Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Dodgers Face Tuesday Decisions For Hudson, Wolf, Others

Tuesday could be an important day in determining the shape of the Dodger offseason.  December 1 is decision day for clubs to offer arbitration to free agents in the top 40% at their respective positions.  Players are ranked by the Elias Sports Bureau based on stats from the previous two seasons, and split into groups:

  • Type A free agents: in the top 20% of their respective position group
  • Type B free agents: in the top 40%, but not in the top 20%, of their respective position group

By offering arbitration, a club guarantees itself some form of compensation should the player decide to leave.  Type A free agents net two draft picks to the former club -- one in the first round (unless that club has a protected pick in the top 15) and one supplemental pick between the first and second rounds.  If a team signs more than one Type A free agent, picks in subsequent rounds are used, and the former team of the higher-ranking free agent (based on the Elias rankings) gets the higher pick.  For instance, last year the Yankees gave up picks in the first three rounds for signing Type A free agents Mark Teixeira (1st round to Angels), C.C. Sabathia (2nd round to Milwaukee), and A.J. Burnett (3rd round to Toronto).  Type B free agents net just a supplemental pick.

If a player accepts arbitration, he is bound to the team for another year.  Player and club each submit a salary figure sometime between January 5 and January 15, and if they don't come to a contract agreement on their own, will face off in an arbitration hearing sometime between February 1 and February 20.

The deadline to offer arbitration to these free agents is Tuesday night, December 1, at 9pm.  Players have until Monday night, December 7, to accept or decline the offer.

Here's a look at the Type A and Type B free agents for the Dodgers:

Orlando Hudson

2009 Salary: $7.99 million

2009 Stats:  .283/.353/.417, 109 OPS+, 2.9 WAR, 74 runs, 35 doubles, one cycle

2010 Age: 32

2010 Free Agent Status: Type A

Hudson is the litmus test for the offseason.  Offering him arbitration should be a no-brainer.  Hudson is exactly the type of player you would want back on a one-year deal.  He compares favorably with all the other second base options, but if he accepts arbitration the Dodgers wouldn't be on the hook for a multi-year contract.  But here's the thing:  there is no way Hudson will accept arbitration.  Hudson split time in September with Ronnie Belliard at second base, then the O-Dog was benched for the playoffs.  As a player who was an All-Star this season, as well as a Gold Glover (deservedly or not), Hudson was rightfully miffed at his benching, as Ramona Shelburne noted last month in the LA Daily News:

According to Hudson, Torre never once called him into his office to discuss the situation, a slap in the face Hudson has trouble accepting.

"My teammates talked to me about it more than Joe did, but I never had any answers because (Torre) and I never talked," Hudson said. "There was no conversation."

Does this sound like someone who wants to come back?  No way.  But even if he does return, as unlikely as it seems, it would be good for the Dodgers.  If the Dodgers are so risk averse as to try to avoid the infinitesimal chance the Hudson would cost them another $8 million or so, that's a bad sign.  Only good things can happen by offering Hudson arbitration:

  • Hudson declines arbitration, signs elsewhere, and the Dodgers get two draft picks in 2010
  • Hudson accepts arbitration, Dodgers get a 2.5 to 3-win player for a one-year deal

If the Dodgers don't offer arbitration, it will be for monetary reasons only.  Saving money in the short-term on things they should be spending money on will only hurt the team in the long run.

Prediction:  I hope I'm wrong, but the Dodgers won't offer Hudson arbitration

Star-divide

Randy Wolf

2009 Salary: $8 million

2009 Stats:  11-7, 3.23 ERA, 122 ERA+, 4.00 FIP, 4.28 x-FIP, career high in starts (34), innings (214.1) and WHIP (1.101)

2010 Age: 33

2010 Free Agent Status: Type A

Wolf is another guy that would be great to have back on a one-year deal, another easy choice to offer arbitration.  The starting pitching free agent market isn't so hot, and Wolf just might be the second-best free agent starter behind John Lackey.  Wolf is bound to get a multi-year contract somewhere.

Prediction:  Wolf gets offered arbitration

Ronnie Belliard

2009 Salary: $1.9 million

2009 Stats:  .277/.351/.425, 105 OPS+, 1.3 WAR, 10 HR, 39 runs, 39 RBI in 287 PA

2010 Age: 35

2010 Free Agent Status: Type B

Belliard would be a nice player to have back, a right-hander with some pop off the bench.  He can spot start at second or third base, even if his glove scares the hell out of me at the hot corner.  After 2007, he signed a two-year, $3.5 million contract following five years as a regular player.  He is coming off two years as a sub (624 combined in 2008-2009), so I don't think he would get anything more than $1.5-$2 million in arbitration.  I would offer Belliard arbitration, gladly taking either the supplemental pick or Mini Manny for 2010.

Prediction: Dodgers don't offer arbitration to Belliard

Vicente Padilla

2009 Salary: $12 million

2009 Stats:  12-6, 4.46 ERA, 100 ERA+, 4.45 FIP, 2.0 WAR, 147.1 innings

2010 Age: 32

2010 Free Agent Status: Type B

After Padilla climbed his way up the Dodger starting pitching ladder to the top spot in October -- he was the only Dodger starter to make three starts in the postseason -- it would be hard for the club to argue against his worth in arbitration.  That said, Padilla reeks of Jose Lima.  If the Dodgers want him back, it's best to sign him to a deal smaller than he would receive in arbitration.  The Dodgers are already way ahead on the Padilla transaction.  It's better to pick up their chips and cash them in rather than buy in for another round.

Prediction: No; offering Padilla arbitration is the equivalent of shooting yourself in the leg

Jon Garland

2009 Salary: $7.25 million

2009 Stats:  11-13, 4.01 ERA, 111 ERA+, 4.48 FIP, 2.4 WAR, 204 innings

2010 Age: 30

2010 Free Agent Status: Type B

With Garland, it is never pretty or flashy, as his career 4.7 strikeouts per nine innings suggest.  However, Garland isn't a bad guy to have fill out the back end of a rotation: a league average or slightly below average pitcher that puts up 200 innings a year and doesn't miss a start.  That said, if the Dodgers want Garland back, they would be better served to try to sign him to a lower deal on the open market rather than head to arbitration.

Prediction:  No; if the Dodgers wanted to pay Garland anything significant in 2010, they wouldn't have declined his 2010 option.

Guillermo Mota

2009 Salary: $2.35 million

2009 Stats:  65.1 innings, 3.44 ERA, 115 ERA+, 4.12 FIP, 4.49 x-FIP, -0.1 WAR

2010 Age: 35

2010 Free Agent Status: Type B

The Dodger bullpen is loaded as is.  There is really no point to pay anything for someone who shouldn't be higher than sixth or seventh at best on the depth chart.  Fun fact: Mota has the fifth best ERA+ ever (143) by a Dodger reliever (minimum 200 games).

Prediction: The Dodgers will not offer arbitration to Mota

Will Ohman

2009 Salary: $1.35 million

2009 Stats:  12.1 innings, 5.84 ERA, 68 ERA+, 7.93 FIP, 5.68 x-FIP, lots and lots of DL time

2010 Age: 32

2010 Free Agent Status: Type B

With George Sherrill and Hong-Chih Kuo in the bullpen, Ohman is simply redundant as another lefty reliever.  Ohman was hurt for most of the year, and I never got a chance to interview him, which is a shame because from some of the excerpts from spring training he seemed hilarious.

Prediction: No; like Garland, if the Dodgers wanted Ohman back, they would have picked up his 2010 option.

The Dodgers have seven decisions to make by Tuesday night.  I think they should offer arbitration to three (Hudson, Wolf, and Belliard), but I believe they will only offer arbitration to Randy Wolf.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great breakdown

Once the deadline passes we will know if we are headed into a winter of discontent or if the Dodgers really are going to conduct business as usual.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Nov 28, 2009 7:44 PM PST reply actions  

Tuesday really is shaping up to be the day when we will know one way or another just how hamstrung the club is by finances.

On a semi-related note, my family and I had fun at Thanksgiving with McCourt’s claim that (a) his checking account got as low as $167,000 (time to downgrade to 87 octane), (b) before he got a $1 million quarterly distribution from the Dodgers. Just an odd, odd statement.

by Eric Stephen on Nov 28, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Excellent synopsis of the situation

Spot on – litmus text exactly.

Just for expository purposes, the salaries you list for 2009 include incentives (e.g., Wolf), but not buyouts (e.g., Garland)? But for arbitration purposes, such as the 20% maximum salary cut rule – the salary is considered before incentives, correct? I’d guess that if Padilla went to arb (not likely), a 20% cut to $9.6M doesn’t sound unlikely, but is still far too much.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Nov 28, 2009 11:53 PM PST reply actions  

I did some reading on this, and all salary is considered, and the 20% cut rule doesn’t apply to free agent arb types.

I treat buyouts as 2010 “salary”

by Eric Stephen on Nov 29, 2009 12:18 AM PST up reply actions  

If Hudson isn't offered arbitration

The Dodgers should be demoted to a AAA team…

…if we had European soccer-style league rules.

by Capt Obvious on Nov 29, 2009 1:32 AM PST reply actions  

well said, Capt(ain) Obvious!

