A Look At The Mets With Amazin' Avenue
The Dodgers are set to play their first three games at Citi Field, the brand new home of the Mets, starting tonight. To give us some insight on the Mets, Eric Simon, Grand Poobah of Amazin' Avenue, was kind enough to answer some questions regarding the Mets, the Dodgers, and the concept of Grission:
1) What are your early impressions of Citi Field? How has it affected play this season?
From a fan's perspective it's a gorgeous park and a great place to watch a ballgame. There are plenty of good places to eat and lots of things to do with kids. Baseball-wise, it's a whole lot tougher on home runs than was Shea, a mild pitcher's park in its own right. The dimensions are cavernous and the outfield walls are sky-scraping, but Citi doesn't so much suppress run scoring as it transforms home runs into lesser hits, mainly doubles and triples. There are rumors that David Wright has adjusted his swing to accommodate the park, which could explain his lack of home runs on the road.
2) Citi Field has the Jackie Robinson Rotunda. Anything honoring Robinson is great, but are there any reservations that Robinson is honored at the Mets' home stadium rather than, perhaps another Met?
I think the Mets could -- and probably will -- do more to honor Mets of yore at Citi Field, either by naming sections of the park for them, erecting statues, creating retrospectives, etc. The Mets have a relatively short history but plenty of interesting stories to tell and I would like to see them embrace that more at Citi Field. As for the Jackie Robinson Rotunda, I have zero qualms about it. Robinson may have played his whole career with the Dodgers at Ebbets Field in Brooklyn -- the park that inspired much of Citi's architecture -- but he was a treasure for all of baseball and I'm quite pleased with the Mets remembering him in this way.
3) How concerned are you about David Wright sitting on five home runs at the halfway point of the season? Also, his .435 BABIP seems awfully high, and has contributed to his .329/.415/.475 (through Saturday) line. Do you think his power will return as his BABIP regresses?
Definitely concerned. I laughed off the lack of homeruns a month or two ago with the customary "small sample size" and "he's a slow starter" routine, but I would have expected him to come around in the power department by now. Then again, Citi Field has robbed him of six homeruns this season, and eleven homeruns at the break are a little more reassuring than five.
His BABIP should definitely regress a bit (his line drive rate would put it around .390 instead of .435), and I think the homeruns will return to some extent (I don't know that there's any correlation between the two, however). We can debate the merits of lineup protection all day long, but there would certainly be less pressure on Wright if he had guys like Carloses Delgado and Beltran back in the lineup.
4) What moves, if any, should the Mets make at the trading deadline?
I would be prepared to move impact prospects in a deal for a superstar who is signed beyond 2009 and low-grade organizational filler for decent veterans who might only help this season. This approach may be unrealistic, and if so, the Mets should pass. After years of relative barrenness the Mets finally have a good group of players in and around Double-A (Triple-A is a dumping ground for has-beens and never-will-bes) and I'd hate to see them dump two or three of their young players for Jason Marquis, e.g.
In terms of their needs, a lot depends on the health of their fallen stars. They could use a power bat who can play first base and corner outfield; they could use another rotation arm or two; they could also use some bullpen reinforcements.
5) What is the latest injury news on Jose Reyes, Carlos Beltran, and/or Carlos Delgado. Given that the Mets have had significant missed time from the regulars at 1B, SS, and CF, is the 39-42 record easier to accept, especially since the club is still within four game of the division lead?
Reyes will apparently start light running soon (if he hasn't already) and could return in early August. Ditto Beltran. Delgado hasn't even begun swinging a bat so his timetable for return is still unknown. Interestingly, Billy Wagner, who underwent Tommy John surgery near the end of last season, may be ready to return before all of them.
Given the teams the Mets have put on the field this year in the absence of their fallen stars, I can much more easily accept the fact that they're not where we thought they would be. They're missing three of their four best hitters, two of their top four starters, plus their setup man. On the other hand, the guys they have out there now have played sloppily and uninspired, which makes losing tougher. I can accept losing because of inferior talent, but losing because of embarrassing defense and shoddy baseball fundamentals is hard to swallow. Get these kids some Tom Emanski videos, stat.
6) What should the Dodgers expect from the scheduled starters during this series (Mike Pelfrey, Oliver Perez, and Livan Hernandez)?
Groundballs, walks, and a steep craft services bill, respectively.
7) What do you think will be the Mets' fans reaction to Manny Ramirez? If you had a vote, would you cast a vote for Manny for the Hall of Fame?
I suspect they'll boo, but that's kind of their thing. Mets fans have an astonishing level of self-entitlement and booing often and aggressively is probably their favorite way of expressing it. Personally, I'm firmly ambivalent about steroids in baseball. I'm not outraged by their use and I refuse to demonize players like Manny Ramirez, Barry Bonds et al the way the mainstream media has. Maybe I'm on an island here, but I'd rather see players on the field and hitting homeruns than recovering from injury and hitting lazy flies to left. The argument that steroid use by ballplayers sets a bad example for kids is a fair one, but you'll have a helluva time convincing me that PEDs are bad for baseball because empirically it just isn't the case. To answer your question: Yes, Manny to the Hall of Fame.
8) I just finished Darryl Strawberry's autobiography, Straw: Finding My Way (review here). Have you read the book, and if so, what did you think of it?
It's sitting on my table in queue behind a couple of other books. We can compare notes once I've gotten to it.
9) What are your impressions of the Dodgers this season? Who is our most Grissioned player?
They've been very impressive. The pitching has been remarkable and the offense has been surprisingly potent considering Casey Blake has been their best hitter. Despite still being an active player, Juan Pierre has already been inducted into the completely imaginary Grission Hall Of Fame (GHoF, pronounced "foff"). All of that grission is what makes the Dodger offense go.
**********
Thanks, Eric. I'm looking forward to a great series.
Pitching Probables:
Tuesday: Clayton Kershaw (5-5, 3.59 FIP) vs. Mike Pelfrey (6-3, 4.10 FIP)
Wednesday: Hiroki Kuroda (3-4, 3.41 FIP) vs. Oliver Perez (1-2, 4.68 FIP)
Thursday: Randy Wolf (3-3, 4.24 FIP) vs. Livan Hernandez (5-4, 6.04 FIP)
Tom Emanski photo courtesy of The Onion
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Any take on these Halladay rumors?
Of course, Rosenthal is up with his usual nonsense about trading our elite pitchers.
Anyway, as much as I like Doc, I hope Ned aims lower. There are middle of the road guys to be had.
The Indians got LaPort and another minor leaguer for CC
and CC was on par with Doc at the time of his trade other then the fact Doc has one additional year which will add to the price. Toronto can talk all they want about they would need a kings ransom for Doc but a few top of the line prospects is all they should expect. No one trades cheap bonafide major leaguers in mid – season deals for soon to be free agents, no matter how good they are. Bartolo Colon was the biggest coup (June 27, 2002: Traded by the Cleveland Indians with Tim Drew to the Montreal Expos for Cliff Lee, Brandon Phillips, Grady Sizemore and Lee Stevens) and it was still all minor leaguers except for the salary dump of Lee Stevens.
Toronto is in a unique situation in that they aren’t really rebuilding, they also have a small window. I don’t see how they can trade Doc, and expect to compete at a higher level. Rebuilding I understand, trading your ace while trying to get better, I don’t. I doubt if Riccardi can pull it off, he will screw it up.
You can start with Kemp, Chad, Kershaw off the table.
No team in the current economic situation is going to trade cheap all-star value for a free agent after 2010. They have an outfield of Rios/Wells/Lind so they don’t need Andre. They have an infield of Overbay, Hill, Scutaro, Rolen so nobody in our infield is any better then that infield. I’d trade them Martin but I doubt they’d be interested as the centerpiece for Doc. So it still comes down to our young pitching that is not off the table that is close to being major league ready. McDonald, Elbert, Lindblom I’d part with for Doc but I don’t see how that gets it done for Toronto. Other then DeWitt I doubt we have any young players ready to step in and produce at the major league level. DeJesus could be added for when Scutaro comes back to earth.
I find it hard to see a fit between our two teams. Maybe Riccardi will trade Doc and Wells as a package to unload the horrible contract of Wells. In that case the Yankee’s are the perfect fit because they could actually use Wells and they have a plethora of young pitchers like Hughes who could come back to the them but they can’t hand the Yankee’s a championship like that.
Another thing to keep in mind
Ned’s history suggests he only trades 2 players most of the time. So these 5 or 6 player blockbusters have just about zero chance of happening.
That seems like an odd trend to assign any kind of significance to.
by Eric Stephen on Jul 7, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Isn't it strange
that we got Manny for LaRoche/Morris and yet the asking price for Doc who couldn’t possibly have the same impact would be a rape of the prospects.
Somethings never change though. Hughes and Bucholz are mentioned as the centerpiece for deals with the Sox and Yankee’s, in the same breath as Chad and Clayton. That is the kind of thing that should be put to rest. It would be like comparing Maybin to Kemp.
McDonald, DeWitt, DeJesus would be OK with me.
by Eric Stephen on Jul 7, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd be fine with that too
And perhaps I’m a bit biased, but I can’t see the BlueJays getting more than that—considering the sort of “blockbuster” deals that have cleared the market in recent history.
by Michael White on Jul 7, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Nice questions Eric.
I liked the answer about the matchups. I could see us sweeping this series, the current Met rotation and lineup is Nat like.
I hope Ryan Church doesn’t get a chance to touch third again :)
by Eric Stephen on Jul 7, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions
I always feel confident against Livan, but of course last time we faced him he allowed one run in 7 IP. Of course we did win that game, but still…
by Eric Stephen on Jul 7, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm not sure which is the more obscure reference ....
“The Poobah of Amazin’ Avenue”, or “the concept of Grission”?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
all I know is that I feel old now because I know what a Poobah is …

by 













