Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Ted Lilly Finally Comes Home, At A Cost

The full deal isn't known yet, but it appears done. Per Joel Sherman of the New York Post:

Lilly and Theriot for DeWitt -- #Cubs to #Dodgers is done

The full deal, per Ken Gurnick of MLB.com:

Dodgers acquire Ted Lilly, Ryan Theriot and $2.5 million for Blake DeWitt, Brett Wallach and Kyle Smit

Ted Lilly was but a Aaron Miller when he was traded to the defunct Expo's at the age of 22, after being the Dodgers 23rd round pick in the 1996 draft. Lilly was not the centerpiece of the deal, Peter Bergeron was. Lilly  climbed to AAA in a very short  period, and was a good prospect when he was dealt.

July 31, 1998: Traded by the Los Angeles Dodgers with Jonathan Tucker (minors), Peter Bergeron and Wilton Guerrero to the Montreal Expos for Hiram Bocachica, Mark Grudzielanek and Carlos Perez.

One year later he was in the major leagues with the Expos. Once Lilly became a full time starter with Yankee's in 2001 he's been one of the most consistent LH pitchers this decade plying his trade for the Expos, Yankees, A's, BlueJays, and Cubs. In 2007 he signed a four year deal with the Cubs and fulfilled every bit of his contract. Since joining the NL he has not had a WHIP above 1.226 and his ERA+  has been as high as 145 in 2008.

He didn't get started in 2010 until late April because of minor surgery but again, he's been Mr. Consistent, and any team would be happy to have him in their rotation. The only problem with Ted Lilly being a Dodger is that he will only be a Dodger for two months, and it is doubtful his two months anchoring the back end of the rotation will make a hill of beans difference in the Dodgers plight this year. We will have traded some of our future, for the present, but when the future is done on Oct 3rd, the future will have only Kershaw and Billingsley in the rotation.

With a salary of $12,000,000 in 2010, no way will the Dodgers be offering him arbitration so his being a Type A is not going to mean much.  The Dodgers could have signed Lilly in the winter of 2006 instead of Jason Schmidt, if so history might be different. Ned has tried to make up for that mistake by acquiring him now, but his penchant for trading the future for the present is gutting the Dodgers of some fine cost controlled players.

This team has bigger problems then trying to compete for a 2010 playoff spot, they need some players for 2011, and trading your starting second baseman for a 2010 rental borders on massive incompetence. This is not a playoff team, and Ted Lilly or PodBoy is not going to change that. 

Comment 605 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You know the saying “Even if you put lipstick on a pig, it still a pig”? Well, in that scenario, I always imagined putting lipstick around the mouth of the pig. Trading a cost controlled league average 2B for 10 starts of Lilly and shitty ass Theriot is like putting lipstick around the pigs behind area. We didnt even put the damn lipstick in the right place!

by UCLADodger32 on Jul 31, 2010 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm done

I’m done with this season. This is rediculous. Ned is selling his soul for nothing. I fucking Hate Colleti. I can’t even begin to fathom the point of this deal.

by nolander on Jul 31, 2010 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Fuck Ned Colletti. Just fuck him. I won’t let the excuse he has no funds to make trades. He shouldn’t make them then.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

DodgertownUSA
  
DeWitt telling media right now that he’s headed to Cubs. “It comes as a surprise.”

Take care bud.

by Julio Nievas on Jul 31, 2010 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Dewitt never got a real chance

It took not being able to afford a real starting 2B to get him a shot. You may not have been the best player, Blake, but you tried your damndest. Fuck, his defense got to be really good too.

Screw you Ned.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

This makes me sad.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

1:09pm: The Cubs will get DeWitt and another player, likely a minor leaguer according to CBS’ Danny Knobler. The Cubs will pay “a significant amount of Lilly’s salary.”

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Jeff Fletcher JeffFletcherAOL
  
Dodgers get Lilly, Theriot and $2.5 M for Dewitt and 2 minor leaguers. Done.

by silverwidow on Jul 31, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

2 minor league pitchers as well???

Let me guess, Miller and Eovaldi.

FML

My twitter = @neufaustcan

by uclatroy on Jul 31, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Pads got Ludwig and Westbrook we got Lilly and Riot

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

No SD got Ludwick not Westbrook he is going to StL

by vadodger on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Let me just go on record as saying I like Ted Lilly and am perfectly fine that he's on my team.

But (no offense to Theriot) the rest of the deal can bite me.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Harold Reynolds – the voice of reason?

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Jaysonst:
Deal done. #Cubs sending Lilly & Theriot to Cubs for Blake DeWitt & minor lgers Brett Walch & Kyle Smit. LA also gets $2.5M. #trades

by Julio Nievas on Jul 31, 2010 11:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Well I could care less about Smit

but Wallach was decent prospect no?

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

He gave up on Brett Wallach? Fuck this.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sadly...

that’s a relief.

My twitter = @neufaustcan

by uclatroy on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

We gave up Wallach? Fuck that shit

by UCLADodger32 on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

But MLBN just said it was a win for the Dodgers and a deal they had to make!

MLBN knows all!

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Owner has a lot to do with it. If we had cash we wouldn’t throw in prospects.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

NO NO NO

THERE IS NO EXCUSE. This is a piss poor stupid trade. No matter how much money they are getting back. This doesn’t even help the team. Our pitching has been a strength, our offense is killing us. So we trade starters.

by nolander on Jul 31, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Could not agree more.. But McCourt needs to make the dumb fans think he is helping the team to sell tickets… For him its not about the future and winning its about $$$$$$$$

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is so fucking stupid.

I can’t fathom what Ned is thinking here.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

MLB network has no clue.. This doesn’t help and if they were top prospect pitchers this is worse than it looks.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:14 AM PDT reply actions  

We traded a cheap 2nd basemen that can get on base…for 10 starts of Ted Lilly that wont get the team to the playoffs.

Amazingly, the offense just got worse.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:15 AM PDT reply actions  

Harold Reynolds is the one who said this move doesn’t make sense. I always liked him.

by vadodger on Jul 31, 2010 11:15 AM PDT reply actions  

Only one on this channel that makes since.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I usually don't like him but he's the voice of reason here. Which is scary.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

We're not going to have a team in 2013 at this rate.

Seriously.

Its going to Kershaw, Withrow, Miller, and who else in the rotation, and Sands manning all three OF positions at this rate.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:15 AM PDT reply actions  

Seriously...

makes me sick.

My twitter = @neufaustcan

by uclatroy on Jul 31, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't like this trade at all but how does losing DeWitt and Brett Wallach ruin the 2013 team?

Can we sift out the hyperbole from the reality here? Or are you worried more about other players going next?

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Doing it three years straight hurt the 2013 Dodgers. First Santana, then Josh bell, now DeWitt, and Wallach. That’s 4 starterss out of that group. And its not like we’re drafting and developing their replacements. We just traded our 3B dept for the next several years.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Santana is the obvious one we all miss. I wouldn't make it so obvious that the other 3 guys

would all be starters for them in 2013. But I understand your point.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Best of luck, Blake.

