Alfredo Amezaga's Contract Breakdown
Newly signed Dodger Alfredo Amezaga's contract calls for him to receive a salary of $650,000 if he is added to the 40-man roster, plus up to $800,000 in incentives:
150 PA- $50,000
200 PA- $50,000
250 PA- $75,000
300 PA- $100,000
350 PA- $125,000
400 PA -$150,000
450 PA- $150,000
90 games played- $50,000
120 games played- $50,000
**********
One thing that isn't in Amezaga's contract Speaking of contracts, the so-called "Ramirez Provision," mandating players to donate a certain amount to a club-chosen charity, brought to light last March when Manny Ramirez signed his deal to return to the Dodgers, has been changed. Bill Shaikin of the LA Times reports that the commissioners office and players' union have agreed to ban such clauses for pre-free-agency contracts.
about 1 month ago
Eric Stephen
32 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Honestly, the guy will be lucky to earn the first 650
Jus sayin"
by 68elcamino427 on Feb 3, 2010 10:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If he’s healthy, I think Amezaga has the inside track to make the club.
by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 10:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if … the wheels can make it around the track for the first lap?
by 68elcamino427 on Feb 3, 2010 11:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It all depends on the pace car :)
by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 11:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good news about the ban on mandatory donations
I thought that seemed real shady. I’m not anti-charity, but cash-poor owners shouldn’t be able to use players to bolster foundations and causes.
by prosellis on Feb 3, 2010 10:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
anyone know where i could find a picture of carlton kemp
matt kemps little bro
by matthewmafa on Feb 3, 2010 10:48 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is it really a ban?
The article says that clubs can still negotiate players donations in the contract for Free Agents. The ban only applies to arbitration players who aren’t FA eligible for the next year. And they’re almost never asked to contribute significant money.
by Tripon on Feb 3, 2010 11:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
Interesting distinction. I completely missed that. Thanks.
by Eric Stephen on Feb 3, 2010 11:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Requiring contracts to have charitable donation provisions is bull. It is none of my employer’s business whether or not I donate cash, labor, or whatever to charities, and certainly none of their business what charities I choose. And forcing me to give to their favorite charity is really out of line. If I don’t want to agree to a provision like that, but no one else is offering me a contract/job, do I really have a choice? This should simply not be allowed. I’m a little surprised the union didn’t fight that all the way.
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Feb 4, 2010 12:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I wonder if the union is backing off this because they have bigger fish to fry for the next labor agreement; picking their battles, maybe.
by Eric Stephen on Feb 4, 2010 12:12 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I am pretty sure Kevin Brown had a similar provision
And if players can get first class airfare, suites and luxury boxes as part of their deals, I don’t know why they cannot freely negotiate this part too, this is not like a player who is under the team’s control and has to sign whatever deal is presented to him.
by bhsportsguy on Feb 4, 2010 7:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I’m okay with it being part of a negotiation, but, really, by making it part of the contract, it really appears to be either/both parties trying to milk the PR end of it. I much prefer the way Casey Blake recently went about making his donation. The only reason we know about it is because of the local reporting goes widespread in the internet era.
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Feb 4, 2010 11:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Basically, like a lot of things in recent Dodger history
This whole thing blew up in how the Dodgers presented it, if they had just said that as part of the deal, Manny had agreed to donate a portion of his salary to the foundation, nothing would have been said about it, by trying to make some sort of precedent about all players signing contracts with the Dodgers would have to do likewise, that is where they got into trouble.
by bhsportsguy on Feb 4, 2010 7:20 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
+1
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Feb 4, 2010 11:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Add a million
I’m sure that as players’ agents get used to these charity clauses, they will simply come to an agreement with the teams: “fine, he’ll donate a million to your charity if you increase his salary by a million”. The team will be moving millions from their own coffers to their chosen charities, which is a fine thing to do…
by berkowit28 on Feb 4, 2010 7:21 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
What’s the point. The team can simply garner all the glory by giving their own money.
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Feb 4, 2010 11:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
…as I’m sure they’ll realize once this starts happening.
by berkowit28 on Feb 4, 2010 12:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think the Dodgers were keen on Bedard
since he likely won’t pitch until May at the earliest, or perhaps July, but one-year, $1.5 million, plus a “shipload of incentives” is too good a deal to pass up.
The deal with Seattle is pending a physical, and Bedard has shoulder issues, but man I would have done that in a heartbeat.
by Eric Stephen on Feb 4, 2010 8:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
If Bedard comes back healthy after the ASB, the Mariners are going to have a crazy good starting rotation.
Anyway, wish we would be in on one of the high risk/high reward types. Maybe we still have a shot at Wang.
by OB12 on Feb 4, 2010 8:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think at $1.5m Bedard is low-risk, high-reward.
And I’m not sold that Wang’s reward is all that high. He can be useful though, and it will depend on the contract I guess as to how I feel about his potential signing.
by Eric Stephen on Feb 4, 2010 8:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True
There really isn’t much risk involved when $1.5M is all that is gauranteed, but Ned seems to be so risk averse these days that even that contract is maybe too much of a gamble.
Wang is certainly not a ace, like Bedard can be when he is right, but a healthy CMW is probably a good fit for the Dodgers.
by OB12 on Feb 4, 2010 8:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A healthy Wang gives us a Jon Garland-like pickup in the summer without the cost of Tony Abreu to cover a contract.
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Feb 4, 2010 11:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather my healthy wang
gave me Tiger-like pickup
by Dodgers1981 on Feb 4, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Damn that’s a deal I would’ve loved the Dodgers to sign. It may be that he took it because he’s rehabbing in Seattle and likes the Mariners. But darn, that would’ve been an awesome pickup for the Dodgers at that price.
by LA Taco on Feb 4, 2010 9:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jordan Bastain covers the Blue Jays for MLB.com, and he wrote a nice story about what it’s like in the offseason for a baseball writer. Good stuff here:
This is our life. The moment we let our guard down, that’s when new happens. In the offseason, no trip to the doctor is safe. A quick run to the grocery store can create chaos. That’s when you’ll get beat by your competitors. Your wife becomes a single mom for hours on end, your dog crosses his legs, stares at you and cries while you’re held hostage at your computer.
You work the phones, calling players, agents, baseball execs, other writers. You scan news sites all day. There’s never enough coffee and you crave the routine schedule of spring training and the regular season. So does your family. You live in constant fear that something is going to happen at any moment
by Eric Stephen on Feb 4, 2010 8:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
He needs to get an iPhone. That way he can take the dog for a walk and still get his email every 30 seconds.
by berkowit28 on Feb 4, 2010 9:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Seems silly to me
to have to be the first. An hour after the signing, nothing is different, the player is still under contract. Five minutes after you spent hours trying to break the story, you will be forgotten as the next story starts to unfold. In this of instant gratification, lots of time is wasted on endeavors of this type. JMO
by meercatjohn on Feb 4, 2010 9:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
USA Today Dodger preview
Ace pitcher from within sought as Dodgers reduce payroll (USA Today)
Dodger season preview includes positional breakdown and a look at some of the team’s top prospects. Nothing earth shattering here…
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
by underdog on Feb 4, 2010 9:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Reading in ESPN MAG today about this Korean 19yo Cub SS prospect Hak Ju Lee has me pretty pissed off about the Dodgers lack of International signings. I have tried to tell myself that it is hard for one to pan out anyways for the last few years, but can not anymore.
by delias man on Feb 4, 2010 10:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
We signed Tae-Hyeok Nam out of Korea last season. Supposedly he has plus power and speed for a corner infielder. It will be interesting to see how he develops.
by OB12 on Feb 4, 2010 10:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tae-Hyeok Nam! Tae-Hyeok Nam! Tae-Hyeok Nam!
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Feb 4, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs















