True Blue LA: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

Mannion Expands Role With Dodgers

Day one of the winter meetings hasn't brought much news regarding the Dodgers, other than speculation and rumors, which can be fun.  However, the Dodgers did announce today that team president Dennis Mannion will now oversee baseball operations in addition to his current duties running the daily business side of the franchise. 

From the Dodgers:

To date, Mannion has had responsibility for business operations, including marketing, sponsorships, finance, ticket sales, human resources, communications and legal affairs. In his new role, Mannion will also oversee General Manager Ned Colletti, who manages the team’s baseball operations.

Mannion is one of the most tenured executives in professional sports. He first joined the Dodgers in 2007 following 27 seasons with the Philadelphia Phillies, Denver Nuggets, Colorado Avalanche and Baltimore Ravens.
 
"Dennis is a seasoned sports executive who has done a great job since arriving at the Dodgers," said Dodger Owner Frank McCourt. "He has already begun integrating baseball operations with the rest of the organization, and today’s announcement formalizes that transition."

I did have the good fortune to meet Mannion during my tour of Camelback Ranch this spring, and even though it was a passing meeting outside the club's offices, Mannion did go out of his way to elicit the opinion of us Dodger bloggers and seemed genuinely interested in our thoughts.  I have no idea how that will affect his ability to run a franchise, but he did seem to have a presence, if that counts for anything.

Colletti praised the move, saying, "I have long believed that both sides of the operation will function better as one - both understanding the challenges each has and working together to celebrate the triumphs as one group. This move acknowledges that and I embrace it wholeheartedly."  But then again, what else would Colletti say in a team press release?

Who knows what effect this move will have on the Dodgers?  It will probably be minimal on the baseball side, but time will tell.

**********

OK, so there is a little bit of news.  The Dodgers announced a few things via Twitter:

0 recs  |  Comment 356 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

For the record

I think the Penny contract was too much guaranteed money, and I agree with Dave that it shows Wolf’s market will be pretty solid, solid enough to know that he would have declined arbitration.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 4:49 PM PST reply actions  

From the Dodgers
In response to whether or not the #Dodgers are “shopping George Sherrill,” Ned says we’re not “shopping anyone.”

But else what are they going to say?

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 4:51 PM PST reply actions  

Not even Juan Pierre? :)

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Did Ned clear that with the business office? Maybe the bean counters want to dump Sherrill’s salary.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

just desserts

I wanna see Martin get paid in arb. And Billz, Brox, Ethier,Kemp.
All these kids risked a Werth injury and non tender..not getting long term security.
If Werth never healed, he’d never have gotten $$$. Thats our kids risks, and we never locked one of ’em in.
Not a one.

by megaballs on Dec 7, 2009 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

The Dodgers tried to lock up Martin

He’s looking like quite the idiot not taking the Dodgers up on that last off-season.

by Michael White on Dec 7, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

true, but he'll get over it

he’s still a millionaire, after all!

by sarcastro9 on Dec 7, 2009 5:36 PM PST up reply actions  

On not offering Wolf arbitration

The point is that they didn’t want to spend the money on the draft picks either, right? It wasn’t a worry that Wolf would be a Dodger — it was only about the money.

by Humma Kavula on Dec 7, 2009 4:53 PM PST reply actions  

They are wide open to criticism

by using the phrase “this was just a baseball decision” though

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Also
Ned also said Ausmus is seriously considering playing next year and they have spoken regularly this winter

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 4:54 PM PST reply actions  

Does it worry anyone else

that Ausmus is the ONLY player that Ned has confirmed ANY interest in?

Its almost like F MC went, “OK, as a personal favor, you can have one grizzled vet Ned”.

by Cool Dudes on Dec 7, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

If the mighty Dodgers are cash poor...

no team is better prepared for austerity.
Hu, DeWitt, DeJesus for 2b and backup INF, XPaul backup OF, Ellis C, McD and Elbert ready to compete with NRI and/or the Juan Pierre loot for 4th or 5th spots.
Hell this might even be the best route!

by megaballs on Dec 7, 2009 4:56 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Added some notes above

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 5:00 PM PST reply actions  

For mwhite

Fangraphs plans to add xFIP very soon

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 5:01 PM PST reply actions  

They also seem to enter a partnership with The Hardball Times.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Right

we talked about that this morning

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

which is why the THT player search takes you to Fangraphs, and the x-FIP is currently unavailable

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Scott Elbert and Josh Lindblom are being groomed for starting pitching roles, whereas James McDonald is “more flexible.”

I wonder why Ned would go out of his way to mention this?

by silverwidow on Dec 7, 2009 5:05 PM PST reply actions  

Starters are worth more in trade than relievers. Or Elbert and Lindblom have a leg up on McDonald for starting spots.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I can’t stomach selling off more prospects, so I hope it’s because they’re in contention for the rotation.

by silverwidow on Dec 7, 2009 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

And is indirectly refuting the L.A. Times story that Dylan Hernandez wrote that the Dodgers don’t have enough starting pitching.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Colletti says nothing too new on #Torre front but that they’re discussing him managing #Dodgers in 2011, then move into a baseball ops role

Also from the Dodger twitter. The future eighth Special Assistant to the GM. Or the fourth Special Advisor to the Chairman?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 5:08 PM PST reply actions  

# dylanohernandez
  
If the Dodgers trade Juan Pierre, they would want pitching in return, Colletti said. less than 5 seconds ago from web

    * Reply
    * Retweet

# Dylan Hernandez dylanohernandez
  
Dodgers: Colletti shot down a report saying that they are shopping George Sherrill. half a minute ago from web

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:12 PM PST reply actions  

Worst cut & paster ever :)

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 5:14 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Colletti said it’s “unlikely” that the Dodgers will sign anyone at these meetings.

Asked if there was a possibility that the Dodgers’ payroll could decrease next season, Colletti said, “Not at the moment.” 3 minutes ago from web

So a $100 million payroll is the ceiling.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Should Colletti be upset or relieved

that there is now a layer of management between him and ownership?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 5:13 PM PST reply actions  

Stating the obvious, McCourt's bleeding this team for personal benefit

While there’s “economic uncertainty”, can we acknowledge there’s been NO dropoff in attendance? Concessions down a smidge?
We have 4mil tix sold with $15 parking, two NLCS appearances, broadcasts featuring Vin Scully and a roughly $90mil payroll…we know the 3s around here. What kinda profit margins and where are the earnings??
This team might be one player away and we go to the winter meetings looking to SHED salary?
Now is time for the FLUSH Dodgers to exploit other teams financial problems

by megaballs on Dec 7, 2009 5:15 PM PST reply actions  

Fox has the TV money.

McCourt doesn’t have any cash

by pdotmac1 on Dec 7, 2009 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

The Dodgers have to account

for arb raises for a half dozen players.

by Michael White on Dec 7, 2009 7:12 PM PST up reply actions  

because of the reality we're facing...

I’d be happy if the Dodgers did nothing. Absolutely nothing. Having a 2nd baseman, 4th starter, and 5th starter making close to the league minimum brings down the payroll, increasing the chances that our potential franchise players- most notably Kemp and Ethier, obviously, but maybe a few of the others- will survive the almost inevitable firesale that is to come sooner or later- hopefully sooner. I hate to even be thinking like that, but we all see how things are right now.

In other words, I’d sacrifice the remote chance of improving the team slightly for 2010 (it’s still pretty good as it stands now), if it means saving money and keeping the “core” of it together beyond that.

by sarcastro9 on Dec 7, 2009 5:22 PM PST reply actions  

Am I the only one

Who sees a giant gap in starting pitching now that Wolf has left for greener pasteurs?

Or is Haegar/Stults just that good?

by Cool Dudes on Dec 7, 2009 6:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Wolf will hurt, but...

I am expecting Billingsley to not have a second half collapse, Kershaw to go more innings with hopefully more command, Kuroda do not be on the DL for anywhere near as long, and hopefully some quality from the young guys like McDonald, Elbert, Haeger, and maybe Lindblom. Not having Wolf’s production is obviously going to be a problem, but if even some of things I’ve listed come true, that loss of production should be offset.

by prosellis on Dec 7, 2009 7:12 PM PST up reply actions  

But when injuries come, there is nothing to fall back on.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 7:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Right, the if everything goes 100% exactly right

and we find out some of our kids are way better than we thought, we’ll have a shot at winning games in the playoffs school of thought.

by Cool Dudes on Dec 7, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think it has to go 100% right

Just some things need to go right. Any reasonable contribution by Kuroda and a non-meltdown second half by Billingsley might be enough to significantly soften the blow of losing Wolf. Since last year’s rotation was rounded out by McDonald/Weaver/Milton/Stults/Haeger, I don’t think it is unreasonable to expect similar performance from some combination of McDonald/Haeger/Elbert/Stults/some other guy.

by prosellis on Dec 7, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions  

That was for the 5th starter spot, which is sometimes skipped. And Ned still felt the need to pick up Padilla and trade (too much) for Garland.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I'd love to see a quality middle rotation guy added

I just don’t think its exceptionally damaging not to. I’m more concerned with a lack of a second baseman, Blake not producing like he did last year, and Manny continuing his post suspension performance. I am more secure in the pitching situation than I am with the offense. So I guess I’m just saying that if I had a limited amount of money to improve the team, I would look towards the offense first.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

I see what you are saying, but I just wanted to point out…

Manny, post-suspension: .269/.389/.492

That .881 OPS was higher than both Ethier and Kemp’s full season OPS. In fact, only nine outfielders in MLB (minimum 100 games in OF) had an OPS that high.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

I hadn't realized he had been that good

Clearly another case where I let my memory speak before looking objectively.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I guess that's where we see things differently

I see a giant hole between the 2.5 starters we have and the 5th starter candiates we have.

by Cool Dudes on Dec 8, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough

I just hope you’re wrong. ; – )

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

obviously Wolf not coming back will hurt

I’m just saying that trying to replace him wouldn’t be a good idea, given the CURRENT situation. I’d rather take my chances with Elbert/MacDonald/Haeger/Milton/Weaver, then pay $8 mil for a could-be quality starter (not like we have that option right now anyway), which you KNOW will be coming out of another area we can ill afford to lose down the road. I shudder to think what that “other area” even would be!

by sarcastro9 on Dec 7, 2009 8:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Thus why the idea of another Ned special (low base, beaucoup incentives) to the brilliant yet brittle starter – Harden, Sheets, et al. – is kind of attractive.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

A lot of things went wrong for the Dodgers in ’09, and they still made the NLCS.

by dsm9412 on Dec 7, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Is it a lot?

  • Manny suspension
  • Kuroda injuries
  • Broxton’s toe
  • Billingsley’s hammy
  • Wade worn out
  • Kuo on the DL early
  • Martin’s weak bat

The Dodgers didn’t lose a whole lot of games to injuries or anything else other than the suspension; I imagine their games lost compares pretty favorably to rest of the majors.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

But of course, they’d LOVE to trade Billingsley. Go figure.

by silverwidow on Dec 7, 2009 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

A surprising number

of people only watched baseball last May.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 7, 2009 5:27 PM PST up reply actions  

JP is a true pro, signing him was not a bad move for the Dodgers. Torre’s mystifying refusal to find a regular spot for the guy, while a marginal producer w/ no heart like Billingsley is constantly referred to as a staff “Ace” is disappointing and speaks to a still backward culture inside the Dodgers. Odd that a proven starter that is all that baseball should be about, should be thrown aside for a LF that is everything wrong w/ baseball. All he does is lead the team to victory when he’s in the lineup- just look at the stats other than HRs. Again, mind boggling that Torre won’t start the guy at least 1/2 time- in a couple of different positions -to keep him on the field. This sends the wrong message to the team and fans when you’re not doing everything to win. No station to station team w/ a slugger(now filled w/ self-doubt) can go very far. Pierre makes the team GO.The Dodgers are a study in wasted talent, wasted money, and unrealistic expectation and reliance on the Schmidts, Dreiforts, Browns and Billingsleys of the world. There are top flight players that refuse to sign w/ the Dodgers because of the shabby treatment they’ve given to(mostly Black) players( remember Dusty, Pedro[and Ramon]?) Dodgers/Torre making a huge mistake if he’s let go. Good luck and full support from this quarter to Juan Pierre no matter what happens. Wanna see him in LA blue & white, though. Is there any doubt that the Dodgers will have won the World Series if Mike Scoscia was head coach, Dusty Baker bench coach, and Juan Pierre was leading off, Furcal batting second, a fat Barry Bonds batting #5,6, and Pedro coming out of the bullpen? Think about it.

Posted by: JEFF | December 07, 2009 at 04:19 PM

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:29 PM PST up reply actions  

There’s a lot of things he’s claiming, but I think the best part is that he’s claiming the Dodgers are racists for not signing black/Latin players.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:44 PM PST up reply actions  

There are a lot ot things wrong with that rant, but just to pick a couple
No station to station team w/ a slugger(now filled w/ self-doubt) can go very far.

Sounds like the world champion Red Sox teams to me.

Then he blasts Manny:

a LF that is everything wrong w/ baseball.
Only to suggest L.A. would have won the WS with:
a fat Barry Bonds batting #5,6
Good grief.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 5:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Jeff you are a dumbfuck

there is so much wrong with this babble i will let me title say it all.

by MammothDodger on Dec 7, 2009 7:03 PM PST up reply actions  

signed jeff pierre, juan's cousin

William Doolittle at your service, a.k.a. will do.

by Ollie on Dec 7, 2009 8:23 PM PST up reply actions  

awful

I'm nobody's fool, least of all yours

by BoulderDodger on Dec 9, 2009 8:04 AM PST up reply actions  

The poll question (Should Juan Pierre be traded?) is specious. Traded for whom (and what)?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 7:37 PM PST up reply actions  

For starting pitching.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 7:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I suppose it says that in the text of the post, but not on the poll itself.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 7:45 PM PST up reply actions  

"a marginal producer w/ no heart"

that sounds like an excellent song title for an indie rock group

by mintxcore on Dec 7, 2009 5:37 PM PST reply actions  

Ian has that covered

Soon to be released on TBLA records :)

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 5:54 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

The Mets are considering a bid of about $6 million for one guaranteed year plus a second-year option for free-agent catcher Bengie Molina, whom they have made their top catching target.

It’s possible the Mets go to two years for Molina. But their hope is that the demand will be limited by a lack of big-market teams looking for a frontline catcher. The Royals, Blue Jays, Rockies and Giants all have catching needs but may not be seen as threats to outbid the Mets.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/jon_heyman/12/07/winter.buzz/index.html?eref=writers

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:47 PM PST reply actions  

This made me laugh.
Tigers seeking offers on young hurler Jackson

The Tigers are seeking offers on fine young pitcher Edwin Jackson, and most executives believe he will be traded. They are asking for young pitching in return. From Seattle, they sought Brandon Morrow and Shawn Kelley.

Edwin Jackson: September 9, 1983 in Neu-ulm, W.Germany, age 25.
Brandon Morrow: Born: July 26, 1984 in Santa Rosa, CA, age 24.
Shawn Kelley: Born: April 26, 1984 in Louisville, KY, age 25

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 5:51 PM PST up reply actions  

$6MM?!?!

Holy crap. Nevermind what I said about Molina playing at 1/2 the price of Martin.

by Michael White on Dec 7, 2009 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

I think any free agent signings the Dodgers make will be players who misjudged the market. Even in a bad economy, teams will overpay for players at the Winter Meetings, like Renteria last year and now Penny. It worked last year with Wolf and Hudson, but obviously there is even less to work with this year than last.

by dsm9412 on Dec 7, 2009 6:21 PM PST reply actions  

Moneyball 2: The Art of Dealing with Delusional Greedy Bastards

The story of General Manager Ned Colletti and his struggle to sign quality players with no operating capital.

by prosellis on Dec 7, 2009 7:04 PM PST up reply actions  

The Delusional Greedy Bastards aren’t the players, the agents, or the GMs.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 7:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m with you on the players and GMs, but I’m thinking agents are usually at least greedy or delusional. If ESPN calls you a “superagent” you’re probably both. Which isn’t to say that makes you a bad business guy.

by prosellis on Dec 7, 2009 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Is Scott Boras really delusional? When’s the last time he screwed up?

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 7:16 PM PST up reply actions  

He doesn’t screw up. That’s the good business part. He was delusional in thinking that the baseball economy is as sound as it once was. I would also say that there is some level of delusion when it comes to the amount of money he thinks his players are worth.

Of course, if I was a supertalented guy, there is no one else I would call.

by prosellis on Dec 7, 2009 7:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Delusional Greedy Bastards

I like that as a band name.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 7:29 PM PST up reply actions  

HAHAHAHAHA. John Kruk doesn’t seem to understand park factors.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 6:38 PM PST reply actions  

Ed Price has news that Wolf may have found a new home
ed_price Hearing #Brewers closing in on three-year deal with LHP Randy Wolf. Trying to confirm

Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a wolf when the wolfbane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.

by Mr. LA Sports Fan on Dec 7, 2009 7:16 PM PST reply actions  

Link here

Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a wolf when the wolfbane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.

by Mr. LA Sports Fan on Dec 7, 2009 7:17 PM PST up reply actions  

A cryptic message from Jon Heyman
SI_JonHeyman
  
#mets were told in meetings that randy wolf has a 3-year offer elsewhere and pineiro wants 4 years. ouch.

Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a wolf when the wolfbane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.

by Mr. LA Sports Fan on Dec 7, 2009 7:49 PM PST up reply actions  

And now it's confirmed
SI_JonHeyman
  
right on the money. the crew offers 3 yrs. RT @ed_price: Hearing #Brewers closing in on 3-year deal with LHP Randy Wolf.

Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a wolf when the wolfbane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.

by Mr. LA Sports Fan on Dec 7, 2009 7:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Good for Randy

this was his last shot at a multi-year deal, he had a great year and the chips fell perfectly for him.

by Michael White on Dec 7, 2009 7:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Time for the Brewers to hand over their 2nd round pick!

OOPS. Nevermind.

by silverwidow on Dec 7, 2009 7:21 PM PST up reply actions  

diamond83
  
RT @SI_JonHeyman gm ned colletti’s new #dodgers contract is for 5 years, through 2014, sources say.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 7:18 PM PST reply actions  

My wild speculation was correct! :)

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 9:37 PM PST up reply actions  

jaysonst
  
Jays talked to Dodgers about Halladay Monday. Looks like they don’t match up,

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 7:35 PM PST reply actions  

Because Ned can’t work that deal without somehow getting the Jays to take Pierre’s contract off his books.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 7, 2009 7:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure he can. He’ll just have to take back Vernon Wells. :)

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

mlbtraderumors
  
Rafael Betancourt Accepts Arbitration http://bit.ly/7Brcp2

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 8:24 PM PST reply actions  

From BTF
143. Dayton Moore is a Big Fat Idiot (AG#1F) Posted: December 07, 2009 at 11:36 PM (#3406287)
The rumored 3way:

D-Backs get:
P Edwin Jackson
P Ian Kennedy

Tigers get:
P Max Scherzer
OF Austin Jackson
P Phil Coke
P Michael Dunn

Yanks get:
OF Curtis Granderson

Supposedly the D-Backs pushed hard for this, and one of the others vetoed.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 8:39 PM PST reply actions  

I read that one on MLBTR, but didn’t want to give it too much credence given that it was posted by Rosenthal.

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

It must be the Yankees wanting somebody else with Granderson. Just getting Scherzer and Jackson should be good enough for the Tigers, and Coke and Dunn are just bodies along for the ride.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 8:43 PM PST up reply actions  

It could have been the Yanks, but getting Granderson for Ian Kennedy and Austin Jackson plus a couple throw-ins seems like a pretty decent deal.

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 8:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh wait, the Tigers are also giving up Edwin Jackson. Okay, they probably want more talent than just Jackson and Scherezer.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 8:57 PM PST up reply actions  

nyp_joelsherman
  
#Yanks left Az/Det talks feeling dead (asking too high prospect cost) and unsure if revisited but clearly want granderson so stay tuned

by Julio Nievas on Dec 7, 2009 8:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Yanks want Granderson but don’t want to give up prospects that would be blocked anyway by Granderson(Austin Jackson). Okay.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 9:02 PM PST up reply actions  

May it’s Kennedy that makes the price too high for NY. I could see that.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Joel Sherman of the New York Post hears that the Tigers were never satisfied with the blockbuster talks.

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 9:29 PM PST up reply actions  

SI_JonHeyman
  
soriano accepts arbitration. stays a brave. team will be slightly surprised. after making $6,3 mil in ’09, might top $7 mil.

by Julio Nievas on Dec 7, 2009 8:47 PM PST reply actions  

That bullpen is going to be nuts!

by Julio Nievas on Dec 7, 2009 8:47 PM PST up reply actions  

At this point (prior to inevitable trades) the entire Braves pitching staff is nuts!

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

agreed

That pitching staff is nasty.

by Julio Nievas on Dec 7, 2009 8:50 PM PST up reply actions  

It will be interesting to see

how the Phillies counter. They were far and away the best team in the NL East. Braves just made that a lot more interesting.

by prosellis on Dec 7, 2009 8:55 PM PST up reply actions  

If only they had some offense.

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 8:57 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah

mccann chipper escobar heyward prado mclouth shoulld be able to score some runs tho.. the one piece missing is a rightfielder and 1st basemen which are 2 of the most offensive positions so imagine if they get great offense in those positions.. they would be a DEADLY team

by matthewmafa on Dec 7, 2009 9:34 PM PST up reply actions  

“YOU LOOKING for me?” says Colletti, calling back and proving he needs no permission to sound like the former PR guy for the Cubs.

“I’ve known Dennis a long time and we get along great. He’s going to let us run baseball and I will keep him informed. I find no problem with this.”

In his new position as Grand Poobah, Mannion tries to explain how it will all work. Boiling down all the corporate gibberish — it sounds as if he wants more meetings.

“At the end of the day, we just don’t want anyone siloed out,” he says.

I don’t know about you, but if it means more meetings with someone who says, “at the end of the day” so much, I’d rather be siloed out.

So Mannion already knows that Simers doesn’t actually want to talk to you. =P

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 8:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Did T.J. Simers ask for the worst photo to show at the L.A. Times website? :)

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 9:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Haha
ed_price
  
#Astros catch break that #Braves didn’t, Jose Valverde declines arbitration offer 3 minutes ago from UberTwitter
jcrasnick
  
With a few minutes left, Astros still haven’t heard on Jose Valverde’s decision. 2 minutes ago from web

by Julio Nievas on Dec 7, 2009 9:02 PM PST reply actions  

jcrasnick
  
Jose Valverde declined salary arbitration, according to his agents, the Beverly Hills Sports Council. 2 minutes ago from web

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 9:06 PM PST up reply actions  

So many relievers… So little time…

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Way to go for Ed Price rebounding against Jerry from that E Jax rumor…

by Julio Nievas on Dec 7, 2009 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m down with Ed Price. He doesn’t spew as much bullshit as the rest of ’em

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 9:11 PM PST up reply actions  

TBrownYahoo
  
Pudge Rodriguez agrees with Nats for $6 million over two years

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 9:15 PM PST reply actions  

Good move for the Nats. Jesus Flores is pretty good and can split time, while Pudge can help Strasburg and some of the youngsters out in their formative years.

by BFDC on Dec 7, 2009 9:18 PM PST up reply actions  

the contract makes Rodriguez very tradeable as well?

by 68elcamino427 on Dec 7, 2009 9:27 PM PST up reply actions  

The rest of the baseball world is laughing at the Nats. Awful contract.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 9:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Because Pudge cratered as a player 3 years ago.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 9:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Gonna be 38
OBP over the last 3 seasons is .297
Shouldn’t ever get more than a 1-year deal.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 9:51 PM PST up reply actions  

So there are worse options than Russell Martin! :)

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 9:52 PM PST up reply actions  

The weirder thing is that the Nats have Jesus Flores, who is pretty decent. He is hurt though, so I’m guessing that Nats signed Pudge because Flores is going to be out longer than they thought.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 9:55 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s Willie Bloomquistesquesly bad.

It's always darkest just before dawn

by Sordid on Dec 7, 2009 10:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I endorse that adverb

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Definition: When a team for reasons unknown to man to gives a mediocre/aging/over the hill player a two year contract.

It's always darkest just before dawn

by Sordid on Dec 7, 2009 10:16 PM PST up reply actions  

An attempt by the Nats to get some walk-up

From the Washington Times:

Pudge could reach 500 homers, 3000 hits if he gets a good chunk of playing time w/#Nats. The draw would be a nice bonus at the gate

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 10:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Although he’s at 2711 hits. No way he’s getting 289 hits in two seasons, at ages 38-39 (216 in last 2 seasons)

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions  

He’s currently at 305 homers, 2711 hits.

I guess its a non zero chance of getting 300 hits split over two seasons. Getting 200 homers? FAT CHANCE IN HELL.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions  

That is so awesome

For some reason I read that tweet as “300” instead of “500” so I didn’t think twice.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 10:18 PM PST up reply actions  

@washtimesbb as @aarongleeman points out, he has 305 HR. could hit 500 in BB and GIDP this year! i’d be thrilled if he got to 500 HR though

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

And, ha! He has 305 homers already.

Lame attempt to justify by Washington Times

by Eric Stephen on Dec 7, 2009 10:16 PM PST up reply actions  

This does not bode well
ed_price
  
When #Cardinals gave Penny $7.5M, it set market and only made sense for Pavano to accept arb from #Twins

Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a wolf when the wolfbane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.

by Mr. LA Sports Fan on Dec 7, 2009 9:40 PM PST reply actions  

Or it bodes very well. It all depends on where we are in the offseason.

Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a wolf when the wolfbane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.

by Mr. LA Sports Fan on Dec 7, 2009 9:42 PM PST up reply actions  

The D-Backs have 10 million dollars to spend Do the Dodgers have zero payroll space?

It's always darkest just before dawn

by Sordid on Dec 7, 2009 10:21 PM PST reply actions  

Yes, we have no money because we’re still paying Fatdruw for his wonderful 2008 season.

by silverwidow on Dec 7, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Remember Eric Stephen said it was a great idea by the Dodgers to split Andruw’s contract until 2014? How great is it now Eric!? :)

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 10:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't remember calling it great

But it freed up $12m for 2009 that McCourt didn’t have.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 5:22 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I hate harping on the same theme, but its really sad to hear the Phillies can go up to $140 Million this year, and despite leading the NL in attendance we can’t top $100 MM.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 7:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Reason #1 why McCourt should sell

Revenue minus Expenses = Operating Income

Operating Income – Debt Service = Cash Flow

I’m fairly certain the Dodgers have a higher operating income than the Phillies, but their debt service is too high and negates any advantage they have (in fact, turning it into a disadvantage).

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 8:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Exactly and hence the reason for the deferred salaries. Frank probably thought he could continually ride the refinance train and keep cashing out as the value of the team went up. Plus he is probably banking on enjoying higher television revenues in 2013 either through negotiating a better contract or creating a Dodgers channel akin to the Yankees or Mets.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 8:59 AM PST up reply actions  

This should be in a FAQ

so whenever someone asks about why our payroll is so low even though we sell 4 Million seats we can just point them to this.

Revenue minus Expenses = Operating Income
Operating Income – Debt Service = Cash Flow

I still don’t think enough Dodger fans have grasped how much Frank has borrowed against the Dodgers to do his capital improvements. He borrowed to much to buy the team now he’s borrowed to much to keep the team. I’m a little surprised MLB let him continue to increase his debt load. This divorce may be painful in the short term but might be the best long term thing to happen to them when they have to sell or have to bring in investors with real capital.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:06 AM PST up reply actions  

There’s even a debt service rule on the books, but MLB only tends to enforce it when it wants to.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Never knew that. I’m assuming there’s no way the Dodgers comply with it, so thanks again… BUD!

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

The debt service rule

might be skirted by the fact the Dodgers might be market valued at 800,000? Leaving Frank in the same position as many home holders in Los Angeles where they were cash poor but asset heavy, but they couldn’t borrow anymore against the asset because the cash flow would not cover the increase in debt load. At least the prudent people at some point stopped borrowing against their houses and still own them, the others lost them. DId Frank stop at a point where cash flow covers his debt service while still able to maintain a$100 Million Dollar payroll? Is that the Million dollar question?

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

That’s the Billion dollar question.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Just to Clarify

The VAST majority of his debt is from buying the team.

The money for capital improvements is a drop in the bucket. It was a classic flipper’s move to gussy up the stadium with granite countertops.

by Cool Dudes on Dec 8, 2009 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

without that flexibility

we would not signed Manny, Wolf, or Hudson so based on Frank’s limited financial ability to increase payroll in 2009 it was a great idea. We will pay the piper in the future but given the options it was the best thing they could do at the time.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 7:20 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Right

and even though deferring money sucks, if you look at it from the point they were at, the Dodgers already owed Andruw $17.1m in 2009. They got him to defer $12m for free, in that they didn’t have to give up anything like more money overall. So at the very least it was “not bad”, especially given the cash constraints.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 8:54 AM PST up reply actions  

cash deferrals

Any time you can postpone money owed interest free, it is a good thing. A dollar now is worth more than a dollar a year from now, so we basically ended up paying FAJ less.

by CarolinaDodger on Dec 8, 2009 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Not when you have

a cap on your payroll. It takes away money from next years team. Not a problem if they had a certain payroll in 2010 and then added the deferred money to that payroll but when they are using the deferred payroll to stay within 100 Million it hurt when trying to build the current team.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

It was great

Because we got O-dog for our last playoff run.

uh, well we got home field advatage throughout the playoffs. Uh, until the Phil’s beat us 3 on the road with 2 home games.

oh, nevermind.

Last O Dog home run = Moral Victory? I’m grasping at straws here. It seemed like a good idea at the time when we signed both Manny and Odog. I’de defer everyone’s contract to get one more go at it.

by Cool Dudes on Dec 8, 2009 12:56 PM PST up reply actions  

And then the four draft picks LA got for Hudson and Wolf to replenish the farm system ……
I really should stop beating the glue puddle.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-dodgers8-2009dec08,0,3986061.story

Dylan Hernandez with a more detailed recap and interview with Colletti.

by Tripon on Dec 7, 2009 10:29 PM PST reply actions  

More Pudge stuff

Set aside for a moment giving a two-year contract to a 38 year old. Here are the top catcher salaries for 2010:

Posada – $13.1m
Mauer – $12.5m
Pierzynski – $6.25m
B.Molina – free agent
Martin – arbitration (earned $3.9m in 2009)
McCann – $5.5m
Snyder – $4.75m
Y.Molina – $4.25m
Laird – arbitration (earned $2.8m in 2009)
Pudge – $3m
Varitek – $3m

Pudge is the 10th highest paid catcher in baseball. Jesus Flores is hurt, but Nats’ GM Mike Rizzo called Pudge “a catcher that could fill in as an everyday guy in the short-term but that could morph into a mentor/teacher for Flores.”

So they are paying starter money for a quasi-backup, with a .297 OBP over his last three seasons. And Pudge will be 38-39 over the next two years. Meanwhile, Greg Zaun signed with the Brewers to be their starter, for one year plus an option for a guaranteed $2.15m with a maximum contract value of $4.25m.

That’s why the Pudge contract is dumb.

And yes, that’s why Martin has a make it or break it year ahead of him.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:28 AM PST reply actions  

And you think

Martin via arbitration is about to become the 4th highes paid catcher in baseball?

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Probably 5th, just behind Molina

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Why isn’t Kim Ng’s argument that Martin shouldn’t be paid more than McCann who is both better and slightly more experienced?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:35 AM PST up reply actions  

That's an easy counter though

the Dodgers can say if McCann were in arbitration, he would easily earn more. His salary is low because he signed a multi-year contract super early.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Small sample size! ;)
Doesn’t matter how McCann got that salary, a comp is a comp. And if he had a crappy season like Martin, his multi-year deal would be for even less.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

This in insane

I was sure Pudge would accept (what I considered) the foolish arbitration offer from Texas. Hey, who knows, maybe Texas offered Pudge arbitration on the wink and handshake agreement that he would refuse it.

Really, Washington just paid Pudge because he has name recognition. Horrible baseball move.

by Michael White on Dec 8, 2009 9:30 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm not so sure

The Nat’s are not bumping up against any payroll ceiling in 2010, they have an extremely young pitching staff who could probably use the benefit of Pudge. While he may not be worth the money in a statistical sense given that it is only 3 Million and if he is able to mentor Flores and the pitching staff why not pay him that if that is what it was going to take to get him to play for a franchise that has no hope of winning in 2010 but could use someone like Pudge. Old catchers to me have plenty of wisdom to impart on catchers and pitchers, we are not talking about a 1st baseman here but a man who controls the game.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Also, next year the Nats will likely have Bryce Harper and if he spends any time whatsoever on the MLB roster, I’m sure Pudge could provide some invaluable guidance to that kid (presuming he remains a catcher).

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 9:49 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree with Phil. Catchers control the game and can often be a plethora of experience and knowledge that gets passed on to the up and comers. I also believe they based part of their decision on noteriety as well. Statistically will his numbers match the dollars? Probably not, but then again the Nats aren’t the most enticing team so they have to make up for it some other way. Reference : big girls just try harder LOL

by VeroJoe on Dec 8, 2009 4:35 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I forgot to include Victor Martinez. He is #3, at $7.7m in 2010. Bumps everyone else down a slot

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

From Heyman (non Dodgers, but NL West)
latest 3-way looks something like this: yanks get granderson; dbacks e-jax, i.kennedy; tigers scherzer, schlereth, a-jax, coke.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:33 AM PST reply actions  

I still don't undestand

the DIamondbacks moving Sherzer for Jackson. That would be like us trading Billingsley for a comparable pitcher. What is the gain?

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Don't know if I would do it

but it is starter + reliever for two starters, which in general is good, but I think Scherzer is the best of the 3 starters

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:37 AM PST up reply actions  

True

but we are talking Ian Kennedy who has been bad more then he has been good in the majors and pretty much just missed all of 2009 with an injury even though it was not a shoulder or rotator.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I missed the fact

they also get Ian Kennedy. So Jackson/Kennedy is greater then Scherzer/Schlereth?

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:37 AM PST up reply actions  

sounds like a coin flip to me. Wasn’t Schlereth rated pretty highly? Is he closer material (I don’t know)?

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:38 AM PST up reply actions  

His stuff looked

nasty to me but he didn’t have great success for the Diamondbacks due to control problems. Maybe the Diamondbacks simply don’t like pitchers whose first three letters areSCH.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Hard to pass up the presidential pedigree of that deal

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:39 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'd do that if I'm AZ

get Kennedy in the NL and he can probably be a 4th starter.

I actually like that trade for all 3. Granderson is a very, very good fit for the Yankees.

by oshea2002 on Dec 8, 2009 9:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Evidently

the Diamondbacks have never forgotten Edwin Jackson’s debut:)

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Scherzer also has 3 more years of club control than EJax. I think I’d rather have Sherzer/Schlereth than EJax/Kennedy, but maybe that’s just me.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 9:50 AM PST up reply actions  

And

Per Baseball HQ:

Max Scherzer (RHP, ARI) has well-known upside, but given his 4.55 ERA and 1.30 WHIP after July 1, many owners may think it’s a year or two away from becoming reality. A closer look shows he posted electric skills during that period: 9.4 Dom, 2.9 Ctl, 106 BPV. This is a budding ace.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I didn’t like facing him.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:19 AM PST up reply actions  

I’ve seen Scherzer pitch twice at DS and he looked pretty impressive to me. I don’t see trading a cost-controlled potential ace – likely to be no worse than a 2/3 starter – for EJax, possibly a three at best, and Kennedy, maybe a middle rotation ceiling. Plus AZ may lose Webb after this season.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I remember an at bat by Martin against him in 2008

that ended up with Martin taking a backwards K and standing there mouthing, “What was that?” Vin Scully gave that little chuckle. I’ve liked Scherzer since. I’m a little shocked that the D’Backs would move him. Haren/Scherzer/Webb (Health?) would be awfully scary.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Diamond Leung passed along a note that the Dodgers are talking to the Rangers about Kevin Millwood.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 9:52 AM PST reply actions  

Gotta be for Pierre.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 9:52 AM PST up reply actions  

I don’t think the Rangers need any more OF so I doubt that works out.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Well, the Dodgers aren’t going to take on a $12M salary without unloading Pierre.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 9:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Remember

they lost A Jones and Marlon Byrd this winter. Hamilton is always hurt, and Murphy is a bit questionable. The current starting outfield figures to be Hamilton, Borbon, Cruz with Murphy in the mix. Since Byrd got plenty of playing time last year it would seem they could slot in Pierre somewhere given the health history of Hamilton. Or they may simply think Borbon is not ready. Plus they always have the DH to work with and Blalock’s health.

Wouldn’t say he’s the best fit for Texas and you’d think they would want to keep all the pitching they could get.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 10:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Blalock is a FA, so there’s a little more room.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:53 AM PST up reply actions  

GREAT deal for Detroit. Scherzer and Austin Jackson are legit.

Doesn’t make much sense for Arizona.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 9:52 AM PST reply actions  

Ryan Church DFA'd by Braves

.813 career OPS against RHP.

I wouldn’t want him as a pinch-runner, but as a 4th/5th OF he’d be fine

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:11 AM PST reply actions  

Maybe they DFA’d him to make room for the impending trade of Pierre for Javier Vasquez straight up!

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Ha! :)

Actually, I think it was to create a spot on the 40-man for Soriano, who surprisingly accepted arbitration

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Talk about a bite in

both buttocks. More money and they lose a decent player.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

Update on the AZ/Det/NY 3-way

Rosenthal:

Revised 3-way prop – Tigers get 2 players from Yankees instead of 3. One of lefties likely out

Ed Price:

#Diamondbacks and #Tigers waiting on #Yankees to sign off on 3-way deal. Answer expected by 2 pm Eastern

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:20 AM PST reply actions  

From Noah Coslov (MLB.com):

Steve Gilbert – Diamondbacks reporter MLB.com says this 3-way deal is very close to getting completed

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

I really don’t understand why the Dbacks are pushing this so hard. I wonder if they know something is slightly wrong with Scherzer or something. He looked like a stud in the making to me.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Sherman says medical records are being exchanged on Granderson. In another tweet Sherman says there’s no deadline on the deal, but one source says it’s “on the goal line.” He adds that removing Dunn from the deal was key for the Yanks.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

No Dunn, done deal?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

this does not make sense

for the dbacks
Max Scherzer is better than e jax and kennedy, but whatever

by hirambocachica on Dec 8, 2009 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

We like trades

that we think weaken the competition.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 10:32 AM PST up reply actions  

I would be happy to see Scherzer out of the NL West, but I don’t understand this from AZ’s point of view, unless they are really high on I. Kennedy.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Well, he did go to USC so it’s easy to see why he is coveted :)

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Sounds like a great deal for Yankees, great deal for Tigers, and meh to bad for D-Backs

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:44 AM PST reply actions  

Totally agree. Even though Granderson doesn’t steal many bases or have the best OBP skills, its not like the Yankees really value that much compared to other teams the way their team is built. Plus they can platoon Granderson with Melky against lefties, and Grandy will surely mash in the new Yankee stadium with that short right field porch.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Heyman
teams in agreement on trade. assuming medicals check out, it’s a go

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:49 AM PST up reply actions  

I’m just jealous of any team that has payroll flexibility and doesn’t have to sell their top prospects so that they don’t have to pay salaries. Imagine the way this team could be built and positioned around the homegrown core.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Its my jealousy that breeds the hate.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 10:53 AM PST up reply actions  

I lol at the red sox

now they need to go out and get adrian gonzalez

by hirambocachica on Dec 8, 2009 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

They've got a lot to worry about

But it would be interesting to see Youkilis playing third full time.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

…. or Roy Halladay

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

If I'm the Padres

I want a whole lot for Gonzalez. He might have the best contract in baseball.

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Can you even imagine how good he could be

with any type of lineup around him? If I was managing against the Padres, I don’t think he would ever see a pitch anywhere near the strikezone.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 10:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Who do the Red Sox have?

You’d have to start with one of Buchholz or Lester, right? Where do you go from there?

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 11:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Start with Buchholz, then let Hoyer pick like 5 other guys from the system. Names would probably include Casey Kelly, Ryan Westmoreland, Josh Reddick, Michael Bowden, Lars Anderson, Ryan Kalish, Yamaico Navarro, Che-Hsuan Lin.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

lester = kershaw ,so no

the padres need bucholz, Ryan Westmorelandand and casey kelly

by hirambocachica on Dec 8, 2009 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Do they have room on the 25 man for Edgar too?

by delias man on Dec 8, 2009 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Has Kennedy been fighting injuries?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

I’d guess his physical is crucial then. This deal falls apart if he isn’t because I don’t think there’s another pitcher to be supplied that makes this deal close for AZ.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Well I guess it will be fun to face EJax a few times next year. Should also be fun to tee off against Kennedy. I really don’t see why the DBacks are so high on him, but maybe he’ll prove me wrong.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

I am going to miss Vin’s overpronounciation of “Shirt-zer”

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 10:59 AM PST reply actions  

…and always mentioning his rare different colored eyes condition.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

A lot of Yankees fans seem to be upset

however no one (aside from Red Sox fans) more overvalue their prospects IMO.

I wonder what DBacks fans are thinking right now.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:06 AM PST reply actions  

I wonder what DBacks fans are thinking right now.

“Hey, Margie, arentcha glad we’re not back in Minn-eh-SOOO-ta and all that snow?”
“Ya, you betcha.”

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 11:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Jim Bowden weighs in
D-backs view Scherzer as back-end reliever long term….which explains their side….Jackson behind Haren, Webb gives them 3 solid starters

By all means, Arizona, keep that scouting department.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:09 AM PST reply actions  

Maybe Jim Bowden is just an idiot. Webb is a FA after this season. Scherzer is cost-controlled far longer than EJax.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Bowden didn't say

he considered Scherzer a reliever did he, didn’t he simply say that is how Arizona felt about him. Don’t shoot the messenger.

Delias will love this but when we traded Carlos Santana, Ned was trying to spin the fact that Santana was probably not going to remain a catcher, completely missing the point his bat will play anywhere but that is what teams do when they trade someone, they have to spin it.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

especially since, who was it, Kevin Goldstein(?), who said Santana’s bat was so good that if he was a 1B he would still be an “elite” prospect.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Great – My eyes just rolled out of my skull.

by delias man on Dec 8, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions  

So is this their push for the playoffs before losing Webb?

I just don’t get it otherwise. Not that it makes much sense anyway, but unless they are hanging their hopes on making a playoff run with Webb I am totally perplexed.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

From everything I can see, AZ made this move out of assuming strong injury risk with both Scherzer and Schlereth… Perhaps they know a few things other teams don’t.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree…some injury risk would be the only way this makes sense for AZ. But that would probably come out in the medical records / physicals, no?

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

You would think so, but dare I bring up the name that should not be uttered.. it also starts out with Sch….. I think there is a pattern emerging!

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

The worst part about that

was that a doctor said his arm was going to explode and the Dodgers signed him anyway.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Some folks on the DBacks blog were discussing the strong possibility of the Verducci effect on Scherzer:

2008 IP: 56 majors, 53 minors so 109
2009 IP: 170.1 major, 4.2 minors so 175
That’s a BIG JUMP in innings pitched. Add that to his already injury-prone frame and wild delivery and it almost seems like a certainty to me.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Over on DT

Eric Enders makes the case for the trade: don’t overvalue Scherzer, who is just 9 months younger than Jackson, throws fewer innings than Jackson, and has pitched worse than Jackson.

If you’re down on Scherzer, this deal makes a lot more sense for AZ.

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 11:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Only Scherzer didn’t pitch worse.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

FIP

Scherzer
2008: 3.33 (in just 56 IP)
2009: 3.87

Jackson
2008: 4.88
2009: 4.28

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Interesting

that Scherzer’s FIP is 3.87 — lower than his ERA of 4.12 — when he had all of those unearned runs that Enders cites.

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 11:33 AM PST up reply actions  

That is a big jump

but wouldn’t the Tigers be aware of that too?

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 11:29 AM PST up reply actions  

You would think. Maybe the Tigers really just need to dump the $10 MM or so they would have to pay since they are saddled with Magglio (amongst others) and that huge payroll for a team in a terrible economic market.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:31 AM PST up reply actions  

It definitely looks like salary dump to me

But they also didn’t hurt themselves too much. I like Granderson a lot, but getting a lot of young cost controlled pitching seems to be a smart way to go if you need to cut costs.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 11:33 AM PST up reply actions  

On the Simers link above

I thought this was interesting:

As for Frank McCourt … he works now out of an office in Beverly Hills. “Frank has had a desire for quite a while to separate himself from the day-to-day operations and focus his time on the developmental opportunity,” Mannion says. “Additional ventures to look at are the development of the 360 acres around the stadium and ballpark improvement. But I should say — Frank isn’t absent at all. He knows everything that’s going on.”

Given that the Dodgers couldn’t raise capital for the ballyhooed DS improvements this off season and last, I can’t imagine that there are any business partners or moneylenders that are hankering to go into business with Frank at the present time. I’ll bet he spends 100% of time consulting with his divorce lawyers and sorting paper clips.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 11:15 AM PST reply actions  

I bet he's working his ass

off trying to raise more money.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

“Hey everybody, thanks for coming over for dinner. Glad to see all of you. Before we sit down to eat, I have a presentation to show you. Have I got a great investment opportunity for you….”

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Up until a few months ago, I worked in Beverly Hills, and often saw Frank eating at La Scala. I think nearly every time I saw him, he was dining with either his wife or one of his sons or some combination of the two. I rarely ever saw him eating with a bunch of businessman as one would expect as that is the reason most people go there for lunch.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Peanut Butter & Jelly now

for Frank:)

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 11:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Did he always ask the restaurant

if he could differ paying his check over five?

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

LOL

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

And my point to that anecdote was to agree. I don’t think Frank actually DOES much business these days.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Interesting take by Jay Jaffe

of FutilityInfielder.com, regarding the Tigers’ side of the deal:

Tigers have $72 million of junk on 2010 payroll, but freed none of it while trading the guys who might have enticed another team to eat $

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:33 AM PST reply actions  

good riddance Scherzer

and jake peavy too, man that dude hated the dodgers

by hirambocachica on Dec 8, 2009 11:34 AM PST reply actions  

Tigers rotation

Verlander
Porcello
Scherzer

Are you kidding me? That POWER pitching at its finest.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 11:41 AM PST reply actions  

Plus they have Bonderman, Armando Galaragga, Robertson and Willis for the 4/5 spots. If any of those guys can bounce back (most likely the first two) that would be a pretty solid rotation. Definitely the class of the AL Central I would think.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Wonder why the D’backs didn’t want more for Mad Max?

