Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

There is Gold Glove and then there is the Fielding Bible

Major League baseball announced their Gold Glove winners today, below is the summary:

2009 AL Gold Glove winners
Position Player Team
C Joe Mauer Twins
1B Mark Teixeira Yankees
2B Placido Polanco Tigers
3B Evan Longoria Rays
SS Derek Jeter Yankees
OF Torii Hunter Angels
OF Adam Jones Orioles
OF Ichiro Suzuki Mariners
P Mark Buehrle White Sox

The major league GG winners always seem to be won by players who can hit. I have pretty much ignored the Major League Gold Glove winners ever since I figured out they were basically a farce, like the time Rafael Palmeiro won the award even though he only played 28 games at 1st base. The award is based on peer vote but it has been obvious forever that not much thought goes into the vote.

One of the welcome sights of the Bill James Handbook are the John Dewan 2010 Fielding Bible awards.  Unlike MLB,  Dewan does not distinguish between the leagues. How the winners are decided are detailed in the book. Every baseball fan of statistics should buy the book. Everyone.

Pos Player
1st Pujols
2nd Aaron Hill
SS Jack Wilson
3rd Ryan Zimmerman
C Yadier Molina
RF Ichiro Suzuki
CF Franklin Guiterrez
LF Carl Crawford
Pitcher Mark Buehrle

 

How did the Dodgers do?

James Loney  - 9th place with 23 points, highest ranking was 7th.

Orlando Hudson - 5th place with 47 points, highest ranking was 1st place

Rafael Furcal - Not in top 10 and received only five points.

Casey Blake - 10th place with 11 points, highest ranking was 6th

Russell Martin - 4th place with 55 points, highest ranking was 3rd (4 times)

Manny Ramirez - 0 points

Matt Kemp - Not in top 10, received only 12 points

Andre -  0 points

To put it mildly, the panel of 10 judges were quite unimpressed with the Dodger outfield defense. However this is a subjective panel. How about the objective Plus/Minus system? Only the top ten for each position are listed in the Bill James book. For the complete list you'd need to buy the 2009 Fielding Bible. They use two different approaches. The Defensive Runs Saved (combines Plus/Minus, bunts, double plays, outfield arms, catchers' earned runs, cathers' stolen bases allowed, pitchers' stolen bases allowed, and home run saving catches)

James Loney  - Plus 3, 9th place

Orlando Hudson - Not in top 10

Rafael Furcal -  Plus 8, 9th place

Casey Blake - Plus 8, 9th place

Martin - Plus 5, 5th place

Manny  -  Minus 7,Fifth Worse

Matt Kemp - Not in top 10

Andre - Not in top 10

Now lets take a look at Plus/Minus

The Plus/Minus system is a way to evaluate defensive range by measuring how often defenders turn grounders and fly balls into outs.

James Loney - Plus 4, 10th Place

Orlando Hudson - Not in top 10

Rafael Hudson - Not in top 10

Casey Blake - Plus 8, 9th Place

Manny - Not in top 10

Kemp - Not in top 10 - Adam Jones winner of the Gold Glove was a Minus 20

Andre - Not in top 10

 

Worse Plus/Minus in 2009

1st - Adam Dunn Minus 24 and Nick Johnson -14 (Man the Nat's were bad)

2nd - Alberto Callaspo Minus 19 (No wonder the Royals are trying to trade him for AJ Ellis)

SS - Orlando Cabrera  Minus 40

3rd - Mike Lowell Minus 23 (Not long ago he was a plus fielder)

LF - Ryan Braun Minus 31

CF - Vernon Wells Minus 30 (doing everything he can to make his contract the worse in baseball)

RF - Jermaine Dye Minus 28

Other simple notes. Watching Brendan Ryan this year we thought he was a hell of a SS and the Plus/Minus supports that theory as he was Plus 24 good for 2nd.

