A Brief Look At The Phillies
| NLCS: Phillies vs. Dodgers | |||
| Game 1 |
Thu |
Dodger Stadium | 5:07pm |
| Game 2 |
Fri |
Dodger Stadium | 1:07pm |
| Game 3 | Sun | Citizens Bank Park |
5:07pm |
| Game 4 | Mon | Citizens Bank Park | 5:07pm |
| Game 5* |
Oct 21 |
Citizens Bank Park |
5:07pm |
| Game 6* |
Oct 23 |
Dodger Stadium | 5:07pm |
| Game 7* |
Oct 24 |
Dodger Stadium | 5:07pm |
| *if necessary | All times Pacific | ||
| All games televised on TBS | |||
I can still remember the sick feeling in the pit of my stomach as Matt Stairs' mammoth home run sucked the air out of Dodger Stadium in Game 4 of last year's NLCS. There are so many painful memories of that series: the Furcal error in Game 1, the sure Manny Ramirez home run that somehow was hit to the only part of the park it wouldn't have been a home run, the Chad Billingsley performances that we still have to hear about to this day, the Victorino laser beam home run that may have been eight feet off the ground during it's entire flight, the foul popout to end the series just like Thurman Munson squeezing the final out of the 1978 World Series at Dodger Stadium. A new year, however, brings a new opportunity, so with the NLCS rematch set to begin tomorrow, here are a few notes heading into the series:
Cole Hamels is the same pitcher as last season
On first glance, it may seem like Phillies' pitcher Cole Hamels is having a down year. After all, his ERA is up over a run from last season, from 3.09 to 4.32. However, his peripherals are nearly identical to last season:
| Year | HR% | UIBB% | K% | LD% | GB% | FIP | x-FIP | ERA | BABIP |
| 2008 | 3.07% | 5.04% | 21.47% | 21.8% | 39.5% | 3.70 | 3.78 | 3.09 | .262 |
| 2009 | 2.95% | 4.79% | 20.64% | 20.8% | 40.4% | 3.71 | 3.75 | 4.32 | .321 |
Hamels has pitched basically the same in both years, yet as we can see by his batting average on balls in play, he has been less fortunate this season, and as a result his ERA has skyrocketed. The truth about Hamels is that he's probably somewhere in between an unstoppable super ace and a struggling pitcher. But, he's the same pitcher as last year, fundamentally, so if you think he's not capable of reeling off another amazing October run, think again.
Phillies against LHP will be a factor
Much has been made about the Dodgers have the left-handed pitching to combat the Phillies' lineup. Chase Utley, Ryan Howard, and Raul Ibanez are forces to contend with from the left side of home plate, as are switch-hitters Jimmy Rollins and Shane Victorino at the top of the lineup. Conventional baseball wisdom suggests that the Dodgers and their southpaw pitchers would have an advantage, but the Phillies have performed quite well against lefties this season. David S. Cohen of The Good Phight tackled the issue yesterday:
Yes, the Phillies lefties do worse against lefthanded pitching, but only going from an .814 OPS against righties to a .793 OPS against lefties. The big difference is that the Phillies righties do much better against lefthanded pitching, going from a .717 OPS against righties to a .783 OPS against lefties.
And, measured against the rest of the league, the Phillies here are at a huge advantage. The Phillies' lefties sOPS+ (measure of how good the team's OPS is against the league for this split, with 100+ being better and below 100 being worse) is 108 against righties but goes up to 125 against lefties. The team's righties sOPS+ goes from 98 against righties to 102 against lefties.
It's true: Utley, Ibanez, and Victorino all hit better against lefties than righties. Rollins has hit worse against LHP this season, but is slightly better in his career. To me, the slew of Dodger lefties matter for one reason: Ryan Howard. Howard against RHP is the best hitter in the National League (.319/.395/.691 this year, .307/.409/.661 career), but against LHP he becomes invisible (.207/.298/.356 in 2009, .226/.310/.444 career). Clayton Kershaw, Randy Wolf, Hong-Chih Kuo, and George Sherrill will play a huge role in attempting to shut Howard down.
