Heart And Soul
I've wanted to write about this topic for a while, but the opportunity never came up. After reading through Murray Chass' annual "VORP is destroying baseball column", now is as good of a time as ever.
This may come as a shock to some people, especially those who think I'm typing this in my underwear in my mom's basement, but I think the most important trait in a baseball player isn't plate discipline, or isolated power, but mental toughness. That's right, I think that an "intangible" is far more valuable than anything that fits in a nice number. Here's the rub: mental toughness is so important that a player can't make the big leagues without it. There's no way that a player can climb up through the dregs of the minor leagues without the ability to solely focus on the task of hitting the baseball.
Personally, I'm a complete headcase when it comes to almost any kind of sport. I once missed 32 soft toss pitches in a row because after I missed the first one my thought process went something like "don't miss, don't miss, don't miss, don't miss, don't miss, don't miss, DAMMIT! Don't miss, don't miss, don't miss...". Conversely, I can constantly drive the ball after a couple of beers because I stop thinking and just swing. Maybe I'm the exception, and this actually isn't true for the majority of the population, but at least for me, the second I start getting down on my self, I fail.
But here's the thing, this lack of mental toughness doesn't happen in a void. In my personal example, when I go into head case mode, I start striking out and get less hits. Hey, we have a stat that measures that, it's called batting average.
When we start talking about how a certain player is more valuable because of his heart or his mental toughness, we're double counting those traits. If David Eckstein wasn't constantly training and running out every ground ball, there's no way he would be able to hit .292/.350/.344 in the big leagues. David Eckstein's heart and grit is what is keeping him in the big leagues, and that's an amazing thing. What it doesn't do is make him better than a guy who puts up better numbers.
I'm going to set a personal anecdote record here with yet another personal anecdote. I ran cross-country in high school, and behind an awkward geek, I wasn't too good at it when I started. As time went on, I worked my butt off and put in the fifth or sixth fastest times on the team. Now, if we were to rank how valuable I was to the team, where would I finish? If Bill Plaschke analyzed high school cross country, his answer would be "most valuable" from all the heart I showed. The actual answer is "fifth or sixth" because while the effort I put in got me to that position, I was still slower than the better runners on the team.
My point here is that all these "intangible" things that us stat guys supposedly miss are actually very tangible. Derek Jeter runs out every ground ball? He gets a few more singles. Juan Pierre spends hours before the game studying how balls roll around home plate? He gets a few more bunt hits. David Eckstein hearts it up? He's a semi-productive major leaguer despite being 4'2''. There's no real difference between a single you hit through effort and a single that Adam Dunn lashes into left followed by him jogging to first. Things like mental toughness are huge, there's no way you can be a productive major leaguer without it, and because of this, there's no way you can put up impressive stats without it. Stats measure what happened on the field, that's what's so great about them.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
right on!
My one caveat:
I guess the argument is that somehow having a heart and soul guy on the team makes OTHER players better. So David Eckstein is allegedly greater than the sum of his statistics because of what he does for other people on the team. I can't imagine how one could measure that contribution, given how many variables would be involved.
And I'm sure leadership, positive example, etc. matter a little bit. Probably more in football and basketball, where emotion matters more in terms of who wins.
by Alfredo Griffin on Feb 27, 2007 8:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
My take on Ned
by Nicks on Feb 28, 2007 2:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re
- No one but the heart and soul guy really wants to win.
- If a guy is so apathetic that he doesn't want to win, the heart and soul guy can show him the light. The example I constantly used a few years ago was "what's Jeter going to do for Gary Sheffield? Hey Gary, let's see some hustle out there?" Somehow, I doubt that would work.
In the end, Eckstein might have a very, very small effect on his teammates, that becomes undetecable in the randomness of baseball.
by Andrew on Mar 1, 2007 10:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm typing this. . .
by Andrew Shimmin on Feb 27, 2007 8:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Excellent points
Your softball story reminded me of the Far Side cartoon "Roger screws up", in which a cymbal player in an orchestra repeatedly thinks "This time I won't screw up!" while only holding one cymbal.
by RedMenace on Feb 28, 2007 10:20 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
However,
by D4P on Feb 28, 2007 12:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
so true
I think it's interesting that people are so desperate to root for players with "heart," "grit," "character" and so on. Like, subconsciously, they think, if David Eckstein can make it, so could I, or so could my son, etc.
Do people really watch sports to find someone like themselves? Isn't this a little sad and pathetic? I'm totally okay with the fact that Manny Ramirez is a physical freak and I'm not. He is a joy to watch because his talent is so rarified. Why is everyone so threatened by this?
Preaching to the choir, I guess.
by FI2 on Feb 28, 2007 12:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
from red reporter
by boobs on Feb 28, 2007 3:48 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm typing this...
In regard to the subject of intangibles, I paraphrase British mathematician & philosopher Alfred North Whitehead (doesn't everyone?): baseball is vital enough to flourish in the lower stages of life with merely barbaric flashes of thought. But when civilization culminates, the absence of a coordinating philosophy, spread throughout the community, spells deacdence, boredom, and slackening of effort. In other words, sportswriters phoning it in---a slow descent of accepted thought toward the inactive commonplace. They neglect the massive importance of the obvious, and instead seek ghosts, in the machinery.
by Blonde Leading The Blonde on Feb 28, 2007 5:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It reminds me of....
by 1958 on Mar 1, 2007 8:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Awesome
I meant to comment on them a long time ago, but I forgot my username.
by wiffle ball legend on Mar 6, 2007 6:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 













