Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

More Pitchers Coming to Camelback

The Los Angeles Dodgers continue to stockpile arms in defense of their Western Division title, signing Jeff Weaver and Ramon Ortiz to minor league contracts and inviting both to spring training.

Weaver, 33, is a familiar face to Dodger fans, having been a solid starter in the 2004 and 2005 seasons for Los Angeles, then returning last season after having been out of the majors for one year.  Weaver was reasonably effective in a swingman role in 2009, posting a 3.65 ERA (108 ERA+) in 79 innings, spread in seven starts and 28 relief appearances, despite having a whopping WHIP of 1.519.  Allowing only one hit and three walks in 24 bases-loaded situations helped hold down the ERA.

Per Rhett Bollinger of mlb.com, Weaver signed an $800,000 minor-league contract.  Dylan Hernandez states that Weaver has a chance of earning "around another $100k in performance bonuses".

Ramon Ortiz last pitched in the majors in 2007.  In his three major league seasons after being traded by the Angels, he has a 5.47 ERA (78 ERA+) over 466 innings pitched, allowing 81 home runs over that span.  Ortiz pitched one season in Japan for the Orix BlueWave, then last season pitched in AAA for the Giants affiliate in Fresno.

Presumably Weaver will be vying for his swingman role, and perhaps the newest R. Ortiz is yet another longshot fifth starter candidate who might provide emergency depth in the minors.

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I go dark for a few hours and I come back to see two more NRIs! That’s 24 now.

Everyone, check your mailboxes. You might be invited to Camelback!

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 12:01 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

speaking of

check your e-mail please

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Feb 3, 2010 12:06 AM PST up reply actions  

It would seem like we have gotten to the point where we are going to have too many players in camp. I would expect that first cut to be a big one.

by OB12 on Feb 3, 2010 7:03 AM PST up reply actions  

They will have to print up a lot of those little red tags.

by BFDC on Feb 3, 2010 7:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Very nice

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 8:06 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

To few inning

but maybe they are doing this because of the trip to Taiwan?

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Feb 3, 2010 7:16 AM PST reply actions  

The Taiwan trip definitely makes for a few more innings. If nothing else, it gives the team a chance to bring in a few more people then they otherwise would and give them a look.

by EMDarrow on Feb 3, 2010 8:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Weaver

will be a solid middle reliever. Great addition with a young staff that will likely pitch fewer innings.

by Dodgers1981 on Feb 3, 2010 8:23 AM PST reply actions  

R.J. Anderson at Fangraphs wrote about Weaver, and was a little surprised there wasn’t more of a market for him:

Weaver is a ROOGY, or at least, the right-handed version of a lefty specialist. These types can come in handy, since most batters are of similar dexterity and this gives Weaver the perceived edge, but types like Weaver are also the most fungible reliever type around.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 8:28 AM PST reply actions  

I’m happy with Weaver as the swingman, as long as he can replicate his numbers with the bases loaded :)

by BFDC on Feb 3, 2010 8:36 AM PST up reply actions  

I’m not counting on a repeat of that, but I don’t think he’ll be terrible in that role. And if he is, there are a bunch of guys within the organization that can take his place.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 8:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Weaver really was quite effective last year. I said it once, but I will say it again, his changing of the release location was brilliant.

by robotmadeofnails on Feb 3, 2010 8:39 AM PST up reply actions  

The best use of Ramon Ortiz is as the answer to a trivia question

He was the winning pitcher in the play-in game between the Rockies and Padres in 2007, the “Did Holliday touch the plate” game.

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 3, 2010 8:47 AM PST reply actions  

Nice

I was actually looking at his gamelogs, hoping to find that he got the loss in the one game out of 22 that you last during that month or so. Alas, Ortiz did not pitch in that game.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Nope, that was all Webb ownage

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 3, 2010 8:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Things I didn't know until 5 minutes ago

Ramon Ortiz (37 in March) is older than Russ Ortiz (36 in June)

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 8:47 AM PST reply actions  

Wasn't Ramon

one of age gate guys, going from a huge prospect with the Angels to a guy with a good arm.

I saw this game.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/ANA/ANA200008080.shtml

He looked awesome as he outdueled Pedro.

by meercatjohn on Feb 3, 2010 8:55 AM PST up reply actions  

I was at that game too!

I think you are right about the age gate thing.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 8:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Nice.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Feb 3, 2010 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

I should probably write a post about this

but just spitballing the roster, here are my thoughts:

Locks (11 offense, 9 pitching)
1) C Martin
2) 1B Loney
3) 2B Belliard
4) 2B Carroll
5) 3B Blake
6) SS Furcal
7) LF Manny
8) CF Kemp
9) RF Ethier
10) OF Johnson
11) C Ausmus

12) SP Kershaw
13) SP Billingsley
14) SP Kuroda
15) SP Padilla
16) CL Broxton
17) RP Sherrill
18) RP Kuo
19) RP Belisario
20) RP Troncoso

DeWitt will be given a shot at 2B, but he is facing an uphill battle, at least to start the season. I think the final two bench spots will go to:

21) PH Mientkiewicz
22) IF/OF Amezaga

Both are non-roster players, so a move will have to be made for each spot

As far as pitching, there are three spots: one starter and two relievers. I think the 5th starter comes down to Stults, Elbert, and McDonald (Torre said as much yesterday). To start the season at least, I think Stults gets the shot, with McDonald in the pen and Elbert in ABQ:

23) SP Stults
24) RP McDonald

The only reason I didn’t make McDonald a “lock” is because I think there’s an outside shot that he would start every 5th day in ABQ rather than join the major league bullpen. That leaves the 7th and final bullpen spot open, likely for a swingman role, although McDonald is capable of doing that as well if needed. I think Weaver gets every chance to take this spot, and he starts the season with the big club:

25) RP Weaver

Weaver is non-roster as well, so we need to clear three spots off the 40-man. The first two are easy: Monasterios and Zerpa, the Rule 5 guys who will need a superhuman performance in spring to get noticed, let alone make the team. The last one is tricky. If Stults doesn’t perform well and loses the 5th starter spot, he will be gone since he’s out of options. Another choice to drop would be Haeger of course. But, watch, it will be someone out of the blue who will be removed from the 40-man instead!

Anyway, that’s my predicted roster for opening day, even though it is probably a fool’s errand to try and forecast something two months away. These things have a way of sorting themselves out.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 9:06 AM PST reply actions  

Couldn’t they just finally cut ties with poor Repko?

by robotmadeofnails on Feb 3, 2010 9:30 AM PST up reply actions  

They could, but there is still relatively very little outfield depth compared to pitchers on hand.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 9:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Corry Wade could be DFA candidate as well.

by OB12 on Feb 3, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Cory Wade’s eventual DFA is simply an inconvenient truth.

by silverwidow on Feb 3, 2010 9:52 AM PST up reply actions  

True.

I wonder if Repko wants to stick around or if he would like a shot at playing as the 4th OF for another team.

by robotmadeofnails on Feb 3, 2010 9:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I heard Amezaga won’t be ready until June. That will give us Mean Nick Green.

by silverwidow on Feb 3, 2010 9:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Weird

Agent says his goal is to be ready by opening day, but Tony Jackson’s source says June. It’s probably somewhere in between, but the source has less of a fiduciary obligation in the matter so I trust him more :)

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 9:57 AM PST up reply actions  

As you said about things sorting themselves out, there is unfortunately at least an injury or two that are bound to happen…

by BFDC on Feb 3, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

McDonald

Is a very interesting situation IMO. I feel like long term his worth should be as a mid-bottom of the rotation starter somewhere. For 2010, if he doesn’t win that 5th starter job or end up there by default, he will probably wind up in the bullpen. However, although he would certainly be useful in the pen (as he was last year), is that really maximizing his value?

What I mean is if his value is higher than just a middle reliever, maybe he should just be traded to maximize his value, rather than just letting him sit there as a reliever. Or then again, like you mentioned Eric, maybe he should start every 5 days at AAA in order to be ready to fill in if/when there is the inevitable injury…

by BFDC on Feb 3, 2010 11:34 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

as the 6th man in the pen, I’m not sure if that’s the best use of J-Mac. If McDonald doesn’t win the #5 spot, I’d rather have Cory Wade take that 6th man role in the pen, with McDonald starting in ABQ, so he’s ready to step into the big league rotation if needed.

I’d hate to see a situation where the Dodgers need a starter, but “can’t” use McDonald (or Elbert) because his arm wasn’t stretched out enough.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Don’t like Torre’s comment from yesterday about potentially using Elbert as a multiple innings reliever.

by silverwidow on Feb 3, 2010 11:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Didn’t get a chance to read everything from last night yet, but that is troubling, yes.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

What is the point of bottling these guys up in the ’pen. They would be given the 5th starter job on at least 10 teams in this league.

by BFDC on Feb 3, 2010 11:51 AM PST up reply actions  

I suppose

but how much of a haul do you expect to get for McDonald? I think he’s a better reliever than Wade, so why trade McDonald then use an inferior pitcher in his spot?