I'm sure all of us are disappointed that Matt Kemp did not show better as we felt he was playing incredible defense all year.  Does this mean we lose our faith in the Plus/Minus system or in Matt Kemps abilities to play centerfield in an above average manner?

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Matt Kemp deserves better

I’m sure every other team has their argument into why their position player should deserve the GG award, but come on. Matt Kemp should win the award. He has a positive UZR, 14 assists (leader) , 4 double plays (leader), just 2 errors… I’d be damn disappointed if he got beat out by Nate McClouth, Mike Cameron, Colby Rasmus, or (UGH)Shane Victorino…

MY PICKS FOR CF GG:
Matt Kemp
Nate McClouth
Andrew McCutchen

PICKS THAT I THINK WILL GET THE AWARD:
Shane Victorino
Mike Cameron
Matt Kemp/ Nate McClouth

by Julio Nievas on Nov 10, 2009 11:55 PM PST reply actions  

+1

Bullshit vote that doesn’t have Kemp top 10. Period.

by Ivdown on Nov 11, 2009 1:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Missed in all the outstanding plays...

…and huge strides in defense, Matt Kemp wasn’t truly elite, IMO. His reads were still a problem in some aspects, and as far as the system goes, those blunders he tends to have take him down a good lot because it’s compared to average. He was likely solidly above average to good in center field this year.

I wouldn’t read into one year samples for UZR/PM too much anyway. Personally, I just average two or three year (or whenever their performance is stable) samples between the two or three best systems to get the most reasonable take. It’s…arrogant…to just rely on one advanced defensive metric at this point, IMO.

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 12:57 AM PST reply actions  

I agree, if only because of work I saw a ton of mariners games this year. Watching guttierez in CF regularly will show you how far Kemp has to go to be the best. Athletically he has all the skill necessary and he made some sensational plays this year. But I think Kensai is right to say he has not fully reached elite status… Yet.

Play of the year in the nl in cf has to be victorino catching a ball at the track in wrigley a second after having a beer poured on his face.

by LA Taco on Nov 11, 2009 4:43 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Right

But comparing anybody to Gutierrez will make that person seem crappy. Metrics or scouting.

I figure Nyjer Morgan deserves the GG in center, but Kemp is somewhere in the top 5 in the NL defensively. Certainly behind Cameron and Morgan, but that’s about it I think.

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 5:43 AM PST up reply actions  

I just average two or three year (or whenever their performance is stable) samples between the two or three best systems to get the most reasonable take

Given the number of metrics that is the only sensible way to go about it. Here was an interesting rebuttal of sorts of between how UZR and +/- are calculated.

I just like to provide information. I’ll be providing the Win Share breakdown for the season soon and the cumulative totals for every LA Dodger but I’m not going to debate the pros/cons of win shares, but I’ll provide the links of those smarter then me who already had and continue to have that debate.

by meercatjohn on Nov 11, 2009 8:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

i’ve read that before.

It sorta irks me how MGL is so defensive of UZR and alludes to it as if it was as reliable as wOBA or something. I mean, I understand, but I thought the whole point of sabermetrics was to find the truth, not be a hard ass about shit you invent. That’s how we got this divide (traditionalist/statistics) in the first place, after all.

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 8:40 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Gold gloves are voted on by managers and coaches

by Eric Stephen on Nov 11, 2009 2:44 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Gold Gloves should not be thought of as a defensive award, they should be seen as who are the guys who coaches feel deserve an award for the way they play the field and who they are as teammates. it has nothing to do with metrics but the feeling you get watching or playing with those guys, how they handle themselves, respect of teammates, etc. It also seems to reward people for lifetime achievement and can be a year or two too late. Utley might have a down season at 2b next year but I would bet now that he gets the gg.

by LA Taco on Nov 11, 2009 4:48 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

That makes no sense

Why should Gold Glove voting deviate from the standard purpose?

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 5:41 AM PST up reply actions  

because they’re humans not machines

by LA Taco on Nov 11, 2009 7:52 AM PST up reply actions  

And?