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 11:43 AM PST reply actions  

latimes
  
“K-Cup” klatsch: Diedrich Coffee agrees to be swallowed by Green Mountain Roasters http://j.mp/4UXzrA by @latimesjerry RT @latimesbiz

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 11:44 AM PST reply actions  

Did you think this was either…

A) True Brew LA, the coffee blog
or
B) True Bleu LA, the food bog?

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

You never been to Dietrich? :)

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 11:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Nope

just yanking your chain

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Post All-Star Break 2009

Pitcher A: 5.07 ERA, 5.39 FIP
Pitcher B: 5.20 ERA, 4.28 FIP

One is questioned for his toughness; the other is hailed as a solid pickup by his new team

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:46 AM PST reply actions  

I knew there’d be a Bills sighting soon!

by KellyStephen on Dec 8, 2009 11:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes, the Giants offer of Freddy Lewis and Kevin Frendsen is underwhelming.

Lewis being the Giants version of Matt Kemp my ass!

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 11:56 AM PST up reply actions  

hahaha

fred lewis = matt kemp
yet another mcc moment hahaha

by hirambocachica on Dec 8, 2009 12:00 PM PST up reply actions  

This was posted at 11:20 AM PST
A.J. Hinch is talking to the media now for his pre-scheduled availability, and he was asked a question about the development of the kids in Arizona, the young rotation, etc., and he kept going on and on about Max Scherzer’s development as a starter and how he’s an ace-in-training.

I suppose it’s possible that he’s playing company man and talking up Max for purposes of making sure the trade gets cemented, but there’s a definite whiff of “Max Scherzer is one of my starting pitchers, and boy I sure am happy to have him” about it all.

http://bases.nbcsports.com/2009/12/someone-needs-to-tell-aj-hinch-that-max-scherzer-got-traded.html.php

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 11:54 AM PST reply actions  

That would be pretty funny (from an outsiders POV) if he did not know.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions  

If we deal Pierre for an overpriced starter, what are the chances Ned doesn’t feel comfortable with XPaul and he signs RANDY WINN?

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 12:07 PM PST reply actions  

Winn is probably the ultimate Ned guy. He engineered the trade to SF from Seattle years ago.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 12:08 PM PST up reply actions  

There seem to be a lot of “probably the ultimate Ned guys”

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

There are a lot of Ned Guys: people who have a lot of the traits he values in a player. But ultimate Ned guys are more limited: I’m thinking Bill Mueller, Mark Sweeney, etc. Winn is in that group.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Can you clarify your question?

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

How is he a Ned Guy?

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Or more specifically, how is he a Torre guy?

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

*Mid 30s veteran
*Batted .290 during his recent Giants career
*Speed
*He’d love to sign away a Dodger “killer”

I have no idea if he’s a Torre guy, though.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Dodger killer

Maybe he can get Carlos Ruiz.

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

You made the last two up. :)

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

It doesn’t matter how Ned feels. It matters a bit more if Torre feels like he needs a Winn type for a 4th outfielder.

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Fortunately Ned probably can’t afford Randy Winn so I don’t think its a concern.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Peter Gammons is leaving ESPN when the winter meetings are done.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 12:09 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Don’t sound like he’s retiring.

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Gammons has become unreadable / watchable lately

I think it’s his time. He’s such a Sox honk that it’s tough to take anything he says seriously. Per him – they have like 97 of the top 100 prospects in baseball.

by oshea2002 on Dec 8, 2009 12:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Ya gotta think

that somebody is going to hire him. Somebody would want him for his name alone.

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 12:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I would

He just needs a job that doesn’t require him to evaluate or analyze. I still think he is really good at reporting the information he gets through his conversations with players, managers, and owners.

His analysis is getting pretty bad, though. Maybe he caught it from the other guys at ESPN. It might be a condition that will clear up once he gets out of Bristol.

by prosellis on Dec 8, 2009 12:27 PM PST up reply actions  

We need to sign someone with upside, ala Wolf from last year. Nobody expected that kind of performance, but his strikeout track record made him a great gamble.

This year’s Wolf, to me, is Bedard.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I would love to see a Bedard signing, but he is not a Ned guy :)

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Ned guy?

He’s a guy that used to be good but now carries substantial risk, and to get him, Ned will have to overpay for a short contract.

Ha! He’s a Ned guy after all!

…..but is he an ultimate Ned guy?!?!

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

You know who probably is an ultimate Ned guy? Randy Johnson!!

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Ultimate Ned guys have great “makeup”/attitude. I don’t think the Unit fits into that category.

by silverwidow on Dec 8, 2009 12:40 PM PST up reply actions  

but he’s proven and he’s old! Really, really old!!

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Over 40

He fits the Dodger’s target free agen demographic.

Will he work for beef jerkey, sunflower seeds, hubba bubba, and a parcel of the Dodger staium parking lot?

That is the burning question.

by Cool Dudes on Dec 8, 2009 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Too many variables at this point to decidedly say yes or no IMO.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I love all the comments on mlbtraderumors

that say “Jackson sucks but will benefit by being in the NL West.”

If they’d say moving from the AL to the NL, sure, I’ll let that slide. But isn’t the AL Central the worst division in baseball?

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 12:19 PM PST reply actions  

Don’t worry, most of the comments on there are written by complete idiots.

I read somewhere the NL West was in fact the 2nd best division in baseball, while the AL Central was the worst. I can’t remember where I saw it, but the analysis was based on W/L vs. various opponents and run differentials.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Sean Foreman joined the BBWAA

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:24 PM PST reply actions  

Foreman runs Baseball Reference

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Another one of George’s kids?

by KellyStephen on Dec 8, 2009 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Not if he isn’t named George.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Per

MLBTR the Dodgers are only offering one year deals

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 12:51 PM PST reply actions  

To be fair, is there really anyone in the Dodgers’ price range worth giving multiple years?

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 12:54 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Randy Winn? Randy Wolf? :)

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Randy Johnson? Obviously!

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 12:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Randy Newman!

He could perform “I Love L.A.” after every win, and “It’s Money That I Love” after every loss!

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 1:02 PM PST up reply actions  

No

But it’s still pretty pathetic for the Los Angeles Dodgers to be operating this way. I’m sure it will be a one year deal deferred over 5, so that we continue having this problem.

by oshea2002 on Dec 8, 2009 12:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m wondering why Ned didn’t act this way from the beginning. :)

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

because the credit crunch didn’t really take hold until late ‘07, and Frank was so busy buying mansions, he probably didn’t realize there was a financial shitstorm until sometime in the middle of ’08.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree

DodgerDivorce.com has a great post today regarding that – that the club is operating on the margins and missing opportunities.

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 1:03 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I hate to sound pessimistic, but the more I think about the margins, the more I realize how completely F’d we are!

Ned probably won’t even be able to afford a high risk guy like Sheets/Bedard/Duchsherer/Harden because other teams with money are going to be in on those guys as well. Also consider what Brad Penny got.

I fear we are going to get someone like Braden Looper on a one-year deal instead.

Then mid-season, when we are still competing but it is close, Ned will sell off one of Withrow/Martin/Miller/Eovaldi etc. to acquire Jon Garland again (or someone in that mold).

The only scenarios I can see things improving are if the divorce proceedings aren’t as nasty as we all expect, or the credit markets thaw out enough for Frank to restructure one of his loans yet again (which is not f…ing likely).

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep.

I’m in the glass-half-empty crowd. Crazy stuff can happen and flukes happen all the time, but if things go the way they’re looking, it’s just as Joshua Fisher (is that his name?) says: the Dodgers will be competitive in ’10, but things look not so good for ’11 and beyond.

by Humma Kavula on Dec 8, 2009 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Is there anyone in the Dodgers’ price range worth having?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Dec 8, 2009 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

No

I basically agree wholeheartedly with this strategy.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 1:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I always enjoy this time of the year, following the proverbial hot stove and what not, but it is quite disappointing that there really will be nothing substantive to read or talk about with the Dodgers in the headline.

by BFDC on Dec 8, 2009 1:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I am also

I had hoped we could be players for one of Harden/Sheets/Bedard or even lesser ones like Escobar or Dusch…. but it is what it is. Someone like Padilla at four million and a battle between Elbert/McDonald/Haeger/Stults/Lindblom is not the end of the world.

My only real worry is that once again we will use our future to get someone to help in the stretch run when we could have just bought that person now.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Thought this was funny.
The D’Backs offered Chris Snyder to the Rangers for C.J. Wilson and were turned down, reports MLB.com’s T.R. Sullivan. Wilson tweets that he’s “borderline offended” by Arizona’s offer.

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 12:57 PM PST reply actions  

I love the Olney tidbit that we're on "lockdown financially"

My wife tells me this quite often, was hoping for a different fate for the Dodgers

by oshea2002 on Dec 8, 2009 1:09 PM PST reply actions  

We now know the Dodgers paremeters

well it’s s rumor, but it passes the smell test.

The only players we will sign with be 1 year deals for less than what Wolf would have gotten.

It may be that someone decent is available at the end of the FA signing period. Last year people arguably overpaid at the beginning as well.

by LA Taco on Dec 8, 2009 1:27 PM PST reply actions  

ah never mind

I see that the item is for pitchers. As Phil says, given who’s available this is not a bad strategy.

by LA Taco on Dec 8, 2009 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Per Dylan Hernandez, the Dodgers named Vance Lovelace the director of pro scouting.

Lovelace was the guy largely responsible for the advance scouting of the Cubs before the 2008 NLDS. During my Camelback Ranch tour, Ned spoke his praises quite highly, and even said that Lovelace was so passionate about and did such a good job with the scouting report on the Cubs that Colletti had Lovelace deliver the report to the players directly (usually done by the coaching staff).

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 1:30 PM PST reply actions  

dylanohernandez
  
The position was newly created. @Tripon01 Who was the previous director of pro scouting?

Wheeeeeeeeeeeee!

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

The Dodgers are perfecting

the business model of giving titles and promotions instead of raises.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

diamond83
  
Vance Lovelace named special advisor to GM Ned Colletti and director of pro scouting. He was once Gary Sheffield’s bodyguard.

So Vance Lovelance.

- Is named Vance Lovelance.
- Was Sheffield’s bodyguard.
- Maybe the Ultimate Ned’s type of guy.
- Special asst. to the GM.

by Tripon on Dec 8, 2009 1:41 PM PST up reply actions  

He is not named Vance Lovelance :)

by Eric Stephen on Dec 8, 2009 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

No wonder

our prospects all have command issues. I remembered Lovelace as a big “wild ass lefty” and sure enough that is exactly what he was. . He was big time number one pick for Cubs and the price the Cubs paid for our own Ron Cey. Safe to say we did not get a very good return for the penguin.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 1:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I mean - come on

16 seasons in the minor leagues and he had a career walk rate of 7.7 with highs of 13. 2. That is right he walked 13 guys every nine inning and yet managed to pitch 16 seasons in the minors because his K rate was also …. Check it out, baseball reference has how many players he walked every season but no K information. Guess we have to hit the Cube for the full picture.

I’m just glad he’s a scout and not an instructor.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Dec 8, 2009 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $15 on parking.
Start posting about the Dodgers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Underdog1_small
The Unofficial Trade Proposal Thread/Armchair GM Contest.
Lbb_small
Why I Still Bleed Dodger Blue This Morning
Greatlakesloons_small
State of the Minor League System - Center Field
100_1427_small
WE KNOW

Recent FanPosts

31133_910720032651_6028096_49154616_544040_n_small
Comparing WAR for Matt Kemp
Sbn_ds_small
August 1st, Dodgers vs Giants - Simulation
31133_910720032651_6028096_49154616_544040_n_small
Here's the Thing....
Sbn_ds_small
July 31st, Dodgers vs Giants - Simulation
Small
hypothetical question
Greatlakesloons_small
7/30/10 Minor League Report – Dodgers Minor League Teams Go 0 for 7
Stunnayeaaah_small
I'm Dreaming Of A Firm Christmas
Thinkblue_small
A Very Premature Look at the 2011 Dodgers
Molicious_small
Andre Ethier Is Our J.A. Happ
Small
Everyone Chill Out

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

NL West Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
San Diego 60 42 .588 0 Lost 2
San Francisco 60 45 .571 1.5 Won 2
Los Angeles 54 50 .519 7 Lost 4
Colorado 54 50 .519 7 Won 3
Arizona 38 66 .365 23 Lost 1

(updated 7.31.2010 at 9:51 PM PDT)

True Blue LA on Twitter

2010 Dodger Payroll

Pos No Player 2010 Salary
C 55 Martin $5,050,000
1B 7 Loney $3,100,000
2B   Theriot $909,290
3B 23 Blake $6,000,000
SS 15 Furcal $8,500,000
LF  21 Podsednik $640,710
CF 27 Kemp $4,000,000
RF 16 Ethier $6,000,000

SS/2B/3B 14 Carroll $1,350,000
2B/3B/1B 3 Belliard $825,000
OF 30 Paul $264,481
PH/OF 9 Anderson $550,000
C 12 Ausmus $850,000

SP 22 Kershaw $440,000
SP 18 Kuroda $14,100,000
SP 58 Billingsley $3,850,000
SP 44 Padilla $4,025,000
SP   Lilly $1,696,721

CL 51 Broxton $4,000,000
LHP 56 Kuo $950,000
RHP   Dotel $636,612
RHP 36 Weaver $800,000
RHP 74
Jansen $159,563
RHP 37 Monasterios $460,000
LHP 52 Sherrill $4,500,000

DL 5 Johnson $800,000
DL 99 Manny $7,267,760
RL 54 Belisario $173,566



Pierre $4,000,000


Andruw $3,600,000


Schmidt $2,000,000


Wolf $2,000,000


Hudson $1,440,000


Nomar $1,250,000
Ra.Ortiz $349,727
AAA 45 Miller $292,623
DeWitt $264,372
AAA 17 Ellis $222,951
AAA 38 Troncoso $204,590


Ohman $200,000
AAA 49 Haeger $195,393
AAA 47 Wade $194,514
AAA  48 Ely $161,749


Repko $122,951
21 Green $96,175
AAA 59 Schlichting $87,431
Ru.Ortiz $63,934
AAA 50 Link $48,087
DFA 35
Taschner $39,344


Zerpa $35,000
McDonald $28,771
AAA 60 Hu $13,148
AAA 57 Elbert $6,557
AAA
Hoffmann ($25,000)


Stults ($400,000)

Totals
$98,391,060
 
For more detailed information, click here.

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

ST. LOUIS - MAY 18:  Ryan Ludwick #47 of the St. Louis Cardinals rounds third base after hitting a game-winning homerun against the Washington Nationals at Busch Stadium on May 18, 2010 in St. Louis, Missouri.  The Cardinals beat the Nationals 3-2.  (Photo by Dilip Vishwanat/Getty Images) +3 updates

Padres, Cardinals, Indians Complete Three-Way Trade Involving Ryan Ludwick, Jake Westbrook

SEATTLE - JULY 08:  Alex Rodriguez #13 of the New York Yankees hits an RBI single in the ninth inning to give the Yankees a 3-1 lead against the Seattle Mariners at Safeco Field on July 8 2010 in Seattle Washington. (Photo by Otto Greule Jr/Getty Images) +16 updates

Yankees' 9th-Inning Win Completely Overshadowed By A-Rod's Ongoing Homer Drought

Colorado Rockies' Carlos Gonzalez is congratulated by teammates after his walk-off home run against the Chicago Cubs in the ninth inning of a baseball game at Coors Field in Denver, Colo. on Saturday, July 31, 2010.  (AP Photo/ Matt McClain)

Carlos Gonzalez Completes Cycle With Walk-Off Homer; Rockies Beat Cubs, 6-5

More from SBNation.com >


Manager

Eric_press_box_1_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Bison_small David Young

2501_small Michael White

Minor League Expert

Greatlakesloons_small Brandon Lennox