Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Joe Torre Out; Don Mattingly To Manage Dodgers In 2011

Don Mattingly will reportedly replace Joe Torre as manager in 2011

Joe Torre will not manage the Dodgers next season, and will be replaced by Don Mattingly, according to Dylan Hernandez of the LA Times.

Torre began contract extension talks last winter, with the idea of staying one or two more seasons after 2010, perhaps with a move to the front office. But those talks had since broken off, with Torre undecided on whether or not he wanted to return. He said earlier this season that he would wait until after the Dodgers had either clinched a playoff spot or were officially eliminated.

The prevailing thought for some time has been that hitting coach Mattingly, who also coached under Torre in New York, would succeed Torre as manager of the Dodgers. Last winter, Mattingly turned down an interview for the vacant Nationals' managerial position, and the Dodgers declined permission to Cleveland for a second interview for their vacant managerial post as it was reported Mattingly was working on formalizing a succession agreement with Los Angeles.

Tim Wallach had also emerged as a strong candidate to succeed Torre. Wallach, unlike Mattingly, has managerial experience, managing the Dodgers' Triple A affiliate in Albuquerque the last two seasons.

Under Torre, the Dodgers won two postseason series in his first two seasons, two more than they had won in the previous 19 seasons. With the Dodgers, Torre has a 251-220 record, a .533 winning percentage. Torre, who turned 70 earlier this year, is the oldest manager in franchise history.

Torre, who made the playoffs all 12 seasons he managed the Yankees, tied Bobby Cox's record with 14 consecutive postseason appearances last year. If the Dodgers, who are 72-75 entering play today, finish under .500, it will be Torre's first losing season since 1995 with the Cardinals, when he was fired after a 20-27 start to the season.

In 29 seasons as a major league manager, Torre was 2,318-1,990, a winning percentage of .538. He made the playoffs 15 times, won six pennants, and won four World Series.

Comment 343 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If you wanted to be funny

You would now immediately make a second post about Mattingly being named Manager of the Dodgers.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 11:54 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Seriously

For an organization that tosses out Jackie Robinson any chance they get, they have never had a minority (not counting Jamie McCourt) as the head of baseball operations or as manager.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 11:55 AM PDT reply actions  

But they had baseball’s highest ranking female executive!

by LA Taco on Sep 17, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Total snark here but

1. If you believe that Wallach would be a better manager than Mattingly…and…
2. If you believe that the 2011 Dodgers will be terrible… then…
3. You should be happy about this. Somebody is going to get fired when next year’s Dodgers are in the tank. Mattingly seems like a good choice for fall guy. Then, when the Dodgers are ready to be good again, here comes Wallach.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions  

This is a very insightful idea actually.

I want to make a political reference here, but will refrain.

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Except for the fact that Wallach might move on now.

by robotmadeofnails on Sep 17, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just to play contrarian here

Do we really know that Wallach would be any good?

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

we just know Mattingly will suck. Wallach may not suck.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Of course not. But Wallach does have managing experience, and I am sure he will be cheaper. And it just flat out made sense.

by robotmadeofnails on Sep 17, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I also agree that this matters little compared to the other pressing needs, but Wallach would indicate a new mindset in the organization and Mattingly indicates to me the same old PR bullshit.

by robotmadeofnails on Sep 17, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep.

He said in a recent interview that he’ll stay on for one more year in the minors, but beyond that he’s not sure if he’s willing to.

by Jesse S. on Sep 17, 2010 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

very good point

http://www.dingersblog.com

by dingers on Sep 17, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not very excited about this Mattingly news

I was kind of hoping for a complete overhaul of the coaching staff.

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Me too

but I would like if it started in the front office. The whole organization seems down and out and it showed on the field this year.

Is it basketball season yet?

by S Jay Bruin on Sep 17, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

To be fair we really haven’t heard about Mattingly being involved in the bashing of Kemp. He has seemed rather diplomatic, if somewhat clueless where it comes to Kemp. Also, this is no gaurantee that Bowa and Scheafer will still be around. I would’ve rather had Wallach, but Mattingly may not be bad.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know I shouldn’t make premature judgment, but its difficult for me to imagine Mattingly handling the pitching staff well.

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know I shouldn’t make premature judgment, but its difficult for me to imagine Mattingly handling the pitching staff changes well.

FTFY.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Need new leadership

I think if the Dodgers brought in a new staff it would help give some of the guys a fresh start. Maybe Kemp and Ethier can reach their potential with a new staff.

by Billyum on Sep 17, 2010 11:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Awkward times in the dugout

with Wallach and Mattingly both on hand for the next couple weeks.

by guy clinch on Sep 17, 2010 11:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Wondering

if Donnie Baseball makes Wallach bench coach.

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man

by mleadman on Sep 17, 2010 12:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Unless he follows the Corleone

version of business strategy, I would say doubtful. Heck, he could bring Willie Randolph here.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

there is a time to joke, and a time to be serious you know?

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Now that is funny.

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was actually wondering if Wallach would accept a coaching position on his staff. Would a bench coach position at the ML level be better than a manager spot in the minors.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would Wallach accept a coaching position with the big club next season or do you think he’ll leave the organization?

by ibleedbloo on Sep 17, 2010 12:04 PM PDT reply actions  

He needs to leave at this point. For his own good.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

It was an interview a couple of weeks ago on XM radio with Jim Bowden.

by Tripon on Sep 17, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thats bullshit

the only thing Bowa should be the coach of is his old balls.

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Then

It was nice knowing you Matt Kemp

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man

by mleadman on Sep 17, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, waiting to hear what Stewart has to say.

http://www.dingersblog.com

by dingers on Sep 17, 2010 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why's that?

Isn’t their main marketing demographic retired people? :)

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have a feeling Bigelow Tea will now be the best selling tea in Chicago or New York.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

i dont like bigelow tea

by DodgerSF on Sep 17, 2010 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

“Why are you taking a bath?”
“I’m not.”

(btw, anyone who gets this reference becomes my favorite poster)

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

oh drats (from previous thread)

I want Dodgers coaching this team; not Yankee coaches. But I want Yankees-like owners owning the team. :-)

by DodgerSF on Sep 17, 2010 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

I still would like to see Brad Ausmus as bench coach.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Two things Mattingly could say at his press conference that would make all of us change our minds about him.

1. “I will be making wholesale changes: I have always wanted to grow my goddam sideburns, and now, I’m gonna do it.”

2. “Hey, Carlos Ruiz: FUCK YOU!”

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:11 PM PDT reply actions  

3. Thank God I don’t have to watch Torre ruin another bullpen.

4. Bowa and Schaffer? Sold’em to Cleveland for an injured catcher.

5. Hey look, I bought a rule book!

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I still think of all the things Torres gets grief

about, the bullpen is the one that is most overstated.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like this piece about it, especially the prediction about Tron Tron found at the end that came true.
http://acrossallsports.com/2009/06/19/joe-torres-flaw-bullpen-management/

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Torre has been a manager for 28 seasons, the last three with the Dodgers. It is still possible he will remain with the organization, according to one of the sources, who required anonymity because the team had not yet announced the move.

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Well

On the surface, this looks like bad news, with a repeat of the Torre regime and a subtle swipe against sudden fan-favorite Wallach. But who really knows. Maybe he’ll be great. I can’t really care too much about this news when, as others have said, we have a million other pressing issues.

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 12:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Mattingly himself doesn’t worry, what worries my is if the coaching staff remains largely intact. We desperately need a new perspective from our coaches, but I don’t think we will get that if Bowa and/or Schaefer are still around.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I highly doubt Bob is staying after the comments he has been making

by robotmadeofnails on Sep 17, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but I think Bowa needs to go as well. Maybe I’m wrong but I view Mattingly as being a little more foregiving and open-minded (must be the soul patch). I think it will be hard to get that clean slate if one or both are still here.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Brand new manager, no experience? At lest one of those guys is staying.

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think

anyone from Torre’s staff would view Bob’s comments as inflammatory. After all, they’ve been saying similar things, and much worse, for most all of Torre’s time in LA.

by EMDarrow on Sep 17, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would think that Ned would view them as inflammatory, especially his comment about next season, since it is an implicit knock on his roster management.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

MIKE SCIOSCIA 2.0

Former Dodger player, prime managerial candidate, WANTS TO BE THE MANAGER, denied…..Succeeds with another team

by soccerman8 on Sep 17, 2010 12:15 PM PDT reply actions  

I still think we’d hate Scioscia if he was the manager.

by Michael White on Sep 17, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kinda hard to compare Wallach with Scioscia. I mean, Mike was Dodger through and through.

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

As the ownership goes, so goes the team I guess.

Dodgers aren’t through and through anything save my dear ol’ Vin.

by soccerman8 on Sep 17, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dodgers aren’t through and through anything

Vicente Padilla and his gun disagree.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Dodgers are through (just not and through).

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Two years ago

Tim Wallach would not have made anyone’s Top Ten list of next managers for the Dodgers.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:16 PM PDT reply actions  

What has Tim Wallach done to get such acclaim

manage a bunch of AAAA players in the PCL. I really don’t know why that makes him a better candidate than Donnie Baseball.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actual management experience at some level?

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

A lot of guys fail

who have tons of managing experience

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

How does that negate the fact that some experience at any job is better than none?

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Players respect the guy. From within the organization.

A huge disconnect between players and coaching staff = our 2010 Dodgers

by soccerman8 on Sep 17, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let's see

who on the current team has played for Wallach.
Dodger products
Kemp, no
Martin, no
Loney, no
Bills, no
Broxton, no
Kershaw, no
Kuo, no
Jansen, no

Only, Ely, Link, Hu, Lindsey, Mitchell and Onjean have played for him.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

So about 50/50 of next year’s team!

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope

This isn’t Tommy Lasorda who managed many of the guys back in 70s.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

What has Donnie Baseball done to get such acclaim?

by Tripon on Sep 17, 2010 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nothing

but the love for Wallach is perplexing, I think again, it’s more anti-Mattingly (Torre) than anything Wallach has actually done.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Didn’t Wallach get Manager of the Year last year? That couple with Mattingly looking like a noob in his couple opportunities has people firmly in the Wallach court.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, according to Bill James,

He is 100% Ballplayer and 0% bullshit, so there’s that.

Seriously, that was James’ whole comment about Mattingly in the NHBA.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

One thing's for sure

Jettisoning Torre sure helps the Dodgers as they try to make the All-Pretty Team. He is not a good looking man.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:17 PM PDT reply actions  

no big deal

That guy gets more trim than you could ever imagine

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Getting it at gunpoint doesn’t count.

by EMDarrow on Sep 17, 2010 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

this

makes me shudder forever

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

repeat from yesterday and the previous day: Dodgers, possibly the sexiest team in baseball.

by DodgerSF on Sep 17, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

This just sucks

We could lose Wallach. Mattingly deserves 2 years to be given a fair chance.
We need to clean house and get younger.
Guys we should lose to be a better franchise in 2012-2014
Torre
Bowa
Mattingly
Ethier (trade for prospects)
Loney (trade for anything)
Martin (unless non-tendered and re-signed for $2mil)

and of course Frank McCourt and his stooge Ned

Commit to Wallach, Ng, Logan, DeJean, Kemp, Bills, Kershaw and the farm system.

This is a sign that McCourt will make his stand.

by megaballs on Sep 17, 2010 12:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Get younger

biggest fallacy in the game, young teams do not win, core should be around 27-31 and you supplement with vets. You can have a few guys but there is no history of younger teams being successful.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think anybody thinks the current core is old

I think they think:

1. The current core can’t be kept together after 2012; they will be too expensive
2. The current core might not be all that good anyway
3. Trading away the core for younger (and better!) players might be a way to bring about the next great Dodger team faster.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think that will work

one, you’ll never get players that can play today based on the lower values of guys like Kemp and Loney. And you are not trading the only two assets you have in Bills and Kershaw.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also

Since the Dodgers had primarily H.S players as their core, you almost had to think, they needed to sign them to one extension past their FA period to be successful, that is how the Phillies did it.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t necessarily disagree. Trading all of those guys is tantamount to blowing up the team, and as disappointing as the season was, I’m not quite sure we’re there. If we are, we had better get a good return for all of these guys.

That said, I worry that keeping all of them around is tantamount to signing up for 83-win Astro purgatory.

I don’t know what the right thing to do is. With their limited payroll, lack of investment in the minor leagues, and the core’s failure, the Dodgers have dug quite a hole for themselves.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

The biggest problem

is that none of core became Howard, Utley or Jeter, Bernie Williams and Posada.

Is there still time, perhaps but you really need that to happen or else everything else really doesn’t matter.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

And I am just not sure

if you can blame that on anyone.

However the Dodgers do have the makings of a better core pitching staff but that isn’t as important as the regulars

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree that that is the biggest problem

Dodgers have no homegrown superstar hitter. I see what you’re saying that you can’t really blame that on anyone… I guess I kinda agree — that’s an awfully high standard…

…however, this year’s performance from the core players — Martin, Loney, Kemp, and I’ll include Ethier and DeWitt — has not only been not-superstar — it’s been a range from disappointing to unacceptable. So yeah, biggest problem is that there’s no superstar, unless the biggest problem is that the best of them are only kinda good enough and some of them aren’t good at all.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you trade Ethier this offseason

Humma, not sure if you are advocating trading Ethier or other players, but I just wonder who you get back and given our current GM, am quite concerned who that might be. While Ethier is down this year and has struggled more against lefties than in the past, his HR’s and doubles are still very good.

Giants got very lucky with Huff, but think he could have bombed as well

by wineracquet on Sep 17, 2010 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know if I advocate trading anybody.

I have to think about it. But Ethier is the player who has the biggest gap between perception (All-Star) and reality (850 OPS guy who needs to be platooned and has poor RF defense).

I’m not saying you can trade him for Rasmus — that might not be possible, gin-in-the-sky thinking by me. But I’d make that call and see what St. Louis thought about it.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cost too much money

They have Pujols to worry about.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pujols going to back to the Cardinals is not a slam dunk.

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

that would be most shocking

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

It would be to most people, but they’re going to have to pay for him. Obviously Albert would love to stay in St. Louis, but he isnt going to take a hometown discount. They’re going to have to offer something massive, and by doing so would have like 80% of their payroll in 4 or 5 players.

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Worst off are the Padres

no matter what they say now, they cannot pay Gonzalez $16+ for 4-5 years

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope. They almost have to trade him this offseason. In a way, if they miss the playoffs, this season will be huge letdown because they will likely get less for Adrian than they would have before (although they do end up with Ludwick).

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ludwick and Petco

are probably not made for each other

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, but he’s still better than anything they had other than Adrian.

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I still don’t understand how they got Ludwick and we got Pods.

by LA Taco on Sep 17, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Their GM is better than ours.

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Manny was still in our sites

Pods was a temporary starter and then maybe backup, Ludwick would have been more let’s deal Manny now deal.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m glad we didn’t get Ludwick.

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

pretty much the only thing that matters.

by LA Taco on Sep 17, 2010 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure they want to trade him anyway. And even if they do they might be able to get a better haul than Ethier.

I guess my position can be boiled down to this:

1. Maybe we stick with the core. Maybe it’s just a down year and they’ll bounce back and next year will look better than any of us think.
2. If you don’t think the core is good enough to be the core of a WS-winning team — and this year should be enough to plant that seed in your mind — then you should trade players now.
3. It doesn’t make sense to hold on to anybody who will not be a part of the next great team. Right now, the only guy you can say that about is Kershaw.
4. Therefore, I advocate either keeping everybody, or trading Ethier and Loney and Martin and Broxton. I could be convinced about Kemp and Billingsley, but maybe trade them too. You might not want to blow it up, and that’s fine, but if you’re gonna blow it up, blow it to smithereens.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Won't do it

Can’t sell that to the fanbase. I probably should write my piece on why the Dodgers can’t take the rebuilding slogan out in public but I am pretty sure that is not in the current FO’s vocabulary.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Two thoughts on that

1. Of course it’s not going to happen. I recognzie that this is the real world.
2. I am also not the GM of the Dodgers. I think this whole conversation is about what we WOULD do, what the Dodgers SHOULD do. Not what they WILL. That is impossible to predict.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

that is a common problem in discussions of this nature and, I would argue, responsible for most of the disagreements people have.

by LA Taco on Sep 17, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ethier to the Rays

for Ben Zobrist, Dioner Navarro, and Andy Sonnanstine. Zobrist goes back to playing 2B.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think they are particularly fond of Navarro and there is no room for Sonnanstine. The only question would be Zobrist, who had a down year.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Its also a question of money for them

Plus they might need Sonnanstine because they will probably only have Shields for one more year (IIRC).

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought they were lousy with pitching prospects. If not then you may be right.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Depends how real you think Zobrist is.

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

You realize

that Navarro is looking more like A.J. Ellis then all-star and he is going to start earning some money soon.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, he had a terrible season, which means he is unlikely to get a big raise. I don’t think he is anything great but he could be the LH portion of a platoon with Barajas.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think he is as good as last year, but slightly better than this year, which would make him a decent 2B.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rays might deal Garza

and since they’ll lose Soriano, Broxton might be attractive as a less expensive option. Some parts could work there…

by Pure Azure on Sep 17, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would love Garza.

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Worst case scenario

We lose Kim Ng and the chance to break barriers and make history.
We lose Logan White, which still sucks even if you say his success came during deep drafts.
We lose Tim Wallach.

Oh, I found a cookie!

by soccerman8 on Sep 17, 2010 12:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Props to Dylan

For breaking the news before I hit the road today on my way to LA

by Eric Stephen on Sep 17, 2010 12:30 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Hopefully just a One Year Deal

and under super-super-top-secret-probation.

by Xeifrank on Sep 17, 2010 12:31 PM PDT reply actions  

Tim Wallach

Has played in the bigs
Has gotten his hands dirty actually managing in the minors
He seems focused on managing in the bigs
He seems to have has some accolades,success there
He’s homegrown…we need that

I never met or interviewed him but he seems to be just the right guy for the next several years

Mattingly is almost the silver spoon son of Torre and by extension Ned and McCourt.
Wallach screams ‘I ain’t no “Fortunate Son”

Bet Torre gets some $$$ BS front Office job too…all to keep Frank’s men quiet

by megaballs on Sep 17, 2010 12:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Release

"Over the past three years, I’ve had the opportunity to work with Don closely and have gotten to know him both personally and professionally and I’m convinced that he’s the right person to lead the Dodgers," said Dodger General Manager Ned Colletti. "His work ethic is unparalleled, his baseball knowledge is vast and his leadership skills have been established during more than three decades in professional baseball.

"Donnie has also learned alongside the best in the business. Joe Torre has been a great friend, a strong leader and an incredible presence for this organization and I cannot thank him enough for his service to the Dodgers. I respect his decision to step aside and I look forward to the day where I can watch him take his rightful place in Cooperstown among baseball’s legends."

Mattingly is completing his seventh season as a Major League coach (2004-10) following seven seasons as a special instructor during Spring Training for the Yankees (1997-2003). He is in his third season as the Dodgers’ hitting coach following one season as the bench coach under Torre in New York (2007) and three years as the Yankees’ hitting coach (2004-06).

"The opportunity to manage the Los Angeles Dodgers is truly an honor," said Mattingly. "There are few organizations in the world with the history, tradition and track record of success as the Dodgers. I’m looking forward to continuing what I came here to accomplish with Joe and that’s to win a World Championship."

Mattingly will manage in the Arizona Fall League at the completion of the regular season. He becomes the eighth current Major League manager to pilot a big league club without previous managerial experience, joining Torre, Dusty Baker, Joe Girardi, Ozzie Guillen, Cito Gaston, Bud Black and Kirk Gibson. Lou Piniella, who began the year as the Cubs’ manager, also managed in the Major Leagues without any minor league experience. Guillen won the World Series in his second year, Gaston in his third full season and Piniella and Girardi in their fourth seasons as a big league skipper. Bob Brenly won the World Series in his first year as a big league manager.

Mattingly spent 14 seasons as a first baseman for New York, where he compiled a .307 lifetime average with 222 home runs and 1,099 RBI while earning MVP honors in 1985, nine Rawlings Gold Glove Awards and six All-Star appearances.

He becomes just the ninth manager in Los Angeles Dodger history, following Hall of Famers Walter Alston (1954-76) and Tommy Lasorda (1977-96), Bill Russell (1996-98), Glenn Hoffman (1998), Davey Johnson (1999-2000), Jim Tracy (2001-05), Grady Little (2006-07) and Torre (2008-10).

Torre guided the Dodgers to consecutive National League Championship Series appearances and reached the postseason in a record-tying 14 consecutive seasons from 1996-2009. The certain future Hall of Famer has more postseason victories than any other manager in Major League history, ranks fifth on the all-time regular season wins list and has posted a three-year record with the Dodgers of 251-220 (.533) through last night’s game. He finished third in 2009 NL Manager of the Year voting.

"It has been an incredible honor to wear the Dodger uniform and I will always carry with me some very special memories from the past three seasons," said Torre. "This was not a decision I took lightly but I believe it’s the right one for myself and my family and I’m truly thrilled that Donnie will be the one leading the Dodgers. It’s time that the Dodgers had a new voice and I have the utmost confidence in him. I know he’s ready for the challenge."

by Eric Stephen on Sep 17, 2010 12:36 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Mattingly will manage in the Arizona Fall League at the completion of the regular season. He becomes the eighth current Major League manager to pilot a big league club without previous managerial experience, joining Torre, Dusty Baker, Joe Girardi, Ozzie Guillen, Cito Gaston, Bud Black and Kirk Gibson. Lou Piniella, who began the year as the Cubs’ manager, also managed in the Major Leagues without any minor league experience. Guillen won the World Series in his second year, Gaston in his third full season and Piniella and Girardi in their fourth seasons as a big league skipper. Bob Brenly won the World Series in his first year as a big league manager.

Tappity tap tap tappity tap tappity tap ha cha!

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m pleased that he’s going down to the AFL. It’s a positive step.

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Team’s trying to deflect criticism of hiring a guy with no experience.

People don't think it be like this, but it do.

by MartinGreen on Sep 17, 2010 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

is that

the PR dance?

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

On a scale of 1 – HOLY GOD YES, how much do you think the PR team for the Dodgers hates their job?

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have never met Josh, never exchanged emails with Josh, so I have no way of knowing for sure.

What I can say is — what would I think my reaction would be if that were my job.

Look, I made fun in the comment above, but all of PR is a tap dance. All of PR is selling things, putting the best message on a situation. That is all fine — we take this job because we prefer the shadows, being the person people call when they need help saying what they want to say.

If it were me, I would see that having that job for the Dodgers would be a dream job. It’s a great gig, I’m sure it pays pretty well, and I bet it would be fun rubbing elbows with the players and helping to craft the team’s message. That said, they’ve been put in a terrible position. It’s a very difficult gig right now — if it were me, my morale would be low, I’m sure. How do you balance a job you really want to love, the job you’ve worked your whole career toward, with the fact that it’s got to suck right now?

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would think if it’s a job you love, that even if it’s tough, you’ll stick it out. Because it’s not going to stay terrible. At least that’s what I hope.

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have met and talked a little to Josh

Now this year probably hasn’t been a great as the last two but I am fairly sure that they still enjoy it and quite to the contrary, I doubt morale has been affected that much.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

What is the burnout rate for top PR professionals at the Dodger and A list level?

by vadodger on Sep 17, 2010 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also

The Los Angeles Dodgers announced today that former American League MVP Don Mattingly has been named the Dodger manager for the 2011 season and that Joe Torre has stepped aside from the position. Mattingly becomes the ninth manager in Los Angeles Dodger history and 27th in franchise history while Torre is expected to take time to determine his plans for 2011.

by Eric Stephen on Sep 17, 2010 12:39 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Do the hokey pokey

get your pitcher kicked right out

THAT’S WHAT IT’S ALL ABOUT

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wonder if Mattingly's comments sound sincere.

Dunno how the Dodgers became the go-to option when the first choice fails. Mattingly wanted the Yanks, got the Dodgers. McCourt wanted the Sox, was given the dodgers..

by soccerman8 on Sep 17, 2010 12:38 PM PDT reply actions  

I think we should give Mattingly a shot. Why does everyone believe he’s Torre 2.0? I think that’s unfair. Mattingly, like Wallach, has been looking for an opportunity like this and he got it.

He’s unproven, but Wallach as well. I just think its wrong to assume he’s going to replicate Torre’s 2010 performance because he knows well enough that he needs to change the current “winning formula”

by Julio Nievas on Sep 17, 2010 12:43 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

I don't mind the lack of managerial experience

Clearly there is a strong track record of success from those without the experience (from press release above).

I was just more in favor of a coaching staff overhaul, so I guess my opinion will tinge more on who are the rest of the coaches.

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree that Mattingly deserves the benefit of the doubt and I would definitely give it to him if he brings in some new blood to the coaching staff. They desperately need some new perspectives.

by OB12 on Sep 17, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm feeling contrarian today so I'll support you here

And I’ve been on the Wallach for president, er, manager train for awhile. But that’s without really knowing how HE’D fare as manager either. I was rooting for the guy. But why are we so sure Mattingly will be an utter failure? And btw, as someone who liked him a lot as a player, I can’t say I’d feel good about him being a fall guy next year. How is that supposed to be a nice thing?

I think people get bent out of shape over everything these days, which is understandable given how crummy the Dodgers have been this year but it’s easier to be a doomsayer than to think positive. So I’m gonna take the hard road and think positive and root for him to succeed.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Drunk with power!

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think people are saying that Mattingly would suck as a manager, but I think it has been more of a “I was pulling for Wallach” sort of thing. I agree that Don could be good, but I was just pulling for Tim and a new look to the team.

by robotmadeofnails on Sep 17, 2010 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Press conference is at 5pm

by Eric Stephen on Sep 17, 2010 12:47 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Dear Don Mattingly

Please tell Ruiz to go fuck himself

Please tell Ruiz to go fuck himself

Please tell Ruiz to go fuck himself

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Way to stay on message!

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

he’d lose over everyone else, but he’d win over TBLA!

by sarcastro9 on Sep 17, 2010 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously. Either that, or promise to trade for him so he won’t be able to hurt us anymore. Love the sig, Humma :)

by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you think/know if there will be a link to it, or if a radio station will be going live with it?

by sarcastro9 on Sep 17, 2010 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only way this will piss me off is if Schaeffer and Bowa are back. So really, I’m getting prepared to be pissed off.

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 12:48 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

sadly

I don’t even care anymore. And some of you know I have been around your blogs for years now every single day. Until the owners are gone and the idiot GM it really dosen’t matter

by Jason Ungar on Sep 17, 2010 12:49 PM PDT reply actions  

I am leaning this way more and more. I will always watch the Dodgers, but with the crap we have seen through this divorce, I just want Frank gone…Ned, Ned has not been that bad.

by robotmadeofnails on Sep 17, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Torre was on his way out anyway

Was there any other choice other than Mattingly?

Follow me on twitter @Joey_Kaufman

by Joey Kaufman on Sep 17, 2010 12:50 PM PDT reply actions  

I just want the 2011 season to start already

2010 came and went swiftly (sometimes not swift enough) and painfully into the dying light.

While Wallach is my first choice by virtue of him being a former Dodger, Mattingly will get my benefit of the doubt. I’m sure he is aware of this Wallach v. Mattingly debate and remembers those mound misteps. He’s also aware of the cons of Torre’s management style (but also the pros). For better or worse, the thing with rookies – including rookie coaches – is they are willing to listen and try something different (at least i hope that is true). Despite being Torre’s protoge, Mattingly is an underdog in the management context, has a chip on his shoulder, and knows he has to prove himself. I just hope he smiles and laughs more than Torre.

by DodgerSF on Sep 17, 2010 12:51 PM PDT reply actions  

He's an underdog?

Okay, I approve then!

;-)

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Last word...

…and I ‘ll let this go. Throughout my life, there have been only three Yankees that I really liked as players—Mercer, Munson, and Mattingly. I’d be fine with this move if he had knocked around in the minors for a couple of years, figured out the basics of the job, and started developing his own ideas about management. I am pleased that he’ll manage this fall, and I’ll be even happier if he builds his own coaching staff independent of Joe’s Grumpy Old Men. I rather doubt the latter, but we’ll see.

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 12:57 PM PDT reply actions  

This is the key

if he builds his own coaching staff independent of Joe’s Grumpy Old Men.

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

Mattingly alone I can deal with along with some new faces.

@neufaustcan

by uclatroy on Sep 17, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

now now, let's not be ageist.

I want me a happy team; not a grumpy one!!

by DodgerSF on Sep 17, 2010 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I also hope he shaves that thing off.

"There’s no reason I can give you that makes sense. A lot of what I do is a feel thing."

by Little Blue Bicycle on Sep 17, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I might be wrong and its totally unfair but Mattingly strikes me as a man without presence or leadership skills….and likely a puppet for the various control freaks that I believe will remain.
Can he stand up to Ned, McCourt, Bowa? Ethier?Kemp? Even Torre ’ll stick around upstairs.
If these other coaches were going to be fired, why would they announce this mid-September?
Its basically Joe retiring and calling all the mngmnt shots.

A fresh start was the way to go

SUX

by megaballs on Sep 17, 2010 12:58 PM PDT reply actions  

I think people often said he was the leader of those Yankee teams (uh, that never won it all) he was on. He’s a quiet leader but, at least as a player, people seemed to think he had leadership abilities. People around him now definitely think he has those skills. Of course, those people are Ned Colletti, Joe Torre, and Frank McCourt so YMMV.

by LA Taco on Sep 17, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

oh, I can field this one

Those Yankee teams didn’t win because Steinbrenner was at his worst, and constantly traded away good young players for lousy veterans, as well as good veterans (when Steinbrenner got mad at them) for nothing. Mattingly survived that entire era because he (mostly) stayed out of trouble. No good deed goes unpunished, you know.

by sarcastro9 on Sep 17, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

to elaborate

“and constantly traded away good young players for lousy veterans”

Try to imagine the Dotel deal every year for about 7 or 8 years in a row. That’s what it was like until Steinbrenner got suspended, and Gene Michael had time to rebuild.

by sarcastro9 on Sep 17, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are we talking like trading Jay Buhner? Who did they get for him anyway?

by Michael White on Sep 17, 2010 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

garbage

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ken Phelps.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah, they got Ken Phelps

NOT joked about on Seinfeld were also Fred McGriff, Willie McGee, Doug Drabek (for an over-the-hill Rick Rhoden), and Al Leiter. I’m sure there were a few others.

by sarcastro9 on Sep 17, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Man, how did those Mariners never win anything?

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Managers who stand up to upper management

Generally don’t stay managers very long. I think there is a difference, in what kind of working relationship you want, right the Kenny Williams/Ozzie Guillen is the most public. I would guess Mattingly will have his role but I don’t expect him to make any waves.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am with you btw in wondering about the minority hiring thing

Isn’t that a requirement? How do the Dodgers get around that? Or is Mattingly half-Asian? It’s just odd is all. I’m not against it entirely and think putting on a fake show of interviewing minority candidates when you have already made your choice is kind of a waste of time for the most part (except for giving someone the experience of interviewing I suppose) but it does seem … odd.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

No backbone, no respect from the players is all.

What we really are railing against is the bad taste in our mouth from everything in 2010

by megaballs on Sep 17, 2010 1:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Who would you guys say the ideal manager choice would be at this point? Joe Maddon?

by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 1:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Anybody who will not retain Bowa and Schaeffer. I’m of the opinion that managers and coaches dont have huge positive impacts (unless its a guy like Dave Duncan), so I really dont care as long as they dont shit on the players.

by UCLADodger32 on Sep 17, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well

the players have done a good job of that themselves.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I will be the one that says

I am cool with Mattingly being named manager. I don’t want Wallach anymore than Mattingly.

by keithc13 on Sep 17, 2010 1:15 PM PDT reply actions  

I was the one that was cool with your other Avatar. Does that count for something too?

by BFDC on Sep 17, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can tell you aren't a Simpsons fan or you'd say

I, for one, welcome our new Mattingly overlord.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Torre

I still love the “more Del Harris than Phil Jackson” line. That was classic.

by kinbote on Sep 17, 2010 1:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Thanks

it was one of the easiest things that ever flowed from my keypad

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

can we get a refund?

Adam Morrison has more rings than Lebron, Bosh, and Wade combined?

by shaqfor3 on Sep 17, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sklar Brothers chime in

Via twitter

Always felt #Mattingly should be an adverb to describe solid hitting. Like, how does Floyd Mayweather get along w/ his wife? Mattingly.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:32 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Oh dear.

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

As I told k3vo

Sometimes I feel like the FO is run by a lobotomized starfish. This is ironic, you see, because a starfish is already lacking in a central nervous system. However, I feel it accurately portrays the STUNNING LACK OF MENTAL CAPACITY.

I’m only slightly bitter.

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Bitter they wouldn't even interview you for the gig?

Jerks!

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

well, with my experience as DVD burner, laser tag enthusiast, and seminary scholar, you’d think I’d get further in the process, wouldn’t you? Something about lacking “grit” in my facial hair choice.

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is that Preston in the center or on the right?

Hey-ohhh!

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

We would also accept this one

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

If people can give Ben Affleck a shot at director

they can give Don Mattingly a chance as manager. That’s all I gotta add.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:46 PM PDT reply actions  

You mean the acclaimed director of “Gone Baby Gone”? That’s what trailers for “The Town” keep telling me.

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I just saw “The Town” and it was pretty good. Has there been any talk about the contract for Donnie? And, would you rather have him say Fuck Ruiz or Fuck Bowa?

by vadodger on Sep 17, 2010 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes indeed

My point is he’s become a surprisingly good director. I dont think anyone expected that with his lack of behind the camera experience.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was just trying to make a joke

I like Ben Affleck. A lot.

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not really

I hear he likes to do it in really uncomfortable places

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Shouldn't you be at some

tailgate party by now, it’s almost 6 o’clock

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I decided to spend my drinking money on dance classes

but I am going to a concert tonight. For a 90s cover band called “My So-Called Band”. Also, it’s an away game for Vandy. :)

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am REALLY HOPING they play that

I’ll also take anything by the Gin Blossoms.

Leading the league in OMGs || Proud owner of a Chad Billingsley Real Doll

by Maddz on Sep 17, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

actually

the Dodgers should henceforth be known as the Gin Blossoms.

by mintxcore on Sep 17, 2010 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was gonna say

I’m a douchebag, but I’m a completely different kind of douchebag than those guys.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

many apologies

plus they were the big thing back in the day

by mintxcore on Sep 17, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

What a coincidence

I decided to spend my dance money on drinking classes.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I refuse to believe

you need classes for that Humma. Now, if you were trying to start your own school……send me a brochure.

"Heroes get remembered, but Legends never die."

by Tommy Blackjack on Sep 17, 2010 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice handle, I like it

12,000 comments but I don’t think we’ve seen you before.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hah, thanks!

It’s a Les Savy Fav reference. Actually, I remember you; I used to be an old DT regular back in the day, and I’ve been reading TBLA off and on for quite a while, but I picked a more anonymous name on SBN and I mostly hang out on the Cal blog these days:)

by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll give you a clue

I was using my actual name! It’s got a South Asian origin, which may narrow it down some ;-) You may or may not remember, but you were definitely around when I was, mostly on All-Baseball and Baseball Toaster.

by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

He also posts once a month or so on twitter

and goes to Dodger games in SF every few years ;-)

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Sep 17, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haha, hey now, I post on Twitter much more sporadically than that! :)

I’m going to Giants-Padres on Oct. 1st for work. I’ll probably be the only person in my group rooting on the Friars.

by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rich Donn—- no, wait, I almost forgot! FUCK YOU DONNELLY!!! BOOOOOO!!!

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't hate this hire as much as others

But I’m annoyed that the organization keeps returning to Boston/NYY figures as if they add credibility to the franchise.
I doubt Mattingly will survive the likely regime change in the next couple of years.

by guy clinch on Sep 17, 2010 2:16 PM PDT reply actions  

This is from a DT poster - I am unclear if he posts here or not.

Jon-TAFKAJ (9/17/2010 at 2:14 PM) Report Violation
Good interview with Larry Bowa on 710AM……
Noteworthy … (paraphrasing)
1. The Dodgers and their fans will not realize what a great manager Joe Torre was until 3 or 4 years down the road.
2. Bowa thinks Mattingly is competent and knowledgeable.
3. Bowa has not interest in managing.. Mainly because he has a hard time relating to the attitudes of today’s players and media coverage.
4. He and Mattingly have talked about him returning.. but, he’s made no decision as of yet.
……
I like Larry Bowa.
I don’t care what I’ve heard from commentators on the new or other DT bloggers….
Bowa is “old school” …. He tells it like it is …. He’s not afraid to show emotion both good and bad…. He cares a lot about his players and being successful.
He kinda reminds me of a “Jon Gruden – type” … and, I like that….
I do, very much believe that many of today’s athletes act like and are treated like total “prima donnas” …
IMHO. ;)

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 2:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Jon Gruden got flagged at a high school football game last weekend for screaming at the ref.

by Michael White on Sep 17, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mainly because he has a hard time relating to the attitudes of today’s players and media coverage human beings — you know, the people of Earth.

Fixed that for you, Larry.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

and Marie!

or did you mean Mattingly?

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man

by mleadman on Sep 17, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

my sarcasm meter picked up on this.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

No sarcasm

At this point all you can do is wish him well. What is the point in being critical at this point when we don’t know if he will be good or bad, or even what he will have to work with? All this gnashing is pointless but maybe useful exercise for those who need to gnash. I’d rather have someone from the long history of the Dodgers but It is not like Jason Philips was named manager.

by meercatjohn on Sep 17, 2010 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

but maybe

Mattingly has a pair of Jason Phillips like glasses!

by mintxcore on Sep 17, 2010 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

If there is one indelible image burned into my brain from 2005

it is Jason Phillips, slowing as he rounds first base, both hands on his helmet, face registering the shock that he has not hit a home run but instead flied out to shallow left for a routine F-7.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do not know if he will do well or not, but it upsets me to see any part of this regime still here. They had a run, it did not work, that is that. The players and the coaches seem to just be done with each other, and a full purge would be ideal at this point.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 2:36 PM PDT reply actions  

I think that evaluation is a little harsh

unless you think its the World Series or nothing, I don’t see this as a situation that requires a total clean house.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Probably true, but I do think this current staff has probably done enough, and it may be time for some new voices / ego’s / attitudes. Unless we’re going to dump a few players that I’m sure none of us want to see go.

by oshea2002 on Sep 17, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

have people already forgotten

that we went 20 years without winning a playoff game? I agree that Torre needed to step away, but this regime has been a lot more successful than any since Lasorda, playoff-wise. Wholesale changes might be an overreaction too, when all that is needed is a new voice and some adjustments.

by Pure Azure on Sep 17, 2010 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

This regime’s success was exclusive to the bat of Mr. Manny Ramirez. If anybody can prove otherwise, please do.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I won't deny Manny's impact

but in August 2008, the Dodgers had just been swept by the Nationals and needed a tremendous run for the last 5 weeks of the season by the entire team (Manny certainly was key) to overtake the falling D-Backs.

And last year, I think it is fair to say that he was very good but he had strong support from many different players and Manny didn’t play for a third of the year.

To go to another sport, the Lakers ability to get to 3 consecutive NBA Finals and win 2 in a row could be tied to having acquired Pau Gasol is much more credible than how much or how little Manny played in 2008 and 2009

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry, I can't agree

Manny played just about as well as I have ever seen anybody play during his time in LA in 2008.