Even if you don’t evaluate them with Plus/Minus or UZR, you could evaluate them with scouting or something. That would still be more credible than giving them awards for career achievements or whatever.

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 8:11 AM PST up reply actions  

you seem to be mistaking “how things are” for “how they ought to be”

I was not describing how I would give the awards, but how we the public should think of them based on how they’ve been given out for, oh, the past 30 years if not longer.

by LA Taco on Nov 11, 2009 10:35 AM PST up reply actions  

I vehemently disagree

Gold Gloves are in fact defensive awards. If someone is voting based on anything else, they shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

by Eric Stephen on Nov 11, 2009 8:05 AM PST up reply actions  

But based on the voting, it would seem that LA Taco is right about what they think goes into a GG because is sure isn’t just defense.

by meercatjohn on Nov 11, 2009 8:24 AM PST up reply actions  

It is what they do but not what they should do

by Eric Stephen on Nov 11, 2009 8:27 AM PST up reply actions  

True

but as LA Taco said they are humans and rarely do humans in any scenario choose the right thing to do.

by meercatjohn on Nov 11, 2009 8:29 AM PST up reply actions  

My comment seems to have caused confusion. I am talking about how we the fans should rank Gold Gloves as achievements. Clearly I am not an MLB coach so I don’t have a vote, I can only affect my perception of the award, not how it’s given out.

by LA Taco on Nov 11, 2009 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Top 10 CF UZR

1. F.Gutierrez 29.1
2. N.Morgan 27.8
3. R.Sweeney 24.0
4. B.Upton 11.0
5. M.Cameron 10.0
6. C.Rasmus 9.8
7. M.Bourn 8.6
8. N.McLouth 3.6
9. M.Kemp 2.6
10. C.Granderson 1.6

by Xeifrank on Nov 11, 2009 8:06 AM PST reply actions  

If the Mariners could trade for Carl Crawford they might have the best defensive outfield in history. And quite an interesting trio, African-American/Venezuela/Japanese. Ty Cobb would not have approved.

by meercatjohn on Nov 11, 2009 8:23 AM PST reply actions  

That would be such a great OF. Jon Garland could put up a 2.50 ERA there :)

by Eric Stephen on Nov 11, 2009 8:51 AM PST up reply actions  

We told Ty Cobb to stick it!

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Nov 11, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually

if the Rays could trade for Franklin Gutierrez, the Rays might have the best outfield in history. :)
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Nov 11, 2009 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Kensai broke the news, BTW. Kemp and Hudson win GG (see front page).

I’ll have a story up once it becomes official

by Eric Stephen on Nov 11, 2009 8:27 AM PST reply actions  

Good thing

they don’t pay attention to the metrics.

by meercatjohn on Nov 11, 2009 8:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Milton Bradley has been traded for Gutierrez and Andre Ethier. Given Gutierrez’s defense you could probably say that he is now the superior player to Milton even though it took a while. I don’t have the book in front of me at work but Milton was also rated as one of the worse right fielders in the game this past season. Signing Milton to play the outfield after all the injuries looked like a brain fart at the time and could easily be the worse FA signing of 2009.

by meercatjohn on Nov 11, 2009 8:28 AM PST reply actions  

For Sure

Gutierrez is better than Bradley.

Could be better than Ethier, depending on your needs. Not to the Dodgers, but to like the Yankees, probably.

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 8:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Remember way back when, I think either just before or just after the Bradley trade, BP said Gutierrez had a chance to hit 500 homers or something, basically calling him the next Juan Gonzalez. It’s funny that his offense was driving his value then and it’s his defense that is so great now.

by Eric Stephen on Nov 11, 2009 8:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Don't remember that

but it’s interesting in retrospect. Hahaha.

Touted slugger becomes defensive wizard. :o

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 9:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Next thing you know

Kyle Russell will win a Gold Glove in right but hit only 15 homers a year. :o

by Chad Moriyama on Nov 11, 2009 9:10 AM PST up reply actions  

or..

next thing we know… kyle russell strikes out in less then 10% of his at bats in the MLB but only hits 5 home runs per year… becoming Juan pierre

by matthewmafa on Nov 11, 2009 9:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Speaking of Kyle Russell

Greg Desme is creating quite a stir in the AFL and he is certainly a comp for Russell with the speed and power and proclivity to strike out. The only difference is that Desme got to play in the Cal League this year while Russell was forced to stay in the MWL. They both had excellent SB ratios. I’ll be watching both of them to see how they progress.

by meercatjohn on Nov 11, 2009 9:33 AM PST up reply actions  

yeah desmes a center fielder too..

his numbers were not so great… Until he got promoted to the offensively driven cal league thoo

by matthewmafa on Nov 11, 2009 9:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Does this mean we lose our faith in the Plus/Minus system

HELL YEAH

or in Matt Kemps abilities to play centerfield in an above average manner?

HELL NO

GOLDEN GLOVES all the way!

These defensive measurements seem completely non-reliable, they did get Dunn as worst in the league, but it was probably by such a wide margin, it was just too easy.

Stats have to be based on empirical evidence or they loose their power. To me subjective statistics will have so much built in error they basically defeat the purpose of statistics.

Unfortunately, defensive statistics based upon actual empirical evidence are about as useful as “rebounds” in the NBA.

by Cool Dudes on Nov 11, 2009 12:09 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $15 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2011-philly-game-me__2__small
2011 Dodgers Spreadsheet Project
Ed-ak286_scully_g_20091006143938_small
It is time to play - Name the BA Top 30
P1010315_small
1st Trip to LA
Small
Take me out to the bid game.
Sbn_ds_small
And Down The Stretch The Dodgers Go

Recent FanPosts

Small
Joe Torre Horrow Show
Small
Are you the Biggest Dodger Fan?
Small
San Diego Road Trip April 7
Dgy_small
Dodger Blogs Softball - Sign Up For The TBLA Team Today
Dodgers_small
Food For Thought (by the numbers)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

2012 Dodgers Payroll

Italics denote estimates
Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $500,000 team control
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 14 Ellis $2,500,000
3B 5 Uribe $8,000,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000 team control
LF 21 Rivera $4,000,000
CF 27 Kemp $10,000,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

IF/OF 6 Hairston $2,250,000
OF 10 Gwynn $850,000
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
C 18 Treanor $850,000
IF 12 Sellers $485,000 team control

SP 22 Kershaw $8,500,000 arb
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 37 Capuano $3,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000

CL 54 Guerra $485,000 team control
RHP 74
Jansen $500,000 team control
RHP 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
RHP Coffey $1,000,000
RHP 66 MacDougal $650,000
LHP 57 Elbert $485,000 team control
RHP 36
Hawksworth $500,000 team control

TJ 41 De La Rosa $485,000 team control



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout

Totals
$114,662,432

For more detailed information, click here.

Players on 40-man roster used as roster
fillers until moves are made.

Current 40-man roster count: 40
(not including Belisario)

2012 Non-Roster Invitees

No Player Age*
63 Jose Ascanio rhp
27
61 Alberto Castillo lhp
36
60 Matt Chico lhp
29
35 John Grabow lhp
33
59 Angel Guzman rhp
30
47 Wil Ledezma lhp
31
72 Shane Lindsay rhp
27
62 Fernando Nieve rhp 29
73 Scott Rice lhp 30
70 Will Savage rhp
27
71 Ryan Tucker rhp
25

30 Josh Bard c 34
82 Griff Erickson c 24
81 Matt Wallachc 26
67 Jeff Baisley 3b/1b 29
62 Luis Cruz ss/2b 28
33 Josh Fields 3b 29
64 Lance Zawadzki if 27
56 Cory Sullivan of 32

*Age on June 30, 2012

NRI count: 19

For more info, click here.


Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox