Cardinals vs Dodgers, Game #1 Simulation
I used my simulator to simulate 50000 baseball games between the Cardinals and Dodgers using what to the best of my knowledge will be close to today's starting lineups. The simulator outputs a win probability for each team, along with the average total runs scored, a distribution matrix of all the final scores and how often they occurred, and an averaged box score tally of all games combined. You may find it strange that there are so many one run games listed as the most likely score, and that the home team is always favored to win in the top couple of scores. This is due to basic math and the way that baseball rules play out of having the home team bat last. Here is a great article explaining this phenomenon. For your viewing pleasure I have also listed a few other games of local interest.
Today's Results... (Last simulation ran at 1130PM)
| Visitors | Home | Pitching Matchup | Favorite | Vegas Win Prob | Simulator Win Prob | AccuScore |
| STL | LAN | C.Carpenter vs R.Wolf | STL | 56.90% | 51.99 | 53% |
Skinny: Simulator Fun Facts... Vegas is somewhat confident in a Cardinals victory, while the simulator has this game closer to a toss up. AccuScore tries to be the voice of reason and splits the difference between the two.
|
Top 20 Most Likely Scores |
|
| 1 | LAN 3-2 |
| 2 | LAN 4-3 |
| 3 | LAN 2-1 |
| 4 | LAN 5-4 |
| 5 | STL 3-2 |
| 6 | STL 4-3 |
| 7 | STL 3-1 |
| 8 | STL 2-1 |
| 9 | LAN 6-5 |
| 10 | LAN 4-2 |
| 11 | STL 4-2 |
| 12 | STL 5-4 |
| 13 | LAN 3-1 |
| 14 | STL 5-3 |
| 15 | STL 5-2 |
| 16 | STL 4-1 |
| 17 | LAN 5-3 |
| 18 | LAN 4-1 |
| 19 | STL 5-1 |
| 20 | LAN 5-2 |
|
Game Pitching Results |
||||||
| Pitcher | IP | SO | BB | HR | WHIP | FIP |
| C.Carpenter | 6.9 | 5.651 | 1.65 | 0.261 | 1.269 | 2.775 |
| R.Wolf | 6.7 | 5.324 | 2.14 | 0.811 | 1.345 | 4.148 |
Note: Keep in mind I did this simulation before knowing the actual starting lineups, so some of the players I used may not be starting. Many of the "Players Most Likely To" stats depend on having the correct lineup. The lineups I used are listed below. Chances are you won't see a big difference in win probability from having the lineup order slightly off. Picking the correct starters is more important, especially if one of the better players is taking the day off. But you still won't see a big change in win probability if the starter and backup are interchangeable.
| Simulation Lineups | ||||
| Name | wOBA | Name | wOBA | |
| 1 | R.Schumaker | .2922 | R.Furcal | .3077 |
| 2 | B.Ryan | .3083 | M.Kemp | .3085 |
| 3 | A.Pujols | .4472 | A.Ethier | .3382 |
| 4 | M.Holliday | .3732 | M.Ramirez | .3520 |
| 5 | R.Ludwick | .3354 | J.Loney | .3313 |
| 6 | M.Derosa | .3355 | C.Blake | .3112 |
| 7 | R.Ankiel | .2891 | R.Martin | .3042 |
| 8 | Y.Molina | .3220 | O.Hudson | .3393 |
| 9 | C.Carpenter | .1506 | R.Wolf | .1472 |
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lineups
Dodgers
Furcal SS
Kemp CF
Ethier RF
Manny LF
Loney 1B
Blake 3B
Belliard 2B
Martin C
Wolf P
I haven’t seen a Cardinal lineup yet
Thanks. I won’t be able to rerun the sim with the correct lineups. Looks like I was pretty close with the Dodgers lineup (Belliard for Hudson), and I don’t think it will matter at all in the simulation whether it’s Belliard or Hudson since Hudson switch hits.
I didn’t know whether to put Ankiel or Rasmus in, but heard chatter that it would be Ankiel in LA and Rasmus in STL. Bigger effect on defense than offense on those two.
vr, Xei
well done
without belliard or rasmus no less haha
I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours
by BoulderDodger on Oct 7, 2009 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions

by 

