Better yet, the McCourts should be forced to sell the team (even though there’s no chance that’ll happen). Not offering him arbitration would be beyond the level of “small-market” cheap- it’d be early 20th century, Charles-Comiskey-cheap, and NOBODY should be allowed to own a MLB team under those circumstances in today’s age, let alone in a big market like Los Angeles. Think about it- if O-Dog turns it down, Dodgers get 2 draft picks. If he doesn’t (very unlikely), the McCourts will still be rich, public posturing notwithstanding. It’s a win-win for all involved!

by sarcastro9 on Nov 29, 2009 3:34 AM PST up reply actions  

(this all assumes they don't offer arbitration, of course)

I will gladly recant if the McCourts prove us skeptics wrong, for once!

by sarcastro9 on Nov 29, 2009 3:35 AM PST up reply actions  

…if we had European soccer-style league rules.

I don’t follow. The Dodgers finished 2nd in the NL; no way would that warrant relegation.

Even if they don’t make any moves this year, I still expect them to finish above the bottom 2 in the NL. Just sayin

by Michael White on Nov 29, 2009 7:58 AM PST up reply actions  

They were #1 in the NL

and #2 in MLB under European soccer-style rules, but under management performance they would absolutely be demoted to AAA this year if they don’t offer Wolf and Orlando arbitration.

Plus, it was funny spock.

by Cool Dudes on Nov 29, 2009 7:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Not on performance

sure, but on some hidden ‘self-defeating ownership’ clause.

by Capt Obvious on Nov 30, 2009 6:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Hudson

The dodgers are such a risk averse team. Everyone knows Hudson is looking 2-3 yrs and would not accept arb..so why not offer..?? risk is very low..
But I agree Colletti will probably not offer..sad..

by coloblue on Nov 29, 2009 12:25 PM PST reply actions  

BTW..great summary!!
Also based on your analysis Belliard should be offered arb..low financial risk.

by coloblue on Nov 29, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

yehh

i just noticed how low his salary is.. 1.9 mill.. they should offer arb and i actually think they will either offer beilliard arb or hudson.. one or the other..

by matthewmafa on Nov 29, 2009 1:30 PM PST up reply actions  

It is not out of line with his production. But the point is that the chances are so low that he accepts arbitration that they simply have to offer him arbitration.

If they can’t accept a 5-10% chance that Hudson accepts — which would be a reasonable price for only a one-year deal — then there are more problems than we thought with the McCourts.

by Eric Stephen on Nov 29, 2009 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly

A 10% risk on 8 million is 800k…and it seems the Dodgers are risking way more than that on other options at 2b.

by Capt Obvious on Nov 29, 2009 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

if he did what he did last year, $8m would be a bargain. I don’t know that he would be though, since he wasn’t very good in the second half.

by LA Taco on Nov 29, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Not quite 4 for 1 but I left the Clipper game right after Memphis had drained a three to take a 20 point lead and the Clips were being booed off the court as the 3rd quarter ended. They ended up outscoring Memphis 33 – 7 in the fourth including 20 straight points at one point, led by Eric Gordon.

I left Staples disgusted, but even though I missed the comeback, I decided to celebrate with a Habit Sundae. Sports will screw with your mind every time.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Nov 29, 2009 4:08 PM PST reply actions  

Double header at Staples today

Lakers absolutely destroying the Nets right now, almost up by 30 right before half.

by Capt Obvious on Nov 29, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $10 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/25-5/27 Harrell, Norris, Happ
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/21-5/23 Corbin, Cahill, Saunders
Tbj_pin_small
Memories of the past: Dodger Glory.com
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/18-5/20 Lynn, Westbrook, Lohse
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/14-5/15 Kennedy and Miley

Recent FanPosts

Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VII
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/16-5/17 Richard and Volquez
Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VI
Small
Hey NYC Dodgers Fans
Dodgers_small
Dodger Need Help. ASAP!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $490,000
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 37 Herrera $375,082
3B 6 Hairston $2,250,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000
LF 23 Abreu $401,311
CF 10 Gwynn $850,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

OF/1B 33 Van Slyke $388,197
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
OF/1B 30 Sands $375,175
IF 13 DeJesus $448,992
C 18 Treanor $850,000

SP 22 Kershaw $6,000,000
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000
SP 35 Capuano $3,000,000

CL 74
Jansen $491,000
RHP 52 Lindblom $483,000
RHP 51 Belisario $414,426
RHP 54 Guerra $488,000
RHP 28
Wright $900,000
LHP 57 Elbert $488,500
RHP 60 Coffey $1,000,000

DL 27 Kemp $10,000,000
DL 21 Rivera $4,000,000
DL 12 Sellers $481,000
DL 5 Uribe $8,000,000
DL 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
DL 14 Ellis $2,500,000
60DL 36 Hawksworth $495,000
60DL 41 De La Rosa $485,000

AA 50 Eovaldi $7,885
AAA 56 Antonini $7,869



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout
DFA 66 MacDougal $650,000

Totals
$115,942,869

For more detailed information, click here.

Current 40-man roster count: 42
(incl. De La Rosa & Hawksworth)

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox

Img_0103_small CraigMinami