Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

2010 Player Profile: Jeff Weaver, Back For More?

Jeff Weaver was a great feel-good story of 2009.  He was a solid pitcher with the Dodgers for two years, 2004 and 2005, and then struggled pretty much ever since, until he came back to Chavez Ravine.  He put up a combined 6.00 ERA from 2006 and 2008, never with a season ERA better than 5.76, including spending all of 2008 in Triple A.  Heading into 2009, there wasn't much reason to think Weaver would contribute much to the Dodgers, but he proved to be a valuable swing man.

Weaver was called up from the minors last year on April 30, and ended up making 28 appearances, including seven starts, putting up a 3.65 ERA and a 4.07 FIP.  He did have the highest walk rate of his career (3.76 walks per nine innings), but also put up his highest strikeout rate (7.29 K/9), a full strikeout per nine innings better than any other season.  His best work came with the bases loaded, allowing just one single in 20 at-bats, allowing opponents to hit .050/.167/.050.  The highlight of the season for Weaver was entering Game 1 of the NLDS with the bases loaded and two outs in the fourth inning, inducing a groundout, and preserving the 3-2 lead with another scoreless inning of work after that.

Weaver started against his brother Jered of the Angels last June 20, beating his younger sibling 6-4.  Jered had the classic younger brother lament, saying after the game, "He's got the upper hand on me the past 26 years.  We're going to laugh about it. It was fun. Hopefully, we don't have to go through it again."

Jeff Weaver returned to the Dodgers this offseason on another minor league deal, hoping for a repeat performance.  With a week left in spring training, it appears Ramon Ortiz is this year's Weaver, who was last year's Chan Ho Park.  The Dodgers seem to have a knack in recent years for coaxing solid seasons out of pitchers without a recent history of success.

Trivia

Weaver was a Type A free agent after 2005, and after he signed with the Angels, the Dodgers received two compensatory draft picks, which became Bryan Morris and Preston Mattingly.  After being traded by the Angels to the Cardinals in July 2006, Weaver put up a 2.43 ERA in five postseason starts, including winning the clinching Game 5 of the World Series against the Tigers.

Contract Status

Weaver signed a minor league deal that will pay him $800,000 if he makes the team, with up to $100,000 in incentives.  He can become a free agent if he is not added to the active roster by Sunday, April 4.

2010 Outlook

Year Age IP BB/9 K/9 ERA FIP
2006
29 172.0 2.46 5.60 5.76 5.47
2007
30 146.2 2.15 4.91 6.20 5.07
2008 (AAA)
31 84.2 3.19 6.27 6.17 5.33
2009
32 79.0 3.76 7.29 3.65 4.07
2010 Projections - Age 33 Season
Bill James 77.0 2.57 5.96 5.03 4.72
CHONE 49.0 3.12 6.98 4.22 4.30
Marcel 80.0 3.38 6.64 4.61 4.46
Baseball HQ 44.0 3.48 6.75 4.70 4.34
ZiPS 98.2 3.01 6.11 4.93 4.69
Thanks to FanGraphs and Baseball-Reference.com

With the delay of Ronald Belisario, injuries to Hong-Chih Kuo and Cory Wade, and demotions of James McDonald and Scott Elbert, I think Weaver still has a good shot at making the opening day bullpen, reprising his swing man role for a second straight season.  I'll guess a 4.66 ERA and 1.411 WHIP in 56 innings.

What is your guess for Jeff Weaver in 2010?  Give us a prediction of ERA, WHIP, and innings.

Comment 155 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Matt Cain deal

He was already under contract this season with an option for next (his final two arbitration years), and was set to make:

2010: $4.25m
2011: $6.25m option, which could increase by $1.9m based on starts and innings
Total: $10.5m, or up to $12.4m

His extension/restructuring:
$1m signing bonus
2010: $4.25m
2011: $7m
2012: $15m
Total: $27.25m

So, essentially they bought out the first year of free agency for at least $14.85m. For doing so two years before they had to, I think the Giants would have been better off either buying out more years or getting a bigger discount.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 8:07 AM PDT reply actions  

I hate this deal because it essentially prices us out of Billingsley’s range. They’re very similar talents.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bite your tongue! I don’t want to hear you say that again. Psshhh, a Giant comparable to a Dodger? Never.

by Ivdown on Mar 29, 2010 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Giants and other teams are crazy

To guarantee that salary when there is no guarantee on the what the market will be in 3 years.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is the part of spring training

when I get lost and have no idea how all these roster decisions will shake out. A few weeks ago, I would have bet on DeWitt making the team and Weaver not making the club, but will the daily fluctuations from Torre, I just zone out and wake up when the final 25 man is announced.

As for Weaver, I still don’t think he will make the team out of camp. Weaver has shown that his pride won’t be hurt by starting the year in AAA and earning his way up to the big club and I think that’s what will happen again. I expect a call up at some point, like what happened with him and Milton last year, and fill a swing role when either the named 5th starter gets DFA’d or one of the other pitchers gets hurt.

Prediction: 4.85 ERA, 1.40 WHIP, 4.25 FIP in 36 innings and 2 starts.

by Michael White on Mar 29, 2010 8:10 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree

It just seems roster decisions seem going in one direction or another, and just when we think we have a feel for everything, something comes out of the blue to surprise us. Someone like Justin Miller and Luis Ayala are prime candidates to surprise us by being on the opening day roster.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 8:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Weaver was pretty adamant about not starting in AAA this year. I think he’ll leave if he doesn’t make the roster.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

His call I suppose. I can’t imagine there would be a huge market for his services elsewhere, especially since he spent all of camp with LAD. His agent would have a better beat on that then I would, but I don’t see the upside in Weaver being so adamant against starting in AAA, especially since the Dodgers were able to promote him last year where he stayed on the 25 man the rest of the year. Not sure he can do better. Either way, I won’t lose sleep over it.

by Michael White on Mar 29, 2010 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Another factor in a potential lack of interest in Weaver is that, even though these are spring stats, to be taken with a grain of salt, he has just one strikeout in seven innings this spring.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Didn't notice this last night

George Sherrill was scheduled to pitch tonight against Cleveland, but per Gurnick “has been scratched to continue working on his mechanics in bullpen sessions.”

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 8:17 AM PDT reply actions  

We could really have a problem on our hands if Sherrill doesn’t come around. Even as strong as our bullpen is, I don’t know that it can withstand an injured Kuo, Bellisario in time-out, and an ineffective Sherrill.

by OB12 on Mar 29, 2010 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ramon Troncoso may have to channel Mike Marshall (the doctor, not the general). :)

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Opening day in Pittsburgh

What we do know is that Akinori Iwamura will beat leadoff for the Pirates, followed by Andrew McCutchen, per Rob Biertempfel of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

Also, the Pirate pitchers will hit eighth a lot of the season, with Ronny Cedeño batting ninth.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 8:35 AM PDT reply actions  

He lays an egg

5.80/1.60 in 28 innings, 1 start.

Outright released in May. Dodgers should have plenty of depth to cover when Belisario is ready, Kuo is healthy, and when JMac regains some confidence and control in AAA. Also, either the signing of a Pedro or a midseason trade for a pitcher is inevitable.

by some_dude on Mar 29, 2010 9:25 AM PDT reply actions  

I know TBLA will do this soon but just for the record

And this is for entertainment purposes.

bhsportsguy21 (3/29/2010 at 9:24 AM)
The Dodgers, backed by a surprising Rookie of the Year performance by Chris Withrow, go 96-66 to win their 3rd consecutive NL West crown. James Loney, who had a career high 22 home runs, hits a the game-winning walk-off home run against K-Rod to send the Dodgers to NLCS to face Cardinals. After Broxton strikes out Pujols and the Cardinals late season acquisition, Matt Stairs, the Dodgers are propelled to their first World Series since 1988. And finally, on an 8th inning error by Adrian Beltre, the Dodgers win the World Series behind Manny Ramirez, who was named World Series MVP despite having to removed from the game after being pelted by trash by the Boston faithful

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 9:26 AM PDT reply actions  

A conservative poster like yourself thinks Withrow will make an impact this year? I’m shocked.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seems like somebody...

… posted his April Fool’s Day joke a couple days early.

by MartinGreen on Mar 29, 2010 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

:)

Very nice, I like it.

by Ivdown on Mar 29, 2010 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

You are the anti-D4P

and your new nickname will be the “Antidote”.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just spitballing

but here is my guess how the rotation looks to be shaping up for the final week:

Today – Kuroda in minor league gm; Billingsley tonight
Tuesday – Towers
Wednesday – Padilla in one game, Stults/Russ Ortiz in the other
Thursday – Haeger (perhaps Russ Ortiz would tag team pitch here instead of Wednesday)
Friday – Kershaw
Saturday – Billingsley & Kuroda
Sunday – off
April 5 – Padilla (4 days rest)
April 6 – off
April 7 – Kershaw (4 days rest)
April 8 – Billingsley (4 days rest)
April 9 – Kuroda (5 days rest)

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 10:08 AM PDT reply actions  

10 haeger
11 Padilla
13 kershaw?

by delias man on Mar 29, 2010 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kershaw is for sure on the 13th. The 10/11 order hasn’t yet been announced.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

It doesn’t really matter which order they choose for the April 10/11 games, because either way Padilla will be pitching with 5 days rest once, and 6 days rest another time, because I don’t think they will skip Kuroda:

Apr 5 – Padilla
Apr 6 – off
Apr 7 – Kershaw
Apr 8 – Billingsley
Apr 9 – Kuroda
Apr 10 – Padilla
Apr 11 – Haeger
Apr 12 – off
Apr 13 – Kershaw
Apr 14 – Billingsley
Apr 15 – Kuroda
Apr 16 – Padilla

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Assuming no weather delays in the east during the first week.

by KellyStephen on Mar 29, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

WEAVER

ERA 3.15 S.O. 7 PER 8 INNINGS 3 WALKS PER 8 INNINGS 76 INNINGS PITCHED
4 STARTS IN 2010

by California Mobile CPR on Mar 29, 2010 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Clayton Kershaw chimes in

on just how many opening days there are. From Tony Jackson:

As far as Clayton Kershaw is concerned, there is only one Opening Day. And the seventh game of the season isn’t it.

“I don’t think so,” the Dodgers left-hander said Sunday, just after he turned in his longest and arguably best Cactus League performance this spring in a 2-1 victory over the Cincinnati Reds before 6,970 at Goodyear Ballpark. “Opening Day is Opening Day. That is an honor I think every pitcher would like to get, and hopefully, I will get that one day.”

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 11:49 AM PDT reply actions  

He’ll get it next year, when the only two locks on the staff are him and Bills.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Apparently, Clayton didn't realize that he was opening on

Broadway while Vincente was opening in Hartford.

Seriously, I am glad someone pointed that out.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I meant to transcribe that wonderful note by Vin, but I deleted the broadcast off my DVR before I remembered to do so. :)

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

PNC is a pretty ballpark. :)

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously!

I read Plaschke this weekend standing in front of a urinal, good place to read it.

I would rather have Clayton start the home opener. Am I the only one that thinks it is more important than a road game in PIT?

by robotmadeofnails on Mar 29, 2010 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes

Opening day happens once per season.

This year happens to be in Pittsburgh.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I always like Opening Day, but home openers are a lot of fun. I still get all excited the first time I walk into Dodger Stadium every year.

by prosellis on Mar 29, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am not playing, so the home opener is more meaningful to me…

by delias man on Mar 29, 2010 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Meaningful or not

What I think is getting overrated by pundits is the significance of Padilla named as the opening day starter. It does not equal Padilla being the Dodgers #1 starter, and I really don’t think they view him that way. That’s what bothers me. The Dodgers are looking at the logistics and schedule of the first two weeks of the season, and they wanted to give Padilla a jolt of confidence, is my guess. I still think Kershaw or Kuroda should’ve gotten the nod. (And Billingsley can use that jolt of confidence, of faith, too.) But I really think it’s made out to be more significant than it is.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Mar 29, 2010 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Another fail:

The Dodgers have an $83M payroll. They couldn’t offer salary arbitration to Jon Garland and Randy Wolf because ownership didn’t want to pay for additional Draft picks

Yes, we were all upset about losing that draft pick for Garland. It wasn’t Orlando Hudson at all.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

he said that on TV too

so I don’t think it’s a mistake, it’s what he believes. Or he just writes it down once and forgets about it.

by LA Taco on Mar 29, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I suppose it is factually correct, since Garland was in fact a Type B free agent, but then again we had several other Type Bs so it’s curious they weren’t mentioned.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

How is he coming up with 83M?

Is he not counting deferred salary? If he’s not is he doing the same for everyone? If he is I have no problem.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

The problem with not counting deferred salary is that, like BH said, it would also require to say Manny is getting something less than $20 million this year. But since he isn’t counting deferred money, he presumably also wouldn’t do so in future years. So that money to Manny never gets counted, even though it is very much a part of future payroll, just as Andruw Jones, Juan Pierre, et al, are a part of the 2010 payroll.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only way that’s true is if you don’t count dead money. But then you would have to do the same for all 30 teams.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

If he's not counting dead money for all 30 teams

then I dont’ have a problem, it would be comparing apples to apples. As long as he applies the same criteria to everyone.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

It would be disingenuous if he’s manipulating numbers to prove his point. I’m all for pointing out Dodger financials and how it may affect future years, but not if it’s based off of faulty numbers.

by oshea2002 on Mar 29, 2010 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

As every team's rotation comes into focus

the idea we are any thinner then other contenders is going to prove a hard sell. At least in the NL.
Cubs just named Carlos Silva as their fourth starter and Gorzalanney as their fifth.
Phillies are going with the oldest pitcher in the NL as their fifth

Will be writing up a story on this as more teams name their rotations.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 12:23 PM PDT reply actions  

So true

the media gets a storyline and runs with it until it’s demonstrably not true, not when it’s not really true, or when by comparison there’s no there, there. The storyline is that the Dodgers are thin when it comes to pitching so that’s what you keep reading.

by LA Taco on Mar 29, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have no problem with the storyline

that we are thin. Any team using Padilla / Haegar and considering Russ Ortiz is thin, just a problem with the idea that our thin pitching is unique to the contenders when it seems to be problematic for everyone not part of the AL East.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Last year, only 40 pitchers had 160+ IP.

There were only 117 pitchers with 20 or more starts; 67 with 30 or more starts.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ex Dodger minor Leaguer

Scott Strickland cut by Marlins for last spot. Kind of interesting story as he keeps getting close but no cigar.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/blog/big_league_stew/post/Cut-by-Marlins-Strickland-might-go-back-to-repo?urn=mlb,230693

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 12:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Any read on who is getting the 7th inning with Kuo down? I would guess the only two candidates are Tron or Ramon.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 12:37 PM PDT reply actions  

I would guess Troncoso is the favorite for that role, with some 6th innings mixed in too for multiple-inning appearances.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Has to be Tron, right? He was pretty damn good at the back of the pen in the first half last year.

by prosellis on Mar 29, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just noticed your avatar change. For the record, I am a Bowersox fan, but Sibohan is the shit, too.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks. I see so much of myself in her (minus the singing talent, of course).

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I also can’t spell, apparently :)

Siobhan

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

For the most part, I don’t really care what rich people do. It doesn’t really bother me. But the one thing I noticed from today’s McCourt hearing was that “they had hair stylists come to their house every day.”

Every day? Again, I’m not bothered by the cost or spending that money, but I am just wondering how someone could use a stylist every single day. At some point, doesn’t a day old ’do suffice? :)

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 12:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Women with frizzy hair who like it to look straight spend a lot of time in the salon. If they’re rich enough, they can go every day. If they’re mega-rich, the salon comes to you.

by LA Taco on Mar 29, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

There’s no way either one of them comes out of this not looking like a complete scumbag. I’m guessing that would happen with many divorces, but this is so public that both are going to just torch the other.

by oshea2002 on Mar 29, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you ever had a reason to pay $39 for Baseball Prospectus Premium

The two-part Logan White interview (part 2 has insights on Dee Gordon, Kyle Russell and drafting philosophy).

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 12:46 PM PDT reply actions  

The best part

was Logan saying how he gathered all this information and doesn’t share it. A man smart enough to know that his employer today may be his competition tomorrow.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Doesn’t share it with the public or the people he works with?

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

From Dodger Thoughts
“Another thing I do is keep a private log of certain types of arm actions – the success rates of them. Certain types of deliveries – their success and failure rates. The same with hitters. There are certain things that we will either like or stay away from based on our own statistics of how those have been working over the past 10 or 15 years. I’ve kept these since I was an area scout. Let’s say for example that a guy is a slinger or he has a bad wrist wrap. How many guys have that who have been drafted and signed, that I’ve seen, and have actually made it? And how far? Things like that. I’ve kept pretty good records and I haven’t publicized them, not even to my own staff, but I do utilize that kind of stuff.”

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow, thanks.

If Logan ever gets away, we’re screwed.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think its clear from the article that he and his scouts

As well as the player development people all work around a same set of general principles.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kyle Russell comments

One of my scouts that I trust is very much a Kyle Russell fan, and there’s that yin and yang where you look at all that other stuff and then you also look at your scouts and piece it all together. When we got to the third round, we just felt that the tools—being able to play defense and hit for that kind of power—were too much to pass up. Plus, we had Billy Mueller, who was a good hitter, in the draft room and I asked him, “What do you think? Can we help him with that uphill swing he’s got? Can we improve it?” He seemed to think that we could. Sometimes you have to have trust in people that they can help with things like that, and I think that if Kyle Russell makes those improvements, he’s got a chance to be a pretty special hitter. I know it’s rare, because there were guys like [Reggie] Abercrombie and different people in the past that I wasn’t big on because it’s tough, when you strike out that much, to get to the power. But I think that Kyle will, and I think that he’ll be able to play center field. He’s really smart and a hard worker with some pretty good aptitude

by megaballs on Mar 29, 2010 1:17 PM PDT reply actions  

For a second, I thought this was you talking. :)

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

The thing we have all been betting on

is that he is not the stereotypical free swinger. How many guys have been excellent defenders at the corners and also capable of striking out 150 times while hitting 30 bombs. I’m going to do a spot check but I think he has an unique set of skills. Not one I remember encountering before in the years I’ve watched the Dodger farm system.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not quite

Andruw Jones was busy hitting home runs in his first two World Series at bats at the age of 19. Though I do get the point of the excellent power, excellent athlete, swing and miss approach.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah that was the point

Generally good fielding outfielders with power are also 5 tool players, thus, pretty rare birds.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wish but who’d care?

by megaballs on Mar 29, 2010 1:22 PM PDT reply actions  

From MLB Network (per Phil)
FYI, the blackout has been lifted in the Los Angeles Dodgers local television market for MLB Network’s simulcast of the Dodgers at Rockies Spring Training game tomorrow, Tuesday, March 30 live at 4:00 p.m. ET/1:00 p.m. PT. MLB Network will carry Fox Sports Rocky Mountain’s call of the game.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 2:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Watching Franklin vs Blake

In the bottom of 9th Game 2 NLDS.

Blake does have the better trimmed beard.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nick Green

Curious that he’s still around. Hasn’t hit a lick and doesn’t look all that impressive on the field. To me, he’d be good AAA insurance only.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 2:50 PM PDT reply actions  

MLB Network games in April

Of course, these are subject to blackout in LA (unlike tomorrow night):

April 8 at Pittsburgh (the dreaded 9:35am start)
April 13 vs Arizona (home opener)
April 22 at Cincy (Thursday Night Baseball)
April 27 at Mets

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 2:57 PM PDT reply actions  

The first three of those games are on Prime Ticket, while the game in NY is on KCAL

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Funny that the Dodgers are playing the Reds so often this year (relatively speaking)

When I heard that on the radio the other day, I figured Charlie was having one of his “moments”. But I checked the schedule, and sure enough, he was right! I hope they will be lousy, just to even out the fact that we’re facing the elite teams of the AL, while the Giants get the A’s, Blue Jays and Orioles. (At least our interleague games should be more fun to watch, though.)

by sarcastro9 on Mar 29, 2010 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dodger lineup

per Dylan Hernandez:

Furcal SS
DeWitt 2B
Ethier RF
Ramirez LF
Kemp CF
Blake 3B
Ausmus C
Closser 1B
Billingsley P

Closser at 1B? Does Justin Masterson have a “tough arm angle?”

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Of course I love DeWitt near the top and Bison 5th. Great idea. ;)

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

That seems very odd

Why not Anderson at 1st, to see how he handles it? Closser?

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Mar 29, 2010 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, it is the easiest position in baseball. :)

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Only thing I can guess is that some vets got the day off (Loney, Belliard, GA)

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Indians lineup

per Paul Hoynes:

Cabrera SS
Sizemore CF
Brantley LF
Hafner DH
Peralta 3B
LaPorta 1B
Valbuena 2B
Toregas C
Crowe RF

Masterson P

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Also from Hoynes, in the “I had no idea he was in Cleveland” department:

INF Mark Grudzielanek (hamstring) says he should be ready to play Wed. Feels good about chances to make club

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lindblom

won the Jim & Dearie Mulvey Award, given each year to the top rookie in camp.

Gotta love it that he won the award pitching all of four innings in big league camp. Shows how highly he is thought of.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Isn’t he the only rookie in camp? Like, not borrowed from the other side?

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is Lindblom still in major league camp? I see his name his not crossed off the NRI list on the front page, but I haven’t heard his name (for scheduled pitching performances) in a while.

by Michael White on Mar 29, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you think you could check with your myriad of sources

And find out if Mr. Withrow is pitching in the minor league camp?

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Speak of the devil

Tuesday in Tucson:

Stults
Lindblom
Troncoso

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kuroda pitched 7 innings today in a minor league game, allowed one run (a HR) and had 7 Ks. He threw 91 pitches, and Russell Martin caught all of them (he caught 7 innings).

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Kuroda is in top form. Should have been the OD starter if Torre wanted a vet.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Too bad he is not ready for opening day

Actually, I am just happy the guy looks for the start of the season

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Per Torre:

I’ll leave him back here tomorrow to get his work in with a lot of the regulars. He’ll get some running in because he didn’t get much in during the game today. He’ll catch Padilla here on Wednesday, him and Ausmus will split that game.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pitching tonight

Billingsley
Broxton
Weaver
Ayala

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 3:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Bullpen as I see it

Broxton
Sherrill
Troncoso
Lindblom*
Ramon
Monk
Weaver

*I’m picking him over J. Miller and Ayala. This assumes Belisario and Kuo as OUT and Link not being considered.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 3:37 PM PDT reply actions  

To get Lindblom and Ramon on the 40 man, I believe we already have 1 spot open, and the other is the result of a Haeger/Stults DFA?

by Michael White on Mar 29, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

We have two spots open if you included Belisario on the Restricted list. Wade can also be placed on the 60-day and Stults will likely get DFA’d.

In other words, there’s plenty of room.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wade is a good one ( I forgot that option) but I am surprised that putting someone on the restriction list removes them from the 40 man. I assumed it was like a 15 day DL trip where it freed up a 25 man spot rather than both 25 and 40.

by Michael White on Mar 29, 2010 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yup, it removes them. Manny was on considered on the roster last May 8-July 3.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I should note that Monk is no sure thing either. We can’t afford carrying a reliever that has trouble throwing strikes.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Torre says 11 pitchers to start the season

but adds:

I think 12 will be the number for most of the year. We’re going to need a fifth starter four times in April

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 4:04 PM PDT reply actions  

This changes everything. Weaver or Monk might not make it, and Haeger could be the swingman.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dylan Hernandez has the revealing quote from Torre:

“I’d say if we have an 11-pitcher scenario that Blake DeWitt’s chances are better.”

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I find this somewhat insane. DeWitt should/could be the starting 2nd baseman! How is he in jeopardy of losing his spot? Belliard is going to play every day at 2nd base? Or is Nick Green making the team so he can play at 2nd and short?

by Michael White on Mar 29, 2010 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yah. Does. Not. Compute.

If Carroll can backup at short and Belliard shouldn’t be an every day starter, than the # of pitchers carried should be irrelevant. DeWitt should be starting. Siiiiiigh.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Mar 29, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

DeWitt should have a spot if we had 14 pitchers :)

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

DeWitt has started 17 games at second

Only Ethier, Kemp and Furcal has started more games. Carroll has started 4 games at second and DeJesus/Belliard have each started once.

If he does not make the team, they sure had a funny way of playing this out during ST.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

18 out of 24 AZ games, including tonight.

And two of those off games were due to split squad, so really DeWitt has started 18 out of a possible 22 days.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hear that in Charles Barkley’s voice.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Mar 29, 2010 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only thing I can think of is the club is not comfortable with Carroll as the backup SS. Therefore the team has to create space for a backup SS (Green) and Carroll and Belliard will split time at 2B.

by Michael White on Mar 29, 2010 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

That seems like the most plausible, but there also might still be concerns over DeWitt’s defense.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t get why they feel the need to have a hardcore defensive team.

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

must...control...rage

at LEAST until we get an official announcement

by sarcastro9 on Mar 29, 2010 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree. I actually am refusing to read about most of this stuff and will just wait for the official roster to be announced. If, at that time, DeWitt is skipped over to keep someone from the garbage heap on the squad, we all have reason to go nuts over it.

by UCLADodger32 on Mar 29, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or why Rafael Belliard

= defensive improvement over DeWitt anyway. And Carroll’s good but he’s not going to be an everyday starter.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Mar 29, 2010 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I remember him from the 1991 World Series. :)

by silverwidow on Mar 29, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Argh I keep doing that

Rafael Landestoy. Ramon Ramirez. Whatever the eff his name is! ;-) That Ronnie dude.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Mar 29, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

F. McCourt: Because that’s what they’re doing in Boston.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Mar 29, 2010 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Must be more of that reasoning

You never know what will happen but Furcal did start 141 games last year. Now some one is going to have to fill in now and then but I think for 2-4 games of month, Carroll might be fine.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

based on what was said today, this is how I see the 25 man roster

1 C Russell Martin
2 1B James Loney
3 2B Blake DeWitt
4 3B Casey Blake
5 SS Rafael Furcal
6 LF Manny Ramirez
7 CF Matt Kemp
8 RF Andre Ethier
9 BU C Brad Ausmus
10 Utility Ronnie Belliard
11 Utility Jamey Carroll
12 BU OF Reed Johnson
13 BU OF Garret Anderson
14 BU INF Nick Green

1 SP1 Chad Billingsley
2 SP2 Clayton Kershaw
3 SP3 Hiroki Kuroda
4 SP4 Vicente Padilla
5 SP5 Charlie Haeger
6 Swing Eric Stults
7 CL Jonathan Broxton
8 SU George Sherrill
9 RHP Ramon Ortiz
10 RHP Ramon Troncoso
11 RHP Carlos Monasterios

This would require 3 spots, two of which we already have, and one would be putting Wade on the 60 day DL. This way, we don’t lose anyone through waivers or through a Rule 5 return.

by Brandon Lennox on Mar 29, 2010 4:49 PM PDT reply actions  

I think in the end

They would rather have Justin Miller type vs. Nick Green

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

well if they are going with only 11 pitchers

I don’t see how that’s possible. Nick Green seems to be the only other position player they would even consider putting on the opening day roster

by Brandon Lennox on Mar 29, 2010 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can't see them going with only 11 pitchers

It didn’t happen last year. I guess I will believe that when I see it.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hope so

I don’t see Stults making team if we carry 11 pitchers. He will get released, pass waivers, end up back in AAA as insurance. I actually don’t see him if we carry 12 pitchers if he is not in the rotation.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I could see Stults passing through waivers

Now, he may decide to sign on with another team when he becomes a free agent.

by bhsportsguy on Mar 29, 2010 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does he have that right?

I thought he had to do it twice before he could choose? What is the rule on that?

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t go so far as to call you a lunatic.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

although that just may be what we are looking for.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Mar 29, 2010 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

HA!!!

Great Billy Joel reference, cuz it just may be a lunatic you’re looking for!

by VeroJoe on Mar 30, 2010 5:48 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

He can be outrighted…once

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Has he been outrighted before?

How would you find out if he has? A spreadsheet with option and outright columns would be something an anal blogger might create.

Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen

by Phil Gurnee on Mar 29, 2010 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

He has not been outrighted yet.

by Eric Stephen on Mar 29, 2010 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I actually have a similar spreadsheet as you are describing

however, I’ve only started it over the past two years. That being said, he has never been outrighted

by Brandon Lennox on Mar 29, 2010 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Normally players aren’t outrighted until after they are out of options?

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Mar 29, 2010 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

My last GM outrighted me once.

The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.

by David Young on Mar 29, 2010 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $10 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/25-5/27 Harrell, Norris, Happ
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/21-5/23 Corbin, Cahill, Saunders
Tbj_pin_small
Memories of the past: Dodger Glory.com
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/18-5/20 Lynn, Westbrook, Lohse
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/14-5/15 Kennedy and Miley

Recent FanPosts

Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VII
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/16-5/17 Richard and Volquez
Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VI
Small
Hey NYC Dodgers Fans
Dodgers_small
Dodger Need Help. ASAP!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $490,000
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 37 Herrera $375,082
3B 6 Hairston $2,250,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000
LF 23 Abreu $401,311
CF 10 Gwynn $850,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

OF/1B 33 Van Slyke $388,197
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
OF/1B 30 Sands $375,175
IF 13 DeJesus $448,992
C 18 Treanor $850,000

SP 22 Kershaw $6,000,000
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000
SP 35 Capuano $3,000,000

CL 74
Jansen $491,000
RHP 52 Lindblom $483,000
RHP 51 Belisario $414,426
RHP 54 Guerra $488,000
RHP 28
Wright $900,000
LHP 57 Elbert $488,500
RHP 60 Coffey $1,000,000

DL 27 Kemp $10,000,000
DL 21 Rivera $4,000,000
DL 12 Sellers $481,000
DL 5 Uribe $8,000,000
DL 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
DL 14 Ellis $2,500,000
60DL 36 Hawksworth $495,000
60DL 41 De La Rosa $485,000

AA 50 Eovaldi $7,885
AAA 56 Antonini $7,869



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout
DFA 66 MacDougal $650,000

Totals
$115,942,869

For more detailed information, click here.

Current 40-man roster count: 42
(incl. De La Rosa & Hawksworth)

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox

Img_0103_small CraigMinami