Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Africa Cup Of Nations Final

Opening Day Roster Game - What is your best guess?



Here are my locks for the roster as of January 21, 2010.

Star-divide

Locks

Pitchers: (9)

Ronald Belisario

Chad Billingsley

Jonathon Broxton

Clayton Kershaw

Hong-Chih Kuo

Hiroki Kuroda

Vincente Padilla

George Sherrill

Ramon Troncoso

Catcher: (1)

Russell Martin

Infield: (5)

Casey Blake

Jamey Carroll

Blake DeWitt

Rafael Furcal

James Loney

Outfield: (3)

Andre Ethier

Matt Kemp

Manny Ramirez

That's 18 players that can look forward to a chilly Opening Day in Pittsburgh.

Probables:

Pitchers:

Eric Stults (First shot at 5th spot due to being out of options).

James McDonald (Long man role)

Infield:

Nick Green

Doug Mientkiewicz

Outfield:

Jason Repko

Unlikely:

Pitchers:

Scott Elbert (5th starter)

Josh Limblom (5th starter)

Outfield:

Xavier Paul (Not Ned's MO to bring a young player to sit on the bench)

 

Now, there are 7 spots out of 25 left, the Dodgers have 3 open spots on left on their 40-man roster, those will probably be filled by at least another pitcher (NRI), catcher and back up infielder.  Another question, will the Dodgers carry 13 pitchers to start the season.

Comment 88 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Options

When a player is out of options, does that mean he can’t be sent down to the minors at any point during the season w/o his approval (ie – rehab)?
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Jan 21, 2010 5:09 PM PST reply actions  

I've been wondering that myself

I’ve seen a whole bunch of posts saying how Stults is “out of options”. At first, I thought it was a figure of speech, but I’ve seen it enough now to think it may have some sort of official meaning…

by sarcastro9 on Jan 21, 2010 5:38 PM PST up reply actions  

When a player is “out of options”, he cannot be sent back to the minors without clearing waivers first. A rehab assignment wouldn’t be subject to this issue. Essentially, if one of Stults or Haeger doesn’t make the 25-man roster coming out of spring training, he would have to the DFAed before he could be sent to the minors. (Look for Haeger to hit the DL at the end of ST with a fingernail problem.)

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Jan 21, 2010 6:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes, look for a mysterious injury from Haeger. :)
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Jan 21, 2010 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

That's assuming the Dodgers don't need his roster spot

If one of the NRI or bench players need the spot, he would be my pick to be DFAed during ST.

by bhsportsguy on Jan 21, 2010 11:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Right now the Dodgers have 37 spots on the 40-man roster filled. One of the remaining spots is probably Eye Chart’s to lose. Berroa/Green might get one. The backup signing Ned alluded to on the radio recently could be a backup catcher. If/when the Yankees offer back rule-5 draftee Jamie Hoffmann, there’d have to be a spot open for him. Of course, fellow rule-5ers Monasterios and Zerpa come off the 40-man if they are offered back to their teams. Still, looks like the roster is pretty tight, which means Brian Barton has got his work cut out for him.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Jan 22, 2010 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

18 Down

19 – AJ Ellis
20 – Berroa over Green, not sure Green will be ready, Torre comfortable with Berroa
21 – Brian Barton over Repko
22 – Stults
23 – McDonald
24 – Minky
25 – One of the rule five guys

by meercatjohn on Jan 21, 2010 5:39 PM PST reply actions  

Brian Barton over Repko is a pretty bold pick

but it’d be nice to have a local guy like that on the big league team- and with quite an interesting background!

by sarcastro9 on Jan 21, 2010 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

1. Repko has a very good chance of being hurt
2. Barton is a better player

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 8:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Just as good a chance

that Repko accidentally hurts Barton or someone, though.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jan 22, 2010 1:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I see Ellis as the backup catcher.

I think that Stults get’s traded or sold and either Haegar or Elbert are the 5th starters.

by lakersdodgersyankees4life on Jan 21, 2010 7:51 PM PST reply actions  

hagar

does he make it through waivers? theres no way after those 2 dominating starts that a team wont pick him up right

by matthewmafa on Jan 21, 2010 9:33 PM PST reply actions  

He has to stay on the 25-man roster

If he is claimed on waivers. My hunch is that he would clear waivers and become a free agent, then he could sign a split contract.

by bhsportsguy on Jan 21, 2010 11:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Heager can stay on as a long relief guy.

by Tripon on Jan 22, 2010 1:25 AM PST up reply actions  

I thought it was the 40-man, not the 25-, but if I was right, Eric would have corrected you already, so I must be wrong.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Jan 22, 2010 1:05 PM PST up reply actions  

If he’s on the 40-man but not on the 25-man roster, they would have to use an option on him. But since he is out of options (2006-2008 used) to remove him from the 25-man means removing him from the 40-man too.

