So Far, So Good For Sherrill
by Eric Stephen on Aug 19, 2009 7:00 AM PDT
in News
Email
Print
Since George Sherrill has donned his number 52 Dodger uniform -- a number he acquired at the cost of a laptop computer to James McDonald, per Dylan Hernandez of the LA Times -- he has done his job. Nine times he has entered a game, and he has yet to allow a run. He did allow an inherited run to score last night, charged to James McDonald's ledger, but that was the first inherited runner Sherrill allowed to touch home plate in six opportunities.
Opposing batters are hitting .206/.289/.294 against Sherrill as a Dodger, and his stinginess is approaching a Dodger record. Since moving to Los Angeles in 1958, the Dodgers have only had four other pitchers start their Dodger career with as many as nine straight appearances without allowing a run:
| Pitcher | Year(s) | Gms | IP | H | R | BB | K | WHIP |
| Steve Wilson | 1991-92 | 15 | 10.2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0.844 |
| Dave Stewart | 1978-81 | 11 | 17.1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 0.923 |
| Brad Clontz | 1998 | 9 | 11.2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0.257 |
| Chin-hui Tsao | 2007 | 9 | 10.2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0.281 |
| George Sherrill | 2009 | 9 | 9.2 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 1.138 |
There will be a point when George Sherrill gives up a run. That is to be expected. But as someone who has been death to lefties over his entire career -- opposing left-handed batters have hit .163/.225/.266 against Sherill -- Sherrill figures to be a valuable piece of the Dodger bullpen for some time.
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm glad that Sherrill has done so well so well
But if Broxton had walked Brendan Ryan with Albert Pujols on deck in the eighth inning, people would have gone nuts. During the Sherrill honeymoon period, Sherrill does it and no one blinks. Broxton gets Pujols out, and no one will remember.
Dodger fans are understandably frustrated
At Broxton’s road performance. A 1.61 road WHIP will bring out the buzzards.
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 8:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Broxton's BABIP on the road is .315
compared to home BABIP of .182. Perhaps a little bit unlucky, no?
And people have mentioned to you several times that there are two outliers in the road appearances when we know that Broxton had the injured toe.
by Michael White on Aug 19, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions
I know. I saw the game in San Diego.
I was sitting twenty feet away from the radar gun. But he hasn’t exactly won our confidence back in his August road appearances, when everyone (except idiots like myself) has seemed relatively confident that the toe isn’t an issue. As for BABIP, let’s hope Haeger stays “lucky”.
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m not confident his toe is not an issue. How could I be? I’m not his doctor, and the team has not disclosed any information suggesting his toe is unhealthy. Considering the road woes you are speaking to could just as easily be explained by the normal ebbs and flows of a season, I’m not willing to go through a progession of:
1) Broxton is not pitching well on the road
2) So therefore he must be injured.
If he is injured, then action should be taken. But if his toe is the issue, is their any logical reason that it would only effect him in road stadiums? Or is a more likely explanation that these are normal fluctuations during a long season.
by Michael White on Aug 19, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions
If you can find an equivalent road/home split
In terms of WHIP or ERA currently active in the majors with over 40 innings pitched, I’d be curious to see it.
Is there a road/toe connection? No idea.
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make
2 of the poor road starts are explained by injury. If he is injured now then we would all agree to take action. But the point of analyzing stats is for their predictive value. So therefore if he is healthy now those appearances he made on the road when unhealthy would have very little predictive value and you shouldn’t be putting too much weight on it.
by Michael White on Aug 19, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions
Right, exclude the SDG and MIL game in early July
Starting with July 29, he has been a disaster on the road. Anyhow, enough negativity for the early morning. Sherrill is great, kudos to Ned & co.
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Starting with July 29, he has been a disaster on the road.
That’s only 4 games. I’m fairly confident that every pitcher has had a stretch of 4 bad road games in a row.
by Michael White on Aug 19, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions
they weren't in a row
the blown saves are sprinkled throughout, like a fine donut… speaking of donuts, that’s what I should be doing at 9AM instead of questioning the abilities of a guy who could crush my spine with his pinky…
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Your claim is that he is been a disaster since July 29th on the road. There have been 4 road games that Broxton has appeared in since July 29th. And now you are conceding that he wasn’t even a disaster in all of them, but that the poor appearances were sprinkled in those 4.
by Michael White on Aug 19, 2009 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm surprised you are trying to debate this
he’s a closer where bad games sprinkled in with good games is not okay. He needs to be good almost all of the time, that is why he gets the ball in the 9th. Being good most of the time is not the criteria I expect of my closer.
Sherrill is not the answer he would also drive us crazy, Broxton is the answer but that doesn’t mean I can’t expect him to be better at his job. That doesn’t mean I can’t hope for a Nathan like performance. He has the stuff, he has no physical reason for not being an elite closer the whole season not just parts of it. The defenders of Broxton talk about him like he was already Joe Nathan. If we are going to talk about Broxton like he is Nathan then he needs to perform like he is Nathan. A guy who has only given up runs five times all year and multiple runs only twice.
At this point Broxton is a solid closer, not a great one and not a lousy one. He’s okay, both sides should agree he’s not terrible and he’s not elite.
Since becoming a closer, Broxton and Nathan are remarkably similar across the board.
by Eric Stephen on Aug 19, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Even factoring in Broxton's performance on the road
he still has the best FIP on the team.
by Michael White on Aug 19, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions
That stat
Makes we wish Joe Nathan was a Dodger
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions
He should have the best FIP on the team
every closer should. They pitch one inning at at time for Christ’s sake. They should have the best WHIP, ERA, FIP and every other ratio stat. What is his FIP compared to his peers not his teammates? His WHIP, his ERA?
I don't follow
why should a closer have better stats? Yes, the pitch one inning at a time but one bad outing is harder to statistically remedy. Starters have more chances to rebound and normalize their stats. And plenty of other pitchers throw 1 inning or less too. Set up men, LOOGYs, almost all bullpen guys except mopup/long relief.
by Michael White on Aug 19, 2009 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Your really asking?
Take a look at historical rate stats and you will see them dominated by relief pitchers not the elite starters.
For this year:
FIP
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=30&type=1&season=2009&month=0
Sure Lincecum and Grienke will sneak in there because they are having Cy Young seasons but for the most part these leaderboards will be dominated by top of the shelf relief pitchers.
WHIP
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=30&type=1&season=2009&month=0
K/9
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=30&type=1&season=2009&month=0
And in that context for the season he’s damn good.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=rel&lg=all&qual=y&type=1&season=2009&month=0
However in the last 30 days he’s not even on the leaderboard.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=rel&lg=all&qual=y&type=1&season=2009&month=3
And that last 30 days of performance is really all we care about, not what he did in April/May/June when we say, he makes us nervous.
one last (positive) comment
If FIP means anything, Feliz has had a smokin’ debut for the Rangers. I really hope they make the playoffs, that franchise has been waiting for a great season for a half century.
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions
No pennants in 50 years
while being the namesake of a truly crappy team. And in a 4-team division for the past ten without a single div win… that monster A-Rod contract… getting nothing out of that crazy home runs scored/allowed record they had a few years ago… it is kind of like they never have…
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions
I do hope they
win the Wild Card, them or the Rays, but blowing that lead against Boston the other day did not help them any. They rarely have been able to end August in contention but as you said Feliz has given the bullpen a huge shot in the arm. Right now with Feliz, Wilson, Francisco they have an excellent back end the problem will be getting the ball to them. By the end of the year I’ll be surprised if they are not 10 games behind the Angels and five games off the Wild Card considering the rotation they are using.
I've never been a Padilla believer
so that was one recent move in the right direction. pecota agrees with you – 88 for TEX and 93 for BOS (96 for ANA).
of course, I’d really love to see them luck into the pennant, because I know our bats would crush those starters.
by stillnotah8er on Aug 19, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m fairly certain that my position on Broxton is clear. I didn’t intend this piece to be a “Sherrill for Closer” campaign piece; I was just interested that he has yet to give up a run (lucky or not) in nine straight appearances, and just how rare that was.
I understand your position – I was more discussing Dodger fans at large. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
No problem. I agree with your point though.
by Eric Stephen on Aug 19, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Broxton has struggled in Aug but
last night will go a long way to quieting the fans, however it is not their over active imagination that makes them uneasy these days when he comes in. He’s made seven appearances in Aug and given up runs in 3 of them moving his ERA from 2.77 to 3.12 with an OPS against of over .800. From the point of June 16th when he had an ERA of 1.36 he has given up at least two runs five times which is a lot when you only pitch one inning at a time. He’s not so perfect that I’d have any problem mixing and matching instead of always just giving him the ball in the 9th. When you have guys like Kuo, Sherrill, and Broxton I don’t see why they can’t be picked for the job at hand. Kuo has given up a run on in only one appearance in Aug, Sherrill zero. Broxton was lights out early in the year, that is not the case now, so just give me the best man for the job.
I’ve got nothing against Sherrill and Kuo, I’m just talking about a double standard in how they are treated.
That being said, when Sherrill blows his first save – not that I’m rooting for it to happen – things will recalibrate.
I saw the double standard
when anyone complained back in April/May but I think anyone who complains about being nervous when Jon enters a save situation right now has a right to be nervous.
It's still a double standard
It’s one thing to be nervous. It’s another thing to shout that he can’t do the job.
There are gradations and I’m not saying everyone shouts, but let’s face it, relative to his ability and overall career performance, Broxton has always been on a shorter leash with some people than other pitchers have been.
It’s almost as if those people are eager to see him fail so they can jump on him, and they are very reticent about crediting him when he does well. That was a big at-bat with Pujols and there was hardly a peep about it.
Well he is following the footsteps
of Saito/Gagne/Shaw. If he had followed Scott Radinsky he’d be considered a god.
Shaw?
“One of these things is not like the others…” :)
by Eric Stephen on Aug 19, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Shaw = good
Saito = great
Gagne = transcendent
by Eric Stephen on Aug 19, 2009 2:02 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Agreed. And all this thinking this morning led me to write a Broxton piece too.
by Eric Stephen on Aug 19, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions
It's too bad Fernando Valenzuela doesn't make that list
He went 12 game and 34 1/3 innings before allowing his first earned run, sullied only by two earned runs in the second inning of his major-league debut. And it wasn’t like he got lit after there should have been three outs. The inning went like this:
- with one out, a batter reached on an error by Ron Cey and advanced on a balk.
- an infield single moved up the runner.
- the first run scored on an error by Derrel Thomas (at SS), the previous batter advanced to third [should be three outs with no runs at this point]
- sacrifice fly, second run scored
- fly out.
Those last four batters were Sarge Matthews, Bob Horner, Chris Chambliss, Dale Murphy. Not bad.
His start almost made me want to use earned runs, but I decided against it.
by Eric Stephen on Aug 19, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
In Association With
Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
- Josh Hamilton on public relapse: ‘It was just wrong. That’s all it comes down to.’
- Photo: The Marlins’ ridiculous-looking home run sculpture is almost complete
- Yankees GM Brian Cashman lures alleged stalker into police dragnet
- Report: Josh Hamilton had a relapse with alcohol
- Happy Birthday Boy! Wes Ferrell, the best-hitting pitcher of all-time, would be 104
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
