Dodgers Reach Agreement On Contract Extension With Colletti
The Dodgers are close to announcing a long-term contract extension with general manager Ned Colletti, according to both Ken Gurnick of MLB.com and Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles Times. Contract details have not yet been revealed. Colletti's current contract contained a mutual option for 2010.
Owner Frank McCourt released this statement:
“One of our core promises to our fans is championship caliber baseball, year in and year out. Ned has been instrumental in our going a long way towards fulfilling that promise. I couldn’t be happier for him, both personally and professionally. The stability and continuity that extending his contract provides will further help us achieve the goal of being a consistent winner and I’m thrilled that he will continue to lead our baseball operations into the future.”
The Dodgers are 349-299 (.539) under Colletti, who has been with the club since before the 2006 season. The Dodgers have reached the playoffs three times in four years, including two straight trips to the NLCS.
“My time here in Los Angeles has been very special to me and I’m honored to be associated with this tremendous franchise,” said Colletti. “I’m very proud of what our baseball operations staff has accomplished over the last four years and I’m grateful for the support of the fans who have truly made me feel at home. I’m hopeful that we can bring them the championship they deserve in the very near future.”
Assistant GM Kim Ng interviewed for the vacant general manager position in San Diego last week.
0 recs |
147 comments
|
Comments
From Dodgers PR
DODGERS AND COLLETTI AGREE
TO LONG-TERM EXTENSION
GM is first in franchise history to reach postseason three of his first four years
LOS ANGELES – The Los Angeles Dodgers today announced that they have agreed to a long-term contract extension for General Manager Ned Colletti. Dodger Owner Frank McCourt made the announcement.
"One of our core promises to our fans is championship caliber baseball, year in and year out," said McCourt. "Ned has been instrumental in our going a long way towards fulfilling that promise. I couldn’t be happier for him, both personally and professionally. The stability and continuity that extending his contract provides will further help us achieve the goal of being a consistent winner and I’m thrilled that he will continue to lead our baseball operations into the future."
In his four seasons as GM, Colletti has seen his teams reach the postseason in three times, the first time a Dodger GM has accomplished that feat. During those four years, the Dodgers’ .539 winning percentage is the second highest in the National League behind the Phillies (.554). Among NL West opponents, the Dodgers lead second-place Colorado by 17.5 games during the four-year span.
The Dodgers recently finished the regular season with the best record in the National League for the first time since 1983 and swept the National League Division Series for the second consecutive season. The team is making back-to-back appearances in the NLCS for the first time since 1977-78.
"My time here in Los Angeles has been very special to me and I’m honored to be associated with this tremendous franchise," said Colletti. "I’m very proud of what our baseball operations staff has accomplished over the last four years and I’m grateful for the support of the fans who have truly made me feel at home. I’m hopeful that we can bring them the championship they deserve in the very near future."
Colletti is one of just three active Major League GMs to have reached the postseason in three of his first four seasons, joining New York ’s Brian Cashman and Boston ’s Theo Epstein.
"Ned’s leadership has created organizational consistency and the results speak for themselves," said Dodger President Dennis Mannion. "He’s a tremendous asset to the Dodger organization and I look forward to working with him to ensure the Dodgers’ success in the years to come."
Among the key contributors Colletti has added in midseason over the past two years are three likely Hall of Famers – Manny Ramirez, Greg Maddux, and Jim Thome – as well as veterans Casey Blake, Vicente Padilla, George Sherrill, Ronnie Belliard, and Jon Garland. Colletti’s first trade as GM netted outfielder Andre Ethier, while he continued to hold onto several key players who have become the nucleus of the team, including All-Stars Jonathan Broxton and Chad Billingsley, as well as Matt Kemp, James Loney, Russell Martin, Clayton Kershaw, and Hong-Chih Kuo, among others.
With a focus on developing top talent, Colletti and his staff launched an offseason Player Development Program in 2008 that included instruction both on and off the field. He also created the Dodger Pride Awards, which honor the organization’s top minor league players each month at each level of the club’s minor league system who play the game with a hustling, smart, aggressive style.
His key free agent acquisitions include the re-signing of Ramirez and Blake as well as deals to sign Randy Wolf, Orlando Hudson, and Juan Pierre, among others. Colletti has also renewed the club’s focus in Asia, signing free agents Takashi Saito and Hiroki Kuroda out of Japan .
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And you can expect Ng to keep looking
It would be interesting to see how she does as a GM – not sure I want that experiment to happen in LA though.
by Dodgers1981 on Oct 20, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if this is good news or not.
I am really confused on how to feel.
by delias man on Oct 20, 2009 1:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The timing is strange, that is for sure. But I’m sure the negotiations were going on behind the scenes for some time anyway.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The timing would be a lot worse
if it was after the Dodgers were eliminated.
As far as Ned goes: if there was a stat like BABIP that measured luck for GMs, I think Ned’s would be really high. I almost feel like everything that he has achieved has been in spite of himself.
by prosellis on Oct 20, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a few days
and we’ll be saying the same things about Torre.
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope Mattingly gets the Cleveland gig
I’d rather go with Tim Wallach, I just feel weird having guys manage the team who I rooted against.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liked Mattingly the player
because I never hated the Yankees growing up.
1981 – Yankees go to World Series (and lose!)
1982-1995: Don Mattingly’s career, one postseason appearance (’95 ALDS loss)
1996 – Yankees go to World Series (and win)
Always thought that was unfortunate timing for him.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is because you started after 1978.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evidently your brothers did not raise you right
but I could see USC fans not hating the Yankee’s.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I grew up hating the Giants, not the Yankees. And I still feel that way today.
I got to go to a game each in the ‘77 and ’78 Series’, and started a large dislike for them. But that was mainly focused at Steinbrenner (what a Richard!) and that ass Billy Martin than anything else. Plus, given the obnoxious attitude of Red Sox fans over the past few years (did you really invent the game? Really???), it’s hard to pick between who you “hate” more between those two.
But overall, on a hate scale, if the Giants are a 10 (and they are), the Yanks may rate a 6 or 7. Just not a big deal.
by KellyStephen on Oct 20, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My feelings exactly
I always loved Mattingly, and I’ll confess here to being a latent Yankees fan …
And the one time he did appear in the playoffs, he did pretty well:
Mattingly batted .417 with 6 RBI and a memorable go-ahead home run in Game Two, his final game at Yankee Stadium. In the final game of the series (and of his career), Mattingly again broke a tie with a two-run double.
(from Wikipedia)
Maybe if he’d held on another year or two, we’d be calling him “Donnie October.”
I’m cool with Colletti. He works well with the ownership and the coaching staff, I think, navigating between their needs and constraints pretty well. Might need some help in building a team for the playoffs, though, I dunno.
by TopDeckTrueBlue on Oct 21, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. I was thinking long term for the team. Wins have come, and I am happy for that. But we all know the horrific moves that we just hope never happen again, and not to mention what this does for Logan White and his future with the team.
by delias man on Oct 20, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
next top 3 prospect ned trades for a veteran to help down the stretch??
we have traded santana, bell and abreu(not top 3 but was great this season in AAA)
Will it be Lambo?? or maybe the hot Trayvon Robinson? Dee Gordon??Thats all the hitting we have in the minors LOL
i doubt he traded starting pitching like withrow martin or eovaldi so it will probably be a hitter.
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 1:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Gordon has the highest trade value of the 3
Lambo’s stock fell last season and Trayvon is probably considered too far away to have that much trade value.
Gordon is like Ned’s dream player though.
And why wait until the offseason? You don’t think there’s a chance we read a TBLA post titled, “Dodgers trade Billingsley and Gordon for Halladay” this winter?
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given the financial contraints
I don’t expect to see that headline.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even so
If the trade did happen, Eric would have a much wittier headline then the bland offering I posted above.
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be something like “Goodbye World, signed Eric Stephen” :)
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont understand..
why is Dee Gordon, Ned collettis dream player?
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Top of the order speed guy. I think there is some residual memories of late 2006 when the first three hitters were at times Furcal, Lofton, and Lugo.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
but I think Dee Gordon as a SS might be most GM’s dream player, not just Ned’s.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking the toolsy, raw, and runs really fast thing.
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if Ned's
dream player is raw, isn’t it more the guy who has 5 -10 – 15 years experience. Kenny Lofton was a one year rental so other then Juan Pierre has he really showed any affinity for speedy guys? I think this line of thinking is still related to his greatest mistake which he made in his first year and I bet he wouldn’t make again.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant dream player as far as scouting goes
not compared to a PVL free agent signing or trade target.
I do hope that he learned from the big mistake. At least he’s been limiting himself to mistakes for 2-3 year contracts instead of 5.
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome back
I was worried I’d lost my biggest prospect commentator.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i was never gone.. :)
and i love them prospects….
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They had no real choice
Based on any objective criteria, the man deserved an extension.
You cannot discount going to the playoffs in a sport where you generally have to win your division to reach it.
And in the end, that’s why he got it.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 1:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If he was spending my money
on guys like Schmidt, Pierre, and Jones, I wouldn’t have a real hard time questioning what he’s done. The results have been positive during his tenure, but I think you have to look at those things when extending a GM.
Not to say I wouldn’t have kept him. It just would have taken a lot longer for me to decide.
by prosellis on Oct 20, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
When the playoffs are over we should do a big pro/con on him.
Eric which side do you want to take or should we both take the Pro and let Kensai do the con?
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frank and Jaime probably just did this
through their lawyers.
by prosellis on Oct 20, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But then don't the arguments come down to
Results on the field vs. signings/trades (big picture, valuation issues). Plus you would have to know what if any financial constraints he was operating under.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The core of this team was built via the draft
before Ned was even in the picture. Adding Manny was nice, that’s a luck thing that should be stripped away in his BABIP adjusted W/L record. I really don’t see why Ned should get the lion’s share of the credit for the teams success these past two years.
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was the core
but without Wolf/Hudson/Belliard/Blake/Belisario/Furcal/Sherrill and of course Manny this team is not a playoff team. Expectations were nill but his pickup of Padilla proved to be brilliant. The man has a good shot to be the NL Executive of the year.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I find it hard to believe this team would not be a playoff team without Belliard, Sherril and Padilla. In fact, I still disagree with the Sherril for Bell deal and that has nothing to do with Sherril’s performance in the last week or so.
I do like the moves from this year. I like that Wolf and Hudson were brought in on the cheap, and the Belisario pick up was a score.
I still think the Blake and Furcal deals were over-reaches and (at least Blake) could have been brought in at lower costs.
I’ll compromise on this point though. I’d be fine giving him credit for 2009, but not 2008; as such I don’t think 1 year of success is enough to warrant a long term deal.
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will say that Ned has vastly improved each year.
But I also think we aren’t going to know exactly how much the moves he made this year are going to effect the organization until three or four years down the road when Manny and Andruw are still being paid and we watch the homegrown guys disappear because they are too expensive.
by prosellis on Oct 20, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
while I'm not a NedCo Basher
I’m just not impressed per say, as mentioned he has had an incredible group to build around via smart drafting, and I think hes good moves are equal to or even out weighed by his bad ones.
Someone at MCC put up a rough pro-con list, I think it might be a little incomplete, because I’d also give credit to Colletti for sticking with the youngsters when he could have traded them i.e. Kemp
http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2009/10/20/1093192/agent-ned-will-remain-embedded
William Doolittle at your service, a.k.a. will do.
by Ollie on Oct 20, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colletti got better
the moment there were rumors that his power had been stripped down
ie he could not offer long contracts anymore and ng/white had more input
by kensai on Oct 20, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure I want a GM that does better when he has less influence over the club.
by prosellis on Oct 20, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
could be
i guess we’ll see when the other two leave :o
by kensai on Oct 20, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For all the input they supposedly have
they did nothing to stop Carlos Santana and Josh Bell from being traded.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shades of Keith Hernandez
from Ed Price of AOL.com on Twitter:
Manny didn’t see Rollins hit. Was showering after coming out for Pierre. “What can u do? The Phillies are playing better. What can u do?”
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i dont know if that is funny
or wrong..
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
he wasn't doing a Bonilla/Henderson and playing cards
don’t most players shower right after being removed?
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They probably do, but it seems weird for me. I don’t even like it when starting pitchers don’t hang around for the rest of the game, but I know that viewpoint is extreme. :)
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wolf was out there in the dugout
And it wasn’t like he had been in the locker room for 2-3 innings, he just left the field after the top of the 9th.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't even know why they shower
I’d just head to the hotel in my gear, pickup an Annie on the way, and let her wash away my Dodger Blues.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
during the regular season yes
but in the 9th inning of a playoff game? I guess he figured Brox had ’em. I did!
by LA Taco on Oct 20, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could care less
If it lightens his heart and helps him hit better tonight, then good.
by Cool Dudes on Oct 20, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope everyone has a good batting practice session tonight :)
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ned has show himself to be a competent if not visionary or special GM
In my opinion with the other strengths of the Dodger organization, this is all they need.
Timing is weird, my guess is there was an offer on the table for Ned and after a sleepless night he goes Yes!
I have to say this is the right move instead of hiring another GM to come in and make a whole bunch of new screw ups before learning from them and then getting fired. Besides if things ever go South, it will be a lot of fun to call for Ned’s head :)
by Cool Dudes on Oct 20, 2009 1:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
In the shitstorm that is likely to come with a divorce
I am a fan of organizational stability at least on some level. Unless the guy has been an incompetent buffoon (which he hasn’t been, at least not all the time), there is something to be said for not having to deal with turnover.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 1:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was just about to post this same thing
Not to mention that attracting a GM during a bitter “custody dispute” might be difficult.
by LA Taco on Oct 20, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I can think of 2 candidates who wouldn't mind the job dispite the "custody dispute"
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, I mean as people pointed out when I said being GM in San Diego may not be a good gig, there are only so many GM jobs anyway, even with bad situaitons. Most likely both Ng and White would be fine, but being GM is not just player development/management, and during the “shitstorm” having someone who has been there before might be a good thing.
by LA Taco on Oct 20, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But player development might be a huge asset
if there is no money to spend on the open market.
by prosellis on Oct 20, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still think it vis ery possible
That those early moves were based primarily on what advice he got from the stafff already in place. That and his obsession about having depth.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 1:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I bet his pantry at home is filled with canned goods. If a bomb ever hit, he’d be like Christopher Walken in “Blast From The Past” with his 40-year survival plan :)
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m going to start rooting against the Angels today It would be to heartbreaking to see the Angels in the world Series and thinking of what might have been.
"If you go to ciphering we are whipped beforehand."
by Sordid on Oct 20, 2009 2:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I never got the rooting against someone thing.
What do you get out of it?
Now don’t get me wrong, I love to watch the giants loose, but the reason I love it is because the Dodgers are killing them. Some times I find a team particularly annoying, especially when they attribute their success to something stupid (and only point it out after they have already been successful) , and want to seem them fail, but to root against one particular club I’ve never understood.
How do you take satisfaction if your team did not cause the demise? I want the Phillies to fail, but I want them to phail because we beat them.
The closest I’ve ever come was the OC vs. giants series and that I had to weigh my options, "let’s see OC, Giants, OC, Giants, hmmm Mike Scioscia on OC, OK, I’ll go with the Angels."
But inexplicably, as much as a joke I thought renaming the team the Los Angeles Angeles de Anaheim, I’ve slowly grown to have a slight like for the Angels more now that they have that LA in front of them. Their owner knew what he was doing when he did that because it works on some subconscious level.
Maybe I’ll even feel a vague feeling of empathy towards the Clippers if they can put a season or two down in a row where they don’t suck :)
by Cool Dudes on Oct 20, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just too hot-headed when it comes to sports to think like that
I developed hatred inside for certain teams and players, whether it be from traditional rivalries or ways players acted on the field. Players like shane vicotrino, brian wilson, yorvit torrealba, they just make my blood boil
William Doolittle at your service, a.k.a. will do.
by Ollie on Oct 20, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One thing that will be interesting to track
Starting next year, the Twins will be playing in a new ballpark, how will that affect whatever advantage they had by playing in the dome.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 2:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
are they building a hill in CF with a flagpole?
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With a swimming pool in right
that doubles as a skating rink when they make the playoffs.
by prosellis on Oct 20, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have an office in Minneapolis near the Target Center. You can see the stadium being built; looks pretty sweet. I haven’t been there in the last 5 months, but supposedly it looks like it’s ready. Of course, with the winters there, they’ll get like 12 days between now and March 15 to work on it so they better be almost done.
They should have gone removable dome, obviously, given the weather. There will be 4-6 delays every year.
by KellyStephen on Oct 20, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't care for Ned, but from a PR standpoint, this had to be done.
The real question is from a year from now, if the team is sold and then we get to do this dance all over again because any new owner is going to want his own guy.
by Tripon on Oct 20, 2009 3:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No new owner
Just like I told you that Ned was going to be extended, the McCourts are not going to sell this team. It is a different dynamic then the Padre situation.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you please explain any financial concerns the Dodgers fans should be worried about?
by PHAT JULIO on Oct 20, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a very quick overview
I could go either way with Ned. He’s done enough that I can see the argument for extending him, he’s pissed me off enough that I could see the argument for going a different direction. That problem I have is that I have no idea what direction Frank might want to go with so in this case I’ll be happy to stay with Ned’s course.
Ned Pissed me of with three moves
Trading Edwin Jackson/Chuck Tiffanny for spare parts
Signing Juan Pierre
Trading Carlos Santana
He irritated me with releasing Jayson Werth when we needed outfielders after JD Drew opted out.
He irritated me with trading Abreu for Garland considering we will need a 2nd baseman next year
He irritated me when he gave Jeff Kent an extension
Other then that I could make a pro argument for every other deal he’s made even if they proved to be mistakes. He’s not my ideal candidate but after watching my ideal candidate fall victim to the same GM nonsense I don’t really have one anymore. Kim Ng has not proven to me that she would be any better or worse. The only thing we know about her is that she is great at the details of the job but we know nothing about what she thinks of using the farm to build the team from within or using the farm to build the team externally. The only free agent she ever signed was Cruz and he was released not long into his two year deal. It would be exciting to have the Dodgers give her a chance, but with this extension that chance will never come. Logan White we would expect to be friendly to the farm but other excellent scouting directors have become GM’s and not succeeded. It could easily be the Peter Principle in effect.
Now some say the core of the team is not his. The core from what i see is Loney, Kemp, and Martin among the position players. Only Kemp is an above average player so if your telling me that the core is the key to this teams success, I’ll politely disagree. Only Kemp is not replaceable.
The pitching staff is a bit different. Kershaw was drafted on his watch so among the current rotation I count only Billingsley as someone from the “core”. In the bullpen that would increase with Broxton, Kuo, and Troncoso. You could add McDonald/Elbert but since they just joined the team this year can you really count them as the core?
So is this core of Kemp, Loney, Martin, Billingsley, Broxton, Kuo, and Troncoso significantly impressive enough that he gained some huge edge over his competition? I don’t think so. What makes this team special is the addition of Andre/Manny/Kershaw, and the augmentation at other spots in the lineup and rotation.
For example the Diamonds have a core similar to the Dodgers.
Upton = Kemp, Conor Jackson = Loney, Martin = Montero, Billingsley = Sherzer but then they don’t have the bullpen core but we don’t have Steven Drew or Mark Reynolds. However when the Diamondbacks augmented their core they fell flat, and when we augmented our core we’ve won two Division championships in a row and have won six straight Division Championship games.
Sure I’d like him to trust the kids more instead of waiting for them to break the door down. Could DeWitt/Abreu have done what Hudson did by the end of the year? Probably but no one is going to trust a player who has missed close to two years of development time when building a team they hope to contend with.
Could Stults or Elbert or McDonald or Haeger done what Garland did? Maybe
Could DeWitt have done what Blake did? I doubt it
Should D Young have been kept instead of Minky? Hindsite says yes
Yes he trades our prospects without getting value in return. I’d much rather make one big trade for a superior talent then a bunch of little deals and end up with Garland, Blake, and Sherrill.
Bottom line for me is that the 2009 Dodgers are in the NLCS and we have been in the playoffs every year but one since he took over. Other GM’s might have done the same thing, but ours did and that is what we have to work with. This was a fun team to root for which also counts for something. My favorite pick for GM built a team I disliked so liking a team I want to root for counts for something for me.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 3:05 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
You wrote what I wrote on DT
With much more detail and thought.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Top of my head
I’m sure there are more deals that pissed me off or irritated me.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no mention of josh bell
and my personal favorite steve johnson
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Sherrill was a big part of the team after we got him
not just because of his performance but we were able to use Kuo judiciously and he stayed healthy and effective from the time we got Sherrill. Also it allowed Joe to throw Broxton at the big RHH when they showed up in the 8th instead of the 9th once in a while.
I’m still skeptical that Josh Bell is all of the sudden a defensive whiz and he struggles so much against LHP will he be anymore then a platoon 3rd baseman? I still miss him, but I’m glad we got Sherrill.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never saw so much hype for Bell until he was traded
by NotJoeTorre on Oct 20, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of Josh
four hits yesterday (1 Triple, 3 doubles) , now hitting .538 in the AFL.
by meercatjohn on Oct 20, 2009 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ethier was missing from your analysis
Do you not consider him part of the core?
by Michael White on Oct 20, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He mentioned the young corps Ned inherited
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude - that's not a comment, that's a new post!
I believe that it’s pretty spot on also.
One small thing, I thought Kim Ng was the person given a lot of credit for making the trade for Marlon “The Magician” Anderson? Is my memory tricking me?
by David Young on Oct 20, 2009 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually no
cause the dodgers dont want to piss off the japanese
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah the dodgers would probably love to get him
but they dont want to ruin their relationship with the japanesse
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There can only be one Kershawander
by NotJoeTorre on Oct 20, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Expected post from you this offseason
“Future Dodger ace?”

by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe I glossed over this yesterday
but Vicente Padilla is starting game 5.
The Dodgers have to win 3 games anyway, so having Kershaw at home is fine by me.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 3:19 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
As much as I love kershaw, I think padilla is probably the better option for tomorrow. But that being said kershaw has proved that he can pitch in big games.
by DannyDodger on Oct 20, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
great news
if padilla wins tomorrow..
and we all have Full faith in kershaw… that means its game 7
and wolf will shine..
i just dont see padilla losing and kershaw losing at home again so i think this series will Defintly come down to Game 7 wolf against Pedro.(or lee) and Game 7s at home are favored big time for the home team
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Really a Suprise
Kershaw has pitched better at home and Torre is still scheduling to win the series and Kershaw is just as likely as Padilla to pitch Lee to a draw at home.
He must think he has some Karmatic MOJO going for him after that Boston Series.
by Cool Dudes on Oct 20, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
YESSSSSSS!
There’s hope. Our strongest post-season pitcher pitching a must win game. I like it. I like it a whole lot.
by Seanny Rotten on Oct 20, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Padilla was awful against LHB
this season, but was awesome against the Phillies in game 2. His fastball was amazing, did he have that stuff all year? If so, how come he was so bad against lefties while at Texas? Inquiring minds want to know
by LA Taco on Oct 20, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
just look at his Home away stats
what he did on the road is truly what kind of pitcher he is…
not what he did in the launch pad arlington
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont know if anybody has noted this but...
Don mattingly interviewd for the cleveland indians job..
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 3:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nationals, too. He hasn’t interviewed yet, but they asked the Dodgers for permission.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would not go near the Nationals. They are not gonna compete for a few years still and when the team loses 100 games, Don will get canned.
by NotJoeTorre on Oct 20, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd think he'd want to wait around another year
so that he can take the Dodgers when Torre retires. But I guess he’s eager to start managing right away.
Game Four is the feces that is produced when shame eats too much stupidity.
by Mr. LA Sports Fan on Oct 20, 2009 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cleveland is a lot closer to his Evansville, Indiana home that Los Angeles is.
by David Young on Oct 20, 2009 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More importantly...
Vic Mizzy, a film and television composer best known for writing the memorable theme songs for the 1960s sit-coms “Green Acres” and “The Addams Family,” has died. He was 93.
Two of the catchiest theme songs of all time.
by KellyStephen on Oct 20, 2009 4:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not my generation
R.I.P.
Saw the “Tomacco” episode of the Simpsons 2 days ago, they played the “Green Acres” theme song. Kind of a strange.
by PHAT JULIO on Oct 20, 2009 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will shed a tear when the writer of the “Facts of Life” theme song passes on.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Alan Thicke and Gloria Loring
Just in case you wanted to write that down somewhere.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And here they are
They’re creepy and they’re kooky
Green Acres is the place to be
Mysterious and spooky
Farm living is life for me
They’re altogether ooky
Land spreading out, so far and wide
The Addams Family
Keep Manhattan, just give me that countryside.
Their house is a museum
New York is where I’d rather stay
Where people come to see ‘em
I get allergic smelling hay
They really are a scream
I just adore a penthouse view
The Addams Family.
Darling, I love you, but give me Park Avenue
Neat
The chores
Sweet
The stores
Petite
Fresh Air
Times Square
So get a witches shawl on
You are my wife
A broomstick you can crawl on
Goodbye city life
We’re gonna pay a call on
Green Acres we are there
The Addams Family.
by bhsportsguy on Oct 20, 2009 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
a win tomorrow
and we have home field advantage back….
Lets go…..
the dodgers can defintly still do this
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 5:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn't know Angel Stadium has replay shown on the screen for fans to see
Never heard boos so loud and so long in a play where Swisher was clearly out.
by PHAT JULIO on Oct 20, 2009 6:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
and then a make up call lol
talking about being able to get in an ump’s head with replay on the screen, because swisher did not leave early
William Doolittle at your service, a.k.a. will do.
by Ollie on Oct 20, 2009 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
*talk about
William Doolittle at your service, a.k.a. will do.
by Ollie on Oct 20, 2009 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
how did the ump call swisher out at 3rd? he wasnt even looking… (maybe perphirial vision) or how about just a plain old MAKE UP CALL
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 6:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
sabathia
4 innings 1 hit 0 runs
Only 38 PITCHES!!!!
hes on pace for a 85 pitch CG Shutout!!!
WOW
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 6:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that sealed it
Angels have a tall order to fill against Sabathia to get 5 runs.
by PHAT JULIO on Oct 20, 2009 6:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the way he is pitching, I would think 2 runs would be a tall order.
by K3vo on Oct 20, 2009 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ump didnt notice that cano was not touching 3rd
he thought his foot was on third when it wasnt..
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lol at ESPN NEWS
the referees for the NBA are back… so the headline is
“THEIR BACK”
who the hell is the editor for these things
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 6:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
if the yanks continue on and win this series
who is the ALCS MVP
A-rod or Sabthia??
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 7:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thought this was interesting
RE: A-Rod
Career regular season: .305/.390./.576
Career postseason: .299/.388/.563
Imagine that…with more plate appearances, his postseason numbers are more and more similar to his overall numbers.
by Eric Stephen on Oct 20, 2009 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeter:
Career regular season: .317 / .388 / .459 / .847
Career postseason: .309 / .378 / .482 / .860
Imagine that…with more plate appearances, his postseason numbers are more and more similar to his overall numbers.
by David Young on Oct 20, 2009 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
5-1 yankees
morales hits a solo shot to center
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 20, 2009 7:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Tim McClellan
SUCKS. But which umpire doesn’t suck?
by PHAT JULIO on Oct 20, 2009 7:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
some bad umpiring this postseason
part of the game tho
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
angels and dodgers both in a 3-1 hole
a freeway world series looks very bleak :(
Because when I think of Boris Diaw, I think of Beethoven and the age of Romanticism....
by shaqfor3 on Oct 20, 2009 8:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Both series have been very similar too. Dodgers and Angels both lost heartbreakers and won heartbreakers and they both got killed once. Hopefully they both come back to win the series as well :)
by KSeal on Oct 20, 2009 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uggg
down 1-3 and stuck with Old School Colletti (soon likely without Ng). ’88 is looking farther away every day.
by Paul Scott on Oct 20, 2009 10:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Likely?
She interviewed for the only open GM job. She’s not the only candidate. I would hazard a very rough guess that the odds of her being hired for that job are on the underside of 50%.
by David Young on Oct 20, 2009 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that cheater
he should give his cy young back… actually nevermind.. mostly everyone was doin it
by matthewmafa on Oct 20, 2009 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