As for the rest of the lefties in the Phillies' lineup, I have to believe the Dodger lefties are good enough to get them out. Left-handed batters have hit just .193/.268/.317 against Dodger southpaws, the fourth best sOPS+ in the league. Here is how the Phillies' lefties have fared against the top NL lefty squads this season:
| LHP Against LHB, 2009 | |||||
| vs MLB LHB | vs Phillies LHB | ||||
| Team | BA/OBP/SLG | OPS | BA/OBP/SLG | OPS | |
| Cardinals | .170/.244/.213 | .457 | .273/..385/.273 | .657 | |
| Reds | .178/.255/.240 | .494 | .211/.286/.579 | .865 | |
| Braves | .203/.267/.304 | .571 | .191/.283/.340 | .623 | |
| Dodgers | .193/.268/.317 | .585 | .189/.254/.358 | .613 | |
Teams whose left-handed pitchers have done the best against the league's lefty batters have also done well against the Phillies. A couple of home runs off Danny Herrera inflated the Phillies' LHB OPS off the Reds, but I'm going out on a limb saying the Dodgers possess better LHP options than that. Dodger lefthanders have struck out an MLB-best 32.5% of left-handed batters this season.
Struggling shortstops may be the key to the series
Any time a regular player has an on-base percentage below .300, it's a cause for concern. Jimmy Rollins has a .296 OBP this season, yet there he is at the top of the Philadelphia lineup, game after game. However, he is still having a good season. His BABIP is just .251 this season, after fluctuating between .281 and .309 over the last six years, suggesting some bad luck.
The Hardball Times features a stat called PrOPS, which is short for "Predicted OPS." They describe it thusly:
PrOPS stands for "Predicted OPS." It was developed by J.C. Bradbury amd introduced in this article. PrOPS isn't really a new stat; it's a formula for predicting what a player's OPS is likely to be in the future based on his batted balls, strikeouts, home runs and walks.
Based on his underlying data, Rollins' prOPS this season is .783 (.290/.331/.452), which is right in line with his career:
| Year | prOPS | Actual OPS |
| 2004 | .769 | .803 |
| 2005 | .767 | .770 |
| 2006 | .820 | .811 |
| 2007 | .831 | .875 |
| 2008 | .816 | .786 |
| 2009 | .783 | .719 |
Rollins is still a force to be reckoned with, despite his low OBP.
As for Rafael Furcal, a healthy back has made him a force to be reckoned with at the top of the lineup, which shifts the Dodger offense into a higher gear. Furcal hit .330/400/.491 since the beginning of September, but more importantly he was six for seven in stolen base attempts. Furcal has had the green light to run all season, but only attempted 11 steals in the first five months of the season. That he is on the move again suggests he finally feels healthy, a great sign for the Dodgers. Furcal hit .500/.500/.667 in the NLDS against the Cardinals.
Brad Lidge is improving, but still struggling
Lidge, one year removed from a "perfect" season (no blown saves in 2008), is having quite the imperfect season in 2009. This year he has blown a whopping 11 saves, including two to the Dodgers back in June on back-to-back days. He has been consistent in his struggling, but a look at the underlying data suggests some improvement later in the season:
| Month | IP | BS | ERA | FIP |
| April | 8.2 | 1 | 7.27 | 6.96 |
| May | 14.2 | 3 | 7.98 | 5.33 |
| June | 4.0 | 2 | 6.75 | 8.40 |
| July | 10.2 | 0 | 5.91 | 5.40 |
| August | 10.2 | 3 | 6.75 | 4.74 |
| Sept/Oct | 10.0 | 2 | 8.10 | 3.35 |
| 2009 Totals | 58.2 | 11 | 7.21 | 5.35 |
Even as his FIP improved into acceptable levels later in the season, he still struggled, blowing five saves over the final two months. He had two saves in the division series, but he also walked two of the six batters he faced. On the season, Lidge has walked 5.22 batters per nine innings, so the key for the Dodgers will be patience and discipline. Not that I would ever want the Phillies to have a lead, but if Lidge enters the game with a one-run lead the Dodgers will take those odds.
Who says voodoo dolls don't work?
Since July 1, including the postseason, Matt Stairs has four hits in 50 at-bats, and is hitting .080/.281/.240.
Just like the NLDS with the Cardinals, this NLCS is a closely-matched series between two very good teams. I anticipate a good series, and by "good" I mean "the Dodgers will win in six."
1 recs |
62 comments
|
Comments
well im glad matt stairs has been shit for them since that game
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 14, 2009 9:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Stairs was doing fine pre-July 1 (.296/.433/.500)
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great article
Did anyone else think that Tracy should have put in Beimel to face Howard and hopefully end the game? Howards numbers are terrible against lefties.
Oh well, I agree with silverwidow in the previous thread, i would like Elbert added to the roster.
by Michael White on Oct 14, 2009 10:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes
My cuts were Garland and Troncoso.
by silverwidow on Oct 14, 2009 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m with you two, I want Elbert on the roster. I’m just imagining a 6th inning situation in which Howard comes up with RISP and we don’t want to have to burn Kuo or Sherrill.
You wanna know how great baseball is? The greatest basketball player ever left his sport to play baseball.
by Jesse S. on Oct 14, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
I mean, in game 1 the Dodgers went to the bullpen as early as the 4th. So there are some LOOGY situations before when you want to use Kuo or Sherril.
by Michael White on Oct 14, 2009 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Elbert would just walk him or hit him
and then Werth would take him deep.
by meercatjohn on Oct 14, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he did walk or hit him
he would be promptly pulled.
No chance he would face Werth…
by Michael White on Oct 14, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re in the minority, apparently, of serious prospect followers that isn’t impressed with Elbert. I think he will be amazing once they carve out a consistent role for him. He’s got super stuff.
by silverwidow on Oct 14, 2009 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
From Beto “what the fruit?” Duran:
Dodgers will open gates early. For 5:07pm games = 2:30 pm. Friday open at 10:30am
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't stop believin'!
This is for you, Eric!
This kid also does some rockin’ lip synching, also on YouTube.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Oct 14, 2009 10:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sweet!
This will cheer me up, now that Captain Lou Albano has passed.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Without re-posting the comment here, I agree with the age confusion of the first commenter on YouTube :)
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rosters should have been submitted 10 minutes ago. When will they be public?
by silverwidow on Oct 14, 2009 10:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was tomorrow. Where did you read that the rosters were due today?
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
However, I submitted
my own Dodgers NLCS roster to the team today. I hope they take it under advisement.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Oct 14, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That Was Not as Breif as a Dodgers - Cardinals Series
But I enjoyed it.
That whole leftie thing never worked out during the last series, so I’m not going to put much stock in it now. I would actually like to see Bills put in the rotation to co-pitch some games (game 3/7 maybe or 1/4/7) and keep Weaver as long relief.
What about Ethier vs. lefties? Does Ethier hitting over 500 last series throw his regular numbers out the window for the post-season? Do we consider having Pierre in CF for the first two plate appearances and then bring in Ethier when going against a lefty SP?
I disagree somewhat about how some of the stats indicate “bad luck” I think those stats just show that something funny may be going on, not just necessarily luck.. That is one possibility, the other could be worse timing, less hard hit balls, or just Karma. Same with pitching, it could indicate easier to hit stuff or luck.
To put it simply, I don’t think the Phillies improved much from last year, and the Dodgers have had several players break into their potential.
It could go either way as they are both good teams, but considering the Dodgers already eliminated St. Louis, who were seemingly the best built playoff team, I would give them the edge because they were better.
The X factor is Manny. He hits like last year or the rest of the bats go crazy like the last series, this series is over in my opinion.
by Dodger Dude on Oct 14, 2009 10:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with a lot of what you say, but I don't think the Cardinals were built that great.
They have great pitching and a couple of great hitters, but their lineup after Pujols and Holliday was manageable. Not so at all with teh Phillies.
by Ian Capilouto on Oct 14, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Ethier doesn't have as wonderful of a series,
but with Matt Kemp facing a lot of lefties, maybe he really lights it up.
by Ian Capilouto on Oct 14, 2009 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hopefully bison and the rest of the lineup can make up for any struggles ethier might have
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 14, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever.
If Bison delivers a soul-crushing bomb in the bottom of the first, that’s fine w/ me.
He better clean up his act in CF for this series. My god what WAS that against the Cards?
by Seanny Rotten on Oct 14, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
he did play some atrocious defense… looked like he was in the wrong outfield position..
by matthewmafa on Oct 14, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah it is funny how pretty much everyone in the media picked the Cards to represent the NL in the World Series, but now that we’ve beat them they still won’t give us the nod.
You wanna know how great baseball is? The greatest basketball player ever left his sport to play baseball.
by Jesse S. on Oct 14, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Either way, the LHP/LHB factor will matter this series because the Phillies’ two-best hitters (Howard and Utley) both hit lefty, and the Phillies have 5 guys in the lineup (including the two switch-hitters) that this matters for.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This seems like such a toss up series.
Both teams have a lot going for them. My opinion is that the series comes down to breaks again. Who gets more of them and not so much who is a better team or plays better. I think both teams will play well to their potentials and I am glad the Dodgers have the Home Field Advantage.
by Ian Capilouto on Oct 14, 2009 10:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't know what to think of this
but take note sarcastro! Steve Phillips is picking the Dodgers:
I’m picking the Dodgers to beat the Phillies myself. I think the Dodgers bullpen is head and shoulders better than the Phillies bullpen. While I like the Phillies starting pitching better than the Dodgers, there is not a dramatic difference between the two teams. I think the Dodgers can steal a game or two late against the Phillies bullpen, and that will be the difference. The Phillies are a very good team with tremendous character and I won’t be shocked if they win, but Torre has been here before and I think he will make the right moves. The Dodgers’ lefthanders of Wolf, Kershaw, Kuo, and Sherrill will be major factors in this series and can neutralize the powerful left-hander bats of the Phillies
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
but Torre has been here before
As opposed to the Phillies who haven’t sniffed the post-season…
since they won the Championship last year.
Good point Steve!
by Michael White on Oct 14, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
Torre was here before, in fact, last season :)
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Phillips point
was that Torre understands the situations of playoff baseball from his experience. Not so much that the Phillies aren’t experienced.
by Ian Capilouto on Oct 14, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, we were just busting Phillips’ chops a little bit.
But I will also ask, Torre also had the experience advantage last season in the NLCS, too.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I actually thought that Torre has been pretty good this year.
He went to his bullpen at the right times and let guys pitch out of jams at the right times. I hope that Torre is willing to let Wolf and Kershaw battle a little bit and on the other hand, bring in Kuo and Sherrill in the sixth and seventh innings if the Phillie Rockers are up to bat with men on.
by Ian Capilouto on Oct 14, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you get 1,000,000,000,000 monkeys sports analysts randomly spewing out stuff and the Yankees and Red Sox are not in your league, odds are you will eventually you will have one get it right.
by Dodger Dude on Oct 14, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damnit.
Well, I won’t chalk it up to a jinx, just Phillips being so dumb he’s liable to get some things right.
by Seanny Rotten on Oct 14, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
MLB.com posted a very good position match-up for the series:
According to the website (which I find not one gripe with, at all), they favor Martin, Blake, The Outfield, The Starters, The Relievers, Broxton and Torre over their respective counterparts, meaning the only positions where the Dodgers lost the match-up were 1B,2B and SS.
With something that seemingly one-sided, I’m really thinking Dodgers in 6 is a possibility…damn that’s cool.
Meanwhile, some analyst for 1st and 10 (the one that isn’t Skip) said something about Manny being the difference maker in the series if the Dodgers want to win and justified his taking the Yankees over the Angels on the grounds that the all-important Rivera-Vlad match-up would be in Mariano’s favor… facepalm
by Talka1ot on Oct 14, 2009 10:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
im also thinking dodgers in 6
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 14, 2009 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That surprises me on catcher and right field so I looked it up
Catcher
Ruiz OPS .780
Martin OPS .680
Right Field
Werth OPS .879
Ethier OPS .869
I agree Blake is much better at third and Ramirez is a better hitting (and possibly fielding) LF than his counterpart. Also, agree on the bullpen, and I doubt Torre being better as a manager means much at all.
I was also surprised about starters, but the numbers bear out a Dodger advantage.
Starters
Wolf x-FIP 4.28
Hamels x-FIP 3.75
Kershaw x-FIP 3.94
Happ x-FIP 4.58
Kuroda x-FIP 3.75
Blanton x-FIP 4.13
If Kuroda can’t go, then Bills is the likely replacement and has a 4.04 x-FIP.
Padilla x-FIP 3.40
Martinez x-FIP 4.24
After looking this all up, I am pretty fired up here. The one matchup that doesn’t favor the Dodgers is likely game 1, all other matchups (assuming 4 man rotations) favor the Dodgers.
by Michael White on Oct 14, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But agree with your general firedupedness (that is now a word).
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Lee's x-FIP is 3.31
Which is the best in the field. Kind of a big omission on my part.
by Michael White on Oct 14, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blanton (possible starter for game 4)
his x-FIP is 4.13
slightly better than pedro
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 14, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
who do u think pitches game 4??
blanton or pedro?
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 14, 2009 11:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Again, strictly a guess but I am thinking that Pedro is a non factor until at least the WS. There is no reason why they could not run him out there in any capacity last series, yet he never even warmed up. I still don’t understand why they named him the starter for game 3 in the last series? If he does start, Blanton is warming up right behind him which is what they may do, but I doubt it. The only way I think that is possible is because you figure that Blanton is younger and requires less time to get out of the pen.
by hessshaun on Oct 14, 2009 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great write up.
Phils fan here. At this point I am just dying for this thing to start. It seems like we have another week to wait for the series to kick off for some reason. Obviously you guys have been idle for a bit longer in closing out the Cards series; I feel your pain.
One the article, loved the write up. You know that there is always the x -factor involved in every series that none of us are able to measure. Great defensive plays, hitting from unlikely sources (Stairs anyone?), or just shut down pitching performances. Without beating this horse to death, the Phils certainly need their starters to go longer that normal where as the Dodgers need at least a full six. Both our bats can mash for days.
So where I really agree with your analysis is in the lead off men. Furcal and Rollins can really generate some damage on pitch count alone, if nothing else, provided they get on base. I read the piece you referenced on the Phil’s site in the article and it’s interesting as well. Above all else, we are talking about the two best teams in the NL and I really don’t think it’s close. Playoffs are always a great place to throw stats out the window.
The real decided advantage I see in this series lies in your bench and our pen. You guys will have the ability to throw some great bats out there to pinch hit and I really think that can be a mental thing for a pitcher. People bash Juan Pierre all the time, but the guy isn’t in the league on speed alone. He has been known to get on base a few times. Then you also have Thome who is always dangerous and will be a brilliant move if you make it to the WS. The Phils don’t have a fraction of that on the bench in terms of PH. Also, as a Phillies fan I can tell you that there is nothing settling about watching Ryan Madson or Brad Ledge trot out there to pitch. Madson can look electric every night of the week, but then all of the sudden he loses any and all movement on his FB. Ledge, my goodness is he a wreck. When he is on, he goes right at batters and just makes them look silly. At this point, he is trying to hit corners and work off his accuracy, which doesn’t exist when your bread and butter is a FB up in the zone or a cutter that doesn’t cut. So all in all, I think you nailed it on the head when mentioning that you guys HAVE to take pitches from Lidge. Manny is patient but I don’t know about the other younger members of the crew.
I think this series is determined by the over under on Brad Ledge appearances/innings. If he pitches five games or four innings for us, you guys definitely take the series.
Phils starters as I see it, merely my opinion.
1. Hamels
If Phils take game one, Lee is game three. If they lose game one, he is game two.
2. Happ/Lee
3. Happ/Lee
4. Blanton
5. Hamels
6. Happ/Lee
7. Happ/Lee
by hessshaun on Oct 14, 2009 11:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
So Lee would go again on three day's rest
Aces are for teams without the best bullpen in baseball.
by Sordid on Oct 14, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they lose the first game, I would not be shocked if he came back on short rest. I know he threw a lot of pitches that last game, but if a guy like that tells the coach he is good to go, how can you not throw him? Everyone keeps talking about Hamels last year, but this guy is doing what Hamels did last year. If Hamels is adequate, the Phils are in decent shape. But again, just looking at SP is near sighted and we all know that there are more factors than that. You guys saw it with a Holiday drop, we received it with the Street pitching to Howard. Things happen.
Also, if Lee does go on short rest, I think the series is over so I really hope the Phils come out of the gate in Game 1. I just wish we were t- 24 at this point. Soon enough!
by hessshaun on Oct 14, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah man,
this series seems like such a toss up series. It really does go back and forth. If the Dodgers can get comparable starts out of their two frontline guys against the Phillies big two, the Dodgers can steal a game or two in the late innings.
by Ian Capilouto on Oct 14, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for that btw
Good thoughts, appreciate the “opposing” fan’s (or phan’s) perspective.
All in all, it should be a close series. Who knows what will happen, but on paper at least it should go 6 or maybe 7.
And as for those “x factors” off the bench, this year it could be… Matt Stairs again. Who knows, someone like Greg Dobbs could come through. For the Dodgers it could be Jim Thome (assuming he’s even on the roster, he’s a better fit as a DH if they made the world series) or Loretta again or Orlando Hudson reminding people he exists.
There are many “keys” to this series for both teams but one of them is definitely how Hamels fares, especially assuming he gets to two starts. If he’s as good as he was against them last year the Dodgers could be in trouble. If they can get to him, they’re in trouble, especially when you match up the two pens.
I will say that the Dodgers’ pen is better than it was last year in the playoffs. Again, who knows, reliable guys can falter. That’s why we watch these games with excitement. Good luck!
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Oct 14, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think happ will start game 2 and Lee in Game 3
happ kinda matches up with Kershaw
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 14, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the extra insight
and yes, it feels like an eternity has passed between games! I just want the damn series to start already.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for stopping by! Hearing your thoughts on theseries is totally appreciated…
2009-10 LA Kings Hockey: Where Smyt Happens!!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Oct 14, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
does any one know the schedule for the world series I need to start asking for those days off thanks
by Dodgermanramon on Oct 14, 2009 11:30 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/schedule/ps.jsp?y=09
Wed, 10/28 at AL
Thu, 10/29 at AL
Sat, 10/31 at NL
Sun, 11/1 at NL
Mon, 11/2 at NL
Wed, 11/4 at AL
Thu, 11/5 at AL
by Eric Stephen on Oct 14, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eric – love the photo caption in this article!
2009-10 LA Kings Hockey: Where Smyt Happens!!
by DodgerBlueBalls on Oct 14, 2009 12:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hamels '09
OK I am a long die hard Phillies fan who still remembers Garry Maddox dropping a fly ball that help the dodgers win the NLCS in ’78.
If Cole Hamels has his A game. The series is over…..
But that is a big IF. Cole had been fighting tightness in his elbow in the first half of the year. He is still tentative with snapping off his curve ball. It breaks more like a slider but it is thrown at 78mph.
Last year Cole could still win a game with out having his a fastball or his a change. His curve ball was good enough to keep hitters honest. Now if either is fast ball or change are sup par, the opposing lineup will realize this and the second time through they sit, wait and BAMN!!
However if both his fastball and change are on then it is a long day for the opposition.
Frankly I think he needs a good cutter as another pitch in his arsenal bag!!
Respectfully,
Jose
by bluejfk on Oct 14, 2009 1:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If Cole Hamels has his A game. and pitches 43 straight scoreless innings The series is over…..
by Dodger Dude on Oct 14, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Adam Wainwright had his A game
which is better than Hamels A game, and St. Louis lost the series- and the game…
by Michael White on Oct 14, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 

















