2010 Player Profile: Doug Mientkiewicz, Vagabond No More?
It's easy to see why Doug Mientkiewicz came back to the Dodgers, as a non-roster player for the second spring in a row. Over the last six seasons, Mientkiewicz has played for seven teams, including starting each of those last six years with a brand new team. It is understandable that he would like to return to familiar settings for the first time in a long time.
| Most Teams Played For, 2004-2009 | |
| Player | Teams |
| Jorge Julio | 8 |
| Doug Mientkiewicz | 7 |
| Elmer Dessens | 7 |
| Luis Vizcaino | 7 |
| Kip Wells | 7 |
| per Baseball-Reference.com | |
Plus, there is a sense of unfinished business for the man affectionately known as "Eye Chart." Mientkiewicz was in the same position last season, a non-roster player who won a job on the bench, as the primary lefty pinch hitter and backup first baseman. However, in just the 10th game of the season, Mientkiewicz slid headfirst into second base to complete a two-run double. He was safe at second, but reached base anything but safely. He dislocated his shoulder, and missed the next four months. Admirably, he fought hard through rehabilitation, and ended up returning to the team in September.
However, the shoulder injury sapped much of his ability to play the field. Once a defensive whiz at first base (his UZR/150 was between +12.2 and +16.3 every season from 2005-2008), Mientkiewicz even to this day still has trouble throwing. While Mientkiewicz and Garret Anderson are battling for a pinch-hitting role, likely one that won't result in much time in the field, Joe Torre still likes to have versatility and flexibility on the bench for late-game maneuvers. Anderson himself isn't much of a fielder (in left field) himself, so the defensive bar for Mientkiewicz (at first base) isn't set very high.
Contract Status
Mientkiewicz signed a minor league contract that will pay him $550,000 if he makes the major league roster. Mientkiewicz can also earn up to $200,000 in incentives based on plate appearances, ranging from 150 to 350.
2010 Outlook
| Year | Age | PA | 2B | Runs | RBI | BA | OBP | SLG | wOBA |
| 2006 | 32 | 361 | 24 | 37 | 43 | .283 | .359 | .411 | .340 |
| 2007 | 33 | 192 | 12 | 26 | 24 | .277 | .349 | .440 | .346 |
| 2008 | 34 | 334 | 19 | 37 | 30 | .277 | .374 | .379 | .337 |
| 2009 | 35 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 3 | .333 | .400 | .389 | .358 |
| 2010 Projections - Age 36 Season | |||||||||
| CHONE | 286 | 15 | 31 | 32 | .249 | .336 | .364 | .316 | |
| Marcel | 243 | 13 | 27 | 25 | .264 | .344 | .392 | .325 | |
| ZiPS | 211 | 12 | 27 | 32 | .266 | .341 | .404 | .334 | |
There has been some talk this spring of the Dodgers starting the season with 11 pitchers, rather than their usual 12. This would create an extra spot on the bench, which could increase Mientkiewicz's odds of making the club. However, I will believe the Dodgers will use only 11 pitchers when I see it. Mientkiewicz's best case scenario is to have a shoulder healthy enough to play the field, to make the club, enter the final game of the World Series for James Loney after a double switch, and keep the ball that recorded the final out, Evan Longoria's groundout to give the Dodgers a win over the Rays.
My guess is that Mientkiewicz loses the final bench spot to Anderson, but if he makes it I'll pick .281/.351/.380.
What are your predictions for Doug Mientkiewicz (BA/OBP/SLG)?
***********
Vin Scully fell last night at his home in Los Angeles, but he is OK. Dodger Vice President of Communications Josh Rawitch released a statement late last night:
I just spoke with him and he told me that he was in bed this evening and simply got up too quickly and fell and bumped his head. For precautionary reasons, he went to the hospital and will stay overnight for observation but he fully expects to be at Camelback Ranch this weekend for the the telecast on Sunday.
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
I agree
I don’t see MInky making this team. He’s not a good enough hitter to make up for the fact that he has no value in the field.
GA has looked good this spring. He’s getting hits, hanging in there against lefties, and even showing some extra base potential. I was reading a preview mag last night and dude has some crazy counting stats (hits, doubles, etc.), mostly because he never walked that much. I think he’s a near-lock for the roster. The only [non-]thing Minky might bring is that cool/wacky vibe that keeps the bench loose (Think Mark Sweeney). After seeing Reed Johnson swat that dinger yesterday, I’m starting to get a decent feeling about our bench.
Count me among the doubters
If GA’s bat shows life, Eye Chart doesn’t make the team. Mientkiewicz was considered more of a defensive 1B, not a hitter, in his prime years, and I can’t see the bum shoulder helping him at the plate either. If by some chance he makes it, .244 / .322 / .342, but my real prediction is .000 / .000 / .000.
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
Minky is a pretty useful player, or at least he was prior to that ill-advised slide last season. However, I just don’t see him beating out GA, who just gives the team more flexibility and a little more power. I think our bench figures to be pretty strong this season.
Good point on flexibility. GA gives us a 5th OF, which is better than having another backup 1b. The positional makeup of our bench would be pretty solid:
Ausmus—C
Carroll—3b/SS/2b
Belliard—3b/2b/1b
Johnson—LF/CF/RF
Anderson—LF/RF/1b
The only area we might be lacking is SS, but we know Torre’s going to ride Furcal hard this year. If Furcal gets injured, we have a legitimate backup in Hu just a phone call away.
Madness has begun
Interesting early games with West Virginia down early, Cornell looking to represent the Ivy League, and much much more.
Power vs. OBP
I’d rather have GA over Doug. Doug would probably have a higher OBP, but GA would provide more power which is what I like to have off the bench. Fun fact: Doug has more walks than GA in his career in less than half as many plate appearances.
Watching minor leaguers practice. DeJesus is listed in minor league camp now
by Eric Stephen on Mar 19, 2010 10:09 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
"Broadcaster Scully Hospitalized"
Seeing that headline at cnnsi.com scared the hell out of me. First thing I did was come here to see if anyone else had any new news. I can’t imagine life without Vin…
Me too
It all happened after I fell asleep and I didn’t notice until this morning. Kind of a jolting wake up.
by Eric Stephen on Mar 19, 2010 11:29 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/shame-we-cant-see-dodgers-true-potential-031910
Actually a good article on the Dodger’s lack of spending the last few years by Ken Rosenthal. I’m surprised.
I don't know ...
He gets bogged down in all that “ace” talk, somehow making that a financial issue. Now we’re told that the Dodgers would have had CC Sabathia but for a lack of money?
And again, he’s using attendance as a baseline for payroll, ignoring the issue of the TV contract.
I’m not trying to defend the McCourts, and you don’t need to bring up Carlos Santana, but this struck me as more of the same broad brush the national media typically uses.
Besides the whole “ace” thing, I think he’s got some good points. The CC offseason thing was a choice between CC and Manny, and I think the right choice was made. CC would have been way too much for way too long to sign.
I think his point stands (though I don’t think the Dodgers should have a payroll of 150 million, but they SHOULD be spending more than they are, if not just on extensions for Kemp, Kershaw, Ethier, and Billingsley. I don’t care that there were no big free agent signings or giant trades that wreck our farm system (then again, who WOULDN’T want that???), but those 4 players have to be extended past free agency. I would settle for Kemp and Kershaw getting long extensions, too.
If it is true that the Dodgers asked for $5M in a Sabathia deal, I could imagine that being part of the price for, once again, including high-quality players from the Dodgers in the deal.
The biggest point Rosenthal misses is the suspected size of the Dodger debt service required to keep the team going and the highly-leverage nature of the purchase to being with. That’s the big issue, and it existed whether or not the McCourts stayed married or started divorce proceedings.
The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Mar 19, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Meh
This reads as the same old tired refrain “You’re the Dodgers! Spend like it!” There is nothing particularly insightful about this article.
It’s my jealousy of Arizona, and KC, and Tampa Bay, and Milwakee and whatever other teams have already signed some of their young studs to team friendly, or even if they are expensive, bargain deals. It feels like it isn’t even being discussed :(

by 




























