Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Everybody slumps, even Mannywood

Back when I made the con argument in the sign Manny Ramirez debate I pointed to a slump he had in 2008 that if it had happened when he became a Dodger would have changed our perception. Lost in 600 at bats are many ups and downs for hitters and pitchers, and contrary to popular belief even the best hitters have these ups and downs including our own Manny Ramirez.

As Manny struggles, many will now point to steroids as being the cause for our Mannyman showing signs of weakness. I'm not here to dispute those claims but the sample size is much much to small to start talking about such things, I'm just going to point out that as recently as 2008 Manny Ramirez was a mortal hitter. From May 1st to May 23rd of 2008, Manny had 89 plate appearances which produced an awful slash line of .195/.303/.312/.615 with only eight runs batted in.

Slumps happen, Manny is in one, the question isn't will Manny hit again, the question is are we going to get Mannywood when he does emerge from this slump, or a 37 year old left fielder who already gave his best last Sept and our expectations should be tempered knowing he's a 37 year old left fielder who would be bucking history if he was to continue to be the force we have seen in the recent past. 

Then again HOF's have a way of bucking history, that is why they are unique, that is why Ted Williams leads the leaderboard when we look at offensive performances from left fielders at an advanced age who were not known steroid users Manny is now a known steroid user, not only recently, but as far back as 2003. Does this change the equation of expectations? Probably, but to what degree I can't even begin to guess so we will have to let the games play to find out what he can and can't do.

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

fwiw,

(and it might not be much) both Ned Colleti and Mitch Kupchack are going to be interviewed today on the Cowherd show.
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Aug 4, 2009 9:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Colletti will be on Jim Rome sometime after 9:30am too

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hm...

His bat speed is the same. I think the whole steroid thing is just getting into his head a bit. He’s home now, he hit a nice double yesterday. He’s in a slump. Normal. Pujols in a slump right now, no one talking about him. Slumps happen. Everyone settle down…

by PHAT JULIO on Aug 4, 2009 9:26 AM PDT reply actions  

BTW

Ned Colletti on Jim Rome, 570 KLAC. NOW

by PHAT JULIO on Aug 4, 2009 9:30 AM PDT reply actions  

Here is the link, if anyone wants to listen (currently in commercial).

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Did he say the usual stuff? Like, it’s a baseball “season”, not a baseball “week” or “month”.
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Aug 4, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mostly…talked up Sherrill, and also was asked about the 2003 list, and he said he just wished MLB could get behind it. He said Manny is just slumping, nothing physically wrong with him (hand).

Ned is on Cowherd right now, I missed the first part. I believe they even talked Vick. They are talking about how much background checking you have to do before acquiring a player. He said back in the old days, it used to be only about talent, and now “by the time you get to the talent part, you have already checked off 8 or 9 other things.”

“When I started, the highest paid Cub was Bill Buckner, making $400,000.”

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fairly amazing stat

fom Buster Olney and ESPN:

“Hoffman has now faced 134 batters with the bases loaded. He has allowed ZERO grand slams (and only 21 hits). He has now been in the following situation six times — team ahead by one run, bases loaded, two outs in ninth inning. On all six occasions, he has gotten the hitter out, including both times this season.”

For flashback purposes, those other five occasions were:

   1. July 8, 2009, versus Cardinals (Yadier Molina grounded out)
   2. April 3, 2002, at Diamondbacks (Steve Finley popped out)
   3. May 22, 2000, versus Mets (Mark Johnson flew out)
   4. July 31, 1998, at Expos (Brad Fullmer struck out)
   5. June 6, 1995, versus Phillies (Gary Varsho flew out)

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 10:32 AM PDT reply actions  

i think he caught something from david ortiz or albert pujols back in st louis…..

by shaqfor3 on Aug 4, 2009 11:17 AM PDT reply actions  

I finally got around to watching the replay on that Furcal bunt…Hudson had a good 15-20 feet to move further down the 3B line, and still safely get back to third if he had to. He should have been further down the line, then once the ball was out of Hoffman’s hand to first, Hudson should have broken for the plate.

That really was such an odd, confusing play.

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right. Once Hoffman went to first, Hudson should have broke for home.

I don’t care how good a throwing arm Prince had. No way was he going to throw out Hudson at home.

by Tripon on Aug 4, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

I also want to add that, with condensed games now available on the MLB Gameday App for the iPhone, that is a $10 that was well worth it.

Every event of the game (every hit, walk, out, HBP) is shown, and last night’s game was just over 16 minutes in that fashion.

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think it’s a bit tougher than that. If Hoffman had faked to first, with O-dog breaking, he would have been hung out to dry and everyone would be killing him and Bowa today. At least that’s how I rationalized it last night. I also think that had it been a squeeze both would have been safe.

Just very frustrating in either case.

by KellyStephen on Aug 4, 2009 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh O-Dog

What is Furcal doing bunting in that situation? You don’t suicide squeeze with two outs. And you don’t bunt for a base hit with a runner on third.

What was Pierre doing bunting in that situation? Hudson was running on the pitch. Let him steal second, thhen bunt him to third. Russell Martin’s flyout would have scored the tying run.

by SaMo Dodgerfan on Aug 4, 2009 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

when juan pierre bunted hudson over to 2nd

did juan do it on his own power… or did joe tell him to bunt??

by matthewmafa on Aug 4, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe whoever is in the blogspot tonight can find out.
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Aug 4, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I haven’t seen it addressed. My first instinct is that it was a called play, but the fact that Hudson was running makes me think something else was up. Either:

1) Hudson missed a sign, thought he should run
2) Pierre missed a steal sign, sacrificed
3) Play was a hit & run, but Pierre’s attempt at a hit was a bunt

Odd play to be sure. Basically both bunts were very confusing plays.

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Phil Rogers did:

It is one thing to be a gifted player, and another again to constantly develop your gifts. Juan Pierre is not the greatest hitter in the majors, but he’s somehow piled up 200-plus hits in three of the last four seasons.

That speaks to his standing as a true craftsman.

It’s no coincidence that the best at their business are often the smartest.

Granted, it was four years ago, but still :)

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

i think that hoffman hit ethier on purpose

he wanted to pitch around ethier to get to manny. theres a few reasons too

by matthewmafa on Aug 4, 2009 1:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Wasn’t the tying run on third at the time? I don’t think you risk throwing a wild pitch in that situation. IBB could’ve safely done the job. I am not sure if you are serious or not though.
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Aug 4, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

It didn’t look like that to me. It seemed like the pitch just got away.

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even if Ethier hit a HR

You would still be waitng for that slam.

by bhsportsguy on Aug 4, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

BTW - Old friend

Greg Brock was at the game with me and he said to me just as Hoffman threw that pitch, Ethier needs to take one for the team.

by bhsportsguy on Aug 4, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ethier would have won the game, it was destined to be and Hoffman took that away. He will pay for that.

by meercatjohn on Aug 4, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

hoffman sucks vs left handers..

ethier is the walk off king.. mannys in a slump.. hoffman kills right handed batters… those are a few reasons why i think hoffman hit ethier

by matthewmafa on Aug 4, 2009 2:02 PM PDT reply actions  

With a runner on 3rd he couldn't take a chance

that a pitch meant to hit someone would not end up up wild pitch which is why I think your scenario is 100% off base.

by meercatjohn on Aug 4, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

John

any news on Garret Gould?

by PHAT JULIO on Aug 4, 2009 2:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Trust us, when we hear something we will post it. Between

Eric, Brendan, Silverwidow, Tripon, and myself I think we will know something. I don’t expect an announcement until Aug 17th and I hope I’m not bummed but since we haven’t signed any notable international signing I’m not holding my breath that Frank is going to go over slot for him. I’m the guy who thinks Frank is tapped so until he proves me wrong by increasing payroll again or spending money to improve the farm I’m sticking with my story.

by meercatjohn on Aug 4, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

It would be funny if Shreill's contract is what's keeps the Dodgers from signing Gould.

But I’m sure guys like Coletti, Ng, and White are telling McCourt that controlling a guy’s rights for up to 10-12 years is very valuable.

by Tripon on Aug 4, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

gould is going to be the next Tim Lincucum

goulds going to be great.. we better not let him get away

by matthewmafa on Aug 4, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m going to notify Silverwidow that his title has been taken from him! :)

by Eric Stephen on Aug 4, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hope we sign him, I really really do

by PHAT JULIO on Aug 4, 2009 3:12 PM PDT reply actions  

I hate these guys playing hardball though…

by PHAT JULIO on Aug 4, 2009 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $10 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/25-5/27 Harrell, Norris, Happ
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/21-5/23 Corbin, Cahill, Saunders
Tbj_pin_small
Memories of the past: Dodger Glory.com
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/18-5/20 Lynn, Westbrook, Lohse
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/14-5/15 Kennedy and Miley

Recent FanPosts

Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VII
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/16-5/17 Richard and Volquez
Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VI
Small
Hey NYC Dodgers Fans
Dodgers_small
Dodger Need Help. ASAP!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $490,000
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 37 Herrera $375,082
3B 6 Hairston $2,250,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000
LF 23 Abreu $401,311
CF 10 Gwynn $850,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

OF/1B 33 Van Slyke $388,197
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
OF/1B 30 Sands $375,175
IF 13 DeJesus $448,992
C 18 Treanor $850,000

SP 22 Kershaw $6,000,000
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000
SP 35 Capuano $3,000,000

CL 74
Jansen $491,000
RHP 52 Lindblom $483,000
RHP 51 Belisario $414,426
RHP 54 Guerra $488,000
RHP 28
Wright $900,000
LHP 57 Elbert $488,500
RHP 60 Coffey $1,000,000

DL 27 Kemp $10,000,000
DL 21 Rivera $4,000,000
DL 12 Sellers $481,000
DL 5 Uribe $8,000,000
DL 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
DL 14 Ellis $2,500,000
60DL 36 Hawksworth $495,000
60DL 41 De La Rosa $485,000

AA 50 Eovaldi $7,885
AAA 56 Antonini $7,869



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout
DFA 66 MacDougal $650,000

Totals
$115,942,869

For more detailed information, click here.

Current 40-man roster count: 42
(incl. De La Rosa & Hawksworth)

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox

Img_0103_small CraigMinami