Dodgers Have Tall Order in Finale With Rockies
If the Dodgers are going to win their eighth straight series against the Rockies, they will have to do so against one of the best pitchers in baseball today. Ubaldo Jimenez has made six starts this season, and won them all, and has a sparkling 0.87 ERA (and 2.19 FIP) in the early going.
For all the talk about how Clayton Kershaw turned things around after last April -- and he did -- Jimenez has been even better. The Dodgers roughed up Ubaldo in back-to-back starts last April, but once May started he turned a corner:
| Since May 1, 2009 | |||||||||||
| Pitcher | G | GS | W-L | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | ERA | WHIP |
| Jimenez | 35 | 35 | 20-9 | 240.1 | 186 | 75 | 72 | 84 | 223 | 2.70 | 1.123 |
| Kershaw | 33 | 32 | 9-8 | 180.2 | 128 | 55 | 53 | 104 | 195 | 2.64 | 1.284 |
The Dodgers beat the Rockies in four of the five times Jimenez started against them last season, but fitting with the pattern, he got progressively better as the season wore on:
| Ubaldo Jimenez 2009 Starts vs LA | |||||||
| Date | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | Result |
| Apr 19 | 4.1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | LA 14-2 |
| Apr 25 | 4.0 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | LA 6-5 |
| May 27 | 6.2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 | LA 8-6 |
| June 29 | 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | LA 4-2 |
| October 2 | 6.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | Col 4-3 |
Amazing Andre
Andre Ethier is hitting an eye-popping .475/.515/.934 at home this season, with eight home runs in 15 games. He is also in the midst of a nine-game hitting streak, during which he has 18 hits in 35 at-bats, including four doubles and five home runs. Ethier is hitting .514/.553/1.057 during the streak, which encompasses the entire homestand to date.
Game Time: 1:10pm
TV: Prime Ticket
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I can not believe the Dodgertalk dorks were saying last night that they think Haegar will stick around because the Dodgers have kept him from the start only because he was out of options, and they did not want to lose him, and they sure are not ready to lose another pitcher. They were serious, and the logic behind that kills me. I mean… the guy is not MLB quality, and Steiner was saying last night that they have lost every game he has appeared in? Barf.
I sincerely doubt that there’s a team who’d claim a guy with a knuckler he can’t throw for strikes and an 11 era.
by hee came hee seop'd he choi'd on May 9, 2010 10:13 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
One way or another, Haeger just cant be on this staff any longer. I didnt see the game last night (thankfully), but again, he couldnt throw strikes. The guy is a knuckleballer who has had command of his knuckleball 2 of his appearances. That’s just not acceptable. I also dont understand the reluctance on the Dodgers’ part to not let him go. His upside, and the very top of his ceiling, is a Tim Wakefield type. That would be great, consistent league average guy, but maybe there is a reason that only 1 knuckleballer has thrived in the last decade or so. I just dont see the positives there in throwing him out there when this team is falling further behind the leaders. Sure, its only 6 games behind the overachieving Padres, but losses are still losses. I’m willing to take the bumps and bruises with Kershaw and Bills, guys who are proven and are integral pieces of the future of this organization. For Charlie Haeger, a guy who cant throw his knuckleball for strikes, he has come to the end of his rope for now and needs to be either phantom DLed or just let go and hopefully clears waivers.
Gosh did I root for him
I root for knucklers, and I root for rookies, and I root for guys who are probably fringe major leaguers… there were all sorts of reasons I rooted for him.
But it’s not meant to be — at least, it sure looks that way now. Silverwidow is right, above, when he says “enough is enough.” I think the Dodgers gave him enough of a chance, but not being able to record a single out last night… the word for it is bummer. It’s a bummer for Haeger, and I’m sure the Dodgers were bummed, too. It’s just too bad that it didn’t work out.
Like so many others before him, it’s probably time for Haeger to plan his life after baseball — or, at least, his life after pitching. It is very likely that after last night, that is over.
The Ultimate Ned's Kind of Guy
by Humma Kavula on May 9, 2010 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions
How many of you guys were crowing for Heager to be released after he pitched 4 innings, 1 run relieving Kershaw?
No one, I'm sure, but
surely Haeger was fighting to keep his spot when he did that. That was a great performance for him and surely most were hoping it was a sign of better times to come.
Not only did better times not come… not only was his outing poor… not only did he implode… he didn’t record an out. He threw 22 pitches, 14 balls.
I don’t think this can be chalked up to “one bad start.” Kershaw imploded last time out and while some — maybe me; I don’t remember my own reaction — were over the top in their calls for blood, the others’ pleas for calm were right.
Haeger is surely different, and I think his 4 inning performance can be chalked up to “one good outing” as the outlier. My point is that even though people took it easy on him after that doesn’t mean that the Dodgers don’t need to make another plan.
The Ultimate Ned's Kind of Guy
by Humma Kavula on May 9, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
4 runs of relief in a blowout shows me absolutely nothing. After his debut, he was nothing short of awful until that appearance. The most glaring thing to me what that he consistently had trouble throwing his knuckleball. You just cannot afford to keep a knuckler on the team that cant throw that pitch for a strike.
by UCLADodger32 on May 9, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions
It's not like they would necessarily lose Haeger
If they DFA’d him. He’s going to clear waivers, an I would bet money he would accept a minor league assignment. He can have value, but he needs to work some things out, and that cannot be at the MLB level.
And if he did decide to become a free agent? Let him go, and wish him well.
BTW, Haeger is here this morning. Nothing seems out of the ordinary. But Russ Ortiz was around at this time on the day he was DFA’d too.
No lineup posted just yet.
Russell Martin lightened the mood in the clubhouse by blaring “Im on a Boat.”. Funny stuff.
by Eric Stephen on May 9, 2010 11:20 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Before or after?
Have the Dodgers let on whether they will be making their moves before or after the game? If they haven’t said, is one of those “traditional”, or which is more likely?
As of right now there is nobody new in the clubhouse, nor is there a new locker for someone.
It is the last game of the homestand, so I suspect any new player(s) will meet them in Arizona.
by Eric Stephen on May 9, 2010 11:31 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I was thinking more of the expected announcement of who will be pitching Tuesday (apparently Torre said he’d announce that today), which more than likely will require some changes to the roster by Tuesday. Is it traditional or expected for this type of announcement to be before or after today’s game?
Furcal
Was running the bases under the watchful eye of Stan Conte. He was running 1at to 3rd no problems
by Eric Stephen on May 9, 2010 11:33 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I'll be going to today's Dodgers game hopefully.
Meeting a BTFer with free Loge tickets. I’m excited

by 



