Maybe the Dodgers’ run that year isn’t ENTIRELY due to him — the D-Backs not being all that played a role — but c’mon, ya gotta attribute it more to Manny than to Torre.

Fuck You Ruiz

by Humma Kavula on Sep 17, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well then

using that logic, you have to attribute the failure of this team more to players than to the “regime” too.

I think it falls somewhere in the middle.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

It is surely in the middle. But easier to bring in new coaches with a different attitude and slightly less ego than get rid of 30-35 players.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not necessarily

I see lots of turnover and while maybe not 30-35 players will be gone, I would suspect around 10-12 won’t be wearing Dodger Blue next year.

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

lakers:dodgers

apples:oranges

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Based on that why not clean house of the players

since based on that comment they were no more instrumental in getting us to the playoffs then the coaching staff.

by meercatjohn on Sep 17, 2010 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I see two guys in the middle that can’t hit worth a shit without him, so maybe you are not far off.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

You mean playoff series.

by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m thankful that Joe managed to lead the Dodgers to 2 NL West titles and NLCS appearances in 3 seasons. I look forward to the sense of new hope and excitement that having Donnie Baseball leading the Dodgers will bring in 2011.

Taylor Morgan: "My abortion was botched!"
Teemu Selanne: "Wow. That sounds awesome."

by DodgerBlueBalls on Sep 17, 2010 2:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Manny helped Loney get the biggest Dodger hit in the playoffs

since 1988?? Manny pitched too, managed game situations, played defense…right. Manny wasn’t even a factor against the Cardinals until Game 3 last year…remember that 50-game suspension thing, too?

by Pure Azure on Sep 17, 2010 2:53 PM PDT reply actions  

this was a reply to deliasman, how it ended up here, dunno

by Pure Azure on Sep 17, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt he helped Loney get that hit. They were going to make the playoffs for Loney to get that AB with Pierre starting every day in LF?

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

no way

Manny was huge, and was the reason they ended up making it in 08, but to say their success over the last 2 years was exclusively because of Manny’s performance isn’t accurate, especially last year. Plus in 08, like in Loney’s case, other people made it happen.

by Pure Azure on Sep 17, 2010 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am not saying Manny did everything, just saying that the success would have never happened without him. Kemp and Ethier alone in 09 would not have carried them offensively past COL or STL.

"We were never friends"

by delias man on Sep 17, 2010 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

But isn't that the argument for any team

The Cards don’t win without Pujols, the Reds without Votto, the Giants without Posey, etc. Even the Padres need Gonzalez to keep teams honest. Why does Manny stand out more than those guys?

by bhsportsguy on Sep 17, 2010 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

and Torre and his coaches, the FO

still get the credit, which goes back to the core of the argument, the regime went farther than any since Lasorda, so why is someone from the minors necessarily the best option? We just don’t know yet…

by Pure Azure on Sep 17, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Consider that pitching staff was almost/equally as good as the current one, and that team still would have failed without Manny.

by Michael White on Sep 17, 2010 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A place for Dodger fans to congregate without spending $10 on parking.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/25-5/27 Harrell, Norris, Happ
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/21-5/23 Corbin, Cahill, Saunders
Tbj_pin_small
Memories of the past: Dodger Glory.com
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/18-5/20 Lynn, Westbrook, Lohse
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/14-5/15 Kennedy and Miley

Recent FanPosts

Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VII
Cal_state_dominguez_hills_logo_small
Opposing Pitcher Preview: 5/16-5/17 Richard and Volquez
Sbn_ds_small
TBLA Challenge Week VI
Small
Hey NYC Dodgers Fans
Dodgers_small
Dodger Need Help. ASAP!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Pos No Player 2012 Salary
C 17 Ellis $490,000
1B 7 Loney $6,375,000
2B 37 Herrera $375,082
3B 6 Hairston $2,250,000
SS 9 Gordon $485,000
LF 23 Abreu $401,311
CF 10 Gwynn $850,000
RF 16 Ethier $10,950,000

OF/1B 33 Van Slyke $388,197
2B/3B 3 Kennedy $800,000
OF/1B 30 Sands $375,175
IF 13 DeJesus $448,992
C 18 Treanor $850,000

SP 22 Kershaw $6,000,000
SP 58 Billingsley $9,000,000
SP 29 Lilly $12,000,000
SP 44
Harang $3,000,000
SP 35 Capuano $3,000,000

CL 74
Jansen $491,000
RHP 52 Lindblom $483,000
RHP 51 Belisario $414,426
RHP 54 Guerra $488,000
RHP 28
Wright $900,000
LHP 57 Elbert $488,500
RHP 60 Coffey $1,000,000

DL 27 Kemp $10,000,000
DL 21 Rivera $4,000,000
DL 12 Sellers $481,000
DL 5 Uribe $8,000,000
DL 55 Guerrier $4,750,000
DL 14 Ellis $2,500,000
60DL 36 Hawksworth $495,000
60DL 41 De La Rosa $485,000

AA 50 Eovaldi $7,885
AAA 56 Antonini $7,869



Manny $8,087,432 deferred


Andruw $3,375,000 deferred


Pierre $3,050,000 deferred
Furcal $3,000,000 deferred
Kuroda $2,000,000 deferred
Garland $1,500,000 option buyout
Blake $1,250,000 option buyout
DFA 66 MacDougal $650,000

Totals
$115,942,869

For more detailed information, click here.

Current 40-man roster count: 42
(incl. De La Rosa & Hawksworth)

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Eric___ned___reporters_2011_trade_deadline_small Eric Stephen

Editors

100_1427_small Phil Gurnee

Dgy_small David Young

Hanauma_bay_small Chad Moriyama

2501_small Michael White

Raptors_small Brandon Lennox

Img_0103_small CraigMinami