I actually think with McDonald’s velocity he could be made a closer elsewhere. But I don’t expect the Dodgers to get enough value for him in a trade, so I wouldn’t move him just to move him.

by Michael White on Feb 3, 2010 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't trade move him to just move him...

and for 2010 if the team need is to have him as a middle reliever then he should serve that need and I expect he will do well. However, I don’t want to think of him being pigeon-holed in that role going forward and if the organization doesn’t think of him as a starter, then I think they should try to use him (or Elbert if its the same scenario) as the centerpiece for someone.

by BFDC on Feb 3, 2010 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Perhaps Monasterios could take the 6th spot in the bullpen with Weaver being the longman and McDonald starting in AAA.

by OB12 on Feb 3, 2010 11:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Under that scenario

the AAA rotation could be something like:

Elbert
McDonald
Lindblom
Ely
Heagar (if he clears waivers)

Not a bad rotation to pull from if we need help.

by OB12 on Feb 3, 2010 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Who is the 5th man in the rotation?

I guess you are pencilling in Stults?

I don’t see it. Torre hates Stults and if he was going to stick in the rotation it would have happened by now. I expect the number 5 man is JMac, Elbert or Lindblom.

by Michael White on Feb 3, 2010 12:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think Stults has the inside track on being the 5th man because he is out of options and because he is a lefty. I think he also benefits from not really being a prospect anymore, if that makes any sense. I don’t believe the organization is worried too much about his development and thus might be more inclined to use him at the beginning of the season.

by OB12 on Feb 3, 2010 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Couldn’t Jon Link have an outside shot at the 6th man as well? He is 25 and performed decently at AA and AAA over the last two years. Seems like he would be pretty dominant if he could harness his control a little better.

by BFDC on Feb 3, 2010 12:04 PM PST up reply actions  

FYI

the Amezaga and Ortiz deals have been confirmed by the Dodgers. Haven’t seen any monetary notes RE: Ortiz (and I hope I never have to!).

by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 11:12 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $15 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2011-philly-game-me__2__small
2011 Dodgers Spreadsheet Project
Ed-ak286_scully_g_20091006143938_small
It is time to play - Name the BA Top 30
P1010315_small
1st Trip to LA
Small
Take me out to the bid game.
Sbn_ds_small
And Down The Stretch The Dodgers Go

Recent FanPosts

Small
Joe Torre Horrow Show
Small
Are you the Biggest Dodger Fan?
Small
San Diego Road Trip April 7
Dgy_small
Dodger Blogs Softball - Sign Up For The TBLA Team Today
Dodgers_small
Food For Thought (by the numbers)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

2012 Dodgers Payroll

Italics denote estimates
Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $500,000 team control
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 14 Ellis $2,500,000
3B 5 Uribe $8,000,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000 team control
LF 21 Rivera $4,000,000
CF 27 Kemp $10,000,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

IF/OF 6 Hairston $2,250,000
OF 10 Gwynn $850,000
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
C 18 Treanor $850,000
IF 12 Sellers $485,000 team control

SP 22 Kershaw $8,500,000 arb
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 37 Capuano $3,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000

CL 54 Guerra $485,000 team control
RHP 74
Jansen $500,000 team control
RHP 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
RHP Coffey $1,000,000
RHP 66 MacDougal $650,000
LHP 57 Elbert $485,000 team control
RHP 36
Hawksworth $500,000 team control

TJ 41 De La Rosa $485,000 team control



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout

Totals
$114,662,432

For more detailed information, click here.

Players on 40-man roster used as roster
fillers until moves are made.

Current 40-man roster count: 40
(not including Belisario)

2012 Non-Roster Invitees

No Player Age*
63 Jose Ascanio rhp
27
61 Alberto Castillo lhp
36
60 Matt Chico lhp
29
35 John Grabow lhp
33
59 Angel Guzman rhp
30
47 Wil Ledezma lhp
31
72 Shane Lindsay rhp
27
62 Fernando Nieve rhp 29
73 Scott Rice lhp 30
70 Will Savage rhp
27
71 Ryan Tucker rhp
25

30 Josh Bard c 34
82 Griff Erickson c 24
81 Matt Wallachc 26
67 Jeff Baisley 3b/1b 29
62 Luis Cruz ss/2b 28
33 Josh Fields 3b 29
64 Lance Zawadzki if 27
56 Cory Sullivan of 32

*Age on June 30, 2012

NRI count: 19

For more info, click here.


Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox