2010 Dodger Profiles - Xavier Paul
| Year | Age | Team | PA | AB | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | SB | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISOP | BB% | K% | BABIP | GB% | LD% | wOBA | |
| 2005 | 20 | A+ | Vero Beach | 330 | 288 | 15 | 3 | 7 | 32 | 81 | 0.247 | 0.324 | 0.392 | 716 | 0.145 | 9.70% | 24.50% | 0.32 | 0.312 | |||
| 2006 | 21 | Wint | North Shore | 125 | 108 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 34 | 0.213 | 0.304 | 0.315 | 619 | 0.102 | 12.00% | 27.20% | 0.292 | 53% | 19% | 0.282 | |
| 2006 | 21 | A+ | Vero Beach | 519 | 470 | 23 | 3 | 13 | 38 | 114 | 0.285 | 0.337 | 0.43 | 767 | 0.145 | 7.30% | 22.00% | 0.353 | 53% | 16% | 0.329 | |
| 2007 | 22 | Wint | Peo Saguaros | 115 | 105 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 28 | 0.248 | 0.304 | 0.286 | 590 | 0.038 | 7.80% | 24.30% | 0.338 | 49% | 16% | 0.272 | |
| 2007 | 22 | AA | Jacksonville | 481 | 422 | 21 | 2 | 11 | 48 | 112 | 0.291 | 0.362 | 0.429 | 791 | 0.138 | 10.00% | 23.30% | 0.375 | 55% | 17% | 0.347 | |
| 2008 | 23 | AAA | Las Vegas | 506 | 443 | 28 | 5 | 9 | 43 | 96 | 17 | 0.316 | 0.372 | 0.463 | 835 | 0.147 | 8.50% | 19.00% | 0.388 | 48% | 19% | 0.359 |
| 2009 | 24 | AAA | Albuquerque | 129 | 116 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 22 | 8 | 0.328 | 0.372 | 0.500 | 872 | 0.172 | 7.80% | 17.10% | 0.391 | 41% | 21% | 0.368 |
| 2009 | 24 | MLB | LA Dodgers | 16 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0.214 | 0.313 | 0.500 | 813 | 0.286 | 12.50% | 25.00% | 0.222 | 44% | 11% | 0.346 |
The ultimate organizational soldier Paul has worked his way to the top rung but can't quite get over the hump. In 2009 he had a great spring, and impressed the brass enough to get the first call when they needed an extra outfielder. Once he got the call injuries and staph infections wiped out the rest of his 2009, and the Dodgers never considered him as a backup outfielder in 2010, bringing in multiple veterans to handle that role.
Just like Jason Repko, Paul will have to do some time with the Isotopes this season while hoping something breaks his way, and he gets another chance to play with the big club. I don't think anyone questions the fact he'd be the best option for the number four or five outfield spot other then the fact the Dodgers want him to get full time at bats since he missed so much time last year.
With an arm almost equal to Repko he can also play all three outfield positions, seems to handle the corners well and could handle CF if he had to. With the oncoming onslaught of Travon Robinson, Andrew Lambo, Scott Van Slyke, Gerry Sands, and Kyle Russell, Paul has a very limited time to be a Dodger.
As you can see from the numbers above, he's been improving in two key areas. His K rate has dropped below 20% and his isolated power (ISOP) has been trending upward. Though it should given the hitting environment he has been playing in. I would not get carried away with what looks like promising offensive numbers in AAA the last two years. Those numbers were created in one of the most friendly offensive environments in all of minor league baseball.
Future: It is doubtful that Paul is anymore then a fourth outfielder but then Randy Winn had a quite a career with the same profile. I don't see much of a future for Paul on the Dodgers as he does not have enough bat to replace Manny in 2011. I'd be content to see him become our all around utility outfielder but the Dodgers don't seem to let kids handle that role.
I'm not asking for community projections for Paul, as the odds are high he will garner very few at bats for us this year.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Indians lineup
SS Cabera, CF Sizemore, DH Hafner, RF Kearns, 3B Rodriguez, 1B Duncan, LF Brantley, C Marson, 2B Valbuena, P Wesbrook
Per Paul Hoynes of the Cleveland Plain Dealer:
The Dodgers have allowed the Indians to use the DH, while LA’s pitchers will hit.
I guess the Dodgers will DH after all
Paul 8
DeWitt 4
Ethier 9
Loney 3
Anderson 7
Belliard DH
Green 5
Hu 6
Closser 2
by Eric Stephen on Mar 21, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Seeing that the Dodgers have a plethora, yes a plethora, of outfielders
It seems fitting that they would make a trade to fix a weak link. We have minor league players for every spot but when do they get the opportunity? I’d like to see a stronger push for the title this year. I say either let them play for us or let them play for someone else. Just be sure to make a wise decision. Easier said than done. I don’t get to see any preseason games, so I can’t judge these players for myself. All this talk of good players in AAA, why can’t we get over the hump? I suppose history is bound to repeat itself. “wait til next year”?
by Skunkburner on Mar 21, 2010 10:39 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
The Dodgers don't really have a plethora of outfielders
They have maybe six guys on the 40-man capable of playing at least semi-regularly, with Repko, Paul, and Johnson as the three besides the starters. And those last three all have pretty sizable flaws. The outfielders that have any trade value right now are at the lower levels, with Lambo being the best of them and probably with as good a shot as anyone in house to take over for Manny in 2011.
by Eric Stephen on Mar 21, 2010 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Mauer close to extension (finally)
This is great news for the game. Seeing Mauer in a Yankee uni would have been disgusting.
Catchers?
[Whatever you call “LAT’d” here at TBLA:]
So, tomorrow there are two games at the same time, split squad. AJ Ellis catches for one of them. Who does the other? Knoedler, for a whole game? Or (shared with?) Lucas May, who was just optioned to AAA? Minor leaguers can still play for the big league team in ST, without complicated official transactions, yes? We’re seeing other minor leaguers, never put on the 40-man*, play for the big team. I wonder if it’s kinder to have let May know right away what his destination is, or to have waited until they in fact no longer need him. Is the pay any different depending which status he has in ST?
*And when I say “40-man”, I mean “53-man” or “47-man” or whatever the number is on the day.
[P.S. I really appreciate when the poster of a new post mentions so in a comment to the previous post. Eric’s very good about doing that. Sometimes I get stuck in the old post while the world moves on…]
Closser and Knoedler are still in big league camp. It wouldn’t surprise me to see May and/or Gabe Gutierrez available as well.
The players don’t get paid much for spring training; it’s really more of a stipend or per diem. I’m sure those in major league camp get more, but I’m not sure what the difference is.
by Eric Stephen on Mar 21, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Dodger pitchers
Today
Stults, Troncoso, Aaron Miller
Monday
vs Angels: Kershaw, Weaver, Sherrill, Broxton
at Brewers: Russ O, Monasterios, Haeger
Tuesday is an off day
Stults – 5 IP
Troncoso – 1 IP?
Miller – 3 IP?
by silverwidow on Mar 21, 2010 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Maybe 5-1-1 or 5-1-2. There will probably be a few more minor league pitchers available too, but I haven’t seen the list yet.
by Eric Stephen on Mar 21, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
“More Than a Feeling” playing on the loud speaker at CBR right now.
by Eric Stephen on Mar 21, 2010 11:43 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Torre isn't managing today's game
He flew back to L.A. for his daughter’s performance of some sort.
Mattingly gets the gig again.
Mattingly didn’t have a media session before the game, so I didn’t get a chance to remind him to check those lineup cards :)
by Eric Stephen on Mar 21, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions
New picture
Dodgers.com seems to have the right photo up for Stults now. Anyway, it’s no longer Leach.















