the backup leadoff man if the other needs a day off.

-Eric

by Eric Stephen on Jan 26, 2009 10:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What to do with Russell

Being a betting man I am going to assume that given the posts here that people will want Bill Russell to bat second. If Wills ends up on top then what of Russell? He spent his first two years as an outfielder because Will was still the shortstop . He then converted to second base and then shortstop. So does Russell make the # 2 slot as a second baseman or outfielder? Should be a nice discussion.

by IWILLRULEYOU on Jan 26, 2009 12:58 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

re:

He didn’t play enough 2nd to qualify as a 2nd baseman, as he only garnered 180 plate appearances. As an outfielder he did get around 800 plate appearances before they realized they had a middle infielders bat playing in the outfield.

by meercatjohn on Jan 26, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $15 on parking.
Start posting about the Dodgers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Dodgers 200 Prospect Countdown: 180 - 171
Th_punkedoutmercat_small
2nd base Dodger rumors
Small
Dodgers 200 Prospect Countdown: 190 - 181
Memoriesofkevinmaloneavatar_small
2009 NL Gold Glove Award Winners
Img_0108_small
Lookouts Win Promotional Award From MiLB
Small
Mark Cuban interested in Dodgers
Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Repo-man_small
CLUTCH!™: Pulls Through to Win World Series: Overacheiving vs. Godzilla, Mediocrity, Voodoo, and Luck Narated by Screamin' Jay
Sc_white_small
It's Going to Get Worse Before It Gets Better
Ed-ak286_scully_g_20091006143938_small
An apology of sorts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Img_0108_small Eric Stephen

Editors

Bison_small David Young

Small Brendan Scolari