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I understand the Dodger’s position. What I am unclear of is the claiming team’s position? You are saying that the claiming team has to put Haeger on the 25-man because he is out of options? I can see that being right.

If he clears waivers, the Dodgers can outright him to the minors because he’s never been outrighted before and he’s not a 5-year MLB man – do I have that right?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Jan 22, 2010 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

The claiming team would be in the same boat as the Dodgers.

But if he does clear waivers, you are right; he can be outrighted once.

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 1:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Haeger might not clear waivers, but I don’t think any team cares much about those two starts. They were very good, but it’s worth noting that Haeger was also lucky (.158 BABIP in those two starts), and that he got shelled in Cincinnati.

If anything, teams will note that he performed well in a strong hitters environment in Albuquerque for almost a full season if they were to claim him.

My guess is that he’s 50/50 to clear waivers

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 8:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Haeger if Haeger clears waivers, it'll be for one reason.

He throws a knuckleball.

For whatever reason, that’s seen as a junk pitch, a trick pitch.

Hey, I think that’s dumb, but it sure seems like knuckleballers aren’t valued just cause they’re knuckleballers.

The Ultimate Ned's Kind of Guy

by Humma Kavula on Jan 22, 2010 10:01 AM PST up reply actions  

My guesses

19 – Mientkiewicz (1 roster spot)
20 – Repko
21 – Green (1 roster spot)
22 – Ausmus decides not to retire (+1 roster spot)
23 – McDonald in the pen
24 – Monasterios as the long man
25 – Stults as 5th starter to begin the season, on a short leash

Zerpa gets sent back to Boston (-1 roster spot)

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 8:21 AM PST reply actions  

agree

with these qualifications

ellis for ausmus (if ausmus is not asked back and/or if he has a terrible spring)

maybe haeger for monasterios if they don’t want to chance losing haeger on waivers (in case stults chokes on his short leash:)

otherwise elbert would seem to be next in line for 5th starter and i’m not convinced joe is even ready to go there

all this assumes that russ ortiz is just a gambit to mess with us

and, not for nothin but I think our projected bench is BAD with a capital BAD

by lchristmas on Jan 22, 2010 11:02 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Very interesting how the paths of Mathews and Pierre have been so similar since that fateful offseason when they both signed ridiculous contracts.

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 8:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Now

the White Sox need to meet the Mets in the World Series

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 8:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I’ve been meaning to write an article on the CF signing of that off-season, including Rowand. More material now.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Jan 22, 2010 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow

per Heyman:

#angels get brian stokes in matthews jr. deal. #angels pay $21.5 mil of $23.5 mil left on matthews deal

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 9:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow is right

So the angels didn’t even think he was worth $1m/season?

by CarolinaDodger on Jan 22, 2010 9:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Sunk costs

The Angels saved $2 million, and got rid of a replacement level player.

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 9:45 AM PST up reply actions  

plus

I think we also need to consider the quality of what the Angels got in return.One would think (and not just because we’re Dodger fans) that Ely/Link are better returns than Stokes, because we KNOW, for all his problems, Pierre was still better for the Dodgers than Matthews Jr. was for the Angels…

by sarcastro9 on Jan 22, 2010 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Thought this was odd phrasing

Tim Brown’s preview of the D-Backs is fine, but the caption on Yahoo’s MLB front page is stupid:

Arizona’s young stars, like Mark Reynolds (L) and Chris Young, haven’t matured (yet) but the D-backs show promise

Reynolds hit .260/.349/.543 last season, a 123 OPS+. I think he’s matured just fine.

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 8:59 AM PST reply actions  

Man if you can't hit

89 home runs in three years and not be considered mature what are the expectations? Actually they simply needed to change out Reynolds for Upton.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 9:56 AM PST up reply actions  

But how scary would the guy be if he could drop his K-rate and improve his defense. I assume that is what they are referring to.

by prosellis on Jan 22, 2010 1:09 PM PST up reply actions  

19 – Mientkiewicz
20 – Repko
21 – Green
22 – Ellis
23 – McDonald (pen)
24 – Monasterios (pen)
25 – Lindblom (5th starter)

Zerpa returned to Boston, Stults traded, Haeger outrighted

by silverwidow on Jan 22, 2010 9:16 AM PST reply actions  

From a Phillies blogger

and Baseball Info Solutions video scout reported this:

Local radio out of MIN says Twins and Joe Mauer are discussing a 10-year deal. That sound is the collective breaking of Yankee hearts

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 9:29 AM PST reply actions  

That sound is the sound of taking chisel to stone.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Jan 22, 2010 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Shane Victorino’s contract with the Phillies bought out one year of FA:

2010: $5m
2011: $7.5m
2012: $9.5m

He made $3.125m last year. That seems like a pretty good deal for the Phillies.

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 9:35 AM PST reply actions  

So

He basically gave them the discount that Rowand wouldn’t. I wonder if the Phillies would have signed Rowand to a smaller contract, and I wonder if Rowand wishes he had stayed if that were possible.

by robotmadeofnails on Jan 22, 2010 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

I bet the Phillies

are glad Rowand didn’t stay! More often than not, signing someone coming off of a career year to a big, multi-year deal doesn’t work out so well.

by sarcastro9 on Jan 22, 2010 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Don't see this everyday

From Jon Paul Morosi of Fox Sports:

Outfielder Grant Desme, one of the Oakland A’s top prospects, has decided to retire from baseball in order to pursue the priesthood, multiple sources told FOXSports.com.

An A’s official confirmed Desme’s decision this morning, saying the 23-year-old is "serious" about the big career change.

Desme was ranked 8th in Oakland’s system by Baseball America

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 9:46 AM PST reply actions  

Had an incredible

AFL – closest minor league comp to Russell as I recall.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 9:57 AM PST up reply actions  

He could have just asked for a

trade to the Padres. {rimshot} {crickets}

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jan 22, 2010 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Colletti said that he was working on possibly bringing in another player for the bench. Any idea who that might be? I think we will see a bat added, which probably knocks out Minky.

by OB12 on Jan 22, 2010 10:05 AM PST reply actions  

Adam Kennedy?

I’ve heard his name. He would be more DeWitt insurance. Too bad he’s a lefty.

by kinbote on Jan 22, 2010 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Any opinions on Melvin Mora? I think he would be a pretty useful bench player.

by OB12 on Jan 22, 2010 10:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Mora is pretty much locked into 3B; he hasn’t played significant time at any other position since 2003 (three innings at 2B, and two at short in the past six years).

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 10:54 AM PST up reply actions  

That is the problem with Mora

if he was still the versatile player he was once he’d have some value but strictly as a 3rd baseman I don’t quite see the fit.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 10:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Not that it means much, but I remember that he said that he was training this offseason as a super utility player.

by OB12 on Jan 22, 2010 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

has a rep as a headcase

with an inflated sense of his own abilities, based on one or two decent seasons about 9 years ago

and would cost way too much for what his role would be here

no thanks

by lchristmas on Jan 22, 2010 10:55 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

In his career, he’s played every position but catcher (even one game at 1b!). If Ned signed him, he could tout his versatility no end. I’m not saying I want him; just saying it could happen.

by kinbote on Jan 22, 2010 10:58 AM PST up reply actions  

But

as Eric pointed out that versatility was long ago and is no longer part of his skill set.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 10:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough--No Mora froma me

I just want a versatile RH utility player with some pop. Who’s out there?

by kinbote on Jan 22, 2010 11:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh man

I just had a Jose Valentin flashback. Didn’t he commit an error on opening day to lose a game for us?

by kinbote on Jan 22, 2010 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

The alternative is Fernando Tatis.

by OB12 on Jan 22, 2010 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Gomes? Garko?

Just throwing those names out there. Not sure it’s actually of interest. Gomes is bad at defense, of course but I like his bat. If they bring back Minky then Garko wouldn’t make much sense…

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jan 22, 2010 1:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m surprised no one thinks that Ayala or Miller will nab a bullpen spot.

by OB12 on Jan 22, 2010 10:19 AM PST reply actions  

I thought about it, but the bullpen is already very strong 5 deep as it is (unless they try Troncoso as a starter) and there are just so many options that it would be hard for on of the NRIs to make the club.

by Eric Stephen on Jan 22, 2010 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Broxton/Sherrill/Beli/Kuo/Troncoso is a superb core bullpen. Add in McDonald and Stults/Haeger [long man] and we’re already up to 7. Even with big springs, it’s going to be easy for us to start the year with Elbert & Lindblom in AAA. I just wonder if Lindblom will be groomed as a starter or reliever. As for the NRIs, I think one [at most] could sneak onto the team if he’s lights out. With our luck on these types of guys, I’m almost expecting it. Could we survive with a 4-man bench? Catcher/Carroll/OF/Super Utilityman who can play SS. Maybe.

by kinbote on Jan 22, 2010 10:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Not with a

an old LF and an old 3rd baseman, and a SS with a questionable back. JMO

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

If would have helped

if Carroll could play SS but he can’t. Felipe Lopez is a guy who can play everywhere and would have been very useful.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 10:58 AM PST up reply actions  

C'mon

You know Martin can sub in at 3B on his days off ;)

by kinbote on Jan 22, 2010 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I just wonder if Lindblom will be groomed as a starter or reliever.

Starter. He’s a dark horse, but I feel Joe will pick him for the 5th spot when all is said and done.

by silverwidow on Jan 22, 2010 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

An interesting choice would be to bring in Tejada to play 2nd base.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 11:00 AM PST reply actions  

I'd have him playing

3rd base everyday in AAA waiting for Casey to get hurt. Ned may be saying it, but I don’t think they are as ready to give DeWitt the 2nd base job in 2010 as they were in 2009. I’m like the ESPN guy who Eric keeps getting pissed off at, I simply won’t believe it until I see DeWitt playing 2nd base on opening day.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

So do you think it will be Carroll out there at 2B or a TBD mystery man?

by BFDC on Jan 22, 2010 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm hoping

it is either TBD or DeWitt because if it is Carroll, I’m going to pine for Abreu more then what is healthy.

by meercatjohn on Jan 22, 2010 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

if jamey carroll is our opening day 2B I will be in pittsburgh with a pitchfork

by lchristmas on Jan 22, 2010 11:10 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Presumably Zach Duke, a lefty, will be the Pirates’ Opening Day starter, so if it is a strict Carroll DeWitt – Joyce’s sister? – platoon, then Jamey Carroll will indeed be the opening day 2B.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Jan 22, 2010 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I advocated Tejada for 2B early in the offseason, don’t know if it still has a chance of happening.

by OB12 on Jan 22, 2010 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Yep, and even though his power is diminished, I think he pushes our offense past that of Philly.

by OB12 on Jan 22, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

I 1,000% endorse a Tejada signing to be the Dodgers 2B in 2010. Would $4 mil be enough?

2009-10 Kings Hockey: Delivering Milk Steaks from the Meat Train at an arena near you!

by DodgerBlueBalls on Jan 22, 2010 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $15 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1209328_7139_small
True Blue Los Angeles Fantastical Base Ball League
100_1427_small
Dodger Blogger Softball Tourney Update

Recent FanPosts

100_1427_small
Great Scott and Jolting Josie
Kemp_small
All-star predictions
Img_0247_small
Dodgers.com might have a job opening...
Small
Law Ranks Dodger System #12
Small
DODGERS -- 2 GREAT SEATS FOR SALE
Small
Joe Torre Horrow Show
2011-philly-game-me__2__small
2011 Dodgers Spreadsheet Project
Ed-ak286_scully_g_20091006143938_small
It is time to play - Name the BA Top 30

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

2012 Dodgers Payroll

Italics denote estimates
Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $500,000 team control
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 14 Ellis $2,500,000
3B 5 Uribe $8,000,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000 team control
LF 21 Rivera $4,000,000
CF 27 Kemp $10,000,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

IF/OF 6 Hairston $2,250,000
OF 10 Gwynn $850,000
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
C 18 Treanor $850,000
IF 12 Sellers $485,000 team control

SP 22 Kershaw $6,000,000
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 35 Capuano $3,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000

CL 54 Guerra $485,000 team control
RHP 74
Jansen $500,000 team control
RHP 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
RHP 60 Coffey $1,000,000
RHP 66 MacDougal $650,000
LHP 57 Elbert $485,000 team control
RHP 36
Hawksworth $500,000 team control

TJ 41 De La Rosa $485,000 team control



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout

Totals
$112,162,432

For more detailed information, click here.

Players on 40-man roster used as roster
fillers until moves are made.

Current 40-man roster count: 40
(not including Belisario)

2012 Non-Roster Invitees

No Player Age*
63 Jose Ascanio rhp
27
61 Alberto Castillo lhp
36
56 Matt Chico lhp
29
33 John Grabow lhp
33
59 Angel Guzman rhp
30
47 Wil Ledezma lhp
31
72 Shane Lindsay rhp
27
62 Fernando Nieve rhp 29
73 Scott Rice lhp 30
70 Will Savage rhp
27
71 Ryan Tucker rhp
25
28 Jamey Wright rhp
37

30 Josh Bard c 34
82 Griff Erickson c 24
81 Matt Wallachc 26
67 Jeff Baisley 3b/1b 29
65 Luis Cruz ss/2b 28
37 Josh Fields 3b 29
64 Lance Zawadzki if 27
56 Cory Sullivan of 32

*Age on June 30, 2012

NRI count: 20

For more info, click here.


Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox