The All-Time LA Dodger Team: The #4 Starter
All-Time Lineup: #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 | #6 | #7 | #8
All-Time Starting Pitchers: #1 | #2 | #3
"And now I know you're dissatisfied
With your position and your place
Don't you understand
It's not my problem"Bob Dylan, Positively 4th Street
So far the votes for our starting pitching staff have been runaways, but these top three are pretty solid.
All-Time LA Dodger Starting Pitchers |
||
| No | Player | Pos |
| 32 | Sandy Koufax |
LHP |
| 53 | Don Drysdale | RHP |
| 55 |
Orel Hershiser | RHP |
Will we have our first close vote, for the fourth starter? To determine the #4 starter, the voting is the same as before, except that Koufax, Drysdale, and Orel are no longer eligible.
Eric's Pick
I'm sticking with Don Sutton, but let's look at some numbers, with Claude Osteen and Happy Hooton replacing Orel on the charts. Here are the top 5 seasons by ERA+
| Osteen | Hooton | Sutton | Valenzuela | Brown | Messersmith |
| 127 | 147 | 161 | 141 | 169 | 149 |
| 124 | 146 | 160 | 135 | 169 | 132 |
| 117 | 130 | 144 | 122 | 143 | 129 |
| 115 | 123 | 127 | 116 | --- | --- |
| 105 | 121 | 121 | 110 | --- | --- |
Here are at the best five seasons using VORP:
| Osteen | Hooton | Valenzuela | Sutton | Brown | Messersmith |
| 69.4 | 57.8 | 54.6 | 62.3 | 82.6 | 84.4 |
| 54.5 | 51.6 | 48.9 | 61.0 | 71.6 | 67.3 |
| 47.2 | 46.3 | 44.4 | 57.5 | 63.4 | 46.9 |
| 35.2 | 34.1 | 43.3 | 52.0 | 32.5 | 1.1 |
| 33.7 | 30.9 | 32.1 | 51.5 | 0.8 | --- |
I think Sutton is still the cream of the crop. However, the first three on our all-time pitching staff have won Cy Young Awards, and the only other LA Dodger starter to win the award, Fernando Valenzuela, is also out there. Claude Osteen actually has the second-highest 5-, 6-, 7-, and 8-year VORP of this group, behind Sutton. For this vote, I'm sticking with Suttonmania.
Phil's Pick
Fernando but I'm feeling sad for Osteen. Didn't he have huge ears like Sutton? Don't a lot of pitchers have big ears?
Who's your pick?
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
The man that gave the Dodgers the key to the rest of LA
Fernando Valenzuela.
Not sure how aware people are, but a certain, fairly sizable, population of Angelenos despised the Dodgers for moving in and tearing down their neighborhood. Fernando made everything ok. Yes this is an emotional pick, but so what.
by mr_blond on Feb 4, 2009 9:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I understand not giving him any of the top 3 spots
But now that we’re down to #4, doesn’t Hideo Nomo at least belong on the balot? His top 4 years (in ERA+) ran 150, 130, 122, 112.
by Malcontent1 on Feb 4, 2009 10:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good point
I’ll be sure to include Nomo in the poll for #5.
His top 5 VORP years:
55.9 (‘95)
54.4 (’03)
50.5 (‘96)
38.7 (’02)
22.7 (’97)
On par with the rest of them, including Fernando.
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Feb 4, 2009 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Chan Ho Park
If Nomo’s going to be in the running for #5, Chan Ho definitely should be. Reading back on a few posts about him in the archives, I can’t understand why there’s been such a negative perception about his performance. If it was leaving to sign with the Rangers, well, the game’s a business. If it was his performance after he left, he had to battle quite a bit of injuries. Park > Nomo for the 5 or 6 games that I’ve seen each of them pitch. Just saying.
by soccerman8 on Feb 5, 2009 12:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Only counting numbers as LA Dodgers
Park’s suckitude with the Rangers has no effect on his standing here.
I would argue Nomo was a better Dodger. Nomo had 3 seasons with 50+ VORP, while Chan Ho had 1 (plus a 49.5 in 2002).
Park’s best 5 years in VORP:
62.7 (‘00)
49.5 (’01)
37.7 (‘97)
33.8 (’98)
19.8 (’96)
Park’s best 5 years add up to 203.5 VORP, versus 222.2 for Nomo. Park did have the best single season among them, however.
I’ll add Park to the final poll, but neither he nor Nomo will win anyway.
-Eric
by Eric Stephen on Feb 5, 2009 12:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kung Fu
By the way, from a white man who by no means is an authority on martial arts, I do believe his kick on Belcher should be called a taekwondo kick and not a kung fu kick. He’s Korean, not Chinese.
by soccerman8 on Feb 5, 2009 12:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Fernando
Simply because the other option was Sutton, and I didn’t want 3 righties in a row and then 2 lefties at #5 and #1. :o
by kensai on Feb 5, 2009 4:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
El Toro
The Pride of Navojoa gets my vote.
by Bob Hendley on Feb 5, 2009 1:23 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Starting early
for Brown over Sutton.
Fernando was my pick here. I get Eric’s Sutton arguments and I also know Brown is too hated to win, but I do think he has the better position for the #5 spot. The only thing Sutton has in his favor is longevity with the Dodgers. I do think that counts for something, but Brown was considerably better at his best than Sutton was at his best. Also, the selection of “best five years” is as arbitrary as “best three” or “best eight” and is really tailor made to put Sutton in the best light.
So, since this is a fantasy team, I am going to put forth a fantasy argument for considering “best” over “longest.” This is the fifth spot in the rotation. This will be the guy that sees the least action. You don’t need or even want a workhorse here. You want a guy that will give you the best performance during the limited time he will be on the mound during the season. That guy is Kevin Brown.
by Paul Scott on Feb 5, 2009 5:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Persuasive
I also chose Fernanado over Sutton, thinking who I would want on the mound. I could go for Brownie as well on that basis
by Bob Hendley on Feb 5, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fernando
I think Sutton may be the best pitcher on this list, but my vote goes to Fernando. When I was 10 years old, he was nearly a god and that counts more than any stat you could give me. An LA Dodger all-star squad without Fernando isn’t an LA Dodger team at all. No matter what I see in baseball from here on out, nothing will ever feel as magical as Fernando in 81.
by IndianaJon on Feb 6, 2009 7:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I find it hard to be objective but I just don’t care. For brief periods Orel and Fernando just dominated and the Dodgers rode each to a World Championship. To my mind they have to follow the first pair. (Unfortunately it is possible each worked so hard in that championship year that they were never quite the same).
by Gen3blu on Feb 6, 2009 8:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 














