Homegrown Dodgers, Part I: The Offense
The Dodgers off-season acquisitions are not yet complete. After all, there's still the matter of a starting pitcher, and perhaps the re-signing of a certain dreadlocked leftfielder. However, no matter who else the Dodgers bring in, the key to the 2009 season will be all the homegrown talent already here. Logan White's drafts have provided the backbone for what will be at least a very competitive team in the National League West. Of course, the key to long-term success in baseball is the acquisition and development of homegrown talent.
For clarification purposes, I have defined "homegrown" as follows: players drafted or signed as an amateur that are still with the club. Some 2008 Dodgers that didn't qualify as homegrown include Andre Ethier (drafted by Oakland), Hiroki Kuroda (veteran who played professionally in Japan), and Chan Ho Park (originally signed by the Dodgers, but left and came back).
The Dodgers, especially under O'Malley ownership, were known for building from within. From the first year of free agency (1976) through the end of the O'Malley ownership (1997), the Dodger offense was mostly homegrown, with 53.5% of all plate appearances coming from homegrown players. Then, along came Fox and let's just say the pipeline began to dry up.
| Year | Plate Apps | Homegrown |
| 1976-1997 | 131,370 | 53.5% |
| 1998 | 6,077 | 48.0% |
| 1999 | 6,338 | 43.0% |
| 2000 | 6,312 | 34.9% |
| 2001 | 6,169 | 36.3% |
| 2002 | 6,146 | 35.5% |
| 2003 | 6,036 | 32.3% |
| 2004 | 6,244 | 28.0% |
| 2005 | 6,134 | 7.0% |
| 2006 | 6,394 | 17.6% |
| 2007 | 6,282 | 27.5% |
| 2008 | 6,194 | 46.7% |
After the five straight rookies of the year in the mid 1990s (Karros, Piazza, Mondesi, Nomo, and Hollandsworth) the farm system really didn't produce anyone for a while except for Adrian Beltre and Paul LoDuca. Logan White was hired in 2002, but the nature of the MLB draft is such that almost all drafted players aren't ready to contribute right away, so there is a lag effect between acquiring young talent and their contribution at the major league level. The departures of Beltre, Alex Cora, Paul LoDuca, and even David Ross during or after the 2004 season meant the Dodgers hit rock bottom in 2005 in terms of having homegrown talent.
However, over the last few years, the fruits of Logan White's labor have really paid off. Here are players drafted or signed during White's tenure that contributed to the 2008 club (meaning they had at least one PA or faced one batter):
| Draft Year |
Player(s) |
| 2002 | Loney, Martin, Broxton, Young, McDonald, Troncoso, Stults |
| 2003 | Billingsley, Kemp, Ellis, LaRoche |
| 2004 | DeWitt, Wade, Elbert |
| 2005 | None...yet |
| 2006 | Kershaw |
That's 15 players acquired in a short period of time that all contributed to the 2008 club. All (except the departed LaRoche) figure to play a role for the Dodgers in 2009 as well. I'll look at the pitching in a separate post later this week, but let's look at the 2008 homegrown Dodgers, and how they compare with the rest of baseball.
| Player | 2008 PA |
| Kemp | 657 |
| Loney | 651 |
| Martin | 650 |
| DeWitt | 421 |
| Young | 143 |
| Hu | 129 |
| Billingsley | 72 |
| LaRoche | 69 |
| Kershaw | 38 |
| Repko | 20 |
| Stults | 18 |
| Kuo | 14 |
| Broxton | 3 |
| Ellis | 3 |
| Elbert | 1 |
| Wade | 1 |
| Total Homegrown PA |
2,890 |
| % of Total PA |
46.7% |
The 46.7% of homegrown plate appearances by the Dodgers was the 7th highest in MLB last year:
| Rank | Team | Homegrown PA % |
| 1) | Rockies | 78.6% |
| 2) | Angels | 68.3% |
| 3) | Braves | 63.8% |
| 4) | Brewers | 62.0% |
| 5) | D-Backs | 55.9% |
| 6) | Phillies | 52.6% |
| 7) | Dodgers | 46.7% |
| 8) | Twins | 42.6% |
| 9) | Cardinals | 42.2% |
| 10) | Red Sox | 36.8% |
| MLB Average | 36.8% | |
The Rockies got an amazing 78.6% of their 2008 plate appearances by homegrown talent, a simply astounding total. Fellow NL West foe Arizona also ranked ahead of the Dodgers. The Dodgers were well above the MLB average of 36.8%.
Looking ahead to 2009, I doubt the Dodgers will have a figure much higher than their 46.7% from 2008, barring injury. It's hard to imagine Kemp, Loney, and Martin amassing much more than their combined 1,958 PA in 2008. The big gain could be from DeWitt, who had 421 PA in 2008. The Dodgers acquired Mark Loretta, and part of his job will be to play 2nd base against lefties, but if DeWitt can show any type of consistency against southpaws, and keep his good eye, he could jump into the 600 PA range. The bottom line is the fates of this team will largely be determined by the performance of the homegrown talent.
Coming soon: a look at the homegrown Dodgers from the pitching side.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
Great Posts
I just want to compliment you on the wonderful posts that you are creating – awesome.
This one is just great.
Thanks.
by 68elcamino427 on Jan 9, 2009 11:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks A Lot
I really appreciate the compliment.
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Jan 9, 2009 12:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like it!
My dad and I were talking about home grown talent a while back and that teams that use their home grown talent are generally more competetive than those who don’t.
by Dusto_Magnifico on Jan 9, 2009 11:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
re:
I think that depends on the talent. It doesn’t do any good if the home grown talent is talentless. Of the top 5 teams according to Eric’s chart only two of them made the playoffs and the Brewers only squeaked in because they traded some home grown talent for the services of CC. Of course the same could be said for the Dodgers, not sure we make the playoffs without Manny.
Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen
by Phil Gurnee on Jan 9, 2009 11:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes
but if we didnt make the playoffs, then arizona would have and they are one of the top 5 teams.
by XXDC2XX on Jan 9, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But
Where does Arizona rate on my “Homegrown Index” (combining both offense and pitching)?
Tune in later today to find out! :)
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Jan 9, 2009 2:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Easier to Root For
Ultimately, what will drive fan support is winning, but there is definitely an extra sense of pride when the team has many homegrown players. Personally I find it easier to root for a homegrown player because he is “ours,” he came up through our system, the Dodger Way, and all that cheesy old stuff.
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Jan 9, 2009 11:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
re:
I don’t believe in the Dodger way and I’m sure you know that it is a myth but I agree 100% that it is more fun to have a good player come up the ranks then trade for or buy one. I’d still rather be rooting for Andy LaRoche then Casey Blake but Mannywood was to special to waste on worries on how Andy turns out.
Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen
by Phil Gurnee on Jan 9, 2009 2:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
The only real Dodger Way I want is “to bring in good players.” :)
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Jan 9, 2009 2:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