I wish it didn’t have to end like this.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 11:16 AM PDT reply actions  

This entire debacle is like a slow train wreck

you see it unfolding, and you cant do anything about it but watch everything slowly crunch together and then fall apart. Wow….just wow.

by EephusBlue on Jul 31, 2010 11:16 AM PDT reply actions  

in 3 years blake dewitt will be hitting 300 for the cubs

lilly will be pitching for the yankees, theriot hitting on high school girls at a mall in encino trying to lure them into his camaro, and the starting 2b for the don mattingly-managed la dodgers – juan uribe

by lchristmas on Jul 31, 2010 11:16 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Cubs fan here

Hate to be Debbie Downer on you guys, but Theriot absolutely sucks. However, you guys WILL fall in love with Lilly. He’s a beast. He’s probably been my favorite Cub for the whole last decade. Anyone care to give me a scouting report on DeWitt?

"Get up or GET OUT THE WAY!"
~Stacy King

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2010 11:18 AM PDT reply actions  

We know Theriot is awful.. DeWitt is a gamer…

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lilly will be here for 10 starts and thats it.
When you’re already way behind in the race, it doesnt matter.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Phillies are better than the Dodgers.
So are the Giants.

If you look at run differential….Dodgers are around 7 games back of the WC.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

as well as...

the reds/cards

My twitter = @neufaustcan

by uclatroy on Jul 31, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like Lilly too

Theriot seems a bench player, And we like DeWItt. I can’t say he’ll be an all star mind you, and he’s been a trooper playing 2nd when he came up as a 3rd baseman. Played better there as of late and did everything management asked of him, Which apparently didn’t matter. :-/

His lack of power has been real disappointing I’ll add. Not much of a slugger. Will give good OBP though.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Theriot will be your starting second basemen

Be ready for plenty of errors and TOOTBLAN’s.

"Get up or GET OUT THE WAY!"
~Stacy King

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2010 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was assuming Carroll will start for now

I’ve been wrong before of course. :-/

But JC has been good and fields very well…

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

No power whatsoever (though leading our team in OPS since the AS break)

But he can sure draw a walk and get on base. His defense has improved a ton at 2B over the last year, and he has made some great plays this year. I’m going to miss him.

How bad is Theriots defense?

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bad

You’ll get very tired of his double clutches

"It's been my policy to view the Internet not as an 'information highway,' but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies." - Mike Royko

by DTJchris on Jul 31, 2010 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was never a Blake Dewitt fan, but he proved that he could at least get on base and his bat played well enough for 2nd.

This move just makes no sense.
Maybe, maybe…if Ted Lilly was signed next year I could see it.

But just an awful move, especially for a team that is done anyway.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:18 AM PDT reply actions  

You’d think Ned Colletti’s 5yr deal would have given him some restraint about making certain moves.

But no.

He’s still an idiot and should be gone.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:20 AM PDT reply actions  

From Jay Jaffe
jay_jaffe
  
Dislike the deal, but do like Lilly quite a bit. Rather see Dodgers re-sign him than Randy Wolf. 3.75 SIERA, .542 SNWP, 7.6 K/9 as Cub.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:20 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree with Jaffe on that point (he hates everything else about trade so agree with him there too)

and about re signing him but what is depressing is Dodgers will cheap out and not offer him arbitration.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Unless Lilly takes a big paycut, I’m not sure the Dodgers can afford what he’ll command.

And he makes too much this year to risk offering arbitration to him.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t mind moving DeWitt if the return was better. I feel like I’ve said that before.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 11:20 AM PDT reply actions  

The return was horrible! :(

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, which is why I mind moving DeWitt. This sucks.

Made a move simply to make a move. Which is that PR BS, but they did it anyway.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

What was the point for trading for Scotty Pods then? They’re both PR moves. Ugh

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

When will Lilly start?

Billingsly today Kershaw tomorrow

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:22 AM PDT reply actions  

The Wallach part of the trade

Was the Wallach part of the trade away of letting Tim Wallach know he will never manage the Dodgers?

by wineracquet on Jul 31, 2010 11:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Not necessarily. I've seen franchises trade away relatives before

and still keep the family around. I wouldn’t go there yet.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Are Wallach and Smit considered good prospects?

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Smit no. Wallach yes.

Not an A or B+ prospect, but B-, something lke that?

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wallach was a potential top ten prospect guy.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lineup!

Podsednik LF, Furcal SS, Kemp CF, Blake 3B, Loney 1B, Martin C, Anderson RF, Carroll 2B, Billingsley P

by kngoworld on Jul 31, 2010 11:24 AM PDT reply actions  

I know Ethier is struggling…but GA should never play in place of Ethier.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Reed or Manny were healthy he would be in the Unemployment line..

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

The people who comment here and pay close attention will hate this, but the average dodger fan and dodger stadium attendee will only care if they do make the playoffs.

This deal could be worth a few more wins since our 5 starter sucks and that is why they did it. I wasn’t in love with DeWitt, but with the future mortgaged we are in trouble regardless of this deal. Not having money is making us make deals that cost too much.

by SLC DODGER FAN on Jul 31, 2010 11:24 AM PDT reply actions  

Ted Lilly has a 1.2 WAR for the season, at most, he is worth one more win for the rest of the season.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Its not as if Lilly was producing ace like production. He’s still Ted Lilly and rated as such.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

As bad as the Dodgers 5th starters have been, they are 14-17 in their 31 starts. We aren’t talking 3-7 here. They have been pretty much right at replacement level.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

it's theriot.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

yes

DeWitt is a league average player with one more year near league minimum, plus three more years under club control.

Horrible deal if it was DeWitt alone.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pimentel, B. Wallach, and Dewitt gone for Scott Pods, Lilly, and Theriot…

by Julio Nievas on Jul 31, 2010 11:24 AM PDT reply actions  

i think the dodgers now something we dont

something abou the midwest league helpins pitchers numbers out by a lot

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thats interesting theory. If they are throw-aways, its too bad we didn’t acquire useful pieces.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Where has DeWitt's power gone?

After hitting nine homers his rookie year he has hit only three since then.

"Get up or GET OUT THE WAY!"
~Stacy King

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2010 11:24 AM PDT reply actions  

He has no power. Hope for the wind blowing out.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

How about his defense?

"Get up or GET OUT THE WAY!"
~Stacy King

by wrigleyrocker12 on Jul 31, 2010 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

inexperienced at 2B

but learning. He’s a good defender at third and should eventually be good at 2nd

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Work in progress. He’s a fantastic 3B defender, but below average at 2B.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Made for third base. Played second decently. Nothing spectacular.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

he has solid gap power. He’ll turn on one every once in a while. But he gets a fair number of gappers

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow this team is run by idiots

You made us proud Lake Show! 2009 and 2010 BACK 2 BACK CHAMPS!

by sumo390 on Jul 31, 2010 11:25 AM PDT reply actions  

IF we make the playoffs

Who would you rather have THIS YEAR? Dewitt or Lilly?

by TXScout2 on Jul 31, 2010 11:25 AM PDT reply actions  

DeWitt

since Lilly isn’t better than our top 4 starters

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

IF we make playoffs is Lilly even a Playoff starter? Kershaw, Billingsly, Kuroda,,,???

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Depending on who gets optioned to AAA to make room for Lilly, the Dodgers added roughly $2.3 million in payroll in this deal.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Has to be McDonald or the German..

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well, I was wrong about Ned

His boneheaded past moves weren’t forced on him by his need to keep his job. He’s got his multi-year contract and he’s still boneheaded. “Borders on massive incompetence” works for me. Come October we’ll have nothing to show for this but Ryan Bleeping Theriot. Bring me that new owner, Judge, I’ll take the devil I don’t know.

by Little Blue Bicycle on Jul 31, 2010 11:29 AM PDT reply actions  

well

i’m happy with lilly because now we may have one of the best starting rotations in baseball… on the other hand… WHAT THE FUCK WAS THE POINT IN EXCHANGING DEWITT AND RYAN FUCKING THERIOT! his ops is below ,700 too, FUCK OUTTA HERE!

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:31 AM PDT reply actions  

I was getting excited earlier that Ned might actually SELL

and we would get something for Manny, and then this…

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:31 AM PDT reply actions  

Have to say —→ I once saw Ryan Theriot buy beer in Chicago a couple years ago at a Jewell. It was bud light.

Yes, he’s very gritty.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:32 AM PDT reply actions  

Wondering if Ned was on the bench between selling/buying.

If he could work out the Cubs deal: buying.

If he couldn’t, sell Manny to an interested party.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 11:32 AM PDT reply actions  

err well i am curious now

which is worse? This deal for Lilly? or a similar deal for Malholm?

by EephusBlue on Jul 31, 2010 11:32 AM PDT reply actions  

This deal. Maholm is under K next year

by vadodger on Jul 31, 2010 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

well if it was giving up blake

then maholm would be better cause we’d have him in the future.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

maybe its good if lilly resigns, but why would he. this team has no money and shitty owners.

by hee came hee seop'd he choi'd on Jul 31, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Probably this deal for Lilly, since we still aren’t likely to make the playoffs and Maholm would have been around next year. Maybe if they weren’t cheap asses and offered Lilly arb, then we could get something, but thats not gonna happen.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

wallach

hes a C+ prospect, Smit it probably a C-

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Are the Dodgers done dealing? or can I expect more change?

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:34 AM PDT reply actions  

This fucks us so badly for next year. No second baseman and Theriot’s arb-eligibility on the payroll is crippling.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Which basically means Casey Blake will at 3B next year.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

We won’t be able to afford to replace him with someone who is OPSing better than .720 in the offseason.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also

Wasn’t out of the realm of possibility that Carroll would have taken over third if Blake continued to regress.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

DeJesus?

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah the walk dropoff is big concern

he’s still young and talented though, first full year after injury… I still have hope.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

i'm sad.

time to blast the despicable me song and just lay back.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:34 AM PDT reply actions  

What puzzles me the most is that Ned seems to be the only one alive who can’t understand the concept that we don’t have money to spend.

by pdotmac1 on Jul 31, 2010 11:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Not now we are buyers… Maybe Manny moves in waivers trade later if we fall far behind. Now we are buyers.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

are we buyers?

Did this even make us better?

(yes, i know we’re now buyers in Ned’s mind. I’m just pissed)

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

to be honest, it probably did.

the offense, definitely not. but lilly just made us better.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

but you're right,

i never said it was worth it. dewitt for theriot is simply retarded.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

that pushes monk to the pen.

i really think that helps us.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

It made us better

but not anywhere near enough for it to matter for our playoff chances, and with negative impact on future years.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Omg please

Ask for that Cuban 3B prospect from the White Sox and then include someone like James Mcdonald too.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

My thoughts on the trade.

I’m upset to see Lilly go, and I wish him well in LA with you guys.

Theriot is most certainly not my favorite player. I am one of several guys at BCB who dislike him.

What is Blake DeWitt like?

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 11:35 AM PDT reply actions  

He has patience but no power.

by silverwidow on Jul 31, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

or speed. He’s not really a 2B

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Too-light hitting third baseman converted to second, was getting the hang of it defensively (numbers better than the stiff you guys sent us), except in average a slightly superior hitter to this stiff you sent us (especially in OPS), cheap, good kid, a grinder type from down SE MO, you’ll like him.

by Little Blue Bicycle on Jul 31, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just like Theriot but much slower and worse defensively. Good ridance.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

very nice person.

dependable. led this sorry offense in ops since all-star break. natural 3rd baseman but defense on 2nd is getting much better. young, cheap. he will get on base. you’re lucky.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

And I was thinking Lilly was a good steal for the Dodgers.

He has actually pitched very well, but in terms of run support, he has ranked dead last in the NL.

I saw him pitch at Wrigley against Houston on July 21, and the Cubs scored 1 run in his support and the Astros beat the Cubs in 12 innings by the score of 4-3.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

oh i love the lilly part.

i’ve been wanting lilly since the rumor came up because he’s no doubt the best 5th pitcher in the league now. with a mid 3.00 era, i was pretty sure his run support was bad haha.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

probably

who’s better as a 5th pitcher? The problem is this trade was for a #5 starter. Hooray

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

oh

i think he meant he was a top 5 pitcher in the league.

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

woa

you read that horribly wrong. best 5th pitcher, not 5th best pitcher.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Best 5th pitcher=

Best 5th starter.

I’ve made the same statement with people not knowing what I meant, lol.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

hahaha

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

it makes more sense if you say

“best #5 starter” or something like that.

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

gotcha.

i’ll do that next time.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, run support for him while with us has been abysmal.

The Cubs have scored 2.4 runs PG when he starts.

This is why his W-L record is bad, it’s not because he’s pitched badly. Basically, if he makes one mistake, he goes from being in line for the win to being on the hook for the loss.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Er, that's for this year.

Not previous years.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

LOL hope he doesn’t expect much more in LA.. Runs have been hard to find since all star.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

solid OBP, decent contact hitter

no power, looks overmatched against big time power pitchers. Not an all star but offensively an average 2B. He’s cheap and controllable for the next few years

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

See some of our comments above to your fellow Cubbie fan

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, saw them too.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Saw them after I made my comment.

My bad.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not a bad, just trying to save time ;-)

I know I’m all spent and can’t type any more about this.

In short: Lilly is liked. I am happy to have him, too.
DeWitt you will like, though he’s not a great player. We felt the trade overall was too much to give up and the money thing pisses us off. Cubs and Dodgers both sort of lose and sort of win on this trade, but our ownership is cheap and sucks. There you have it!

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dewitt and Hudson

The stats of Dewitt and Hudson offensively are very close. How sad is it that we are downgrading a position two years in a row, and for a few million dollars we wouldn’t have had to do it. Would really love to know if the Dodgers would have taken only 1 million and thrown in the same prospects would we have had to put Dewitt in the package?

by wineracquet on Jul 31, 2010 11:36 AM PDT reply actions  

personally

if this was Lilly for Wallach and Smit it would be reasonable. I like Lilly. He’s a solid pitcher that’s now probably the best #5 starter in baseball. But Dewitt for Theriot is where Ned loses me. That is absolutely retarded.

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:36 AM PDT reply actions  

Plus

We traded a Major league player and prospects for two months of LILLY.

Angels trade a major league player and prospects for HAREN.

Phillies trade a major league player (who isn’t even in the bigs right now) and prospects for OSWALT.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Blake Dewitt is our Joe Saunders is our JA Happ...

Lilly, Haren, Oswalt….1 of these is not like the other.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

the prospects we gave up

aren’t as good as the prospects angels and phils gave up

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know that Gose or Villar

are much better than Wallach. They’re just toolsy speedsters. Huge gamble IMO.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

i like gose more than wallach.

but thats just personal peference. wallach, for a guy who was relatively polished, should not be walking 4+ in low A ball.

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Happ started and won last night for Houston

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

My bad

I didn’t know he was brought up.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

We traded a guy in Brett Wallach

who at 21 has a 3.72 ERA, 4.6 BB/9, 9.8K/9 in Low-A.

Yes, he’s only at low-A, and shit might happen and he may have never reach the majors, but the Dodgers should be the ones to find that out.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:41 AM PDT reply actions  

MORE TRADES TO COME???
Ken_Rosenthal
  
Hearing #Rays, #Dodgers on League. #MLB 3 minutes ago via web

by silverwidow on Jul 31, 2010 11:43 AM PDT reply actions  

League plays for Seattle, Dodgers and Rays interested in him. Seattle won’t be taking Manny, it’ll be someone else off the farm. I’m not sure I can bear to watch.

by Little Blue Bicycle on Jul 31, 2010 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Which League? Independent ball? ;-)

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is their rationale simply that DeWitt wasn’t doing much and Carroll will be better at 2B for the next year and a half?

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:43 AM PDT reply actions  

I don’t even think they’re wrong. But, to trade DeWitt for this return was wrong.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why the fuck are we buying? Why the fuck are we buying?

We just lost series to the Padres, and Giants, two teams we have to jump over. WHY THE FUCK ARE WE BUYING?

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

Last Dodgers-Giants series, the Giants won 2 out of 3

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

right

haha. i was traveling that whole series, which is why i forgot about it.

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

last week yo

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

kengurnick
  
The Dodgers acquire Ted Lilly, Ryan Theriot and $2.5 million fron Cubs for Blake DeWitt, Kyle Smit and Brett Wallach.

Why has he tweeted this like 7 times..

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

lmao

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Gurnick doesn't strike me as the sort who would find this trade funny or terrible

FWIW ;)

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

That 2.5 Mill can build a lot of youth baseball fields

There’s still a lot of baseball to be played. The Dodgers are just going to keep slapping paint on a 75 Buick all willy nilly like, cause that’s what you do when you rename a section of your ballpark after a 75 Buick, and eh, maybe we’ll get a few more memories out of it. I doubt Ned ever lets this team be a bunch of young upstarts, like some of the A’s teams or the Rays now.

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 11:46 AM PDT reply actions  

i would be completely in love

if we could get a team like the rays. they will no doubt win a couple of rings in the future…

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's just not gonna happen under this regime

remember when the Dodgers were known for their farm, used to win ROY every year. When did that end?

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

haha

i know. i would just be in love if it happened. ):

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol
When did that end

when you were like 9

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Damn

I miss the Dodgers 9 year old me watched. That’s around the time my dad stopped taking me to games, Fox bought the team, Old Man Jenkins closed the rec center

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

me too.

i’m half korean and lived in korea back then (up until i was 19 lol) but park chan-ho was THE SHIT over there. me and korean family just sat back and watched him pitch back then. they were only dodger fans because of him though hah.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

me too.

him and piazza, hands down my two favorite players back then. god i miss them :( park chan-ho is forever korea’s favorite player lol. well, that is, until choo becomes a HUUUUUGE STAR

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

to think...

if they still had josh hamilton and delmon young too… they’d be crazy!

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

and where did that get us….

by raj m on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Colletti speaks

"We’ve been looking to improve our rotation and with Ted, we feel like we’ve got a very good group of starting pitchers for the stretch run," said Colletti. "Ryan is versatile and can help us in the middle of the diamond as a nice complement to our existing infielders.

"Of all the times I’ve had to tell a player he was traded, this was one of the toughest telling Blake DeWitt," Colletti added. "His professionalism, his passion and who he is made doing this one of the toughest moves I’ve made."

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT reply actions  

from Dodgers press release

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not tough enough, apparently.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

ow much of this is Torre? He likes the vets. Did he push for the DeWitt for Theriot part of this?

by mrboma on Jul 31, 2010 11:48 AM PDT reply actions  

DeWitt’s his guy though. Torre loves DeWitt. This is on Ned.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure, Torre always pulls DeWitt for defense late in games… Not anymore… Opens a bench player spot up

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Because he’s been playing out of position at 2B.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

but BEST PLAYER

is dewitt.

like i said, those low A arms being traded is not what’s pissing me off. It’s acquiring a piece of shit like theriot and trading dewitt.

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah. You want to trade DeWitt? Fine, but get value for him. Fuck, just trade DeWitt for Lilly, I might be pissed off less in that case.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Theriot and DeWitt are the same player except Theriot has speed and range that’s better than a lamppost. As far as I’m concerned we traded three minor leaguers for a solid starter, a minor leaguer and cash.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

same player?

look at that ISO discipline spread. i don’t see a same player. OBP is extremely important if you can’t hit for power.

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

And until this year Theriot’s OBP was the same as DeWitt’s. It has dipped a bit this year.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

His OBP has largely dipped

because he was used as a leadoff hitter for most of the first half of the season, until when Lou started using Colvin and Castro at 1-2.

It mostly is due to what he thinks at the plate.

Theriot gave an interview earlier this year when he said he didn’t look for walks, calling them a “defensive state”. He went from May 1 to June 5 without a walk, using that mindset. When he finally did get a base on balls, on June 5, he got hi-fived in the Cubs’ dugout.

When Lou finally moved him out of leadoff, it was for this game between the Cubs and Phillies. That was the Sunday night Cubs-Phillies game at Wrigley, and I was in the left-field bleachers that night.

Since then, Theriot has largely been in the 8 spot but his average and OBP have not improved by much.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

except Theriot can't hit

even when compared to Dewitt. Plus Theriot is about $8 million more expensive for the next two years

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

And his defensive stats are notable worse.

by Little Blue Bicycle on Jul 31, 2010 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

There are no reliable stats to measure defense.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

But the best we have show him to be worse.

by Little Blue Bicycle on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

you're missing the point about the money

even if you think Dewitt is no better than Theriot, which i disagree with, Dewitt is so much cheaper. Especially since Dewitt will be making $400-500K next two years and Theriot is arb. eligible

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

only next year for DeWitt

he is arb eligible in 2012, but your point is still very valid, and the main reason I am pissed about the deal.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

wllaach

younger… has more of a starters repotoire while pimental is probably a bullpen piece down the road..

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

no Heyman

this is not a plus on offense

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 11:52 AM PDT reply actions  

“Lilly may not be an ace, but he’s a veteran.”

My twitter = @neufaustcan

by uclatroy on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Batting average! Which is all that matters.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

obp.

plus, theriot’s ops is below .700… bad.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

In early June, his OBP was .311.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

This screams of giving up on Manny playing anytime soon.

The ONE thing Theriot can do that DeWitt can’t is steal a base. Getting Pods and Theriot. Its seems like posturing the team for pitching, and run manufacturing.

Except for the fact that Theriot and Pods suck at getting on base.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:55 AM PDT reply actions  

I think Carroll takes DeWitts role, and Theriot takes Carrolls spot on the bench.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed that's what Im thinking too

I don’t think Theriot is coming in to be a full time starter…

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Stark says Rays are unlikely to make a deal.

If #Mariners trade Brandon League, doesn’t look as if it’s to #Rays. Hearing Tampa Bay unlikely to make another deal today.

http://twitter.com/jaysonst/status/20011406757

Which could mean we’re getting Brandon League.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 11:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Hip hip

hoo fucking joy!

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

let's be honest.

that’s a huge upgrade in the pen lol. BUT, which good prospects are the idiots going to give up for this?

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lilly/Dewitt

Not a bad deal, we need pitching and got it. Wasnt a big fan on blake anyway

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 11:56 AM PDT reply actions  

Look beyond the 2010 season

and you will see this trade for what it is.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

FUCK
tomkrasovic
  
#Dodgers are making a push for Orioles OF Luke Scott. #Rays also in the mix.

by silverwidow on Jul 31, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions  

FUCK FUCK FUCK. NO MORE TRADES PLEASE.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes!

Please, Scott can actually put up a mid .800s OPS.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

LF

Yes, trade Manny too, get a pretty good prospect for him, I’d love that.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's the best option left

we need offense, let’s go after him! :)

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I actually like Luke Scott

but couldn’t they have started and ended with this one?

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe Colleti will throw in the deed for Dodger Stadium to make the trade.

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

what the

fucking fuck?

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

What the fuck

So now Ned wants Luke Scott and then Pods can sit on the bench along with Theriot and Reed and Manny (if those two ever come back)?

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I'm the only Dodger fan

that doesn’t mind this trade.

Why is everyone acting like Blake DeWitt is Chase Utley? And mistaking Wallach for Withrow?

Why is everyone overlooking that Lilly should be a type A? With Kuroda and most of Manny’s money off the books, we’re going to lock up Lilly or get some draft picks.

Why is everyone ready to give up on this season? We’re behind the Giants and Padres, not exactly juggernauts. Remember 2008 and the DBacks?

Theriot’s fine. I’ll take his 4.5 and 3.4 career UZR at 2B and SS, respectively, over a guy that’s an awful defensive 2B or terrible hitter at 3B.

Also, you know Ned isn’t done. Let’s wait until we see the bigger picture (please, no snarky comments about how he’s working on more ways to “mortgage the future”).

Calm down, folks! :)

by some_dude on Jul 31, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions  

we won’t offer Lilly arbitration anyway.

by dodgerpreacher on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

No i agree with you

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

We’re not offering arbitration to Lilly where he can potentially make $15 million for one year.

Blake DeWitt is not Chase Utley, however, he is worth more than Theriot.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

With Kuroda and most of Manny’s money off the books, we’re going to lock up Lilly or get some draft picks.

The Dodgers are not going to offer Lilly arbitration.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dodgers track record on this issue is well documented

Dodgers need an owner with real resources to run the team

by 68elcamino427 on Jul 31, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Besides

We’re still paying Manny the next two years

by StolenMonkey86 on Jul 31, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

1) it is debatable that Lilly will be a Type A (he is replacing a 17-win season with a current 3-win season in the 2-year stats)

2) the Dodgers won’t offer him arbitration anyway

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why is everyone ready to give up on this season? We’re behind the Giants and Padres, not exactly juggernauts. Remember 2008 and the DBacks?

We’ve been saying this the entire season about the mysterious Padres. Yet they continue to lead the division, and the just acquired Ryan Ludwick.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

They’ll offer him arbitration right after the offer me.

by Little Blue Bicycle on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's not worth suicide over

but it’s frustrating in that the Dodgers are again giving up young players and prospects in order to not only make a trade but save money. If it was just acquiring Lilly I’d be on board with it but it’s the whole DeWitt / Theriot thing that made me angrier.

I like Lilly and all.

But the Dodgers won’t offer him arbitration making that part not a win for LA.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or what everyone else said.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jul 31, 2010 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why is everyone overlooking that Lilly should be a type A? With Kuroda and most of Manny’s money off the books, we’re going to lock up Lilly or get some draft picks.

the type A value is the only saving grace but the dodgers dont exaclty have a track record of offering arb.

by npurcell on Jul 31, 2010 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

They offered arb to Lowe (and Manny) a year earlier.

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

And didn’t to Hudson and Wolf.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

So what track record are we talking about? Does one year make a trend?

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

They also didn’t offer arbitration to Biemel and picked up an easy comp pick in 2008.

If the Divorce didn’t cause the money problems the Dodgers had, it certainly made it harder.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

It seems to have always been a major ownership goal to have a relatively small payroll compared to other major markets.

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

that was when they weren’t broke

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aw, c’mon. $15 mil in arb? People are still hung up on Wolf? Is nobody glad that the Dodgers didn’t offer HIM arb? That could have been a disaster. Let’s wait until the offseason to be so quick to shoot down the notion of arbitration for Lilly. I’m just saying there are good possibilities.

You can bash Ned, and much is deserved. But I think the Dodgers are generally smart in arbitration.

by some_dude on Jul 31, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lilly is making $12 million this year, 15 million in an arbitation settlement is not unreasonable.

And that’s a fuckton of money for what you would consider your 5th starter. He’s not going to get arbitration.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well to be fair

he wouldn’t be our 5th starter next year.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

These rumors

are starting to make me wonder if ESPN has hacked into Ned’s email account, and are just posting everything they see. I’m just waiting for “Dodgers have been offered up to 4 inches of enhancement, for low payments”

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 11:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Excellent

we just need to wire the money through this Ugandan prince, everything will work out gangbusters

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

hahaha

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can you go tie Ned up

So he can’t make any more moves (unless its to sell Manny)

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

He’s still the same GM who lead the team to two NLCS.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

By the way, I have to give props to Harold Reynolds, who was the only one on the panel on MLB Network who didn’t like the trade for the Dodgers, saying Lilly wouldn’t get them to the playoffs.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT reply actions  

really and what will?

sitting going out and doing nothing like we are now? losing division games?

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

So you want to sell our future for a slim hope of this year?

These trades don’t help us all that much. Have fun watching the dodgers fall apart over the next couple years.

by nolander on Jul 31, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

You either trade for someone who can actually help you

like Haren or Oswalt, or you don’t do anything at all.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

The point is really, nothing will. If the team plays better, they have a shot, but Lilly isn’t a big enough upgrade to be the difference.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

A question

Whats with all u people hatin on this trade? please people give me some insight on why

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Theriot

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

thank you for

answering. unlike other people that dont know how to read my question.

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not my question

can u read? i wanna know why U think its a bad idea.

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don’t be an asshole.

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

im not.

i asked a simple question, and obviously he didnt understand it.

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

But there are literally hundreds of comments saying why we don’t like the trade.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

LIke I said

if you would read all the comments above you would see everyone’s opinions of the trade reiterated over and over again.

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

consensus is

dodgers are losers, need to sell

Unless you trade for a 21 WAR player who can single-handledly make up the 7GB problem

by TXScout2 on Jul 31, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do the Dodgers have anything to sell?

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is trading Manny a realistic possibility?

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

To me

when your losing, you buy. when your winning you buy.

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is not a smart position.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

well i mean

when your in a position like us.(6-7 games back of leader and can’t win lately) u go out get players that will help your team win those div games which will help your chances at winning the division. but if your 10-20 games back then u sell. and if your only a few games leading then you get players that will increase your lead.

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

That would be true

if you get players that can bridge a 6 – 7 game deficit. Ted Lilly cannot. And Theriot sucks so he will sit on the bench and pinch run which will not win you games.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

theriot is the starting 2b

read that i think on twitter that comin from torre.

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

When you’re losing you can buy as long as it makes the team better in both the long and short term. As of today it seems like the Dodgers might have over payed which isn’t a good strategy.

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

1) Lilly is not good enough of an upgrade to make up 4.5 games
2) Theriot is a worse player than DeWitt, plus older and more expensive
3) We lose a league minimum average player in 2011 (DeWitt), plus the chance that Theriot might be offered arbitration and make more money the next two years to suck
4) Lilly is not signed for more years (if he was it would bolster next year’s currently-thin rotation)

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dewitt for Lilly

People are looking at this wrong. It wasn’t DeWitt for Theriot and the pitchers for Lilly. This was DeWitt and Wallach for Lilly. Theriot was a throw in by the Cubs to make the deal happen.

by mrboma on Jul 31, 2010 12:03 PM PDT reply actions  

DeWitt .262/.340/.379

Theriot .287/.350/.362

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Career numbers are not in season numbers.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right. Career numbers are more reliable.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not if he’s trending downwards. And his production at SS counts as well. You’re arguing career numbers but intentionally trying to hide Theroit’s flaws.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are you ready to get rid of Kemp because he’s trending downward after half a season? And what flaws does Theriot have that DeWitt doesn’t?

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Kemp was 30, had a career year 2 years ago, and looks like he could never reach it again, yes.

Ryan Theroit is 30 years old, He had his career year in 2008 where he produced a 3.2 WAR
In 2009 he had a 2.4 WAR because he was such a bad hitter than even his above average fielding couldn’t outweigh it.

In 2010, Ryan Theroit even performs worse offensively compared to 2009, and his fielding takes a dive to produce a -0.1 WAR.

He’s 30 years old, going to get expensive in arbitration and is getting noticeably worse. Yes, he is a bad player and DeWitt is more valuable than him.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Matt Kemp in comparision

2008:3.2
2009: 5.1
2010: 0.5 (And this with UZR rating him as the worst CF in the league, which I don’t believe.)

You’ll have to believe that Kemp and Theorit are even remotely comparable offensively to think they’re similar.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh my God! I’m not trying to compare talent between Kemp and Theriot. I’m making the point that you’re giving up on a player who has regressed very little. Something you wouldn’t do with a player you liked.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very little? Even when he’s was good he produced below all star level, and was solid at best. It only takes a little regression from Theroit to enter replacement level which is where he is at right now.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

And so is DeWitt.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

The difference is that DeWitt had options and still in his mid 20s and wasn’t going to get expensive in 2 years.

You basically traded for his older, more expensive version. That’s a dumb trade.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

but dewitt wasnt traded for theriot

he was traded for lilly… we either give up dewitt or we give up a sands withrow type of player or players

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Then don’t trade for Theriot. For what ever reason, they wanted him

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry, the difference in value between the two is miniscule. They’re both AAAAplayers at best.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

it's about the money

Dewitt would’ve saved us $6 million that we could’ve used on improving the team instead of making it worse

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

DeWitt and Theriot.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

DeWitt’s the one with a positive WAR this year though.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

no

because Kemp’s in his mid 20’s instead of early 30’s, has 10x more talent than Theriot has, and is still having a better year than Theriot’s ever had

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

if those are career stats

you’re still completely missing the point

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t care about the money right now. I’m refuting people who are saying DeWitt is a better player. He’s not.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly. So I don’t understand the ire. Except for the money and Theriot won’t be on the team next year. I don’t want DeWitt as a starter next year either.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

WAR

Blake DeWitt: 1.0
Ryan Theriot: -0.1

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

DeWitt career UZR/150 at 2B: -7.3
Theriot: 6.8

And he can play SS.

by some_dude on Jul 31, 2010 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Irrelevant

The trade wasn’t Theriot for DeWitt. It was DeWitt for Lilly. Theriot was a throw in.

by mrboma on Jul 31, 2010 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Theriot is gonna make at least $8 million

in the next 2 years through arbitration. Dewitt will probably make around $2 million in that time

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

And Theriot will make 8 million for being 31-33YO while DeWitt will be 24-26.

I like Cetera.

by G.Scott on Jul 31, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

He went to an arbitration hearing with the Cubs in February this year.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

he should get non-tendered

but i doubt he will. If he does, then he’l a little more reasonable as a throw in by the Cubs

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think he will. And I don’t want either starting next year.

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll miss DeWitt

tho I’m not sure he had good enough defense for second or good enough offense for third. Maybe he’ll turn out to be a good player but I’m not sure he really was the future. I really hope they end up offering arbitration to Lilly, who could end up being cheaper and better than Kuroda, although I’m also a Kuroda fan.

by Dalton Paull on Jul 31, 2010 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Cheaper than Kuroda seems unlikely

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

If we sign Lilly to an extension, does it make this deal ok?

I like Cetera.

by G.Scott on Jul 31, 2010 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

No.

They could have just, signed him and not traded anybody if they wanted him next year.

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Lily gets extensions

then we’re talking

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

would of really

liked him to be on the team:(

Um, how am i supposed to sign this thing? It's a computer?!

by mikeinsp on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kevin Kaduk

thinks we could get a haul for Vin Scully

by TXScout2 on Jul 31, 2010 12:10 PM PDT reply actions  

By the way...

Having a backup SS isn’t a bad thing. Also, who do we want at SS if Furcal were to go down (the thought of that just made me feel sick)? Theriot or Castro or Carroll?

by some_dude on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 PM PDT reply actions  

2:08pm: Scott is getting play but not from the Dodgers, tweets Brown.

:(

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 PM PDT reply actions  

I like Luke Scotts bat but we already have one DH to Many.

by Dalton Paull on Jul 31, 2010 12:12 PM PDT reply actions  

I can't wait to see Plaschke's writeup on this

Behind a desk, sat a GM with a stache.

In a chair, sat an owner with some cash.

Behind a desk, “I’ve got a trade!”

In a chair, “We’ll all get paid.”

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 12:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Rumor

My dad works for the Giants, and he said the Giants are close to getting Dunn.

My name sucks.

by Dodgers on Jul 31, 2010 12:15 PM PDT reply actions  

JOY

We’re even more screwed.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

He mashed for the first month of that deal, then slumped

Dunn is still a mid .900s OPS bat, I don’t care if he didn’t help the Dbacks win in 2008, with another big bat in Dunn the Giants could win now.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 31, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe they’ll DFA Burrell to make room and we can grab him.

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

No run support for Lilly

Lilly, 34, has just a 3-8 won-loss record — but only because he has had the second-worst run support of any starting pitcher in the major leagues (3.77 runs per nine innings).

I hope he doesn’t expect any change to that.

by mrboma on Jul 31, 2010 12:16 PM PDT reply actions  

The Dodgers have regressed offensively at every position this year with the exception of SS with Furcal and maybe 1B with Loney. Unless that changes, the Dodgers aren’t making the playoffs, Ted Lilly or not.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 12:17 PM PDT reply actions  

Andre Ethier has left for the birth of his child. #dodgers

http://twitter.com/JeffFletcherAOL

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

it's ok

a lefty is pitching today lol

by bucknellbruin on Jul 31, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

hahaha

the child is a blessing for us all.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Congratulations but our offense just got temporarily worse

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

don’t tell Josie. It’s always harder to leave a marriage with two kids instead of one

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like your thinking.

Now just wait about 6 months so Andre stops losing sleep at night and he’ll be fantastic again. :)

by Jesse S. on Jul 31, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nah

I’m actually really happy for him! Congrats Andre! Out of respect for the second child, I hereby lay to rest my Andre love shtick. I will not comment on his desirability ever again.



*sniff

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Keep that kid away from Ned, Andre

he might trade him for someone with a bit more experience…

by mintxcore on Jul 31, 2010 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

According to the email a bunch of us probably just got

The rotation is now Padilla, Kershaw, Bills, Kuroda, Lilly. Monk goes back to the pen. This is what we knew, but seeing it in print, that’s not a bad rotation, and now Monk can provide the middle relief that’s been eh.

How would you define your approach to management, apart from being brilliant?

by Josie Becker on Jul 31, 2010 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

To make things better

I will be a guest again on a special trade deadline special with good friend Vito Chirco (“The Godfather”) on Sports Talk Soup.

Listen for me at 1pm.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sportstalksoup/2010/07/31/sportstalksoups-mlb-trade-deadline-special

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Hopefully much needed comic relief

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just keep thinking

practice for podcasts, practice for podcasts

by bhsportsguy on Jul 31, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why do you hate yourself? :)

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

It’s good practice, plus it’s fun

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Terry-OT, thre-eOT how do you say it?

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Just curious ... what was Belliard known for?

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

He came to the team last September

And hit pretty well, thereby moving Hudson onto the bench

by bhsportsguy on Jul 31, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Playing suprisingly well last year

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

A power surge and timely hitting down the stretch last season.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks, guys.

Back to BCB for me.

I didn't believe it last August, but it turns out that love survives.

Mount Washington conquered July 5, 2010

State high point count: 3/50

by Vermont Cubs Fan on Jul 31, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

He played out of his mind down the stretch as soon as he put on the Dodger uni

by 68elcamino427 on Jul 31, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Big difference

Theriot can hardly hit the ball out of the infield.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

dewitt

damn i didnt know everyone loved the guy so much

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Honestly I’m not that upset about him getting dealt.

Just the return.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

we get lilly

whose a very good pitcher….

its not like dewitt could be a center piece for a oswalt or haren deal. hes the type of player right now that is a centerpiece for a solid player

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

They could have just kept DeWitt and had him play 2nd base for the Dodgers at $400K

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol

this is the same type of deal as the john garland deal last year….

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

except Abreu didn’t have DeWitt’s track record, and the Dodgers didn’t take on an older, shittier player as well, nor did they give up two other minor league prospects.

Other than that, same deal.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

i dont think dewitt is that much better then abrue

his defense is sure not better… and dewitt aint really known as an offensive player..

plus lilly is a better pitcher then garland.

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would be fine with the deal if Lilly were signed for 2011, but he’s done after this year.

Pointless deal.

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

john garland 2.0

tony abrue could have been our starter for the next 6 years or dewitt…

but now they are gone for 18 starts combined of lilly garland…

plus we get theroit who sucks

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dewitt's ceiling

is probably a league average 2B. He would be cost-controlled for at least 2 more years plus even past that, his salary would be on the low end barring any great improvement.

Theriot is older, already earning more money and his ceiling is probably slightly below league average.

The Lilly deal is a rental but he does improve the rotation.

Low A arms are still pretty far away

by bhsportsguy on Jul 31, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

It’s not even that. I did like him, but this trade is so damn stupid.

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

so damn stupid

so are most people here in agreement that playoffs this year are a longshot?

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am. The Pads got better. The teams in front of us in the WC got better. We might be a little better with Lilly, but its not enough unless Manny comes back and him, Ethier, Kemp, etc. start tearing the cover off the ball.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Could this team make a run

Look, the pitching will keep them in the game, the bullpen might even settle down to where Weaver is the worst option (depending on what happens with Sherrill).

However, as people have been saying, it will depend on the one thing they really could not improve during this trade deadline, the offense.

by bhsportsguy on Jul 31, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.

The Phillies, Giants, Cardinals are all better than the Dodgers.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

No more than they were yesterday

"A baseball game is nothing but a great slow contraption for getting you to pay attention to the cadence of a summer day."

by Langhorne on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sure it’s easy to blame Colletti but it is even easier to blame the McCourts.

Let justice be done, though the world perish.

by Sordid on Jul 31, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I doubt McCourt is pulling the strings, he’s too busy with his divorce attorneys.

In this case, I’m sure Ned could have sat tight.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

wtf??

i thought the trade deadline passed this morniing??

what time??

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:27 PM PDT reply actions  

probably longer

some deals get processed after getting submitted right at the deadline and theres lag

by hee came hee seop'd he choi'd on Jul 31, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

didnt see this

holy shit

Jose Valverde is not available on Saturday or Sunday after throwing 60 pitches on Friday.

by hee came hee seop'd he choi'd on Jul 31, 2010 12:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Off to get lunch

game thread will be up at 12:45

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:29 PM PDT reply actions  

boo

yanks couldnt get someone more reliable..?

i wouldnt trust the guy in the 8th inning right now…

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

HR is awesome today on MLB Network. Blasting this trade.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who you rather have gone, Frank or Ned?

by pdotmac1 on Jul 31, 2010 12:34 PM PDT reply actions  

FRANK

he is making ned do these trades

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Frank, because he would mean the end of Ned. Whether he would be replaced with someone better is debatable.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which team did the best/worst at the deadline?

Best deals:

#1. Padres — Tejada/Ludwick for no one off the current roster
#2. Phillies — Oswalt for nothing.

Worst deals:
#1. Blue Jays dealing Brett Wallace for an A baller..
#2. Dodgers dealing Dewitt when they are out of it anyway.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:34 PM PDT reply actions  

MSTI has a great point - No bench today

Just thinking, if DeWitt’s traded, Theriot’s not there yet, Ethier’s gone.. Dodgers might have only 3 bench guys today: Ausmus/Paul/Belliard

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 12:35 PM PDT reply actions  

So really 2 cuz you never use backup catcher.. WOW this could be interesting..

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah the Lilly trade would have been a small amount better if it happend earlier to prevent Bills going on short rest.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Question: If the Dodgers had money to make deals, does Ned try to trade prospects left and right like he had?

I’d say no. He was pulling this shit since he’s been GM in 06. He doesn’t value prospects as potential additions to the club, he rather build the club from veteran players.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:35 PM PDT reply actions  

And by no, I mean yes, he would cont. to trade prospects for vets

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

what

a jackrabbit fucker.

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

He doesn't value every prospect

But to say he doesn’t value prospects is ignoring the evidence that since the 1980s, this team has the largest collection of home grown talent (or in the case of Ethier, players who began their MLB career as a Dodger) in over 25 years.

by bhsportsguy on Jul 31, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

And if you make trades

and don’t trade from your 25 man roster, who do a end up trading, minor league players.

by bhsportsguy on Jul 31, 2010 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Its the value of the prospects that he trades for middling veterans is where he doesn’t respect prospects. If you’re constantly trading potential starters from your farm club for veteran players, its shows you have a preference.

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

What does the Dodgers history dating back to the 1980s have to do with what Ned Colletti does right now?

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am saying that

for nearly 25 years, the Dodgers were not this place of home grown talent and great drafts. Since the mid-80s, the Dodgers were a team made up of free agents and trades. The 90s ROYs were rare players in a system that was pretty run dry until the 2002.

So this idea that the Dodgers operate differently now than in the past is wrong.

by bhsportsguy on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dodgers have less money now than then (relative to the league).

So they are going to have to change.
You either build thru the farm, or sign free agents.

Being in between…whereby not spending enough on premier free agents, yet also trading your prospects for middling vets…is a recipe for an overpaid mediocre team (i,.e. the 1992 – 2003).

I think the Dodgers are unfortunately going back to that.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

This smells like Ned

The Pirates might be on the verge of trading lefty reliever Javier Lopez, tweets Dejan Kovacevic of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

by BFDC on Jul 31, 2010 12:36 PM PDT reply actions  

He probably goes to the Giants.
They need a lefty reliever.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

the padres got ryan ludwick

a really good RF…. and they gave up 2 prospects… none of which were in their top 10…

we get lilly theriot…. and give up 1 major league player and 2 guys who arent in the top 10 but one which has a chance

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:38 PM PDT reply actions  

trade furcal

He is at a point were his value is at his highest it will probably get. We now have theriot who can play SS till Dee gordon or someelse is ready.

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:39 PM PDT reply actions  

That’d actually be a forward thinking deal.

If you sell Furcal and his salary to the highest bidder, and then play Theriot at SS…I could get behind that.
But its never gonna happen

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

A lot of meaningless games in your future.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Their meaningless right now.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

And do you really trust Ned to sell Furcal correctly? No way.

by Alex41592 on Jul 31, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

See, I'm all for selling...

except that reason.

My twitter = @neufaustcan

by uclatroy on Jul 31, 2010 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

When Ned sells, he’s done okay (Ethier)

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

It probably not going to happen this year, but I could see a scenario where the Dodgers are so far out of it at the Trade Deadline in 2011 that they would have reason to trade him.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

When his value is lower, he’s a year older, and has a full no-trade clause.

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

All of this is true, but Ned has made it clear he thinks we’re in it. When you do that, you don’t trade your everyday third-baseman.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ned obviously wont, but he should

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t disagree.

by dsm9412 on Jul 31, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would have entertained that. Fuck it I still would. The team should be selling.

by Michael White on Jul 31, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

wishful thinking.

but please give us a good trade in the next 20 minute :(

Seriously, Dodgers... HELP WANTED

by douchiedude on Jul 31, 2010 12:39 PM PDT reply actions  

2:35pm: The Mariners approached the Braves about taking Chone Figgins off their hands, tweets ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick. Crasnick adds that the Braves are also making a late bid for a reliever.

Where would the Braves play Figgins?

by Tripon on Jul 31, 2010 12:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Prado broke a knuckle last night

by vadodger on Jul 31, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Dave Roberts role – designated pinch runner.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

UPDATE

Suchon:

Theriot is everyday 2nd baseman.

Lilly starts Tuesday.

by silverwidow on Jul 31, 2010 12:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Everyday?

i think he should split time equally between carroll

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

MLBTR
[Javier] Lopez goes to the Giants for Joe Martinez, according to a CSN report passed along in this Andrew Baggarly tweet

by Little Blue Bicycle on Jul 31, 2010 12:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Joe Martinez is a nobody.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

On pregame show

Suchon said Torre said Theriot was the everyday 2b

by Eric Stephen on Jul 31, 2010 12:46 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Just threw up in my mouth.

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

After dumping Juan Pierre….we go acquire two Juan Pierres -→ Theriot & Pods.

Barf.

by Joey Joe on Jul 31, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why the hate for Carroll? Do they not think he play every day?

by Erik951 on Jul 31, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

but what about splitting time equallly

what has theriot done this year to show that hes better then carroll

by matthewmafa on Jul 31, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

DeJesus or DeWitt

I think before making this trade the cubs either wanted DeJesus or DeWitt… We chose to give them DeWitt over DeJesus and of the two i’d rather have DeJesus. He could take over the 2b job next year.

by dawolfman18 on Jul 31, 2010 12:47 PM PDT reply actions  

Ned’s just gonna trade DeJesus for someone shitty.

by pdotmac1 on Jul 31, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ned Dipshit Colletti

Any of you Dodger fans out in LA do all of us Dodgers fans a favor by running that dipshit of a general manager over next you see him. Either that or take a baseball bat to his head, preferable an aluminum bat…

by HappyHooten on Jul 31, 2010 3:52 PM PDT reply actions  

trading your starting second baseman for a 2010 rental borders on massive incompetence.

Can you really “border” on massive incompetence?

Sorry. /shows self out

Mr. Science Boy

by DbacksSkins on Aug 2, 2010 4:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $15 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

100_1427_small
Dodger Blogger Softball Tourney Update

Recent FanPosts

N1209328_7139_small
True Blue Los Angeles Fantastical Base Ball League
Kemp_small
All-star predictions
Img_0247_small
Dodgers.com might have a job opening...
Small
Law Ranks Dodger System #12
Small
DODGERS -- 2 GREAT SEATS FOR SALE
Small
Joe Torre Horrow Show
2011-philly-game-me__2__small
2011 Dodgers Spreadsheet Project
Ed-ak286_scully_g_20091006143938_small
It is time to play - Name the BA Top 30
Small
Are you the Biggest Dodger Fan?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

2012 Dodgers Payroll

Italics denote estimates
Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $500,000 team control
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 14 Ellis $2,500,000
3B 5 Uribe $8,000,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000 team control
LF 21 Rivera $4,000,000
CF 27 Kemp $10,000,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

IF/OF 6 Hairston $2,250,000
OF 10 Gwynn $850,000
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
C 18 Treanor $850,000
IF 12 Sellers $485,000 team control

SP 22 Kershaw $6,000,000
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 35 Capuano $3,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000

CL 54 Guerra $485,000 team control
RHP 74
Jansen $500,000 team control
RHP 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
RHP 60 Coffey $1,000,000
RHP 66 MacDougal $650,000
LHP 57 Elbert $485,000 team control
RHP 36
Hawksworth $500,000 team control

TJ 41 De La Rosa $485,000 team control



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout

Totals
$112,162,432

For more detailed information, click here.

Players on 40-man roster used as roster
fillers until moves are made.

Current 40-man roster count: 40
(not including Belisario)

2012 Non-Roster Invitees

No Player Age*
63 Jose Ascanio rhp
27
61 Alberto Castillo lhp
36
56 Matt Chico lhp
29
33 John Grabow lhp
33
59 Angel Guzman rhp
30
47 Wil Ledezma lhp
31
72 Shane Lindsay rhp
27
62 Fernando Nieve rhp 29
73 Scott Rice lhp 30
70 Will Savage rhp
27
71 Ryan Tucker rhp
25
28 Jamey Wright rhp
37

30 Josh Bard c 34
82 Griff Erickson c 24
81 Matt Wallachc 26
67 Jeff Baisley 3b/1b 29
65 Luis Cruz ss/2b 28
37 Josh Fields 3b 29
64 Lance Zawadzki if 27
56 Cory Sullivan of 32

*Age on June 30, 2012

NRI count: 20

For more info, click here.


Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox