Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Fighters React to Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Troncoso Saves The Day For Dodgers

The score may have been the same as Friday night, but tonight's 6-5 Dodger win had an entirely different backstory.

After a four-run first inning which saw the Dodger leadoff batter reach base to start the tenth consecutive game and five straight two-out hits, the Dodgers looked to put away Ubaldo Jimenez early.  However, James McDonald ran into more trouble in the third inning, walking three and allowing three runs.  After the Dodgers padded their lead to 6-3, all McDonald had to do was last through five to qualify for his first major league win.

Well, that didn't come easy either.  After settling down, McDonald allowed a two-run homer to Garrett Atkins in the fifth that cut the lead to 6-5.  McDonald pitched five innings, but had his third straight unimpressive start.  McDonald has seemed good out of the gate each time he has pitched, but after his second inning he has faltered:

Situation IP H R BB K Opp ERA
1st 2 IP 7.0 4 0 1 3 .160/.222/.200 0.00
After 2 IP 5.2 7 10 9 3 .304/.515/.609 15.88

Enter Ramon Troncoso.

The sinkerballing specialist came in the game in the sixth inning to protect a one-run lead, and boy did he protect it!  Troncoso pitched the final four frames to close out the win, getting eight groundball outs and a strikeout while allowing only an infield single in his 45 pitches.

Troncoso's first major league save closed out James McDonald's first major league win, and the save was a notable one.  Troncoso's masterpiece was only the 52nd four-inning save in Los Angeles Dodger history, an average of one per year.

This was the first Dodger four-inning save since Wilson Alvarez at Jacobs Field in 2003, and the first to protect a one-run lead the entire time since Jerry Reuss in April 1979.

When this turn in the rotation comes up again Thursday against the Padres, would McDonald or Troncoso be a better option to start?

Clayton Kershaw goes to the hill on Sunday, hoping to rebound from his poor outing in Houston on Tuesday.  Jason Marquis will start for Colorado.  Ken Gurnick tells us both Rafael Furcal and Casey Blake are expected to rest Sunday, in favor of Juan Castro and Blake DeWitt, respectively.  UPDATE:  Tony Jackson tells us Manny will sit as well on Sunday, for the first time all year, in favor of Juan Pierre.

Oh yeah, the Dodgers are tied with St. Louis for the best record in baseball, at 13-5.

Tonight's Box Score

Poll
Who Would You Rather Start For the Dodgers Thursday Against San Diego?
James McDonald
72 votes
Ramon Troncoso
67 votes

139 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Tomorrow's predicted lineup

Hudson
Ethier
Ramirez
Loney
Martin
Kemp
DeWitt
Castro
Kershaw

by silverwidow on Apr 25, 2009 9:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Aw crap

I just read (via Tony Jax) that Manny is sitting for the first time this year. Pierre in LF (hopefully not leading off).

Poor Kershaw. It might be tough getting run support tomorrow.

by silverwidow on Apr 25, 2009 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bound to happen sometime

I think the revised lineup will be something like:

Pierre
Hudson
Ethier
Kemp
Loney
Martin
DeWitt
Castro
Kershaw

by Eric Stephen on Apr 25, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

It might be tough getting run support tomorrow

Against the Rockies at Coors?

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Apr 25, 2009 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Only two starts better in LAD history

through 19 games:

1977: 15-3
1981: 14-4

Then again, the 2005 squad was also 13-5, but I refuse to be daunted.

by Eric Stephen on Apr 25, 2009 9:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah...can you guys not get greedy and throw us a bone

The Broncos’ collapse and Rockies start is enough to send we fans scrambling to shrinks

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Apr 25, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately

I have to say I hope we sweep you guys. But i do think the Rockies are a much better team than they’ve shown thus far. Things will certainly get better.

by Brendan Scolari on Apr 25, 2009 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

That must be incredibly painful

The draft day show performed verbal mutilation of Raider Nation without hesitation

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Apr 25, 2009 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Troncoso should be running away with the poll

but he’s not.

Seriously, McD is far more suited for relief.

by silverwidow on Apr 25, 2009 9:41 PM PDT reply actions  

He needs the pressure to throw strikes

In one or two innings, McDonald can concentrate on fastball command, while mixing in some changeups. When he starts, he likes to nibble A LOT, which ruins him every time.

by silverwidow on Apr 25, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously, McD is far more suited for relief.

I agree with you

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Apr 25, 2009 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Old Friend updates

Andy LaRoche (MLB): .250/.296/.354
Bryan Morris (High A): Minor League DL
John Meloan (AAA): 6.52 ERA
Carlos Santana (AA): .220/.339/.540

by silverwidow on Apr 25, 2009 10:41 PM PDT reply actions  

And

Joel The Destroyer: .069/.129/.069 (2 for 29 with 2 walks) in AAA

by Eric Stephen on Apr 25, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yikes

Poor Joel.

Bow down to his Royal Thighness.

by the big grabowski on Apr 25, 2009 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tony Jackson also reported

McDonald would in fact start Thursday, rendering our poll moot! :)

McDonald gutted his way through five innings, and Torre said after the game that he’ll be back out there in five days, in the homestand opener against the Pods on Thursday night.

by Eric Stephen on Apr 25, 2009 10:42 PM PDT reply actions  

Joe Thurston MLB .308/.386/.487

by kretz on Apr 25, 2009 11:05 PM PDT reply actions  

McDonald in the pen

I wrote that I believed that’s where he belonged almost two months ago. Tell me if I’m wrong, but it seems he was begrudgingly put in the rotation when other candidates failed to take the job in ST.

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Apr 25, 2009 11:08 PM PDT reply actions  

No you're right.

He wasn’t really a candidate originally.

by Brendan Scolari on Apr 25, 2009 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I voted for Troncoso

He is underrated and has good stuff. His sinker is much better than McDonald’s fastball, which he has to locate perfectly. Troncoso has had good peripherals and I really believe he is a significant upgrade over McDonald. Maybe it’s just small sample size but McDonald has been better in short stints. We can’t afford to have someone go out there and give up 5 runs in 5 innings or less everytime.

by Brendan Scolari on Apr 25, 2009 11:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I’d like tomorrows score to be 6/5 so that Eric can figure out the last time we had three identical scores that were victories.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Apr 25, 2009 11:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Damn you!

I already have 2 or 3 goose chase type searches I need to do. This just adds to the list.

Ahh, who am I kidding? I love it.

by Eric Stephen on Apr 25, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

The last time

the Dodgers won three straight 6-5 games was April 8-12, 2000.

by Eric Stephen on Apr 26, 2009 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

3 starts

And he’s far more suited for relief?

Despite being a starter his whole career and not having control problems like this before? Honestly, it’s not like he’s been getting shelled as of yet.

You don’t go Seattle Mariners and give up on a rotation arm, even a middling one, for a guy who may or may not be better in the pen for an inning.

At what level has he proven he’s better in short relief?

by Chad Moriyama on Apr 26, 2009 4:01 AM PDT reply actions  

OPS against

Starter: .802 (BABIP .222, so he hasn’t been unlucky)
Reliever: .528 (BABIP .250)

It’s a small sample size but you also can’t ignore that his stuff is a touch better in relief as well (more ticks on the fastball). That may or may not be where he belongs long term, but in 2009, it’s where he helps the team most.

by silverwidow on Apr 26, 2009 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with that
That may or may not be where he belongs long term, but in 2009, it’s where he helps the team most.

I’d like to see McDonald do well as a starter, but there’s a point when the plug should be pulled. Based on his quotes last night, he seems to lose concentration in the middle innings.

I don’t have a problem with J-Mac in the rotation, and perhaps the hot start has afforded the Dodgers some rope here, but he has to do better to stay in the rotation, and fast.

by Eric Stephen on Apr 26, 2009 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

You guys are pulling the plug way to fast. McDonald doesn’t have the stuff to just waltz in like our other bulldozer prospects, he will need plenty of games to learn how to start at the major league level. Troncoso has been great but when was the last time he pitched more then 4 innings in a non winter professional game? The idea that he should just step in to our rotation without any professional starts seems absurd. He will need to goto to AAA to get some starts before stepping into our rotation. His arm has no history of being able to handle five innings at the current time.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Apr 26, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Concentration

Is an experience thing. Billingsley looked solid in the bullpen in 2007 from what I can recall.

It’s weird to me, because as a fan of Troncoso for a long time, just a week ago, people have been saying he shouldn’t even be on the Dodgers team. 2 great outings later and he should replace McDonald?

It just reeks of overreaction.

by Chad Moriyama on Apr 26, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

It’s weird to me, because as a fan of Troncoso for a long time, just a week ago, people have been saying he shouldn’t even be on the Dodgers team. 2 great outings later and he should replace McDonald?

Can’t speak for anyone else, but I’m a fan of both guys and want them to succeed right away. When there was talk that Tron was going to be converted to a starter, it was very interesting because of his groundball rates. Since that never took place, McDonald was a good fall back option because of his minor league track record. But it’s all about weighing the upside: do we want a good starter with an average FB and variety of off-speed pitches, or possible impact reliever with a big differential between the hard stuff and slow stuff? I’ll take the latter THIS YEAR for McDonald. If Troncoso can get stretched out to 5 innings or more and continues to get consistent grounders, all while sitting at 92-93 MPH, there’s no doubt in my mind that he’d help the club more as a starter.

by silverwidow on Apr 26, 2009 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

It’s really not that rotation that’s the problem right now though. McDonald/Stults or otherwise.

Troncoso has always come out of the pen, and he’s proven to be good at doing it. Meanwhile, McDonald hasn’t proven he’s solid out of the pen over his career, so why flip flop roles to allegedly address one concern?

by Chad Moriyama on Apr 28, 2009 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Everybody's stuff is better in relief

And his statistics should be lower in relief. It’s been proven that it’s easier to relieve than start. That should be commonsense.

I agree that he may be more helpful in the bullpen because it’s shot right now, but pulling the plug for good and saying he’s more suited for the pen is ridiculous to me.

by Chad Moriyama on Apr 26, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Small sample size...

…doesn’t say the half of it either. What is it now? 8 innings in relief, 12 innings as a starter?

If only we judged all prospects so quickly.

by Chad Moriyama on Apr 26, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's going to end up moot

because McDonald probably won’t get significant innings as a starter once Kuroda comes back. At that point, his sample size as a reliever will go way up.

by silverwidow on Apr 26, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

"Pulling the plug for good"

Sure, that might be a ridiculous assertion. But saying McDonald is more suited for relief in 2009 – his rookie year – is not ridiculous, however.

by silverwidow on Apr 26, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lineup per Tony Jackson

Pierre 7
Hudson 4
Ethier 9
Loney 3
Martin 2
Kemp 8
DeWitt 5
Castro 6
Kershaw 1

Game thread will be up in about 15 minutes

by Eric Stephen on Apr 26, 2009 10:14 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $15 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

100_1427_small
Dodger Blogger Softball Tourney Update

Recent FanPosts

N1209328_7139_small
True Blue Los Angeles Fantastical Base Ball League
Kemp_small
All-star predictions
Img_0247_small
Dodgers.com might have a job opening...
Small
Law Ranks Dodger System #12
Small
DODGERS -- 2 GREAT SEATS FOR SALE
Small
Joe Torre Horrow Show
2011-philly-game-me__2__small
2011 Dodgers Spreadsheet Project
Ed-ak286_scully_g_20091006143938_small
It is time to play - Name the BA Top 30
Small
Are you the Biggest Dodger Fan?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

2012 Dodgers Payroll

Italics denote estimates
Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $500,000 team control
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 14 Ellis $2,500,000
3B 5 Uribe $8,000,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000 team control
LF 21 Rivera $4,000,000
CF 27 Kemp $10,000,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

IF/OF 6 Hairston $2,250,000
OF 10 Gwynn $850,000
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
C 18 Treanor $850,000
IF 12 Sellers $485,000 team control

SP 22 Kershaw $6,000,000
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 35 Capuano $3,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000

CL 54 Guerra $485,000 team control
RHP 74
Jansen $500,000 team control
RHP 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
RHP 60 Coffey $1,000,000
RHP 66 MacDougal $650,000
LHP 57 Elbert $485,000 team control
RHP 36
Hawksworth $500,000 team control

TJ 41 De La Rosa $485,000 team control



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout

Totals
$112,162,432

For more detailed information, click here.

Players on 40-man roster used as roster
fillers until moves are made.

Current 40-man roster count: 40
(not including Belisario)

2012 Non-Roster Invitees

No Player Age*
63 Jose Ascanio rhp
27
61 Alberto Castillo lhp
36
56 Matt Chico lhp
29
33 John Grabow lhp
33
59 Angel Guzman rhp
30
47 Wil Ledezma lhp
31
72 Shane Lindsay rhp
27
62 Fernando Nieve rhp 29
73 Scott Rice lhp 30
70 Will Savage rhp
27
71 Ryan Tucker rhp
25
28 Jamey Wright rhp
37

30 Josh Bard c 34
82 Griff Erickson c 24
81 Matt Wallachc 26
67 Jeff Baisley 3b/1b 29
65 Luis Cruz ss/2b 28
37 Josh Fields 3b 29
64 Lance Zawadzki if 27
56 Cory Sullivan of 32

*Age on June 30, 2012

NRI count: 20

For more info, click here.


Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox